JUSTICE ALITO PROVES, AGAIN, THAT EITHER HE HASN'T READ THE ENTIRE BODY OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, OR CHOSES TO IGNORE WHAT HE DOESN'T LIKE.

                                HERE IS A PICTURE OF ALITOS "DREAM" VERSION OF THE SCOTUS.

QUOTE FROM WALL STREET JOURNAL ARTICLE:

Justice Alito tells the @WSJ that Congress has no business policing SCOTUS. "I know this is a con­tro­ver­sial view, but I’m will­ing to say it... No pro­vi­sion in the Con­sti­tu­tion gives them the au­thor­ity to reg­u­late the Supreme Court—pe­riod."

Really? How about this:

ARTICLE III

Section 1 The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

My guess is that selling out to anyone that has a vested interest in a matter before the Court would not be considered "GOOD BEHAVIOUR." Since the Constitution says nothing about the SCOTUS being the Judge of what is "GOOD BEHAVIOUR," it must be found elsewhere. Congress can Impeach these Justices for various offenses, and they are not Immune from Criminal Charges. It therefore would make sense to allow Congress to establish Proper Moral/Ethical Guidelines.

Rhttps://