What is even more Disturbing, is their desire to see it instituted into Law, either by Statute or Judicial Decree. Unfortunately, the Lack of Freedom to Choose never seems to bother them, unless it inhibits their own ability to make Individual Decisions.
FREEDOM OF RELIGION, AS A RIGHT, INCLUDES THE ABILITY TO OBEY OR DISOBEY ANY FORM OF RELIGIOUS DOCTRINE. IT IS NOT A MATTER OF SELECTING WHICH FORMS OF FAITH CAN BE LEGALIZED, AND ADJUSTING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM TO CONFORM. NONE OF THEM ARE TO BE PART OF ANY CODE OF LAW, BECAUSE THE CONCEPT OF 'FREEDOM OF RELIGION' WOULD BE MEANINGLESS.
A Response to this is could be something like: "The Word of God is Absolute, we must Convert or Convince others that their only hope for Salvation is accepting Scripture, and Submitting to Gods Will."
This type of Response makes the following Assumptions;
- DEFINING "GOD" IS THEIR RESPONSIBILITY AND MUST BE ACCEPTED.
- That Their DEFINITION OF GOD IS THE CORRECT ONE.
- THAT FAITH ALONE IS REQUIRED AND NECESSARY. NO LOGICAL PROOFS OR SCIENTIFIC METHODOLOGY IS NEEDED TO "KNOW THE TRUTH."
- That GOD HAS REVEALED INSTRUCTIONS FOR A MORAL LIFE, THROUGH INTERPRETATIONS OF SPECIFIC TEXTS, WHICH MUST BE ACCEPTED AS TRUE AND INFALLIBLE.
- "SALVATION" IS A DESIRABLE GOAL, THAT CAN ONLY BE ACHIEVED BY OBEYING THESE INSTRUCTIONS.
Now there is nothing UNCONSTITUTIONAL OR ILLEGAL about believing any of the above. A FREE SOCIETY allows each of us to find answers on our own and being able to share our BELIEFS OR FAITH with others.
HOWEVER, THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONVERTING OR CONVINCING SOMEONE TO ACT OR BELIEVE CERTAIN RELIGIOUS DEFINITIONS OR ABSOLUTES VOLUNTARILY, AND FORCING THEM TO THROUGH THREATS OF CRIMINAL OR CIVIL SANCTIONS INSTITUTED INTO LAW.
Unfortunately, the U.S. is currently being controlled by a SUPREME COURT that ignores the concept of Voluntary Acceptance of Religious Doctrine. The Constitutional Guarantee that Government will not Force a specific set of Moral principles upon all Americans, based on the Personal Beliefs of Individual Judges/Justices has now been destroyed. This is the ESTABLISHMENT OF A FASCIST THEOCRACY* THAT THE U.S. CONSTITUTION WAS DESIGNED TO GUARD AGAINST. However, when acts of TREASON AND SEDITION ARE IGNORED, ALL THE SAFEGUARDS IN THE WORLD ARE BASICALLY USELESS.
*When we speak of CHRISTIAN FASCISM, we are describing a THEOCRATIC FORM OF GOVERNMENT that attempts to Legally Enforce a SET OF BELIEFS AND MORAL STANDARDS THAT ELIMINATES THE CONCEPT OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF FREEDOM OF RELIGION FOR ALL CITIZENS INTO AN OBEDIENCE TO A NARROW AND STRICT CODE OF LAW THAT DOES NOT EVEN COME CLOSE TO REPRESENTING ALL BRANCHES OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH. CURRENTLY, THE ONLY CHRISTIANS IT REPRESENTS ARE THE TRUMPIAN/FASCIST PARTY OF AMERICA/GOP SUPPORTERS WHO USE HATE, PREJUDICE, IGNORANCE, AND AN ANTI-INTELLECTUAL MINDSET SEEKING TO DESTROY THE CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS THAT THE U.S. CITIZEN HAS COME TO KNOW, UNDERSTAND, AND ACCEPT AS PART OF BEING A LOYAL AMERICAN.
This type of Mindset is further exemplified by those who still support Donald Trump, even after his Felony Convictions. To them, evidence of Criminal Behavior, Prosecution, and a Fair Trial are all just stumbling blocks into establishing a Dictatorship that they believe will force on all Americans a code of Morality based on their confusing and non-sensical form of "Christian" Fascism. (When they can come up with a Valid NEW TESTAMENT Argument to support any of their beliefs I would be glad to re-examine the issue. Don't hold your breath.)
DONALD TRUMP IS A TOOL TO GET WHAT THEY WANT. HATE, PREJUDICE, RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY, AND DESTROYING OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC IS THE GOAL, AND USING A SOCIOPATHIC DEMAGOGUE IS NO PROBLEM AT ALL. THE LAW BE DAMNED.
No comments:
Post a Comment