...BOTH PARTIES TO ACTUALLY CONDUCT A TRIAL THAT WILL MAKE AN HONEST ATTEMPT TO UNCOVER THE TRUTH REGARDING DONALD TRUMPS ATTEMPT TO CREATE A FASCIST STATE TO REPLACE OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC. HIS CALL FOR A VIOLENT OVERTHROW OF OUR REPUBLIC WAS JUST THE LAST ACT IN A PRESIDENCY FILLED WITH ATTEMPTS TO UNDERMINE OUR DEMOCRACY, WHICH INCLUDED THE ACTIVE PARTICIPATION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, AND THE DO-NOTHING ATTITUDE OF THE DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP IN THE U.S. SENATE.*
WITH THAT IN MIND, WE SHOULD LOOK FOR WAYS TO "AID" THE SENATE IN SEARCH OF THE TRUTH.
HERE IS ONE STRAIGHT FROM THE HEADLINES:
EXCERPT FROM THE WALL STREET JOURNAL ARTICLE:
Trump Pressed Justice Department to Go Directly to Supreme Court to Overturn Election Results
WASHINGTON—In his last weeks in office, former President Donald Trump considered moving to replace the acting attorney general with another official ready to pursue unsubstantiated claims of election fraud, and he pushed the Justice Department to ask the Supreme Court to invalidate President Biden’s victory, people familiar with the matter said.
Those efforts failed due to pushback from his own appointees in the Justice Department, who refused to file what they viewed as a legally baseless lawsuit in the Supreme Court. Later, other senior department officials threatened to resign en masse should Mr. Trump fire then-acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, according to several people familiar with the discussions.
NOW THIS MAY SEEM TO BE JUST A CASE OF TRUMPS MEGLOMANIA REFUSING TO ACCEPT THE TRUTH ABOUT HIS FAILED ATTEMPT AT REELECTION, EXCEPT FOR THE FOLLOWING:
THIS IS FROM SEPT, 25TH, 2020.
REP. U.S. SENATOR LINDSAY GRAHAM WAS QUOTED IN THE MEDIA, SAYING THE FOLLOWING:
"People wonder about the peaceful transfer of power. I can assure you, it will be peaceful.... I promise you as a Republican, if the Supreme Court decides that Joe Biden wins, I will accept the result. The court will decide, and if Republicans lose, we'll accept the result."
LOOK CAREFULLY AT WHAT GRAHAM SAYS. HE DOES NOT SAY..."IF THE COURTS"...OR..."IF OUR COURT SYSTEM.." ...OR..." STATE, DISTRICT, OR APPELLATE COURTS." HE ONLY REFERENCES THE SUPREME COURT. IN OTHER WORDS, HE AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WILL ONLY ACCEPT THE DECISION MADE BY THE SUPREME COURT, LEAVING ALL OTHER JUDICIAL DECISIONS AS UNACCEPTABLE, AND NOT BINDING ON THEM.
SINCE NONE OF TRUMPS ATTEMPTS TO OVERTURN THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION RESULTS EVER CAME CLOSE TO BEING REALIZED IN ANY COURT OF LAW, WITH SITTING JUDGES OFTEN USING SCORN AND DERISION TO DESCRIBE THESE BASELESS LAWSUITS, HOW COULD THIS POSSIBLY REACH THE SUPREME COURT, BYPASSING ALL LOWER COURTS, AND EVEN IF IT DID, WHY WOULD THE HIGHEST COURT IN THE LAND IGNORE ALL PREVIOUS RULINGS, AND UPHOLD A LAWSUIT THAT HAS NO BASIS IN FACT?
COULD IT BE THAT BY REMOVING AN ATTORNEY GENERAL WHO WOULD NOT BLINDLY OBEY HIS EVERY WHIM, WITH A FASCIST FLUNKIE WHO CARED NOTHING FOR FOLLOWING CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, TRUMP WOULD BE ABLE TO SEIZE POWER WITHOUT ANY FEAR OF PUNISHMENT FROM THE LEGAL SYSTEM.
AS FOR THE HIGH COURT, 3 OF 9 JUSTICES ARE TRUMP APPOINTEES, CHOSEN FOR THEIR ABILITY TO FOLLOW FASCIST DOGMA. TOGETHER WITH FAR-RIGHT STOOGE CLARENCE THOMAS, THEY WERE 1 VOTE AWAY FROM GRANTING DONALD TRUMP DICTATORIAL POWERS, WITH MOSCOW PULLING THE STRINGS.
*WHICH ACTUALLY STARTED WITH THE FAILURE TO CONTEST MITCH MCCONNELLS UNCONSTITUTIONAL REFUSAL TO GIVE JUDGE MERRICK GARLAND A SENATE HEARING AND PUBLIC VOTE AFTER HE WAS NOMINATED BY THEN PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA FOR A SEAT ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT.
No comments:
Post a Comment