About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Tuesday, July 2, 2024

IF I WERE PRESIDENT BIDEN, HERE IS A POSSIBLE RESPONSE THAT ADDRESSES THE RECENT SCOTUS DECISION ON PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY.


"My fellow Americans, I speak to you with the Legal Power to do as I wish to anyone I wish. The recent SCOTUS decision has given me the status of Dictator, where I cannot be held legally accountable for any Criminal Activity I may engage in, as long as I invoke my Official Capacity as President."

"Actions such as Murder, Treason and Accepting Bribes are perfectly acceptable to 6 members of this SCOTUS. They are Activities that the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES may now engage in, with no fear of future penalties from our Legal System."

"However, I BELIEVE THIS RULING IS CLEARLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND SUCH BEHAVIORS THAT ARE NOW LABELED AS PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE WOULD VIOLATE THE OATH OF OFFICE I TOOK TO SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE U.S."

"I believe that certain members of this "Version" of the SCOTUS have, in this decision and several others, shown themselves to be a possible Treasonous and Criminal Element determined to destroy our Republic by undermining Judicial Precedent and passing down Decisions that are clearly contrary to what is contained with the body of the Constitution. Even worse, it seems to be their intent to give aid and comfort to the Enemies of the U.S. BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC."

"I am, therefore, asking the Dept of Justice and the Attorney Generals Office to begin a thorough Criminal Investigation into all 9 members of the U.S. Supreme Court, WITH THE GOAL OF ESTABLISHING ANY VIOLATIONS OF OUR LEGAL SYSTEM THAT THEY HAVE ENGAGED IN. Why? Are the Decisions they have handed down the result of Illegal Influences that show a disregard for the Rule of Law, and make them Legally and Morally Incapable of the Trust of the American People."

"The Justices of the SCOTUS are NOT IMMUNE FROM BEING CHARGED CRIMINALLY, AND FOR THE SAKE OF THE FUTURE OF OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, THIS IS A PATH THAT MUST BE TAKEN."

Thank You for Listening.

Monday, July 1, 2024

WHEN YOU GIVE A GUN TO A MONKEY... WHEN YOU GIVE A BLACK ROBE TO A FASCIST...

 

Sunday, June 30, 2024

Special Newsletter | What We Do After the Debate. INDIVISIBLE. (Also a note from this Sites Publisher)

 Indivisible Logo

David,

I’ve timed this newsletter to come after our movement’s Weekend of Action around the Dobbs anniversary, and after the first presidential debate. This is a rapid response newsletter, so let’s get right to it the News, the Brag, and the Discussion.

The News: That debate…oof.

Here’s my personal opinion on the debate: Biden turned in a terrible performance and Trump was an unhinged, nonsensical, lie-spewing, convicted felon who refused to accept the last election results or the next one. It was painful to watch.

But here’s the thing: Ultimately my personal opinion on this doesn’t matter. I know who I’m voting for. You know who you’re voting for. We don’t need convincing. The question is what impact this had on the voters who aren’t already with us -- the folks who don’t like politics, who find elites of both parties untrustworthy, and who aren’t currently thinking about the stakes of this election.

In the days to come, we're going to get a ton of data on how these voters reacted to the debate. Frankly, there's no reason to think Biden won people to our side. I also don't think there's much reason to think Trump won them over, either.

But let's not skip over the damage Trump did to himself. He refused not once, not twice, but three times to accept the results of this election. He refused again to accept the results of the last election. And he bragged about killing Roe and opening the floodgates to attacks on reproductive rights around the country. You don’t have to be a Democratic campaigner in the spin room to recognize all that is deeply unpopular and bad for Trump.

You’re going to hear me repeat this a lot in the months to come: When voters focus on the personalities, we struggle. When voters focus on the stakes, we win. And what all the data so far tells us is that many, many voters do not yet understand the stakes. 

I wish Biden had done better in this debate. But there is no world where Biden could carry this message on his own regardless of how well he landed his lines. He’s an elected politician and a member of one of our two national, unpopular political parties. Our target audience -- those folks who legitimately are torn between voting for Biden, voting third party, or not voting at all -- view him and others in his class with skepticism. Mathematically speaking, most of them did not even tune into the debate.  

You and I know these stakes -- it’s what makes us so engaged in this fight. And we need to blast it out again and again and again, in as many creative ways as possible, in the hope that eventually it will break through with the voters we need. Not the first or second time, but maybe the eighth or ninth. 

So here’s my real take on the debate: Ask not what Biden can do to win the election; ask what you can do to help defeat Trump. And that brings us the brag: 

The Brag: But what can we do? Lots.

In these virtual pages, I’ve been writing about the two-year anniversary of the Republicans overturning Roe for a couple months. When nearly a third of voters blame Biden or aren’t sure who to blame for killing Roe, we know we have to correct the record or risk losing in November. But far more important than what I write here is what Indivisible movement leaders do to take narrative advantage of this moment. Here’s the strategic logic of this work:

The problem: Many voters who support reproductive rights aren’t paying close enough attention to assign blame to Trump and Republicans for attacking reproductive rights.

