About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Thursday, May 28, 2020

WAKE UP PROGRESSIVES: FACEBOOK PROTECTS TRUMP. HERE IS A SAMPLE OF POSTS THAT WERE REMOVED FROM THE SITE.

OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS, FACEBOOK HAS ADOPTED A POLICY OF CENSORING ANTI-TRUMP MATERIAL. THEY DON'T BOTHER FACT CHECKING, FOR TRUTH IS SACRIFICED TO PROTECT KING DONALD. THIS ALLOWS HIM TO CONTINUE HIS SELF-CENTERED DESIRE TO TURN THE U.S. INTO A FASCIST UTOPIA, RUN BY WHITE SUPREMACISTS, NEO-NAZIS, RELIGIOUS ZEALOTS, RADICAL ISOLATIONISTS, AND ANTI-INTELLECTUAL IDEOLOGISTS.

 BELOW IS A FEW EXAMPLES, BUT REMEMBER THIS: TWITTER IS FACT CHECKING THE INFORMATION DONALD TRUMP IS POSTING. HOWEVER, FACEBOOK IS REMOVING THE POSTS ENTIRELY, REGARDLESS OF THE ACCURACY OF THE CONTENT.

 LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT: FACEBOOK BLOCKS THE
ARTICLES AND POSTS YOU SEE BELOW, BUT ALLOWS
GROUPS LIKE THOSE MENTIONED ABOVE TO OPERATE
WITHOUT ANY SANCTIONS.
I WAS INFORMED BY A READER THAT FACEBOOK IS NOW BLOCKING POSTS CRITICAL OF DONALD TRUMP, POSTED BY ELECTED DEMOCRATS IN THE U.S. SENATE AND THE HOUSE OF REP. TO VERIFY, I ASKED THE INDIVIDUAL TO TRY POSTING THE FOLLOWING EXAMPLES. GUESS WHAT?

Donald Trump, Pop Art, Edit, Dollar

Our 21-0 record against Trump. WASH. ATTORNEY GENERAL BOB FERGUSON. Your message couldn't be sent because it includes content that other people on Facebook have reported as abusive.


Trump's racist words against my colleagues. U.S. REP. JENNIFER WEXTON. Your message couldn't be sent because it includes content that other people on Facebook have reported as abusive.



AMY KLOBUCHAR: AT LEAST ONE CAND. FOR THE WHITE HOUSE WAS PAYING ATTENTION. Your message couldn't be sent because it includes content that other people on Facebook have reported as abusive.


The best argument I've seen for checks and balances. PAT LEAHY. Your message couldn't be sent because it includes content that other people on Facebook have reported as abusive.

Kamala Harris and "Medicare for All." BERNIE SANDERS.Your message couldn't be sent because it includes content that other people on Facebook have reported as abusive.


How my Medicare for All plan works. KAMALA HARRIS.Your message couldn't be sent because it includes content that other people on Facebook have reported as abusive.


I WONDER IF THEY ARE PAID IN DOLLARS OR RUBLES?








SEARCHINGFORREASON.NET
THE 2018 MID-TERM ELECTIONS: LEARNING NOTHING FROM THE 2016 ELECTION DEBACLE.
If you have spent virtually any amount of time on this website, the topic of the 2016 Presidential Election would be something that wo...
caution-traingle
This post goes against our Community Standards, so no one else can see it.



SEARCHINGFORREASON.NET
THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. IT WAS THIS BAD...THIS ELECTION WAS A SHAM!
IT WAS THIS BAD... Any Analysis of the 2016 Presidential Election, MUST…
caution-traingle
This post goes against our Community Standards, so no one else can see it.








SEARCHINGFORREASON.NET
WORTHWHILE OR WORTHLESS- A CONSUMER GUIDE TO AVOIDING SCAMS AND SCOUNDRELS. THE ADVERTORIAL- SELLING THE "NEWS?" #2.
I have been using DONALD TRUMP, AND HIS FREQUENT APPEARANCES ON THE INTERNET, AS EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT WAYS CERTAIN MARKE...
caution-traingle
This post goes against our Community Standards, so no one else can see it.


caution-traingle
This post goes against our Community Standards, so no one else can see it.





