A SHORT DESCRIPTION OF CHRISTIAN FASCISM. PART 4.

 

From ARTICLE 6 OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be Required as a Qualification To any Office or public Trust under the United States.

As you can see from the passage, Article 6 prohibits the creation of any Law or Regulation that forces any Elected Official to pass a test that is designed to pass Judgment on their Religious Faith or Beliefs as a requirement to assume Office.

Of course the Fascist Party of America/GOP is counting on Corrupt and Incompetent Judges to circumvent this part of the Constitution. ( Which is essential to their goal of destroying our Republic, and replacing it with a Fascist Dictatorship. Treason and Rigging elections don't hinder them, so why would ending Religious Freedom be a problem?)

How do we know this to be true? Consider this;

When you hear "Judges" adapting their rulings to the Religious Morals of a particular group, it is usually taken from the Far-Right Mentality of forcing a personal set of Ethics based on a purely subjective interpretation of Christian Scripture. Whose you say? It doesn't matter because a Dictatorship picks and chooses its own Allies and Flunkies. So whichever set of Religious Fanatics suits their needs at the time. It is the Job of the Hand Picked Judges to make sure their wishes are carried out.

As I have previously pointed out there is not a single Word or Phrase contained in the Body of the U.S. CONSTITUTION THAT INDICATES THAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS WANTED TO TURN THE NEW COUNTRY INTO A THEOCRACY, CHRISTIAN OR NOT. SO HOW ARE THEY TRYING TO GET AROUND IT?

THEY ARE CREATING LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY NOT BY FORCING ELECTED OFFICIALS TO MEET ANY CONSTITUTIONAL STANDARD, BUT BY REQUIRING LAWS TO MEET THEIR PERSONAL SET OF MORAL GUIDELINES.

THE CONSTITUTION AND LEGAL PRECEDENT ARE NOT THE SOURCES FOR CREATING LEGAL STANDARDS, THEY ARE.

ASSORTED FASCISTS TRY TO USE THE ARMY-NAVY GAME FOR TRUMPIAN/FPA PROPAGANDA.

It's a sign of the Times the type of "PATRIOTS" er...FASCISTS that will use LIES AND VULGARITY to Demean and Drag one of this Countries greatest Traditions into the Gutter they inhabit.

On Dec. 10, 2023, a video was circulated on social media, allegedly showing a crowd at an Army-Navy footgame chanting "F*ck Joe Biden" about the U.S. president. The footage was shared on various platforms such as X (formerly Twitter), Reddit, YouTube, iFunny and Instagram. "Ya ears are hearing you correct 'F*ck Joe Biden' being cheered at the Army Navy game. There’s no way Joe Biden wins re-election unless they cheat for him," one post on X read.

It turned out to be a Doctored and Fraudulent Video.

In fact, the original video from the event did not include the in-question chant. Shazam, an app that helps identify music based on a short sample, revealed that a song was playing in the background: "Martin Garrix Animals vs Tsunami" remix.

AP News

Video footage from the 2023 Army-Navy game was altered

 to add anti-Biden chant.

Snopes

Video of People Chanting '[Expletive] Joe Biden' at Army-Navy Game Is Fake.

As you can see from above, it was

originally Doctored and

Posted on X-

Twitter, for all of Elon Musks Nazis to enjoy.

Of course the Editorial Standards of REDDIT,

YOUTUBE,

AND INSTAGRAM ARE NOW

SINKING TO HITLERIAN

STANDARDS,

WHERE ACTUAL FACTS AND TRUTH ARE IGNORED.

Himmler would be proud.

So this is how we celebrate those Future Leaders who will

someday lead our Military in future conflicts.

In Honor of those sites that posted this garbage without

checking its

veracity, I leave these words:

Das Vedanya Tovarisch.

IN RESPONSE TO THE ANTI-SEMITES ON FACEBOOK.

On Facebook you come across FASCIST ANTI-SEMITES TRYING TO BLAME THE ENTIRE ISRAEL- HAMAS WAR ON THE IDF ALONE, AND ACCUSE PRESIDENT BIDEN AS BEING IN LEAGUE WITH THEM. HERE IS PART OF MY RESPONSE:

...I forget, who committed an act of war against a sovereign nation with no declaration? Who seized Civilian Non-Combatants as a shield? Which side conducts combat operations among their own Non-Combatants, and then blames the other side for trying to neutralize the Military Forces that initiated the War? This is a War between Hamas and the State of Israel, not the Palestinian People. If Hamas can give a Valid and Rational Reason of how this War was to benefit the Civil Population of Gaza, I would love to hear it.

