About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Thursday, July 13, 2023

AN ANALYSIS OF THE SUPREME COURT RULING THAT WEBSITE DESIGNER CAN REFUSE TO CREATE SAME-SEX WEBSITE(S). PART 3.

 

To try and obscure the matter, the Majority brings in two cases...

A Veterans organization- Was allowed to hold a Parade without including Specific

Homosexual Element in it: Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc

The Boy Scouts were allowed to exclude Homosexuals as Scout Masters: Boy Scouts of America v. Dale.

...to justify its decision in finding for the Plaintiff.

The SCOTUS knows full well that PRIVATE MEMBERSHIP GROUPS: CIVIC GROUPS,

FRATERNITIES, GENDER SPECIFIC, FAITH OREINTED., etc are exempt from many

Discrimination Charges because they are not LICENSED BUSINESSES WHICH OPERATE

IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR, OFFERING SPECIFIC SERVICES AND/OR PRODUCTS.

The Plaintiff was engaged in offering the PUBLIC GOODS/AND OR SERVICES under a BUSINESS 

LICENSE OBTAINED FROM GOVERNMENT and is not an exempted entity.


No comments:

Post a Comment