VLAD AND DONALD, IT WAS A GOOD PLAN...BUT HUMANITY IS MORE THAN JUST SYCOPHANTIC SELF-CENTERED YES MEN...PART 11.

You were lucky Donald, when it came to having:

- "A Vocal and Fanatically Loyal Voter Base..."

- "Hard Core Far-Right Politicians..."

WHAT DO I MEAN?

IT IS AN ELEMENT OF AMERICAN SOCIETY that believes THE U.S. CONSTITUTION,

with its GUARANTEES AND IDEALS SET FORTH IN THE CONTENTS OF THE DOCUMENT,

APPLY ONLY TO THEM, AND SELECTED INDIVIDUALS AND GROUPS. CONCEPTS SUCH AS

"RIGHTS" ARE NOT MEANT FOR ALL, JUST THE CHOSEN FEW.

AS WE HAVE SEEN THROUGHOUT WORLD HISTORY, THERE ARE ALWAYS WANNABE 

DICTATORS, DESPOTS, AND POWER-HUNGRY NARCISSISTS WHO PANDER TO THESE 

ELEMENTS IN SOCIETY. POWER IS AN END IN ITSELF. HOW IT IS ACQUIRED OR USED IS

 OF NO CONSEQUENCE.

(The following ARTICLE was first published on 7/12/2016.)

THE HATE CHRONICLES. THE KEYS TO UNDERSTANDING THE MINDSET, MOTIVATIONS, AND GOALS OF THE FAR RIGHT FANATIC. #1.

It is a mistake for Progressives to think that those who make up the Most Conservative Elements of the "NEW REPUBLICAN PARTY" ARE ALL CUT FROM THE SAME CLOTH. WHILE THEY MAY VOTE AS A BLOC,THE PRIMARY MOTIVATION DIFFERS FROM GROUP TO GROUP.

While They are usually Packaged Together, ULTRA CONSERVATIVE POLITICIANS HAVE REALIZED THAT FINDING THE ONE KEY ISSUE THAT DRIVES CERTAIN GROUPS OF VOTERS TO THE POLLS, OFTEN WILL TURN THEM INTO LOYAL ALLIES, who will support an agenda full of Issues They may care little about.

It could be GUN CONTROL, SAME- SEX MARRIAGE, GOVERNMENT SPENDING, SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, IMMIGRATION LAWS, REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE etc. THE STRATEGY IS TO PUT FORTH AN UNCOMPROMISING, RIGID, AND VITRIOLIC POINT OF VIEW ON A PARTICULAR ISSUE, APPEALING TO THE BASER ELEMENTS OF HUMAN NATURE.

THE REASON: TO LEARN OF THE ONE ISSUE THAT EACH SECTION OF INDIVIDUAL VOTERS MOST IDENTIFIES WITH, AND MANIPULATE IT TO THEIR ADVANTAGE.

IT'S A TACTIC THAT REQUIRES NO INTELLECTUAL EFFORT ON THE PART OF THE LISTENER.THERE IS NO NEED TO UNDERSTAND, OR EVEN CARE ABOUT THE OPPOSITIONS POINT OF VIEW. IT PLAYS ON RAW EMOTION, WITHOUT THE NEED FOR CONTEMPLATION OR REFLECTION.

THE INDIVIDUAL IS ENCOURAGED NOT TO THINK ABOUT AN INTELLECTUAL JUSTIFICATION FOR THE OPINION THEY ARE SUPPORTING, BUT TO REACT TO THE WORDS OF THE AUTHOR AND\OR SPEAKER, AND ACCEPTING THE MESSAGE AS TRUE, AND WORTHY OF SUPPORT.  THIS, IN TURN, ENCOURAGES AGREEMENT WITH OTHER OPINIONS THAT ARE EXPRESSED THE SAME WAY.

VIDEO FROM TWITTER: STANDING UP TO THE GOP, MEANS STANDING UP TO HATE. GOOD JOB SENATOR MCMORROW.

SEE VIDEO:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1516453738403143681

FROM MICHIGAN STATE SENATOR MALLORY MCMORROW.

"Senator Lana Theis accused me by name of grooming and sexualizing children in an attempt to marginalize me for standing up against her marginalizing the LGBTQ community...in a fundraising email, for herself. Hate wins when people like me stand by and let it happen. I won't."

