About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Monday, January 9, 2023

I OFFERED A SHORT ANSWER TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTION BY QUORA: How does the US define a 'refugee'?

This answer is for general knowledge and is not a complete and comprehensive definition.

A REFUGEE, by definition, is an Individual who seeks to move or live in another Country or Jurisdiction, because of Traumatic, Destructive, or Inhumane conditions that exist in their current place of Residence, be it a Region or Country.

A Refugee- Seeks Sanctuary or Asylum to alleviate the suffering that specific living conditions in their current place of habitation or residence are causing them.

Refugee status, if allowed, does not grant Individual Citizenship. It is generally a HUMANITARIAN GESTURE TO AID THOSE LIVING IN INTOLERABLE CONDITIONS, TO BE ALLOWED SANCTUARY UNTIL THE CONDITIONS THAT CAUSED THEIR CHOOSING TO LEAVE ARE ALLEVIATED OR ENDED.

The cause(s) for seeking Refugee or Asylum status could be events such as Change of Government, War or Domestic Strife, Natural Disasters, Famine, or Pestilence.

Can a Refugee become a Resident or Legal Immigrant? Yes, but that is a different process, and is not automatic. A different set of Rules and Standards apply.




A COUPLE OF MORE SHORT TWITTER RESPONSES.

 JUST ANNOUNCED: Senator Lindsey Graham said: "I have military retirement, Congress pension plan, if you asked me to take a little less to save Social Security..count me in.."

Don't let Senator Graham speak for YOU! REMIND him Social Security is OUR money!

MY RESPONSE:
Not Fair, without the current exchange rate for Rubles to Dollars, we have no way of knowing the Value of your I.R.R.A. (Individual Russian Retirement Account) What is the going rate for selling out your country, or are you TRUMPING YOUR MONEY? (FOREIGN BANK ACCOUNTS).



Heartland Signal
Newly elected Minnesota State Sen. Nathan Wesenberg (R) suggests jailing Gov. Tim Walz (D) over COVID-19 mandates and refers to the vaccine as "a death shot" in one of his first public speeches since his election.


MY RESPONSE:
Replying to
It's nice the "BLITHERING IDIOT" BRIGADE OF THE FASCIST GOP CAN EXIST OUTSIDE OF TEXAS AND FLORIDA. Is he looking for an "IRON CROSS", OR AN "ORDER OF STALIN" MEDAL?

A SHORT TWITTER RESPONSE TO A TRUMPIAN/FASCIST STOOGE.

 Rep. Elise Stefanik

@RepStefanik
House Republicans are ready to get to work on behalf of the American people!

MY RESPONSE:

Translation: On behalf of the Richest, Fascist, Bigoted, Xenophobic, and Homophobic Americans. You know the ones who lost big in the 2020 and 2022 elections.

Sunday, January 8, 2023

TIME TO GET SERIOUS...WHY ARE THE DEMOCRATS CELEBRATING? THEY CONNED YOU GOOD.


It's 2023, and even 7 years or so after a rigged election gave an undeserving Donald Trump the White House, the Democrats are still finding ways to allow the Far-Right Fascists that run the GOP to achieve success that competent opposition should have prevented.

How the seeming mishandling of the election for Speaker Of The House Of Rep. by the GOP could turn into a key victory for them points to the continuing lack of proper leadership that has plagued the Democrats for years. For every victory by Progressives and Liberals throughout the U.S. is achieved, other elements, such as the Incredible Incompetence of the Democratic Leadership in States such as Florida and Texas, often negate very positive outcomes elsewhere.

Now we come to the election of the Speaker.

We knew the following going in;

- The GOP held a small majority, so the speaker was coming from their ranks.

- That the Mid-Term results were a major defeat for the Rep. Party. The so-called

"RED WAVE" never came ashore, and Donald Trump Endorsed Candidates were 

defeated regularly in both State and Federal Elections.


With the Senate Remaining in Democratic Hands, what could the GOP do to bolster the

FASCIST and TREASONOUS ELEMENT of the Party so that they could remain the party

of Putin and Trump, with Ideological heroes in Hitler and Stalin?


Why get the opposition to do it for them.


The First Vote, and the Subsequent Dozen or so Votes following showed McCarthy with the support of 

around 200 members of the GOP, with the TREASON CAUCUS SUPPOSEDLY REFUSING TO 

BACK HIM. That left him short of the needed votes. The Democrats rejoiced.


WHAT THEY SHOULD HAVE DONE WAS: REALIZE THAT WHEN MCCARTHY MADE HIS 

FIRST INITIAL "CONCESSION" TO THE FAR-RIGHT ELEMENT OF THE GOP, AND NONE OF

THE OTHER "ANGRY" 200 MCCARTHY SUPPORTERS VOICED ANY OPPOSITION TO THAT

CONCESSION, THAT THEY WERE BEING SCAMMED. THIS WAS REINFORCED WHEN NO 

OTHER MEMBER OF THE GOP MOUNTED ANY SERIOUS OPPOSITION. (HOW THAT RED 

FLAG WAS IGNORED IS MIND-BOGGLING)


MCCARTHY WAS THE GUY FROM THE BEGINNING, BUT THE DEMOCRATS FELL FOR IT 

HOOK, LINE, AND SINKER. THEY COULD VOTE ALL DAY FOR A DEMOCRAT TO BE 

HOUSE SPEAKER, BUT THAT WASN'T GOING TO HAPPEN, AND THEY SHOULD HAVE 

KNOWN THAT.


WHEN THE FIRST CONCESSION WAS ANNOUNCED, THE DEMOCRATS SHOULD HAVE

REALIZED WHAT WAS HAPPENING AND DONE THIS:

EITHER:

GO UP TO MCCARTHY, TELL HIM TO KNOCK IT OFF OR:

- THEY WOULD FIND AS MODERATE A REPUBLICAN AS POSSIBLE, AND NOMINATE THAT

PERSON AS A REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE TO TRUMPIANS AND FASCISM. WITH ALL 

DEMOCRATS ON BOARD, IT WOULD NEED ONLY A HANDFUL OF GOP REPS. FOR 

VICTORY.

OR

- ANNOUNCE THAT THEY WERE WITHDRAWING THEIR OPPOSITION TO MCCARTHY, NOT 

BECAUSE HE WAS A DECENT AND HONEST POLITICIAN, (HE'S NOT), BUT BECAUSE THE 

EXTREMIST ELEMENTS OF THE GOP WERE USING THIS TO SPREAD TRUMPIAN AND 

FASCIST CONTROL OVER THE HOUSE OF REP., SOMETHING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAD

DECISIVELY REJECTED, BY HAVING MCCARTHY OFFER "CONCESSIONS" TO HIS OWN 

PARTY.

DEMOCRATS, WHY ARE YOU CELEBRATING? THEY MADE FOOLS OF YOU.