There is One Thing I Want to make perfectly clear; I Have never come across an ANTHROPOLOGIST, ZOOLOGIST, NATURALIST, BIOLOGIST etc; WHO WOULD NOT WELCOME SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE PROVING THE EXISTENCE OF A BIGFOOT TYPE CREATURE LIVING IN THE WILD.
WHY WOULD THEY BE AGAINST SUCH GROUNDBREAKING INFORMATION?
The Primary Goal of Science is to LEARN NEW THINGS. NOT MUCH CAN BE ACHIEVED IN TERMS OF ADVANCING SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE IF THERE ARE NO DISCOVERIES TO BE MADE, INVENTIONS NEEDED TO SOLVE PROBLEMS, OR NATURAL MYSTERIES TO UNCOVER.
Anyone who claims that "THE SCIENTIFIC ESTABLISHMENT" is against such Research is probably either Lying to create controversy, or has a RESEARCH METHODOLOGY SO POOR THAT NO SERIOUS SCHOLAR OR ACADEMICIAN TAKES THEM SERIOUSLY.
What Science will not do, is ALLOW QUESTIONS LIKE THE FOLLOWING TO BE IGNORED, OR ANSWERED WITHOUT PROPER DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THE PROCESS THAT LED TO THE THEORIES AND CONCLUSIONS BEING OFFERED.
- TO MAINTAIN A SUSTAINABLE POPULATION, THERE MUST BE A LARGE ENOUGH COMMUNITY OF GENETICALLY COMPATIBLE INDIVIDUALS TO BREED SUCCESSFULLY, BUT WITH ENOUGH VARIATIONS TO KEEP DIVERSITY IN THE GENE POOL.
- OVER-USED AND TIRED EXCUSES SUCH AS; "THE REASON NO BIGFOOT REMAINS HAVE EVER BEEN FOUND IS THAT THE WILDERNESS ENVIRONMENT CAUSES A RAPID DECOMPOSITION OF PHYSICAL EVIDENCE, THROUGH SCAVENGERS AND INSECT LIFE. HOW OFTEN DO YOU FIND DEER, BEAR OR ANY ANIMAL CARCASSES POST MORTEM."
THE PROBLEM IS THAT, WHILE IT IS RARE TO FIND THE PHYSICAL REMAINS OF MANY NATIVE SPECIES IN THE WILD, IT DOES HAPPEN ON OCCASION. SKELETAL EVIDENCE HAS BEEN FOUND AND ANALYZED FOR SUCH WILDERNESS FAUNA AS DEER, BEARS,etc.
HOW MUCH HAS BEEN FOUND INDICATING THE POSSIBLE EXISTENCE OF A BIGFOOT TYPE CREATURE- NONE.
No comments:
Post a Comment