PRESIDENT JOE BIDENS EASTER MESSAGE, TRUMPS EASTER MESSAGE, AND A MESSAGE TO DONALDS "CHRISTIAN" SUPPORTERS.

 

HERE IS TRUMPS EASTER MESSAGE:

Trump: "Happy Easter to all including the Radical Left Maniacs who are doing everything possible to destroy our Country. May they not succeed, but let them, nevertheless, be happy, healthy, wealthy, & well!"

FINALLY, IF I HAD ANY RESPECT FOR TRUMP, THE GOP, AND THEIR FASCIST STOOGES I WOULD NOT REPRINT THIS. SO, ENJOY.

HEADLINES FROM 4/15/2022: WHAT LIES BENEATH.

 

Elon Musk makes offer to buy Twitter

On Thursday, billionaire Elon Musk announced he had made a bid the day prior to buy Twitter at $54.20 per share. This offer comes just weeks after he became Twitter’s largest shareholder and turned down a seat on the company's board of directors.

WHAT IT REALLY MEANS: "I BOUGHT A 9.2% SHARE OF TWITTER, AND WAS OFFERED A SEAT ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. HOWEVER, THEY STILL PLAN ON KEEPING STANDARDS ABOUT NOT ALLOWING MEMBERS TO TWEET FALSE AND UNSUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION. I'M GOING TO PUT A STOP TO THAT, BECAUSE DONALD TRUMP AND HIS FOLLOWERS MUST BE HEARD, JUST LIKE ON FOXNEWS. THE TRUTH BE DAMNED."

Russia threatens nuclear escalation in the Baltics if Sweden and Finland join NATO

On Thursday, the Russian Deputy Chief of the security council and former president Dmitry Medvedev said "there can be no talk of non-nuclear status for the Baltic" in case Finland and Sweden decide to become members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Both countries have expressed their intention to join the Alliance following the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

WHAT IT REALLY MEANS- "YOU DARE TO STAND UP TO US, AND ARE LETTING THE WHOLE WORLD KNOW. WELL, WE WILL THREATEN ALL COUNTRIES, AND TEACH THEM TO THINK TWICE ABOUT BLOCKING OUR PLANS TO RECREATE THE "IRON CURTAIN."    

The Republican National Committee (RNC) voted Thursday to withdraw from the commission responsible for organizing presidential debates,taking a line from former President Trump who has repeatedly leveled accusations of Anti-Republican bias against the group.
WHAT IT REALLY MEANS- "WE WANT A FORMAT THAT DOES NOT EXPOSE OUR CANDIDATES LACK OF INTELLECTUAL DEPTH, OR LEAD TO QUESTIONS THAT THE CANDIDATE CAN NOT ANSWER DUE TO IGNORANCE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER, OR WHERE A TRUTHFUL REPLY WOULD BE HARMFUL TO THE GOPS CHANCE OF WINNING THE ELECTION."

So, allowing Putin to Dictate Foreign Policy to NATO members is the Better Choice? Caving in to Despots always ends well.

LET'S lay this one out:

NATO is a Treaty Organization created to protect its members from possible Foreign Invasion. (Which, at its creation, WAS THE U.S.S.R AND ITS SATELLITE PUPPET GOVERNMENTS.)

So, with the breakdown of the U.S.S.R, former IRON CURTAIN COUNTRIES SUCH AS POLAND, THE CZECH REPUBLIC, AND GERMANY join NATO. Given the recent history of THESE COUNTRIES BEING SUBJECT TO THE TYRANNIES OF STALIN AND HITLER, allying yourself with other DEMOCRACIES for mutual protection would seem to be a NO-BRAINER.

With the recent invasion of UKRAINE BY PUTIN, it would seem to be a pretty smart move, considering the fact that the rest of the world has apparently forgotten the LESSONS LEARNED BY THE CONFLICTS OF THE 20TH CENTURY.  LESSONS SUCH AS:

APPEASING OR BACKING DOWN TO SOCIOPATHIC HEADS OF STATE, WILL NOT MAKE THEM:

- MORE REASONABLE IN CONFLICT RESOLUTION.

- WILLING TO IMPLEMENT "HUMANITARIAN POLICIES."

-  PURSUE LESS AGGRESSIVE FOREIGN POLICIES THAT WILL 

ENSURE NO FURTHER DIRECT PHYSICAL INTERVENTION

INTO THE SOVEREIGNTY OF OTHER NATIONS.