The message: Republicans stacked the court with right-wingers to kill Roe, enacted state abortion bans across the country, and are actively blocking the Right to IVF Act and the Right to Contraception Act. 

The messenger: Biden and other elected Democrats can carry the right message, but for that message to get through to the voters we need to reach, we need the right messengers. And there’s no better messenger than friendly fellow community members.

The opportunity: On the anniversary of the Dobbs decision overturning Roe, journalists will be looking for hooks for their articles. This gives us an opportunity to influence the narrative.

And that’s what Indivisibles did this week:

Local Indivisible groups orchestrated 150 events in 30 states and 45 cities with more than 50 press hits all over the country. Here are some great ones that stood out to me: 

Before a single vote is cast -- before we even start doing any GOTVing -- this is how we focus public attention on the stakes. The right message, the right messengers, again and again and again.

When Indivisible is doing its part right, we’re supporting this local group work on the ground. And I find our work on this SUPER brag-worthy:

  • We released a toolkit with everything groups needed to know to plan an event. We also sent out supplemental docs with creative visual ideasmessaging guidance, and funding info.
  • We hosted two trainings, a community planning space, and office hours to make sure folks had the support they needed in planning events.
  • 14 organizers worked with 172 groups around the country to plan events.
  • We designed signs that groups could print locally and graphics to promote their events.
  • The press team directly prepped advisories, pulled press lists, and pitched eight events to local media, and provided training support to a ton more.
  • We sent out personalized recruitment emails for 65 events and texts for 10 events.
  • We directly funded events through GROW Grants and the reimbursement requests are still coming in! (Hey, did you host an event? You can apply for a reimbursement for event materials here)
  • We dedicated 1,850 total staff hours to support groups and staff everything.

I want more of this over the next four months. We need more of this over the next four months. And more of this costs money. And that money comes from the pockets of grassroots supporters. Grassroots supporters like you. Please chip in if you can.

The discussion: Movement vibe check and coffee chat Monday!

About six months ago, I included a simple survey to take a vibe check of the movement. We’re halfway through the year and past the first presidential debate, and I know folks are having a lot of feelings after that debate. So I want to check again on how you and your community are feeling. The specific question is this: As you think about your own community -- the community that was involved in building the Blue Wave in 2018, defeating Trump in 2020, and holding back the red wave in 2022 -- how engaged are they now? On a scale of depressed, dejected, and fatalistic to willing to crawl over broken glass on their hands and knees to defeat Trump again. Or, to make it simpler, on a scale of 1 (disengaged) to 5 (highly engaged).

If you’ve got a minute to give me some additional texture, it’s always helpful to read through your responses!

11
2
3
4
5

And reminder: Leah and I will be holding another friendly afternoon coffee Q&A this Monday at 4pm ET/1pm PT. You can sign up here. If you’ve never come before, drop on by! It’s an informal space where we talk about the state of the campaign, organizing tactics, messaging strategies, political anxieties, fears, and hopes. If you have come before, come again and bring a first-timer with you. Hope to see you there!

In solidarity,
Ezra


************************************************************************

From David McDonald, Publisher.

Just want to point out one thing: I think it is very important to contrast personalities. Trumps history of Lies and Falsehoods, A constant string of Juvenile Insults against the opposition, Outright threats against opponents (Even attacking his one-time allies), His legal failures which include being held Civilly Liable for Sexual Assault, Repeated Attacks against Law Enforcement for holding him responsible, Admiration for Despots around the World (Who hold the type of power he wishes he had) TELL US ONE THING: TRUMP IS A SOCIOPATH WHO BELIEVES NOTHING HE SAYS OR DOES SHOULD RESULT IN ANY FORM OF PENALTY. I CAN'T THINK OF ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO EXHIBITS THESE PERSONALITY TRAITS AS BEING ANYTHING BUT MENTALLY UNSTABLE. THAT IS HIS PERSONALITY, AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD BE REMINDED OF THIS CONSTANTLY.

Friday, June 28, 2024

A REMINDER: ONE EXAMPLE OF HOW AN ILLEGALLY ELECTED PRESIDENT GAVE US A CORRUPT U.S. SUPREME COURT.

 

REMEMBERING THE KAVANAUGH HEARINGS: TRUMP AND FASCISM TRIUMPH.

SINCE THE DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP IN THE SENATE,  AND THE "LIBERAL " NEWS MEDIA SEEM TO HAVE FORGOTTEN WHAT OCCURRED DURING THE BRETT KAVANAUGH HEARINGS FOR HIS APPOINTMENT TO THE SUPREME COURT, HERE IS A REMINDER. THIS IS WHAT YOU GET WITH A FASCIST WHITE HOUSE,  AND AN INEPT AND UNCONCERNED OPPOSITION PARTY.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

BLAST FROM THE PAST: THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU ALLOW CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION TO BECOME CORRUPTED BY SELF-SERVING POLITICIANS, INCOMPETENT JURISTS, AND AMORAL LAWMAKERS.

 

REMEMBERING THE TIME WHEN THE U.S. HANDED TRUMP AND HIS BAND OF CORRUPT GOP FASCISTS THE OPPORTUNITY TO DESTROY OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.

