MUSK, TRUMP, FREE SPEECH, AND TWITTER. “ONCE MORE UNTO THE BREACH, DEAR FRIENDS."

 

Let's take a moment, and think out loud, about the concept of "FREE SPEECH," as it is expressed in the U.S. CONSTITUTION.

 - At one time or another, each of us will work for someone we dislike, for various reasons. We might be perfectly right in our criticism, for the "BOSS'' might be useless, who got their position by who they know, not what they know. What would have happened if we confronted that "BOSS," and told them exactly what we thought of them? If immediate Termination was the result, could we run to the POLICE, THE COURTS, EVEN THE OWNERSHIP AND SAY: "YOU ARE VIOLATING MY RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH, SO I CAN'T BE FIRED. YOU ARE 'CENSORING' AN EMPLOYEES 'RIGHT' TO "FREE EXPRESSION."

- As I, and many others, have reported repeatedly, FOX NEWS has a habit of reporting FALSE AND UNTRUTHFUL NEWS ITEMS ON A CONSISTENT BASIS. This includes promoting FAR-RIGHT PROPAGANDA ABOUT THE 2020 ELECTION BEING FIXED AGAINST DONALD TRUMP. I GUESS MY INVITATION TO SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT ABOUT THE LIES THEY ARE SPREADING SHOULD BE COMING ANY DAY NOW. AFTER ALL, THEY HAVE TO GIVE ME AIR TIME, DON'T THEY? They have to let me set the record straight, or it would be "CENSORSHIP," and that would violate my "RIGHT" TO "FREE SPEECH," WOULDN'T IT?

In fact, every RIGHT-WING OR CONSERVATIVE WEBPAGE HAS TO LET ME ONTO THEIR SITE so I can make sure their readers are given the correct and factual information. I MEAN TO DENY ME THAT IS A VIOLATION OF MY "RIGHT" TO "FREE SPEECH," ISN'T IT?

- Along the same lines, how come the MAINSTREAM NEWS MEDIA, (Those who are considered part of the LIBERAL AGENDA), don't spread the same type of BOGUS NEWS REPORTS THAT WOULD MAKE DONALD TRUMP APPEAR TO BE AN EVEN BIGGER VILLIAN THEN HE ALREADY IS. I mean if FOX NEWS IS GOING TO LIE ABOUT PROGRESSIVE POLITICIANS, why doesn't the LIBERAL NEWS MEDIA LIE ABOUT THE MEMBERS OF THE GOP WHO SUPPORT TRUMP? Why not just make things up, after all, that is what the FAR-RIGHT AGENDA IS DOING.

It's almost like, that there are some Individuals, Groups, and Companies WHO HAVE PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS about reporting and disseminating NEWS AND INFORMATION that can be VERIFIED, or at least have a minimal standard of BELIEVABILITY OR RATIONALITY.

I think they are called EDITORIAL GUIDELINES...

TO BE CONTINUED...

THE "EMPTY" ASSERTION: THE DEMAGOGUES BEST FRIEND, AND THE FOUNDATION FOR "CONSPIRACY THEORIES." UPDATE.

 WHAT IS THE MOST ESSENTIAL PART OF TRUMPSPEAK?

"EMPTY" ASSERTION-  ANY STATEMENT, (WRITTEN OR ORAL), THAT CLAIMS TO BE FACTUAL, BUT HAS LITTLE SUPPORTING EVIDENCE OR DATA THAT CAN WITHSTAND PROPER SCRUTINY.  In many cases, the act of criticizing the Assertion is discouraged, AND IT MUST BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT QUALIFICATION.

THE EMPTY ASSERTION works best when it feeds into preconceived ideas and conclusions. It allows those with little Intellectual Evidence to support their opinions on certain issues, to make "FACTUAL CLAIMS" that are not based on the Rules of Logic. 

It gives the Opportunist the chance to prey on the Prejudice and Irrationality of those who don't want Reality and Truth to keep them from forcing their own brand of "TRUTH" on everyone else.

Some examples might include;

-  Inventing a causal relationship between certain groups, that their place of Birth or National Origin automatically indicates the Increased Chance that they are likely to carry a communicable disease. This is done without actually researching the statistics to back up this conclusion with 

factual data.

-  That the belief in the Existence of a Right according to Constitutional Law is found not to be Valid by Judicial Decision, will lead to an immediate Government crackdown to eliminate any trace of the Subject Matter ruled on before the Court.

-  That an Accusation of MORAL or CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT, automatically means there is Sufficient Grounds or Evidence to make such a Statement.  In fact, there may be nothing at all. The Accusation is just a Tool to mislead and place an undeserved Tag on an Opponent or Rival Organization.

