Any Analysis you may have heard about the results of the 2016 Presidential Election could be, at the very least, misleading. In Fact, obvious signs of possible Tampering with the results are being ignored, with all the attention focused on PUTIN, RUSSIA, AND WIKILEAKS. 
Don't get me wrong, these allegations are not to be taken lightly, and should be Investigated thoroughly, but they are only part of the story.
In part 1, I laid out statistics that raise questions about the Validity of the election results in 3 States; MICHIGAN, PENNSYLVANIA, AND WISCONSIN. These States, and their Electoral Votes,
is where the outcome of the election rested.
We will look at these results more closely, but first...
A LITTLE MORE BACKGROUND INFO.
is where the outcome of the election rested.
We will look at these results more closely, but first...
A LITTLE MORE BACKGROUND INFO.
As I related in Part 1, Hillary Clinton won the Popular Vote by about 3 Million Votes, (2.87 Million). In the end, her percentage of the National Vote was 48.06% to Trumps 45.97%. TOTALS: CLINTON- 65,844,610, TRUMP- 62,979,636.
It is True that Trump accumulated 2.05 Million more votes than Mitt Romney did in 2012.
However, there were almost 8 Million more votes cast for President in 2016 than there were in 2012.
(2012- 129,085,409 2016- 137,045,863)
This is why Trumps 45.97% was less than Romneys 47.20%.
However, there were almost 8 Million more votes cast for President in 2016 than there were in 2012.
(2012- 129,085,409 2016- 137,045,863)
This is why Trumps 45.97% was less than Romneys 47.20%.
Yes, Hillary Clinton did not get as many votes as Barack Obama did in 2012.
Here is the difference: Obama- 65,915,795, Clinton- 65,844,610. A Difference of 71,185 Votes.
These Numbers, in practical terms, are a wash. The Difference is so miniscule, that the totals
would be considered one and the same. Like Romney/Trump, the increase in the total number of ballots from 2012- 2016 caused the difference in Percent of Votes Received Nationwide.
2012: Obama- 51.06%
2016: Clinton- 48.06%
So between 2012 and 2016, the Democrats saw a Decrease of 3%, the Republicans 1.23%
In the end, the Republicans increased their Percentage of the National Vote, as compared
These Numbers, in practical terms, are a wash. The Difference is so miniscule, that the totals
would be considered one and the same. Like Romney/Trump, the increase in the total number of ballots from 2012- 2016 caused the difference in Percent of Votes Received Nationwide.
2012: Obama- 51.06%
2016: Clinton- 48.06%
So between 2012 and 2016, the Democrats saw a Decrease of 3%, the Republicans 1.23%
In the end, the Republicans increased their Percentage of the National Vote, as compared
to the Democrats, by less than 2%.
2012- DEMOCRATS- 51.06%
REPUBLICANS- 47.20%
DIFFERENCE- 3.86%
2016- DEMOCRATS- 48.06%
REPUBLICANS- 45.97%
DIFFERENCE- 2.09%
These are hardly the Numbers of a POLITICAL REVOLUTION. IN REALITY, THERE WAS
NO REAL REJECTION OF HILLARY CLINTON, NOR A VAST AMOUNT OF INCREASED SUPPORT FOR REPUBLICANS BECAUSE OF DONALD TRUMP.
THIS IS NOT THE REAL STORY. THE REALITY OF THE 2016 ELECTION LIES ELSEWHERE...
STAY TUNED...
No comments:
Post a Comment