This U.S. Supreme Court isn't about Intellectually and Reasonably applying Constitutional Law to todays Social and Political Issues. It's about finding any excuse to install Fascism in the U.S. PART 2.

To understand the direction being taken by this version of the SCOTUS, it is necessary to actually READ AND UNDERSTAND WHAT IS BEING RULED UPON, AND EXACTLY WHAT THOSE RULINGS MEAN. Further, are recent Decisions Justified?  Are ReasonablyValid Arguments being put forth that are Structurally Sound, and can withstand proper scrutiny?

I'll start out the analysis with a simple Quiz. Here is a Transcript of the First Two Amendments to the U.S. CONSTITUTION. THE BEGINNING OF WHAT IS MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE BILL OF RIGHTS.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II

A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

As you can see, these Amendments mention:

- RELIGION.

- SPEECH.

- THE PRESS.

- ASSEMBLY

- PETITION AND REDRESS.

-  ARMS.

Seems pretty straightforward, doesn't it? Where is the Controversy?

After all, they are all on equal footing, Right? No Differences, no Reason

to look any closer, Right? WRONG.

THERE ARE DIFFERENCES, AND THEY CAN BE FOUND, AND ANALYZED

PROPERLY. GUESS WHAT? YOU DON'T NEED A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE 

TO DO THAT. (Which turns out to be a very good thing)

SEE PART 3.