About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Wednesday, January 6, 2021

Biden to name judge Merrick Garland as attorney general. AP AND AOL NEWS.

 (OH NO, WHAT IS MITCH MCCONNELL AND HIS RUSSIAN SUPERIORS GOING TO DO?

I MEAN CAPABILITY, HONESTY, AND INTEGRITY IS WHAT THEY DON'T WANT. FASCISM

DOESN'T WORK TO WELL WITH GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP THAT ACTUALLY HAS A 

SET OF MORAL PRINCIPLES.)- DAVID.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX


BY- ERIC TUCKER AND MICHAEL BALSAMO

WASHINGTON (AP) — President-elect Joe Biden has selected Merrick Garland, a federal appeals court judge who in 2016 was snubbed by Republicans for a seat on the Supreme Court, as his attorney general, two people familiar with the selection process said Wednesday.

Biden is expected to announce Garland's appointment on Thursday, along with other senior leaders of the department, including former homeland security adviser Lisa Monaco as deputy attorney general and former Justice Department civil rights chief Vanita Gupta as associate attorney general.

In picking Garland, Biden is turning to an experienced judge who held senior positions at the Justice Department decades ago, including as a supervisor of the prosecution of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.

The pick will force Senate Republicans to contend with the nomination of someone they spurned in 2016 — refusing even to hold hearings when a Supreme Court vacancy arose — but Biden may be banking on Garland's credentials and reputation for moderation to ensure confirmation.

Garland was selected over other finalists including Alabama Sen. Doug Jones and former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates. The people familiar with the process spoke on condition of anonymity.

If confirmed, Garland would confront immediate challenges, including an ongoing criminal tax investigation into Biden’s son, Hunter, as well as calls from many Democrats to pursue inquiries into Trump after he leaves office. A special counsel investigation into the origins of the Russia probe also remains open, forcing a new attorney general to decide how to handle it and what to make public.

Garland would also inherit a Justice Department that has endured a tumultuous four years and would likely need to focus on not only civil rights issues and an overhaul of national policing policies after months of mass protests over the deaths of Black Americans at the hand of law enforcement.

It was unclear how Garland’s selection would be received by Black and Latino advocates who had advocated for a Black attorney general or for someone with a background in civil rights causes and criminal justice reform.

Garland would also return to a Justice Department radically different than the one he left. The Sept. 11 attacks was years away, the department’s national security division had not yet been created and a proliferation of aggressive cyber and counterintelligence threats from foreign adversaries have made counties like China, Russia and North Korea top priorities for federal law enforcement.

But some of the issues from Garland’s first stint at the department persist. Tensions between police and minorities, an issue that flared following the 1992 beating of Rodney King in Los Angeles, remain an urgent concern particularly following a summer of racial unrest that roiled American cities after the May killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis.

And the FBI has confronted a surge in violent from anti-government and racially motivated extremists. That is a familiar threat to Garland, who as a senior Justice Department official in 1995 helped manage the federal government’s response to the bombing of a government building in Oklahoma City that killed 168 people. The bomber, Timothy McVeigh, who was later executed.

Garland has called the work the “most important thing I have done” and was known for keeping a framed photo of Oklahoma City’s Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in his courthouse office in Washington.

At the time of the bombing, Garland was 42 and principal associate deputy attorney general, a top lieutenant to Attorney General Janet Reno. He was chosen to go to Oklahoma City, the highest-ranking Justice Department official there, and led the prosecution for a month until a permanent lead prosecutor was named.

Garland was selected over other contenders for the job including former Alabama senator Doug Jones, who lost his Senate seat last month, and former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates.

It is rare but not unprecedented for attorneys general to have previously served as judges. It happened in 2007 when President George W. Bush picked Michael Mukasey, a former federal judge in Manhattan, for the job. Eric Holder, President Barack Obama’s first attorney general, had also previously been a Superior Court judge.

Garland was put forward by former President Barack Obama for a seat on the Supreme Court in 2016 following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, but Republicans refused to hold hearings in the final year of Obama’s term. The vacancy was later filled by Justice Neil Gorsuch during the Trump administration.

Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refused to let the nomination move forward in the Senate in the final months of Obama’s tenure. He was criticized by Democrats this fall when he took the opposite approach toward confirming President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court pick, Amy Coney Barrett. He said the difference this time around was that the White House and Senate were controlled by the same political parties.

One year later, after the firing of FBI Director James Comey, McConnell actually floated Garland’s name as a replacement for that position, though Garland was said to be not interested.

Garland has been on the federal appeals court in Washington since 1997. Before that, he had worked in private practice, as well as a federal prosecutor, a senior official in the Justice Department’s criminal division and as the principle associate deputy attorney general.


American Philosophical Association: General Discussion Digest for Tuesday January 5, 2021.

 

Discussions

started 6 days ago, Keith Parsons (59 replies)
Teaching Philosophy to Deeply Religious Students   external link to thread view
1. Hello Prof.Keith, One of the suggestion that... Sivaram Sivasubramanian
2. Mark, I have told people that my two favorite... Keith Parsons
3. Sivaram, I think that bringing in empirical... Keith Parsons
4. Hello Professor, Many thanks for your... Sivaram Sivasubramanian
5. You're right. Gantry was a strong movie, in its... Mark Coppenger
6. Your reference to "thinking hats" reminds me of... Mark Coppenger
7. Or, to use biblical categories, unregenerate and... Mark Coppenger
8. Let me pitch in another way to usher into the... Mark Coppenger
started 28 days ago, Jacob Andrews (8 replies)
Thought experiments to explain metaethical positions   external link to thread view
9. Dr. Drange: That's fair. I've heard people take... Jacob Andrews
10. Dr. Coppenger - Using legal cases is an... Jacob Andrews
11. For starters, let me send you a copy of my case... Mark Coppenger
12. Well thank you, that's very kind of you! I look... Jacob Andrews

Tuesday, January 5, 2021

PENNSYLVANIA: REMEMBER THIS ARTICLE ON THE 2016 ELECTION? DON'T LET TRUMP AND HIS GANG OF REPUBLICAN TRAITORS, AIDED BY MOSCOW, HURT YOUR STATE ANY FURTHER.

 DON'T LET THESE FASCIST RUSSIAN STOOGES DO ANY MORE DAMAGE.

DEMOCRATS IN PENNSYLVANIA: DON'T BE SCAMMED AGAIN!!! DEMOCRATS CONFIDENT IN PENNSYLVANIA? REMEMBER 2016...


American Flag, Usa Flag, Textured, Rough, Harsh, Coarse


THE SPECIAL ELECTION ON MARCH,13,2018 IN PENNSYLVANIA HAD THE DEMOCRATS FEELING CONFIDENT...

REALLY? HOW ABOUT THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. 
IS THE STATE PARTY LEADERSHIP ACTUALLY 
GOING TO PAY ATTENTION: THIS TIME!!!!

HERE ARE THE RESULTS FROM 2012 AND 2016                       
ELECTION RESULTS FOR PRESIDENT.                                      

PENNSYLVANIA- 2012 ELECTION. TOTAL # OF DEMOCRAT\REPUBLICAN VOTES: 5,670,708.

TOTAL DEMOCRATIC VOTES- 2,990,274.

TOTAL REPUBLICAN VOTES- 2,680,434.

MARGIN OF DEMOCRATIC VICTORY- 309,840 VOTES.

PENNSYLVANIA- 2016 ELECTION.  TOTAL # OF DEMOCRATIC/REPUBLICAN VOTES: 5,897,174.  UP +226,466 VOTES FROM 2012 ELECTION.

TOTAL DEMOCRATIC VOTES- 2,926,441 VOTES, LOSS OF 63,833 VOTES FROM 2012 ELECTION.

TOTAL REPUBLICAN VOTES-  2,970,733 VOTES, GAIN OF +290,299 VOTES.


HERE IS A BREAKDOWN:

The TOTAL # OF  DEMOCRAT/REPUBLICAN VOTES INCREASED +226,466 votes from
2012-2016.

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY LOST 63,833 VOTES BETWEEN 2012 AND 2016, OR ABOUT -2.1%. In itself, that's 
not a drastic decline. It would be considered a result that is well within normal expectations.