Does this mean that Israel has no Humanitarian Responsibility in trying to Decrease Civilian Casualties? Of Course not. However, A Ceasefire requires BOTH SIDES TO SUSPEND MILITARY OPERATIONS, NOT JUST ONE. I offered what I believe to be a Rational Temporary Solution to the problem of reducing Casualties among Civilian/Non-Combatants in a previous post on the topic of the ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR.

REMEMBERING TRUMPS DISGRACE: ARTICLES AND POSTS FROM HIS IMPEACHMENT. BREAKING DOWN THE MUELLER REPORT...EXONERATES NO ONE, ANSWERS NOTHING. PT 2.

 

The introduction addresses the nature of the RUSSIAN INVOLVEMENT, AND POSSIBLE "COLLUSION" WITH THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN.

TEXT FROM THE REPORT:
"As set forth in detail in this report, the Special Counsel's investigation established that Russia interfere~ in the 2016 presidential election principally through two operations. First, a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Second, a Russian intelligence service conducted computer-intrusion operations against entities, employees, and volunteers working on the Clinton Campaign and then released stolen documents. The investigation also identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign. Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
END TEXT.

How can we make sense of this? At one point, the report comments about the contacts between the TRUMP CAMPAIGN, AND THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT: "The investigation also identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign."
Yet, at another point, it seems to exonerate the TRUMP CAMPAIGN with the following: "...the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

Further Down, we see the reasoning used in evaluating any CRIMINAL LIABILITY THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN MAY HAVE, INVOLVING THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENTS ACTIVITIES TO INFLUENCE THE OUTCOME OF THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. IT IS HERE THAT WE FIND OUT HOW MUCH OF A "WITCH HUNT" THIS INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN. THE TRUTH MAY SUPRISE YOU. 

TEXT FROM THE REPORT.
1) "In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of "collusion." In so doing, the Office recognized that the word "collud[ e ]" was used in communications with the Acting Attorney General confirming certain aspects of the investigation's scope and that the term has frequently been invoked in public reporting about the investigation. 2) But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. For those reasons, the Office's focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law. In connection with that analysis, 3) we addressed the factual question whether members of the Trump Campaign "coordinat[ ed]"-a term that appears in the appointment order-with Russian election interference activities. Like collusion,4) "coordination" does not have a settled definition in federal criminal law. We understood "coordination" to require an agreement-tacit or express- between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference. 
5) That requires more than the two parties taking actions that were informed by or responsive to the other's actions or interests. We applied the term coordination in that sense when stating in the report that the investigation did not establish that the Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities." 

END TEXT.

THE NUMBERS 1-5 ABOVE CORRESPOND WITH THOSE BELOW, IN GIVING A BASIC INTERPRETATION OF THE MEANING OF THE ABOVE TEXT.

1) THE POPULAR TERM "COLLUSION" HAS NO BASIS IN LAW, THE LAW REGARDING "CONSPIRACY" WAS USED.

 2) JOINT CRIMINAL LIABILITY WAS DETERMINED BY THE FEDERAL LAW REGARDING "CONSPIRACY."

3) DETERMINED WHETHER OR NOT MEMBERS OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN "COORDINATED" WITH THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENTS INTERFERENCE ACTIVITIES.

4) THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL COUNCEL DECIDED THAT TO ACCUSE THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN OF "COORDINATING" WITH THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT, THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOTH BODIES, "TACIT OR EXPRESS." 

5)"That requires more than the two parties taking actions that were informed by or responsive to the other's actions or interests."

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? A MEMBER OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN COULD HAVE ENGAGED IN "CONSPIRITORIAL CONDUCT" WITH THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT AND/OR AFFILIATED INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS, BUT IF IT WAS NOT DONE AT THE EXPRESS ORDER OF THE CAMPAIGN ITSELF, with the approval of the Russian Government, NO CRIME WAS COMMITTED.

CUTTING THROUGH THE NOISE, HERE IS WHAT IT MEANS: THAT NO ONE IN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN IS EXONERATED. BY THIS VERY NARROW DEFINITION, ANY INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP IN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN COULD HAVE "CONSPIRED" WITH THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT, OR ANYONE WORKING ON BEHALF OF THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT, AND AS LONG AS THERE WAS NO EXPRESS AGREEMENT AMONG BOTH THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT, THE FINDING WOULD BE THAT OF NO "COLLUSION" OR NO "CONSPIRACY."

THIS IS A TRAVESTY. IT LITERALLY GIVES INDIVIDUALS AND GROUPS A FREE PASS TO HAVE COMMITTED ELECTION FRAUD, AS LONG AS THE "LEADERSHIP" DID NOT FORMALLY APPROVE IT.