Remember, the "EMPTY ASSERTION" does not need to provide any Reasonable Explanation for anything that is said, or claimed to be true.

MEDIEVAL ORIGINS OF UKRANIANS- PROJECT UKRAINE- HISTORY DOCUMENTARY.

 Kings and Generals 

VIDEO: https://youtu.be/3uyHWEOoPnM

THE THREE TYPES OF TRUMPIANS. (General Definitions, and their Applications.)

(This is a Basic Guide, only meant to inform the General Public of what they are facing when

confronted by a supporter of DONALD TRUMP.)

If you find yourself talking to a TRUMPIAN, KEEP IN MIND THAT THEY FALL INTO THREE GENERAL CATEGORIES;

FOOLISH- lacking good sense or judgment; unwise.

This is not a measure of General Intelligence. It is an evaluation of someone who only

looks at the superficial, and refuses to analyze or comprehend the actual meaning of what

 they are being told, and/or the likelihood of what is being asserted is true, or even rational.

TRAITOR- a person who betrays a friend, country, principle, etc.

Knows exactly what they are supporting, and has no problem with destroying

and remaking our Political System. ( Into what they want it to be. Guess What?

in the case of Trumpians, it's a FASCIST UTOPIA. A system, where only they, 

the chosen few, make the rules and create the laws.)

FANATIC/ZEALOT- a person filled with excessive and single-minded zeal, especially for an extreme religious or political cause./ a person who is fanatical and uncompromising in pursuit of their religious, political, or other ideals.

Cares only about what they want, and what they want must be instituted, no questions asked.

There is no compromise, no debate. They differ from the Traitor in one major area: There is no

need to destroy our Political System entirely, just give us what we want, or else.

BY THE WAY, HERE IS THE LATEST FROM "DER FUEHRER" TRUMP:

Trump blames deaths in Ukraine war on 'rigged election' in the US: 'It's a shame all those people are dead'

I HAVE TO ADMIT, EVERY TIME I THINK THAT HE COULDN'T SINK ANY LOWER, DONALD CONTINUES TO FIND NEW LEVELS OF DEPRAVITY.

FLORIDA DEMOCRATS: IF YOU DON'T CARE, WHY BOTHER?

TODAY, COMMISSAR RON DESANTIS SIGNED INTO LAW A BILL CREATING A VOTER FRAUD "POLICE FORCE" THAT DOES NOTHING TO ADDRESS THE BOGUS AND MANIPULATED VOTE TOTALS IN THE STATE THAT OCCURRED DURING THE  2016 AND 2020 ELECTIONS. THESE ALTERED RETURNS BENEFITTED THE GOP ON A STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL.

AS I EXPECTED, STATE DEMOCRATS DID WHAT THEY DO BEST: IGNORED ACTUAL DATA, AND GAVE DESANTIS WHAT HE WANTED- EMPTY/TOKEN OPPOSITION OF NO REAL VALUE.

TO LEARN ABOUT ACTUAL CRIMES THAT WERE COMMITTED DURING THESE ELECTIONS, HERE ARE THE LINKS.

2016 ELECTION- PARTS 1-4.

https://searchingforreasondotnet.blogspot.com/p/the-2016-presidential-election.html

2016 ELECTION- PARTS 5-8.

https://searchingforreasondotnet.blogspot.com/p/part-5.html

2020 ELECTION

https://searchingforreasondotnet.blogspot.com/2020/11/florida-you-have-done-it-again-exactly.html

https://searchingforreasondotnet.blogspot.com/2020/11/election-fraud-thy-name-is-florida-pt-1.html

https://searchingforreasondotnet.blogspot.com/2020/11/2020-presidential-election-lets-start.html

https://searchingforreasondotnet.blogspot.com/2020/11/2020-presidential-election-lets-start_13.html

I'LL SAY IT AGAIN: DEMOCRATS IN FLORIDA, TEXAS, OHIO, AND VIRGINIA- AS OF THE LAST ELECTION, YOU ARE GIVING TIME, MONEY, AND LOYALTY TO PARTY OFFICIALS WHO ARE IGNORING THESE TYPES OF RESULTS. YOU DON'T STAND A CHANCE IF YOUR PARTY OFFICIALS DO NOTHING. GIVE IT TO OTHER STATES DEM. COMMITTEES WHO WILL FIGHT FOR YOU. 

CAN IT CHANGE?