FROM NPR NEWS- 6/27/2019.
In a 5-4 decision along traditional conservative-liberal ideological lines, the Supreme Court ruled that partisan redistricting is a political question — not reviewable by federal courts — and that those courts can't judge if extreme gerrymandering violates the Constitution.

WHAT DO YOU GET WHEN YOU IGNORE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, AND ALLOW THE OPPOSITION TO CONTROL THE SELECTION PROCESS FOR A NEW SUPREME COURT JUSTICE?

Image result for mitch mcconnell images- public domain photos

OR

WHAT DO YOU GET WHEN YOU DO NOT CHALLENGE BOGUS RETURNS IN A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, HANDING THE WHITE HOUSE TO A SELF - CENTERED DEMAGOGUE?

Image result for donald trump images- public domain photos



ANSWER TO BOTH.

YOU GET DONALD TRUMPS CHOICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT.


Image result for judge kavanaugh images- public domain photos



XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

THE FOLLOWING IS TAKEN FROM JUDGE BRETT KAVANAUGHS' TESTIMONY BEFORE THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, REGARDING ACCUSATIONS MADE AGAINST HIM.

"This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit, fueled with apparent pent-up anger about president trump and the 2016 election, fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record. Revenge on behalf of the Clintons and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups. This is a circus. The consequences will extend long past my nomination. The consequences will be with us for decades."

WHAT AN INTELLECT!! FITS IN WITH TRUMP AND MCCONNELL PERFECTLY.
WHAT ELSE CAN WE TAKE FROM THIS?

#1. Anger-  Does this reference the Unconstitutional denial of President Barack Obamas choice for the Supreme Court, Merrick Garland, a chance to testify before the Senate, to be followed by a public vote? 

BUT YOU'RE BEING TREATED UNFAIRLY. REALLY?

#2. President Trump and the 2016 Election- You mean an election with Bogus Returns in at least 6 States that handed Donald Trump the White House, paving the way for him placing 2 Judges on the Supreme Court.

Do you mean "FEAR" of having the future course of Judicial Precedents decided by DONALD TRUMP, whose behavior while in the WHITE HOUSE is often considered to be IRRATIONAL AND VINDICTIVE? 

#3. Revenge on behalf of the Clintons- I assume you have the facts to back this up, since this is a direct accusation. Also, Do you mean that the Clintons planned and executed these plans directly, or are unwitting pawns that had no knowledge about the attempt to create this "Circus"?

IS THIS HOW A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SHOULD CONDUCT HIMSELF IN THE FACE OF ADVERSITY?




Washington Dc, Boulevard, Avenue, Street

So, What do I mean when I say: TODAYS DONALD TRUMP IS WHAT 
HE WAS ALLOWED TO BECOME...

Ask yourself the following question: OF THE THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT;  EXECUTIVE, LEGISLATIVE, AND JUDICIAL, WHAT IS THE HIGHEST OFFICE/MOST POWERFUL POSITION THAT CAN BE OCCUPIED IN EACH BRANCH?

ANSWER.

EXECUTIVE-    PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.

LEGISLATIVE-  U.S. SENATE MAJORITY LEADER.
                     SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REP.

JUDICIAL-        ONE OF THE NINE MEMBERS OF THE
                       U.S. SUPREME COURT.

Now, in most recent history, what events have most influenced the
current state of each office. 

For that, let's go back a few years.

THE SUPREME COURT.

On FEB,13, 2016 SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA passed away.
THEN PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, following procedures Set forth in the U.S.
CONSTITUTION, nominated JUDGE MERRICK GARLAND TO FILL THE VACANCY.       

The following passage is taken from the U.S. CONSTITUTION.


"...and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for..."

However, for the first time in U.S. HISTORY, THE U.S. SENATE DID NOT MEET TO QUESTION
THE NOMINEE, SO THAT THEY COULD "ADVISE" THE PRESIDENT, AND VOTE TO APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE OF THE JUDGE GARLAND NOMINATION. SENATE MAJORITY LEADER MITCH MCCONNELL DECIDED THAT CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IS NOT A DUTY OR OBLIGATION THAT THE U.S. SENATE HAS, BUT CAN BE FOLLOWED WHENEVER THEY FEEL LIKE IT. SO, HE REFUSED TO SEAT THE SENATE TO ACT ON THE NOMINATION.

GIVEN SENATOR MCCONNELLS LEGISLATIVE HISTORY, I DON'T EXPECT MUCH IN THE WAY OF FAIR AND INTELLECTUALLY JUSTIFIABLE REASONS FOR THE POLITICAL AGENDA HE PUSHES. HOWEVER, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTIES REFUSAL TO FILE SUIT, AND BRING THIS MATTER INTO COURT TO FORCE MCCONNELL AND OTHER REPUBLICANS TO OBEY THE OATH THEY TOOK TO "SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION," SHOWED AN INEXPLICABLE LACK OF MORAL AND INTELLECTUAL COURAGE. WHAT MESSAGE DO YOU THINK THIS SENT TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? TO BAD, IT WAS ONLY THE BEGINNING.