HOWEVER, THE REPUBLICAN PARTY NUMBERS ARE ANOTHER MATTER. AN INCREASE OF +290,299 VOTES REPRESENTS ABOUT AN + 10.8% INCREASE.

This number, (+290,299), is more than 4 times the number 
of votes that the Democrats lost.

TO ACHIEVE THE TOTAL OF 2,970,733 VOTES IN 2016, THE REPUBLICAN PARTY NEEDED A SCENARIO LIKE THE FOLLOWING TO HAPPEN:

EVERY SINGLE VOTER WHO CAST A BALLOT FOR THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN 2012, HAD TO DO SO AGAIN IN 2016: 2,680,434 VOTES.

EVERY NEW VOTER WHO CAST A BALLOT FOR EITHER THE DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE, HAD TO CHOOSE REPUBLICAN: +226,466 VOTES.

THAT TOTAL= 2,906,900 IS STILL SHORT OF THE "OFFICIAL" TOTAL OF 2,970,733 VOTES.

HOW COULD THIS BE? THE REPUBLICANS WERE STILL 63,833 VOTES SHORT OF THE FINAL NUMBER. WELL, GO BACK A FEW PARAGRAPHS AND CHECK OUT THE NUMBER OF VOTES THE DEMOCRATS LOST FROM 2012-2016= -63,833.

TO ACHIEVE A TOTAL OF 2,970,733 VOTES IN 2016, HERE IS RUNDOWN OF WHAT THE REPUBLICANS NEEDED TO HAPPEN:

EVERY REPUBLICAN VOTER FROM 2012, RETURNS AND VOTES REPUBLICAN AGAIN IN 2016: 2,680,434.

EVERY NEW VOTER WHO SELECTS EITHER DEM.\REP. IN 2016, CHOOSES REP.: 226,466.

EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE 63,833 VOTERS THE DEM. PARTY LOST BETWEEN 2012- 2016, RETURNS TO THE POLLS AND VOTES REPUBLICAN.

2,680,434 + 226,466 + 63,833 = 2,970,733.

THIS IS LUDICROUS. NO REASONABLE INDIVIDUAL WHO LOOKS AT THESE NUMBERS COULD TAKE THEM SERIOUSLY. 


THIS ELECTION WAS A SHAM. 

DON'T TAKE MY WORD, GO OVER THE RESULTS 
CAREFULLY. 

DEMOCRATS IN PENNSYLVANIA: DON'T BE SCAMMED AGAIN!!!

Monday, January 4, 2021

TO THE PEOPLE OF GEORGIA, ON THE EVE OF THE 2020 RUNOFF ELECTION.


I WAS A GEORGIA RESIDENT FOR 5+ YEARS, AS AN UNDERGRADUATE AT VALDOSTA 

STATE COLLEGE. (NOW UNIV.)


I REMEMBER THE KIDDING I RECEIVED IN THE DORMS AS A "YANK", BUT I LEARNED

VERY QUICKLY THAT THE PEOPLE OF GEORGIA WERE KIND AND WELCOMING, WHO 

TREATED ME, AND OTHER STUDENTS FROM OUTSIDE THE REGION, WITH RESPECT AND

 TOLERANCE. 


THIS INCLUDED FELLOW STUDENTS AND PROFESSORS WELCOMING ME INTO THEIR 

HOMES DURING HOLIDAY RECESSES AT VSC, WHEN RETURNING TO MY HOME IN MASS.

WOULD BE A FINANCIAL HARDSHIP. 


GEORGIA, THE HATE AND IGNORANCE OF DONALD TRUMP AND HIS ALLIES IS NOT 

YOU. THE LOVE OF FRIENDS AND FAMILY, AND BEHAVIOR THAT IS DIGNIFIED AND 

HONORABLE SHOULD BE YOUR LEGACY. DON'T LET DONALD TRUMP AND HIS 

CANDIDATES SHAPE THE DESTINY OF YOUR GREAT STATE.


WITH GRATITUDE AND RESPECT,

DAVID MCDONALD.