Current NATO Countries and the Years They Joined:

Note: * indicates a founding member

Country	Joined		Country	Joined
Albania	2009		Lithuania	2004
Belgium	1949*		Luxembourg	1949*
Bulgaria	2004		Montenegro	2017
Canada	1949*		Netherlands	1949*
Croatia	2009		North Macedonia	2020
Czech Republic	1999		Norway	1949*
Denmark	1949*		Poland	1999
Estonia	2004		Portugal	1949*
France	1949*		Romania	2004
Germany	1955		Slovakia	2004
Greece	1952		Slovenia	2004
Hungary	1999		Spain	1982
Iceland	1949*		Turkey	1952
Italy	1949*		United Kingdom	1949*
Latvia	2004		United States	1949*

WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE ABOVE LIST, ASK YOURSELF THESE QUESTIONS:

- HOW MANY WERE FORCED BY MILITARY INVASION OR PHYSICAL INTIMIDATION

TO JOIN NATO? 

- SO NATO IS A THREAT TO RUSSIA? PERHAPS YOU CAN LIST FOR ME THE NUMBER OF

MEMBER  NATIONS THAT INVADED ANOTHER SOVEREIGN COUNTRY, AND SEIZED 

CONTROL OF ITS GOVERNMENT?

- HOW MANY OF THESE NATIONS SUFFERED THE TYRANNIES OF THE U.S.S.R,  NAZI

GERMANY, OR OTHER FASCIST REGIMES BEFORE, DURING, OR AFTER WW2, AND WILL

CLAIM THAT THEY WERE COERCED INTO JOINING?

AT THE SAME TIME, THINK OF HOW OFTEN THESE COUNTRIES SUFFERED BECAUSE OF POLICIES AND AN AGENDA DIRECTED BY A HEAD OF STATE SITUATED IN MOSCOW?

...WHAT WILL THE EXCUSE BE WHEN PUTIN DECIDES TO PUT ANOTHER COUNTRY ON HIS SHOPPING LIST, AND LIES THROUGH HIS TEETH ABOUT HOW IT WAS NECESSARY TO INVADE, TO PROTECT RUSSIA?

I REALLY SUGGEST THAT PICKING UP A HISTORY BOOK MIGHT "ENLIGHTEN" SOME WORLD LEADERS AS TO WHAT COULD BE LOST, IF WE CHOOSE TO THINK THAT THE PUTINS AND TRUMPS OF THIS WORLD CAN BE TRUSTED.

VLAD AND DONALD, IT WAS A GOOD PLAN...BUT HUMANITY IS MORE THAN JUST SYCOPHANTIC SELF-CENTERED YES MEN...PART 9.

                                                                                                                                        

FOUR FACES OF EVIL.

OF COURSE, YOU SAW IT FIRST, RIGHT VLAD?

Invading UKRAINE successfully, which has the second strongest Military when we look at the 

former Republics of the U.S.S.R that are now Independent Nations, would be tough enough.

Even with your encouraging separatist groups to revolt against the Democratically elected 

Government, you had no way of knowing the amount of resistance you would come up against.

(YOU KNOW NOW. I GUESS FREE UKRAINIANS DO NOT WANT TO BECOME 

THE VICTIMS OF ANOTHER FASCIST DESPOT. I GUESS WITH STALIN AND HITLER, 

TWO MASS MURDERERS WERE MORE THAN ENOUGH. YOU WILL HAVE TO 

SLAUGHTER A LOT MORE WOMEN AND CHILDREN TO CATCH UP.)

However, it could get much worse. You realize that the NATO TREATY REQUIRES MEMBER

NATIONS TO COME TO THE AID OF ONE OF THEIR OWN IN CASE OF MILITARY  AGGRESSION BY A FOREIGN POWER. THAT INCLUDES: “such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force” in response...

You knew that UKRAINE was looking to join NATO, which if achieved, would probably MEAN MILITARY INTERVENTION FROM ALLIED COUNTRIES IF YOU INVADED. 

That would not do. So, how could you prevent, or at least delay, such an event? How about finding a willing NATO GOVERNMENT that was strong enough, ECONOMICALLY AND MILITARILY, TO INFLUENCE OTHER MEMBER COUNTRIES TO MAKE DECISIONS THAT WOULD BENEFIT, AND NOT IMPEDE, YOUR FORCEFUL TAKEOVER OF A FREE PEOPLE.

What about the NATO MEMBER with the STRONGEST ARMED FORCES ON THE PLANET? If they're on your side, how much easier it would be.

Hey Donald, care to take it from here?