BLAST FROM THE PAST: Sunday, May 14, 2017- LOGIC. ONE WAY TO ENCOURAGE PROPER ANALYSIS: DO NOT COMBINE TWO DISTINCT ISSUES.

 

As the controversy about a possible RUSSIAN INVOLVEMENT IN THE 2016 U.S ELECTION HEATS UP, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE ONE THING PERFECTLY CLEAR;  MY SERIES OF POSTS TITLED, "THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION- SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG...", DOES NOT ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING:  

INFORMATION ACQUIRED, AND DISSEMINATED, THROUGH "HACKING" OR UNAUTHORIZED VISITATION TO ANY FILES, EITHER INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP.

THE MULTI-PART ARTICLE,"THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION- SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG...", DEALS WITH CALCULATED AND DELIBERATE ACT(S) OF ALTERING THE VOTING RESULTS IN AT LEAST 5 STATES, WITH THE GOAL OF ENSURING DONALD TRUMPS VICTORY IN THE 2016 ELECTION.  IN THIS POST, I WILL NOT GET INTO THE EVIDENCE, OR MY REASONING, FOR COMING TO THIS CONCLUSION. FOR THAT I REFER 
YOU TO THE SERIES OF POSTS ADDRESSING THE SUBJECT.

WHAT MUST BE MADE CLEAR IS THE FOLLOWING: THE TOPIC OF RUSSIA, OR ANY OTHER COUNTRY, INDIVIDUAL, OR GROUP BEING GUILTY OF TAMPERING WITH THE ELECTION BY PROVIDING ILLEGALLY OBTAINED INFORMATION TO ONE SIDE IN BENEFITTING THEIR CANDIDATE OF CHOICE, IS AN ENTIRELY SEPARATE ISSUE FROM THE SUBJECT MATTER CONTAINED IN MY ARTICLE. 

THE CONCLUSIONS:

X OBTAINED INFORMATION ILLEGALLY, AND PROVIDED IT TO ONE SIDE IN THE DESIRE TO BENEFIT CANDIDATE A...

AND

THE VOTING COUNTS IN ...WERE ALTERED DELIBERATELY, GIVING ELECTORAL VICTORY TO CANDIDATE B...

...ARE SEPARATE AND DISTINCT.  THE TRUTH OF ONE IS NOT DEPENDENT ON THE OTHER. THEY MAY BOTH BE TRUE, OR BOTH FALSE. ONE MAY BE TRUE, AND THE OTHER FALSE. WE MUST NOT ALLOW EVIDENCE, OR LACK OF, IN ONE CASE TO BE USED IN JUDGING THE OTHER.

DO YOU THINK COMMISSAR TED CRUZ CARES? THAT WOULD REQUIRE A SENSE OF HONOR OR DUTY. (UPDATED)

 52 buses carrying NRA Children’s Museum drive to Ted Cruz's home.

More than 4,000 empty seats will honor the number of children killed in the last two years.

Photo via @mySA

THE GOP GAME PLAN:

4,000 CHILDREN KILLED IN THE LAST 2 YEARS.

# OF U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES ASSASSINATED 

IN U.S. HISTORY.- 0.

# OF SHOTS FIRED AT, OR FIREARMS POINTED AT JUSTICE KAVANAUGH? - 0.

HOW IS SUSPECT CAUGHT?- CALLS LOCAL POLICE TO TURN HIMSELF IN, 

FOR A CRIME HE HAS THOUGHT ABOUT COMMITTING.

GOP SOLUTION : WE NEED TO INCREASE PROTECTION FOR SUPREME COURT JUSTICES.

So, if we can change the law, and allow 12 year olds to sit on the SCOTUS, at least the GOP will make sure that particular Child is well protected from a crime that has never been committed.

WJAR-10 NEWS IS A PATHETIC DISGRACE. GOEBBELS WOULD BE PROUD.

This will be my final post on the ''NEWS" broadcast on WJAR-10 NBC. They are not worth the trouble. 

THEIR SUPPORT OF TRUMP, THE GOP, FOXNEWS AND SINCLAIR BROADCASTINGS CONTINUING MEDIA CAMPAIGN OF PROMOTING IRRATIONAL, BOGUS, AND TREASONOUS ARGUMENTS, BY FABRICATING CERTAIN NEWS ITEMS, AND IGNORING OTHERS, IS A TRANSPARENT ATTEMPT TO DEFEND OR JUSTIFY TRUMPS WORDS AND ACTIONS,  NO MATTER WHERE THE TRUTH MAY LIE.

ON 7/12/2022 the JAN.6TH Committee Hearings were again BROADCAST PUBLICLY, and witness Testimony placed DONALD TRUMP at the HEART OF THE CONSPIRACY TO OVERTURN THE 2020 ELECTION results. THIS TESTIMONY INCLUDED MEMBERS OF HIS OWN STAFF, INCLUDING WHITE HOUSE CHIEF COUNSEL PAT CIPOLLONE. Did WJAR -TV MENTION ANY OF THIS? NOT ONE WORD.

Oh they did mention, in a spot lasting 20-30 seconds, that TRUMP may have tried to contact a future witness, and that action could be considered unlawful.

However, we were subjected to a FOXNEWS REPORT, (THAT LASTED SEVERAL MINUTES), ON POSSIBLE ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES OF HUNTER BIDEN, PUSHING THE SAME RUMOR AND INNUENDO THAT LACKS ANY CREDIBILITY, FOR, AS USUAL, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT STANDS UP TO MINIMAL SCRUTINY. Their main source of info used in this report seems to be the TABLOID NEWSPAPER "THE DAILY MAIL" OF LONDON. THE FOLLOWING IS TAKEN FROM WIKIPEDIA:

In February 2017, pursuant to a formal community discussion, editors on the English Wikipedia banned the use of the Daily Mail as a source.^[25][26] Its use as a reference is now "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist".^[17][252] Support for the ban centred on "the Daily Mail's reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication".

WJAR- 10 NEWS IS NOTHING MORE THAN A PROPAGANDA TOOL, PROMOTING A FASCIST MESSAGE THAT IS TREASONOUS, AND ANTI-INTELLECTUAL IN NATURE.

THE TRUMP TREASON TRAIN MOVES ON. DON'T HAVE THE FACTS, JUST MAKE THEN UP.

Recent claims of US Supreme Court ruling on 2020 presidential election results are false, according to fact-checkers

False claims related to US Supreme Court action on the 2020 presidential election results have circulated online, Reuters, The Associated Press and PolitiFact report. The Supreme Court has “no power to overturn the 2020 presidential election results” and “the only way to remove a president from office is through impeachment,” Richard Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at New York University School of Law told Reuters.

Photo via @ReutersFacts.

AP Fact Check

@APFactCheck

·

Jul 11

Social media users are spreading false claims that the U.S. Supreme Court voted to overturn the results of the 2020 election results. The court has made no such decision and is on its summer recess.

PolitiFact

@PolitiFact

The recent Supreme Court term was sensational, but they didn’t weigh in on the 2020 presidential election, much less overturn it.

politifact.com

PolitiFact - No, the Supreme Court didn’t overturn the 2020 election

The recent Supreme Court term was sensational, but the conservative justices didn’t overturn the 2020 presidential election.