About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Tuesday, July 12, 2022

WJAR-10 NEWS IS A PATHETIC DISGRACE. GOEBBELS WOULD BE PROUD.



This will be my final post on the ''NEWS" broadcast on WJAR-10 NBC. They are not worth the trouble. 

THEIR SUPPORT OF TRUMP, THE GOP, FOXNEWS AND SINCLAIR BROADCASTINGS CONTINUING MEDIA CAMPAIGN OF PROMOTING IRRATIONAL, BOGUS, AND TREASONOUS ARGUMENTS, BY FABRICATING CERTAIN NEWS ITEMS, AND IGNORING OTHERS, IS A TRANSPARENT ATTEMPT TO DEFEND OR JUSTIFY TRUMPS WORDS AND ACTIONS,  NO MATTER WHERE THE TRUTH MAY LIE.

ON 7/12/2022 the JAN.6TH Committee Hearings were again BROADCAST PUBLICLY, and witness Testimony placed DONALD TRUMP at the HEART OF THE CONSPIRACY TO OVERTURN THE 2020 ELECTION results. THIS TESTIMONY INCLUDED MEMBERS OF HIS OWN STAFF, INCLUDING WHITE HOUSE CHIEF COUNSEL PAT CIPOLLONE. Did WJAR -TV MENTION ANY OF THIS? NOT ONE WORD.

Oh they did mention, in a spot lasting 20-30 seconds, that TRUMP may have tried to contact a future witness, and that action could be considered unlawful.

However, we were subjected to a FOXNEWS REPORT, (THAT LASTED SEVERAL MINUTES), ON POSSIBLE ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES OF HUNTER BIDEN, PUSHING THE SAME RUMOR AND INNUENDO THAT LACKS ANY CREDIBILITY, FOR, AS USUAL, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT STANDS UP TO MINIMAL SCRUTINY. Their main source of info used in this report seems to be the TABLOID NEWSPAPER "THE DAILY MAIL" OF LONDON. THE FOLLOWING IS TAKEN FROM WIKIPEDIA:

In February 2017, pursuant to a formal community discussion, editors on the English Wikipedia banned the use of the Daily Mail as a source.[25][26] Its use as a reference is now "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist".[17][252] Support for the ban centred on "the Daily Mail's reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication".

WJAR- 10 NEWS IS NOTHING MORE THAN A PROPAGANDA TOOL, PROMOTING A FASCIST MESSAGE THAT IS TREASONOUS, AND ANTI-INTELLECTUAL IN NATURE.

THE TRUMP TREASON TRAIN MOVES ON. DON'T HAVE THE FACTS, JUST MAKE THEN UP.




Recent claims of US Supreme Court ruling on 2020 presidential election results are false, according to fact-checkers

False claims related to US Supreme Court action on the 2020 presidential election results have circulated online, Reuters, The Associated Press and PolitiFact report. The Supreme Court has “no power to overturn the 2020 presidential election results” and “the only way to remove a president from office is through impeachment,” Richard Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at New York University School of Law told Reuters.
Photo via @ReutersFacts.

Social media users are spreading false claims that the U.S. Supreme Court voted to overturn the results of the 2020 election results. The court has made no such decision and is on its summer recess.






FOR ALL OF YOU "EXPERTS" WHO CRITICIZE MERRICK GARLAND- 3 POINTS. (UPDATE)



- HE HAS BEEN ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR LESS THAN A YEAR AND A HALF, WITH A RESPONSIBILITY TO CLEAN UP FOUR YEARS OF TRUMP MAKING A MOCKERY OF THE JUSTICE DEPT, AND A GOP DETERMINED TO PROTECT TREASON.

- PERHAPS YOU CAN REPRINT YOUR MESSAGES/TWEETS ABOUT THE VIOLATION OF  CONSTITUTIONAL LAW THAT WAS COMMITTED WHEN, AS PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMAS CHOICE FOR THE OPENING ON THE SUPREME COURT, HE WAS DENIED A MANDATED PUBLIC HEARING AND VOTE BY THE U.S. SENATE. SHOW US THE OUTRAGE YOU EXHIBITED THEN.

- AS FOR THE JAN. 6TH HEARINGS, (POSSIBLE PROSECUTIONS), I WOULD RATHER SEE IT DONE RIGHT, THAN DONE FAST. YOU DO REMEMBER THAT TRUMP AND THE GOP OWN TWO-THIRDS OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT. HOW HARD WILL THEY WORK TO FIND AN EXCUSE, ANY EXCUSE, TO LET TRUMP WALK? MAKE IT IS AIR-TIGHT AS POSSIBLE.

TWITTER BROADCASTS- January 6 committee hearing looks at Trump associates’ ties to extremist groups.

 

TREASON AND TRUMP.


https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1ZkKzbbLvAoKv