WHY DON'T YOU ASK MICHIGAN, PENNSYLVANIA, AND WISCONSIN. WHAT HAPPENED IN 2016 WAS NOT REPEATED IN 2020. THAT IS WHAT DEDICATION CAN DO. IF THESE STATES HAD ALLOWED A REPETITION OF THE 2016 ELECTION FRAUD, TRUMP WOULD STILL BE IN THE WHITE HOUSE. THINK THAT OVER...

DONALD TRUMP HELD IN CONTEMPT FOR NOT COMPLYING WITH NEW YORK SUBPOENA. TWITTER.

 

On Monday, New York Judge Arthur F. Engoron held former president Donald Trump in contempt for failing to comply with a subpoena related to state attorney general Letitia James' investigation into the Trump Organization. Trump was ordered to turn over materials sought by James and will be fined $10,000 per day until he does so, according to The New York Times.

Photo via @thehill

MUSK, TRUMP, TWITTER, AND FREE SPEECH. (INTRODUCTION)

WHEN ELON MUSK AND DONALD TRUMP SAY "FREE SPEECH" MUST BE RETURNED TO TWITTER, WHAT THEY REALLY MEAN IS;

"HOW DARE YOU, (TWITTER), HAVE EDITORIAL STANDARDS THAT DO NOT ALLOW US TO MAKE BASELESS ACCUSATIONS WITHOUT A SHRED OF EVIDENCE."

"FURTHER, YOU CAN NOT FACT CHECK ANYTHING I TWEET, BECAUSE I HAVE THE 'RIGHT' TO SAY OR PUBLISH ANYTHING I WANT ON THE SITE."

TO BE CONTINUED...

TREASON, IRRATIONALITY AND MORAL DEGENERACY IS ALIVE IN GEORGIAS GOP.

NORMALLY I WOULD NOT GIVE A TRUMPIAN STOOGE LIKE DAVID PERDUE ANY TIME

ON THIS SITE, BUT HIS COMMENTS SHOULD TELL EVERY AMERICAN WHO VALUES 

INTELLECTUAL HONESTY AND MORAL ACCOUNTABILITY, THAT THE REPUBLICAN 

PARTY IN THE U.S. IS LITTLE MORE THAN A CRIMINAL SYNDICATE. 

THEIR GOAL? TO TURN THIS COUNTRY INTO A POPULATION OF DUMB-DOWNED

 SIMPLETONS, WHOSE MORAL DEGENERACY WILL LEAVE THEM EASY TO CONTROL.

SEE PERDUES COMMENTS ON THIS LINK, JUST KEEP A BARF BAG HANDY.

Https://twitter.com/i/status/1518379100817309696

SENATOR ELIZABETH WARREN TAKES A STAND ALL DEMOCRATIC SENATORS NEED TO: CALLING A TRAITOR, A TRAITOR.

IT IS NICE TO SEE A VETERAN DEMOCRATIC SENATOR TAKE A STAND, AND SHINE THE LIGHT ON THE TREASONOUS ACTIONS OF A TRUMPIAN/GOP FASCIST STOOGE.

- DAVID.

TOM WILLIAMS/GETTY

MOTHER JONES

JACKIE FLYNN MOGENSEN

Assistant Editor

Elizabeth Warren is fresh out of patience for Kevin McCarthy

When asked about the Kevin McCarthy tapes on Sunday, Sen. Elizabeth Warren did not mince words. “Kevin McCarthy is a liar and a traitor,” Warren told CNN’s State of the Union. “This is outrageous.”

On Friday, the New York Times shared new reporting, including audio, which showed the House Minority Leader caught in a lie about Jan. 6. After the attack on the Capitol, according to the tapes, McCarthy said that his “recommendation” for then-president Donald Trump would be to resign. The tapes contradict McCarthy’s denials that he’d ever pushed Trump to resign.

On Sunday, Warren also said McCarthy’s apparent lies are indicative of a larger problem in the GOP regarding Jan. 6. “That is really the illness that pervades the Republican leadership right now,” she said. “They say one thing to the American public and something else in private.”

“They understand that it is wrong what happened—an attempt to overthrow our government—and the Republicans instead want to continue to try to figure out how to make [the] 2020 election different instead of spending their energy on how it is that we go forward in order to build an economy, in order to make this country work better for the people who sent us to Washington.”

“Shame on Kevin McCarthy,” Warren concluded.

A BAD DAY FOR PUTIN AND TRUMP: FASCISM DEFEATED IN FRANCE.

 

Le Monde in English

2022 French presidential election: Emmanuel #Macron wins 58.8% of the votes compared to 41.2% for far-right candidate Marine #LePen, according to projections by Ipsos-Sopra Steria for France Télévisions and Radio France, updated at 9.44 p.m. Paris time. https://lemonde.fr/en/politics/article/2022/04/24/macron-wins-french-presidential-election_5981506_5.html?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1650830190…

SATURDAY NIGHT: 4/23/2022. DER FUEHRER TRUMP HOLDS ANOTHER FASCIST RALLY, THIS TIME IN OHIO. WHAT DOES TWITTER HAVE TO SAY?

