FROM -11/26/2020: THE TRUMPIANS AND THE TRUMPOCRATS PERFORMED THEIR ROLES WELL. DONALD ADDS A THIRD SUB-PAR INTELLECT TO THE SUPREME COURT. FASCISTS REJOICE. UPDATE.

Always remember, Trump and the Republicans did the most damage in situations where SENATE DEMOCRATS OFFERED LITTLE OR NO RESISTANCE.

I QUOTE THE WORDS OF CHUCK SCHUMER, UPON THE CONFIRMATION OF A THIRD

SUPREME JUSTICE, CHOSEN BY TRUMP.

But Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called Monday’s vote “one of the darkest days” in the history of the 231 years of the Senate, and said Republicans will regret their power grab in the long haul.

“I want to be very clear with my Republican colleagues: You may win this vote, and Amy Coney Barrett may become the next associate justice of the Supreme Court, but you will never, never get your credibility back,” Schumer said. “The next time the American people give Democrats a majority in this chamber, you will have forfeited the right to tell us how to run that majority.”

MY RESPONSE...

CHUCK, YOU ARE A CORRUPT JOKE, AS IS EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT INCUMBENT IN THE U.S. SENATE. YOU SOLD OUT PRESIDENT OBAMA, HILLARY CLINTON, AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. NOW WE HAVE A SUPREME COURT WITH THREE JUSTICES WHO WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED BY A COMPETENT AND HONEST PRESIDENT. 

THE REFUSAL OF THE DEMOCRATS IN THE SENATE TO CONTEST THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL AND SENATE RETURNS, (WHICH COST THE DEMOCRATS THE WHITE HOUSE AND CONTROL OF THE SENATE), WAS NOTHING SHORT OF CRIMINAL. I HAVE JUST PUBLISHED U.S. SENATE RESULTS FROM 2008- 2018, TO COMPLEMENT THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION RESULTS. AMERICANS CAN SEE THE TYPE OF VOTER RETURNS THAT WERE NEVER QUESTIONED OR DEBATED, BUT THAT YOU AND YOUR FLUNKIES ACCEPTED WITHOUT A WORD.

IT IS AMAZING THAT IN 2016 AND 2018 DONALD TRUMP ACCUSED THE DEMOCRATS OF ELECTION FRAUD WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE, AND THE ACCUSATIONS WERE PROVEN TO BE GROUNDLESS. YET, WITH EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE OF FRAUD BY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY AND RUSSIA IN THE 2016 ELECTION, THE DEMOCRATS IN THE U.S. SENATE DID NOTHING. 

PERHAPS, YOU AND YOUR "COLLEAGUES" CAN EXPLAIN YOUR REASONING FOR NOT CALLING OUT MITCH MCCONNELL FOR HIS REFUSAL TO GIVE PRES. BARACK OBAMAS SUPREME COURT CANDIDATE A CONSTITUTIONALLY MANDATED PUBLIC HEARING AND VOTE BEFORE THE U.S. SENATE, SETTING UP A REPUBLICAN DOMINATED SUPREME COURT, WHICH FOLLOWED FROM THE FRAUDULENT 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.

YOU MUST FEEL PROUD. WHAT WAS WORTH BETRAYING YOUR COUNTRY?

I WANT TO MAKE CLEAR THIS IS NOT A CRITICISM OF NANCY PELOSI OR ANY OF THE DEM. HOUSE MEMBERS. THEY SHOWED THEIR COURAGE DURING THE TRUMP IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS, HANDLING THE PRESSURE VERY WELL, AND INTRODUCING HONEST AND CAPABLE WITNESSES TO SHOW THE DEPTHS OF TRUMPS DISHONESTY.

DAVID.