SEARCHINGFORREASON.NET
SELLING AMERICAS SOUL- "PRESIDENT" DONALD TRUMPS LATEST ADVERTORIAL.
The DEMOCRATIC PARTY, AND THE MEDIA, FREQUENTLY COMMENT ON DONALD TRUMPS BUSINESS ARRANGEMENTS, AS HE ASSUMES THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF POTUS....
caution-traingle
This post goes against our Community Standards, so no one else can see it.
caution-traingle
This post goes against our Community Standards, so no one else can see it.
caution-traingle
This post goes against our Community Standards, so no one el







SEARCHINGFORREASON.NET
THE MUELLER REPORT. PART 2. COLLUSION OR DELUSION. READ ON.
(THE INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN THIS ARTICLE IS TAKEN FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL BARRS LETTER TO CONGRESS SUMMARIZING THE FINDINGS OF...

caution-traingle
This post goes against our Community Standards, so no one else can see it.









Posted by at No comments:

Wednesday, May 27, 2020

NORTH AMERICAN KANT SOCIETY MEMBER MEETING JUNE 3rd.

Dear David McDonald,
As mentioned in an earlier email, I will be convening a meeting on June 3 to discuss the proposed changes to the NAKS constitution: Proposed Amendments to NAKS constitution May 2020.pdf
After this meeting (subject to the outcome of the discussion), the voting period on the proposed amendments will begin.
The meeting will be at 12 p.m. US Central time, and I hope to complete the discussion within an hour. All members are welcome. I have pasted the Zoom invitation below. (Please note the password on the invitation.) Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
With best regards,
Rachel Zuckert, President

Rachel Zuckert is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.

Topic: NAKS member meeting 2020
Time: Jun 3, 2020 12:00 PM Central Time (US and Canada).
Posted by at No comments:

THE CLOWN PRINCE OF THE "FASCIST/REPUBLICAN" PARTY THROWS ANOTHER TEMPER TANTRUM. AFTER ALL, NO ONE SHOULD FACT CHECK HIM!!!




(THIS IS THE "REAL" DONALD TRUMP: AN INTELLECTUAL LIGHTWEIGHT, AND MORAL DEGENERATE, WHO BELIEVES "FREEDOM OF SPEECH" DOES NOT INCLUDE ARTICLES 
PUBLISHED BY  AUTHORS WHO DISAGREE WITH HIS JUVENILE RAMBLINGS. THIS EXTENDS TO HIS INABILITY TO ACTUALLY FACT CHECK SPECIFIC ASSERTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS HE OFFERS TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.)
DAVID MCDONALD, PUBLISHER.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

CNN- POLITICS.

Trump threatens to crack down on social media platforms after Twitter labels his tweets.