 

                              

                                 

Marjorie Taylor Green failing to remember if she called for martial law to overturn the 2020 election is critiqued by Rep. Adam Schiff. "It's hard to imagine if you were calling for the imposition of martial law to overturn an election that you wouldn't remember doing so,” Rep. Schiff tells Joy Reid.

                                      

VLAD AND DONALD, IT WAS A GOOD PLAN...BUT HUMANITY IS MORE THAN JUST SYCOPHANTIC SELF-CENTERED YES MEN...PART 11.

You were lucky Donald, when it came to having:

- "A Vocal and Fanatically Loyal Voter Base..."

- "Hard Core Far-Right Politicians..."

WHAT DO I MEAN?

IT IS AN ELEMENT OF AMERICAN SOCIETY that believes THE U.S. CONSTITUTION,

with its GUARANTEES AND IDEALS SET FORTH IN THE CONTENTS OF THE DOCUMENT,

APPLY ONLY TO THEM, AND SELECTED INDIVIDUALS AND GROUPS. CONCEPTS SUCH AS

"RIGHTS" ARE NOT MEANT FOR ALL, JUST THE CHOSEN FEW.

AS WE HAVE SEEN THROUGHOUT WORLD HISTORY, THERE ARE ALWAYS WANNABE 

DICTATORS, DESPOTS, AND POWER-HUNGRY NARCISSISTS WHO PANDER TO THESE 

ELEMENTS IN SOCIETY. POWER IS AN END IN ITSELF. HOW IT IS ACQUIRED OR USED IS

 OF NO CONSEQUENCE.

(The following ARTICLE was first published on 7/12/2016.)

THE HATE CHRONICLES. THE KEYS TO UNDERSTANDING THE MINDSET, MOTIVATIONS, AND GOALS OF THE FAR RIGHT FANATIC. #1.

It is a mistake for Progressives to think that those who make up the Most Conservative Elements of the "NEW REPUBLICAN PARTY" ARE ALL CUT FROM THE SAME CLOTH. WHILE THEY MAY VOTE AS A BLOC,THE PRIMARY MOTIVATION DIFFERS FROM GROUP TO GROUP.

While They are usually Packaged Together, ULTRA CONSERVATIVE POLITICIANS HAVE REALIZED THAT FINDING THE ONE KEY ISSUE THAT DRIVES CERTAIN GROUPS OF VOTERS TO THE POLLS, OFTEN WILL TURN THEM INTO LOYAL ALLIES, who will support an agenda full of Issues They may care little about.

It could be GUN CONTROL, SAME- SEX MARRIAGE, GOVERNMENT SPENDING, SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, IMMIGRATION LAWS, REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE etc. THE STRATEGY IS TO PUT FORTH AN UNCOMPROMISING, RIGID, AND VITRIOLIC POINT OF VIEW ON A PARTICULAR ISSUE, APPEALING TO THE BASER ELEMENTS OF HUMAN NATURE.

THE REASON: TO LEARN OF THE ONE ISSUE THAT EACH SECTION OF INDIVIDUAL VOTERS MOST IDENTIFIES WITH, AND MANIPULATE IT TO THEIR ADVANTAGE.

IT'S A TACTIC THAT REQUIRES NO INTELLECTUAL EFFORT ON THE PART OF THE LISTENER.THERE IS NO NEED TO UNDERSTAND, OR EVEN CARE ABOUT THE OPPOSITIONS POINT OF VIEW. IT PLAYS ON RAW EMOTION, WITHOUT THE NEED FOR CONTEMPLATION OR REFLECTION.

THE INDIVIDUAL IS ENCOURAGED NOT TO THINK ABOUT AN INTELLECTUAL JUSTIFICATION FOR THE OPINION THEY ARE SUPPORTING, BUT TO REACT TO THE WORDS OF THE AUTHOR AND\OR SPEAKER, AND ACCEPTING THE MESSAGE AS TRUE, AND WORTHY OF SUPPORT.  THIS, IN TURN, ENCOURAGES AGREEMENT WITH OTHER OPINIONS THAT ARE EXPRESSED THE SAME WAY.

VIDEO FROM TWITTER: STANDING UP TO THE GOP, MEANS STANDING UP TO HATE. GOOD JOB SENATOR MCMORROW.

SEE VIDEO:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1516453738403143681

FROM MICHIGAN STATE SENATOR MALLORY MCMORROW.

