TRUMP HAS, ONCE AGAIN, MADE A FOOL OF HIMSELF BY SEEKING TO MISUSE THE JUSTICE SYSTEM.

SINCE I HAVE PUBLISHED NUMEROUS ARTICLES GOING BACK TO DEC., 2016, REGARDING THE BOGUS RESULTS THAT GAVE THE WHITE HOUSE TO DONALD TRUMP, I SEE NO NEED TO BRING THEM UP HERE. ( THERE IS PLENTY OF INFO. ON THE WEBSITE THAT WILL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.)

THE FOLLOWING ARE EXCERPTS FROM THE WASHINGTON POST ARTICLE, 

Judge dismisses Trump lawsuit against Hillary Clinton over 2016 election- ByAzi Paybarah

Updated September 9, 2022 at 7:41 p.m. EDT|Published September 9, 2022 at 11:43 a.m. EDT

A federal judge in Florida has dismissed Donald Trump’s lawsuit against former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, saying there was no basis for the former president to claim that Clinton and her allies harmed him with an orchestrated plan to spread false information that his campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 presidential race.

Trump “is seeking to flaunt a two-hundred-page political manifesto outlining his grievances against those that have opposed him, and this Court is not the appropriate forum,” Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks of the Southern District of Florida wrote in a scathing 65-page ruling dated Thursday. The judge also wrote about “the audacity of Plaintiff’s legal theories and the manner in which they clearly contravene binding case law.”

Middlebrooks noted “glaring structural deficiencies in the plaintiff’s argument” and said that “such pleadings waste judicial resources and are an unacceptable form of establishing a claim for relief.” (1) SEE BELOW.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

...Middlebrooks criticized the quality of the legal work presented by Trump’s attorneys.

“Many...characterizations of events are implausible because they lack any specific allegations which might provide factual support for the conclusions reached,” Middlebrooks wrote. (2) SEE BELOW.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Later, the judge took a shot at what he said was the lawsuit’s sweeping attempt to criminalize criticism of Trump, writing: “Neither politically opposing Plaintiff, disliking Plaintiff, nor engaging in political speech about Plaintiff that casts him in a negative light is illegal.”

Middlebrooks also highlighted the difference between being in conflict with Trump and causing him harm: “Opposing Plaintiff’s presidential campaign does not amount to a realized pecuniary loss. Statements to law enforcement or comments made in a political campaign are not intended to induce others not to deal with Plaintiff or his business, or to cause direct or immediate financial loss.”

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE MY OWN- DAVID.

1- An ABUSE OF PROCESS is the unjustified or unreasonable use of legal proceedings or process to further a cause of action by an applicant or plaintiff in an action. It is a claim made by the respondent or defendant that the other party is misusing or perverting regularly issued court process (civil or criminal) not justified by the underlying legal action.

2- "EMPTY" ASSERTION-  ANY STATEMENT, (WRITTEN OR ORAL), THAT CLAIMS TO BE FACTUAL, BUT HAS LITTLE SUPPORTING EVIDENCE OR DATA THAT CAN WITHSTAND PROPER SCRUTINY.  In many cases, the act of criticizing the Assertion is discouraged, AND IT MUST BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT QUALIFICATION.