729627 CNN Digital Expansion Washington DC 2020, Brian Fung

By Brian Fung, CNN
Updated 10:59 AM ET, Wed May 27, 2020



Twitter fact-checks Trump's tweets for the first time
Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump on Wednesday threatened to "strongly regulate" or even shut down social media platforms after Twitter applied a fact-check to two of his tweets this week.
Trump did not elaborate on what actions he could take. But the threat is Trump's clearest expression of intent to use the power of government to target his perceived political enemies in the private sector -- businesses that already enjoy wide latitude under the law to moderate their platforms as they see fit. And it raises the stakes for Twitter and Facebook as they grapple with Trump's misleading claims about mail-in voting and his baseless insinuations that a cable TV news host had a hand in an aide's death decades ago.
"Republicans feel that Social Media Platforms totally silence conservatives voices. We will strongly regulate, or close them down, before we can ever allow this to happen," Trump tweeted Wednesday. He went on to accuse the tech industry of trying to interfere in the 2016 election, before repeating an unfounded claim about voter fraud stemming from mail-in ballots.
"We can't let large scale Mail-In Ballots take root in our Country," Trump tweeted. "It would be a free for all on cheating, forgery and the theft of Ballots. Whoever cheated the most would win. Likewise, Social Media. Clean up your act, NOW!!!!"
    Facebook and Twitter declined to comment Wednesday.
    MORE FROM CNN POLITICS ON CORONAVIRUS POLLING
    Later Wednesday morning, Trump teased a "big action" regarding social media but declined to elaborate on what that could be.
    Trump's Twitter outburst followed an unprecedented decision by the platform on Tuesday evening to apply a fact-checking label to Trump's content for the first time.
    The label, which Twitter has designed to combat misinformation and unverified claims, linked to a curated page with links and summaries of articles describing how Trump's claims on mail-in ballots are unfounded.
    Shortly after the labels were applied, Trump took to Twitter to claim the company "is interfering in the 2020 Presidential Election" and "stifling FREE SPEECH." He added that he "will not allow it to happen!"
    But Twitter's fact-checking decision raised further questions about whether it would apply the same treatment to Trump's misleading claims about Lori Klausutis, the aide to former Rep. Joe Scarborough, a prominent critic of Trump. In recent days, Trump has leveled unsubstantiated allegations at Scarborough suggesting he was responsible for Klausutis's death. The claims have been undermined by the official autopsy, which found Klausutis had an undiagnosed heart condition. Klausutis's husband, Timothy Klausutis, reiterated that in a letter to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey last week, saying that Trump's claims denigrated the memory of his wife for perceived political gain.
    Twitter has told CNN Business that it will not be removing the tweets about Scarborough.

    Trump's options limited

    Trump's options for cracking down on social media are somewhat limited, legal experts say.
    The most "obvious" course of action, according to Andrew Schwartzman of the Benton Institute for Broadband and Society, would be for Trump to seek changes to the Communications Decency Act, which shields tech platforms from legal liability for a wide range of online content.
    There has been an ongoing push, led by the Justice Department and Republicans in Congress, to do just that. Changing the law would require building broad consensus in a deadlocked Congress. The Trump administration could not go it alone. A new law that specifies how tech companies must police their platforms could raise questions about the law's constitutionality.
    On Wednesday, Federal Communications Commission member Jessica Rosenworcel, a Democratic-affiliated commissioner on the five-member commission, appeared to allude to that when she tweeted the text of the First Amendment.
    Trump could pressure agencies such as the FCC and the Federal Trade Commission to take action against social media companies. But the agencies have previously resisted efforts by the White House to transform them into arbiters of political speech, and experts say the FCC lacks jurisdiction anyway over Twitter and Facebook.
    Privately, officials from the FCC and FTC have expressed concerns about a prior proposal from the White House to appoint those agencies as direct regulators of political content on social media.
    Meanwhile, major tech industry players remain under federal and state antitrust investigation. But antitrust probes tend to be highly technical and are usually limited to the impact of corporate conduct on competition in the marketplace.
    David Vladeck, a Georgetown University law professor and former top FTC consumer protection official, said any government push to restrict how private platforms moderate their websites could raise First Amendment questions.
    "This is just another example of Trump thinking that the Constitution makes him a king, but it doesn't," he said.

    Long-standing complaints from conservatives

    Trump and conservatives have long complained that tech platforms algorithmically censor right-wing voices. The claims derive from a perception that Silicon Valley's largely left-leaning workforce has designed social media products to discriminate against conservatives, though the companies strongly deny the allegations.
    Some executives, like Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, have sought to accommodate conservative voices by meeting with them privately, and even meeting with Trump himself.
      Trump has previously suggested that the US government could take action against media he dislikes. Last year, the White House set up a website to solicit complaints from the public about tech companies' perceived political bias, and Trump has called for an examination of NBC's television license, even though it does not have one.
      Earlier this month, Trump tweeted: "The Radical Left is in total command & control of Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Google," and promised, without specifics, that his administration would "remedy this illegal situation." Following that tweet, The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump has considered establishing a White House commission to study allegations of conservative bias.
      Posted by at No comments:
      Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)