About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Saturday, November 7, 2020

AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION. General Discussion Digest for Friday November 6, 2020.

 



American Philosophical Association

General Discussion

Post New Message
 
Nov 6, 2020

Discussions

started 19 hours ago, Alex Blum (1 reply)
Metaphysical Truth   external link to thread view
1. What is a metaphysical truth? What makes it... Alex Blum
2. What is a metaphysical truth? What makes it... Friedrich Grafe
started 8 days ago, Alex Blum (8 replies)
Short Paper Section   external link to thread view
3. Smart idea.  Didn't Wittgenstein argue that the... Stefan Lukianov


 
top next
1.Metaphysical Truth
Reply to GroupReply to Sender
Alex Blum
Nov 6, 2020 4:35 AM
Alex Blum

What is a metaphysical truth? What makes it metaphysical?

  Reply to Group Online   View Thread   Recommend   Forward   Flag as Inappropriate  



 
topprevious  next
2.Re: Metaphysical Truth
Reply to GroupReply to Sender
Friedrich Grafe
Nov 6, 2020 10:00 AM
Friedrich Grafe

What is a metaphysical truth? What makes it metaphysical?

 Dear Alex Blum, I'll try to answer:

asking/talking about metaphysics – in my perception - is a prime example for what is typical to philosophical dialogue, viz., eliminating questionable presuppositions before trying to answer.

I'd like to summarize my personal answer to this topic (at some length but below 500 words :-) ) as follows:

  1. The use of the epistemological labels 'true', 'false' for metaphysical statements is -in my perception - inadequate, for suggesting an epistemic situation for metaphysical research, it does not reside in.
  2. Take Immanuel Kant's CPR seriously, as to that metaphysics is not possible as an exact science (like theoretical physics or pure mathematics). But it does not follow, that metaphysical research in some less ambitious way were not possible.
  3. Next, metaphysics is not the science of a separate world different from the world as viewed by science or as perceived or else experienced in every day life, profession and industry. In the opposite. Metaphysics is just about this one world, we inhabit, work on, reason about, … , while looking at it  from other points of view.
  4. There are basically at least two cognitive points of metaphysical view, and else perhaps equally legitimate non-cognitive view points in terms of ethical value, aesthetic respect, religious worship, … confine here to the cognitive ones:
  5. The perhaps most discussed cognitive viewpoint concerns the implicit assumptions about population and/or structure of the world, scientific theories carry with them, which vary with history of science (-> Collingwood). Examples are, the logical structure of scientific theories (including e.g. Ramsay sentences, indiscernibles, … ), the nature of physical space (in the time of Descartes,Leibniz, Newton), or physical conservation laws (mostly in a later time in the history of physics)
  6. Another equally important cognitive view point, not really covered by Kant but by his (e.g. german idealist) successors concerns the fact, that despite the (by CPR part I doctrine) indirectness of scientific access to the world, we are (intelligent) part(s) of this one world ('Ding an sich','substance','universe', …), have thus too some (!) direct cognitive access to the world, this cognitive relation given by introspection as well as indirectly by practice of different kinds (emotions, intentions, will, technical and industrial practice, social and economical interactions, … )

[My recent rather special article on Spinoza's metaphysics in E1 (see e.g. @philpapers) reflects in some way these general cognitive view points. ]



------------------------------
Friedrich Grafe
Wendelstein
------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 11-06-2020 04:34
From: Alex Blum
Subject: Metaphysical Truth

What is a metaphysical truth? What makes it metaphysical?

  Reply to Group Online   View Thread   Recommend   Forward   Flag as Inappropriate  



 
topprevious
3.Re: Short Paper Section
Reply to GroupReply to Sender
Stefan Lukianov
Nov 6, 2020 11:19 AM
Stefan Lukianov
Smart idea.  Didn't Wittgenstein argue that the last task of philosophy was verbal language?  I'm sure that includes determining the best way to articulate your thoughts!

------------------------------
Stefan Lukianov
Self
Framingham MA
------------------------------
  Reply to Group Online   View Thread   Recommend   Forward   Flag as Inappropriate  
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 11-05-2020 08:03
From: Anne Waters
Subject: Short Paper Section

Enjoying this site! Thanks and keep up the good work.

Sent from my iPhone
Dr. Anne Waters, J.D., Ph.D.


Original Message:
Sent: 11/4/2020 11:12:00 AM
From: Jacob Andrews
Subject: RE: Short Paper Section

Are you guys picturing something peer-reviewed, a blog with looser guidelines, a subset of the APA website, or what?

------------------------------
Jacob Joseph Andrews
Upper School Latin Teacher and IT Administrator – Covenant Classical School
PhD Candidate, Philosophy – Loyola University Chicago
https://jacobjandrews.wordpress.com/

No comments:

Post a Comment