About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Thursday, July 13, 2023

AN ANALYSIS OF THE SUPREME COURT RULING THAT WEBSITE DESIGNER CAN REFUSE TO CREATE SAME-SEX WEBSITE(S). PART 3.

 

To try and obscure the matter, the Majority brings in two cases...

A Veterans organization- Was allowed to hold a Parade without including Specific

Homosexual Element in it: Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc

The Boy Scouts were allowed to exclude Homosexuals as Scout Masters: Boy Scouts of America v. Dale.

...to justify its decision in finding for the Plaintiff.

The SCOTUS knows full well that PRIVATE MEMBERSHIP GROUPS: CIVIC GROUPS,

FRATERNITIES, GENDER SPECIFIC, FAITH OREINTED., etc are exempt from many

Discrimination Charges because they are not LICENSED BUSINESSES WHICH OPERATE

IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR, OFFERING SPECIFIC SERVICES AND/OR PRODUCTS.

The Plaintiff was engaged in offering the PUBLIC GOODS/AND OR SERVICES under a BUSINESS 

LICENSE OBTAINED FROM GOVERNMENT and is not an exempted entity.


Wednesday, July 12, 2023

THE FPA VOTES AGAINST, THEN TAKES CREDIT FOR IT. ("LOOK AT THE MONEY WE GOT, ITS GREAT EVEN THOUGH I VOTED AGAINST IT.")

ANOTHER FINE MOMENT FOR THE FASCIST PARTY OF AMERICA.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX





Buttigieg: Many Republicans stood in the way and denounced it as socialism. Of course, what's remarkable is it turns out that they don't think it is socialism when it's coming to their district.


WATCH VIDEO BELOW:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1678943092223688711

Monday, July 10, 2023

WHEN SOMEONE SUPPORTS DONALD TRUMP, HERE IS WHAT YOU GET.

FAMILY OR STRANGER

FRIEND OR FOE

WHEN SOMEONE SUPPORTS DONALD TRUMP, HERE IS WHAT THEY ARE OK WITH.


Set aside the fact that Donald Trump...

...being held liable for 
Sexually Assaulting a Woman.

...Under indictment for Felonies.

...Several different Investigations
for other possible Criminal Acts.

Here is the REAL DONALD TRUMP IN HIS OWN WORDS AND ACTIONS.

6/15/2015
TALKING ABOUT MEXICO.


"They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people."


7/12/2015

TRUMP ON MUSLIMS.

"Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what the hell is going on."                                                                                                                      


1/23/2016

COMMIT MURDER? DONALD IS NEVER TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE, ESPECIALLY BY HIS SUPPORTERS.

"I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose voters."

3/30/2016.

Trump on abortion.

“Do you believe in punishment for abortion – yes or no – as a principle?”

“The answer is there has to be some form of punishment.”

“For the woman?”

“Yeah, there has to be some form.”


8/10/2016. 

NOTHING LIKE SUGGESTING ASSASSINATION.

CANDIDATE TRUMP  TALKING ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON,

“If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. 

Although the second amendment people, maybe there is, 

I don’t know. But I’ll tell you what, that will be a horrible day.”


12/8/2017

IN TRUMPS WORLD, INNOCENT VICTIMS ARE GUILTY

IF THEY'RE KILLED BY HIS SUPPORTERS.

Trump on the violence committed by Domestic Terrorists

in CHARLOTTESVILLE, N. CAROLINA.

“We condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides. On many sides.”


6/4/2018

PRESIDENT TRUMP CAN PARDON...PRESIDENT TRUMP.

"...I have the absolute right to PARDON myself..."


11/1/2018.

DONALD TRUMP OM IMMIGRATION.

“Why are we having all these people from shithole countries coming here?”


The following exchange occurred during a White House Press conference on Wednesday, Sept 24, 2020.

 “Win, lose, or draw in this election, will you commit here today for a peaceful transferal of power after the election?” reporter Brian Karem asked Donald Trump, who didn’t even attempt to give the impression he cares whatsoever about preserving democracy. “Well, we’re going to have to see what happens,” Trump said. “You know that. I’ve been complaining very strongly about the ballots, and the ballots are a disaster.” Pressed again to “commit to making sure that there’s a peaceful transferal of power,” Trump responded, “Get rid of the ballots and...we’ll have a very peaceful—there won’t be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation. The ballots are out of control. You know it. You know who knows it better than anybody else? The Democrats know better than anybody else.”

''...Pressed again to “commit to making sure that there’s a peaceful transferal of power,” Trump responded, Get rid of the ballots and...we’ll have a very peaceful—there won’t be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation."

THE STATEMENT: “Get rid of the ballots and...we’ll have a very peaceful..."   IS AN ASSERTION OF FACT BY TRUMP, AND MEANS THE FOLLOWING:

TRUMP IS CLAIMING THAT HE  KNOWS WHAT WILL BRING FORTH A PEACEFUL RESOLUTION. WHETHER OR NOT HE CAN MAKE IT HAPPEN, OR HAS KNOWLEDGE OF WHAT WILL OCCUR SHOULD THIS REQUIREMENT FOR A "PEACEFUL RESOLUTION" NOT BE MET IS IRRELEVANT.  "GET RID OF THE BALLOTS" IS A "DO WHAT I WANT" OR "PAY THE PRICE" ULTIMATUM.

SO DONALD IS NOW THE SUPREME JUDGE ON WHETHER ELECTION RESULTS SHOULD BE HONORED, OR VOIDED.


TRUMP TALKS ABOUT RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN THE 2016 ELECTION.WHOM DOES TRUMP BELIEVE: U.S. INTELLIGENCE OR VLADIMIR PUTIN?

HOW DOES THAT OLD SAYING GO? YOU DON'T BITE THE HAND THAT FEEDS YOU. https://youtu.be/mBtsNNXjBPw


Saturday, July 8, 2023

AN ANALYSIS OF THE SUPREME COURT RULING THAT WEBSITE DESIGNER CAN REFUSE TO CREATE SAME-SEX WEBSITE(S). PART 2.

 


In trying to justify their decision, the Six Person Majority invokes Free Speech;

(a) The framers designed the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to protect the “freedom to think as you will and to speak as you think.”

The freedom of thought and speech is “indispensable to the discovery and spread of political truth.”

 "...it is the principle that the government may not interfere with “an uninhibited marketplace of ideas,” 

It is obvious from the above statements, that this Majority is ruling against previous Judicial Precedent, and fly in the face of Constitutional Principles in JUSTIFYING DISCRIMINATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR.

The Majority is making a Decision that mixes two different principles; That "FREEDOM OF SPEECH" protects you from possible negative consequences by Government for expressing certain opinions publicly, but it does not necessarily protect you from IMPLEMENTING THOSE OPINIONS INTO ACTIONS.

For example; I believe that my restaurant should be for White People Only, and I want to only serve that part of the Public. I express that opinion publicly, and wish the Law Reflected that belief. That expression of my opinion is protected, however, Constitutional Law will not allow me to act on it.

Well, that was the way Judicial Precedent used to work. The Majority of the current SCOTUS has decided that your personal prejudices, in terms of acting on them, should be protected just as much as your ability to express them. This is a deliberate attempt to create Social and Political Anarchy, and is exactly what FASCISTS LOOK FOR IN TAKING CONTROL OF ANY SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT.

...to be continued