"Senator Lana Theis accused me by name of grooming and sexualizing children in an attempt to marginalize me for standing up against her marginalizing the LGBTQ community...in a fundraising email, for herself. Hate wins when people like me stand by and let it happen. I won't."

VLAD AND DONALD, IT WAS A GOOD PLAN...BUT HUMANITY IS MORE THAN JUST SYCOPHANTIC SELF-CENTERED YES MEN...PART 10.

Well, Donald, the Fascist Segment that seized control of the GOP LEADERSHIP during the OBAMA ERA, ( A Highly Successful and Admired Two Term Democratic President was Bad Enough, BUT A BLACK MAN!! THE WHITE HOODED AND SWASTIKA WEARING WING OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY COULD NOT ALLOW MORE OF THAT), reminded their followers of the Good Old Days, When;

- JIM CROW LAWS WERE STILL AROUND.

- SPOUSAL AND CHILD ABUSE WERE KEPT IN THE 

  FAMILY, NO NEED FOR THE POLICE.

- THE ONLY TYPE OF "GAY" BEHAVIOR ALLOWED BY

  LAW INDICATED HOW HAPPY YOU WERE.

- IMMIGRANTS KNEW THEIR PLACE, AND WOULD NOT

  DARE TO ACCUSE "REAL" AMERICANS OF EMPLOYMENT

  AND HOUSING DISCRIMINATION.

So, where would they turn to rewind the Clock on the "PROGRESSIVE" POLITICS

that REMOVED ECONOMIC, POLITICAL, AND SOCIAL BARRIERS for 

so many MILLIONS OF AMERICANS, GIVING THEM A BETTER CHANCE TO

ACHIEVE THE AMERICAN DREAM?

They Turned to this BATTLE PLAN.

THEY WOULD NEED:

1- A Vocal and Fanatically Loyal Voter Base, though not being a Majority,

would follow an action plan that would create the ILLUSION OF BEING THE 

"NO LONGER SILENT MAJORITY."

2- Hard Core Far-Right Politicians who would do anything to Achieve Their Goal 

of turning the U.S. into a Fascist Oligarchy.

3- Media Outlets Sympathetic to their Agenda and Goals, with no Real Professional

Standards regarding Editorial and Reporting Policies.

Here is where you come in DONALD;

4- A Figurehead to be the Public Image of Their Totalitarian Agenda, someone with

no Identifiable CODE OF ETHICS, OR MORAL STANDARDS FOR ACCEPTABLE

BEHAVIOR.

Quite a List, Isn't it Donald?

BLAST FROM THE PAST: THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT- A SET OF QUESTIONS TO EVALUATE AN INDIVIDUALS OPINION, AND KNOWLEDGE OF THIS UNIQUE AND HISTORY MAKING LAW.*

 

THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT- A SET OF QUESTIONS TO EVALUATE AN INDIVIDUALS OPINION, AND KNOWLEDGE OF THIS UNIQUE AND HISTORY MAKING LAW.*

 

                                                                                                                   
INTRODUCTION:

Do you Believe that the Federal Government has a Moral Responsibility to Provide, or Subsidize, Medical Insurance for every American, (Unable to attain it Through Private Sources), to Alleviate Financial Hardship, or should Such Aid be Restricted to Specific Groups?

If Restricted, to which groups, and why?

                          

                                                        THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT.
1) 

When it was First Introduced as a Bill that could become Law, did you Support its Passage or not?

If Yes-  Why?

                    The Reasons that you did, or did not Support the ACA., were They

                     Based on Moral, Political or Economic Considerations? ( It can be more than one.)

If No-  Why?

2)

For you to consider the ACA a Success, what conditions must be met?

or 

Do you believe it can never be a success, for it Violates Certain Moral or Legal 

Standards?  If so, which ones, and why?

3)

Since Becoming Law, would you say the ACA has been:

-  A Major Success, with only small changes needed to make it even better.

-  A Qualified Success, with Weaknesses that should be addressed in the 

   next Session of Congress.

-  A Major Mistake, Terminate it Immediately, it's Beyond Help.

-  Mostly Unsuccessful, with Major Changes Needed ASAP.

What are the Reasons that led to the Conclusion(s) you have made about 

the ACA?

If it can be shown that your Beliefs or Conclusions about the ACA are Incorrect,

Erroneous, or not Factual, would it change your opinion? If no, why not?

*THIS EVALUATION COULD BE APPLIED TO VOTERS, POLITICIANS, ELECTED OFFICIALS,
AND JUST ABOUT ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO IS AFFECTED BY ITS PASSAGE.