This U.S. Supreme Court isn't about Intellectually and Reasonably applying Constitutional Law to todays Social and Political Issues. It's about finding any excuse to install Fascism in the U.S. PART 2.

To understand the direction being taken by this version of the SCOTUS, it is necessary to actually READ AND UNDERSTAND WHAT IS BEING RULED UPON, AND EXACTLY WHAT THOSE RULINGS MEAN. Further, are recent Decisions Justified?  Are ReasonablyValid Arguments being put forth that are Structurally Sound, and can withstand proper scrutiny?

I'll start out the analysis with a simple Quiz. Here is a Transcript of the First Two Amendments to the U.S. CONSTITUTION. THE BEGINNING OF WHAT IS MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE BILL OF RIGHTS.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II

A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

As you can see, these Amendments mention:

- RELIGION.

- SPEECH.

- THE PRESS.

- ASSEMBLY

- PETITION AND REDRESS.

-  ARMS.

Seems pretty straightforward, doesn't it? Where is the Controversy?

After all, they are all on equal footing, Right? No Differences, no Reason

to look any closer, Right? WRONG.

THERE ARE DIFFERENCES, AND THEY CAN BE FOUND, AND ANALYZED

PROPERLY. GUESS WHAT? YOU DON'T NEED A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE 

TO DO THAT. (Which turns out to be a very good thing)

SEE PART 3.

U.S. SENATOR WARNOCK ACCEPTS THE CHALLENGE...BALL IS IN YOUR COURT CANDIDATE WALKER.

FROM TWITTER:

Reverend Raphael Warnock

@ReverendWarnock

·

My opponent has said if I name the place, he'd be there ready to debate. Then I guess I’ll be seeing you in Macon on October 13th and in Atlanta on October 16th. Is that right, Herschel Walker?

Nichelle Nichols, Lt. Uhura on ‘Star Trek,’ has died at 89. ABC NEWS.

 

ByLINDSEY BAHR AP Film Writer

Relatives say Sunday that Nichelle Nichols, who broke ground for Black women acting on television as the beautiful, no-nonsense communications officer Lt. Nyota Uhura on the original “Star Trek” TV series, has died at the age of 89.

Her son Kyle Johnson said Nichols died Saturday in Silver City, New Mexico.

“Last night, my mother, Nichelle Nichols, succumbed to natural causes and passed away. Her light however, like the ancient galaxies now being seen for the first time, will remain for us and future generations to enjoy, learn from, and draw inspiration,” Johnson wrote on her official Facebook page Sunday. “Hers was a life well lived and as such a model for us all."

Her role in the 1966-69 series as Lt. Uhura earned Nichols a lifelong position of honor with the series’ rabid fans, known as Trekkers and Trekkies. It also earned her accolades for breaking stereotypes that had limited Black women to acting roles as servants and included an interracial onscreen kiss with co-star William Shatner that was unheard of at the time.

“I shall have more to say about the trailblazing, incomparable Nichelle Nichols, who shared the bridge with us as Lt. Uhura of the USS Enterprise, and who passed today at age 89,” George Takei wrote on Twitter. “For today, my heart is heavy, my eyes shining like the stars you now rest among, my dearest friend."

THE ENEMY OF THE TRUMP/GOP DOCTRINE OF PROMOTING IGNORANCE AND MINDLESS OBEDIENCE.