In trying to justify their decision, the Six Person Majority invokes Free Speech;
(a) The framers designed the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to protect the “freedom to think as you will and to speak as you think.”
The freedom of thought and speech is “indispensable to the discovery and spread of political truth.”
"...it is the principle that the government may not interfere with “an uninhibited marketplace of ideas,”
It is obvious from the above statements, that this Majority is ruling against previous Judicial Precedent, and fly in the face of Constitutional Principles in JUSTIFYING DISCRIMINATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR.
The Majority is making a Decision that mixes two different principles; That "FREEDOM OF SPEECH" protects you from possible negative consequences by Government for expressing certain opinions publicly, but it does not necessarily protect you from IMPLEMENTING THOSE OPINIONS INTO ACTIONS.
For example; I believe that my restaurant should be for White People Only, and I want to only serve that part of the Public. I express that opinion publicly, and wish the Law Reflected that belief. That expression of my opinion is protected, however, Constitutional Law will not allow me to act on it.
Well, that was the way Judicial Precedent used to work. The Majority of the current SCOTUS has decided that your personal prejudices, in terms of acting on them, should be protected just as much as your ability to express them. This is a deliberate attempt to create Social and Political Anarchy, and is exactly what FASCISTS LOOK FOR IN TAKING CONTROL OF ANY SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT.
...to be continued