VLAD AND DONALD, IT WAS A GOOD PLAN...BUT HUMANITY IS MORE THAN JUST SYCOPHANTIC SELF-CENTERED YES MEN...PART 10.

Well, Donald, the Fascist Segment that seized control of the GOP LEADERSHIP during the OBAMA ERA, ( A Highly Successful and Admired Two Term Democratic President was Bad Enough, BUT A BLACK MAN!! THE WHITE HOODED AND SWASTIKA WEARING WING OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY COULD NOT ALLOW MORE OF THAT), reminded their followers of the Good Old Days, When;

- JIM CROW LAWS WERE STILL AROUND.

- SPOUSAL AND CHILD ABUSE WERE KEPT IN THE 

  FAMILY, NO NEED FOR THE POLICE.

- THE ONLY TYPE OF "GAY" BEHAVIOR ALLOWED BY

  LAW INDICATED HOW HAPPY YOU WERE.

- IMMIGRANTS KNEW THEIR PLACE, AND WOULD NOT

  DARE TO ACCUSE "REAL" AMERICANS OF EMPLOYMENT

  AND HOUSING DISCRIMINATION.

So, where would they turn to rewind the Clock on the "PROGRESSIVE" POLITICS

that REMOVED ECONOMIC, POLITICAL, AND SOCIAL BARRIERS for 

so many MILLIONS OF AMERICANS, GIVING THEM A BETTER CHANCE TO

ACHIEVE THE AMERICAN DREAM?

They Turned to this BATTLE PLAN.

THEY WOULD NEED:

1- A Vocal and Fanatically Loyal Voter Base, though not being a Majority,

would follow an action plan that would create the ILLUSION OF BEING THE 

"NO LONGER SILENT MAJORITY."

2- Hard Core Far-Right Politicians who would do anything to Achieve Their Goal 

of turning the U.S. into a Fascist Oligarchy.

3- Media Outlets Sympathetic to their Agenda and Goals, with no Real Professional

Standards regarding Editorial and Reporting Policies.

Here is where you come in DONALD;

4- A Figurehead to be the Public Image of Their Totalitarian Agenda, someone with

no Identifiable CODE OF ETHICS, OR MORAL STANDARDS FOR ACCEPTABLE

BEHAVIOR.

Quite a List, Isn't it Donald?

BLAST FROM THE PAST: THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT- A SET OF QUESTIONS TO EVALUATE AN INDIVIDUALS OPINION, AND KNOWLEDGE OF THIS UNIQUE AND HISTORY MAKING LAW.*

 

THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT- A SET OF QUESTIONS TO EVALUATE AN INDIVIDUALS OPINION, AND KNOWLEDGE OF THIS UNIQUE AND HISTORY MAKING LAW.*

 

                                                                                                                   
INTRODUCTION:

Do you Believe that the Federal Government has a Moral Responsibility to Provide, or Subsidize, Medical Insurance for every American, (Unable to attain it Through Private Sources), to Alleviate Financial Hardship, or should Such Aid be Restricted to Specific Groups?

If Restricted, to which groups, and why?

                          

                                                        THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT.
1) 

When it was First Introduced as a Bill that could become Law, did you Support its Passage or not?

If Yes-  Why?

                    The Reasons that you did, or did not Support the ACA., were They

                     Based on Moral, Political or Economic Considerations? ( It can be more than one.)

If No-  Why?

2)

For you to consider the ACA a Success, what conditions must be met?

or 

Do you believe it can never be a success, for it Violates Certain Moral or Legal 

Standards?  If so, which ones, and why?

3)

Since Becoming Law, would you say the ACA has been:

-  A Major Success, with only small changes needed to make it even better.

-  A Qualified Success, with Weaknesses that should be addressed in the 

   next Session of Congress.

-  A Major Mistake, Terminate it Immediately, it's Beyond Help.

-  Mostly Unsuccessful, with Major Changes Needed ASAP.

What are the Reasons that led to the Conclusion(s) you have made about 

the ACA?

If it can be shown that your Beliefs or Conclusions about the ACA are Incorrect,

Erroneous, or not Factual, would it change your opinion? If no, why not?

*THIS EVALUATION COULD BE APPLIED TO VOTERS, POLITICIANS, ELECTED OFFICIALS,
AND JUST ABOUT ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO IS AFFECTED BY ITS PASSAGE.