Officers provide first-hand accounts as January 6
commission holds first hearing on US Capitol attack
Tuesday, July 27, 2021
THE HOUSE OF REP. HEARS FIRST DAY TESTIMONY ABOUT THE JANUARY, 6TH, 2021 ATTACK ON THE U.S. CAPITOL.
Monday, July 26, 2021
THIS IS WHAT A "DICTATOR" SOUNDS LIKE. TRUMP "THREATENS" THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. PART 1.
THE FOLLOWING EXCHANGE SHOULD BE PRINTED IN EVERY TEXTBOOK. BE IT;
- PHILOSOPHY.
- HISTORY.
- POLITICAL SCIENCE.
- SOCIAL STUDIES.
- CIVICS.
...EVEN LAW.
IT IS THE WORDS OF A TRAITOR AND A SEDITIONIST.
The following exchange occurred during a White House Press conference on Wednesday, Sept 24, 2020.
“Win, lose, or draw in this election, will you commit here today for a peaceful transferal of power after the election?” reporter Brian Karem asked Donald Trump, who didn’t even attempt to give the impression he cares whatsoever about preserving democracy. “Well, we’re going to have to see what happens,” Trump said. “You know that. I’ve been complaining very strongly about the ballots, and the ballots are a disaster.” Pressed again to “commit to making sure that there’s a peaceful transferal of power,” Trump responded, “Get rid of the ballots and...we’ll have a very peaceful—there won’t be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation. The ballots are out of control. You know it. You know who knows it better than anybody else? The Democrats know better than anybody else.”
''...Pressed again to “commit to making sure that there’s a peaceful transferal of power,” Trump responded, “Get rid of the ballots and...we’ll have a very peaceful—there won’t be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation."
THE STATEMENT: “Get rid of the ballots and...we’ll have a very peaceful..." IS AN ASSERTION OF FACT BY TRUMP, AND MEANS THE FOLLOWING:
TRUMP IS CLAIMING THAT HE KNOWS WHAT WILL BRING FORTH A PEACEFUL RESOLUTION. WHETHER OR NOT HE CAN MAKE IT HAPPEN, OR HAS KNOWLEDGE OF WHAT WILL OCCUR SHOULD THIS REQUIREMENT FOR A "PEACEFUL RESOLUTION" NOT BE MET IS IRRELEVANT. "GET RID OF THE BALLOTS" IS A "DO WHAT I WANT" OR "PAY THE PRICE" ULTIMATUM.
SO DONALD IS NOW THE SUPREME JUDGE ON WHETHER ELECTION RESULTS SHOULD BE HONORED, OR VOIDED.
HITLER, STALIN, MAO ZEDONG, POL POT etc., would be so proud.
Saturday, July 24, 2021
THE YEAR: 2100. THE PLACE: HISTORY CLASS. THE SUBJECT: EARLY TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY POLITICS. PART 2.
NOW CLASS, YOU HAVE BEEN TESTED REGARDING THE PRESIDENTIAL RESULTS FROM
2008-2020. BEFORE WE GO THROUGH THE RESULTS, I WOULD LIKE YOU TO ANALYZE
THE ELECTION RESULTS FOR THE U.S. SENATE DURING THAT SAME PERIOD. FOR EXTRA
CREDIT, WRITE AN ESSAY IDENTIFYING ANY RESULTS THAT MIGHT INDICATE ELECTION
FRAUD, AND IF SO, HOW THEY MIGHT COINCIDE WITH PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION FRAUD
FROM THE SAME ERA.
THE INFORMATION BELOW, TOGETHER WITH THE DATA FROM THE QUIZ ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS FROM THE SAME TIME PERIOD, YOU WILL USE TO ARGUE AND JUSTIFY ANY CONCLUSIONS THAT YOU MAKE.
COLUMN 1- WHICH PARTY RECEIVED THE HIGHEST % OF THE POPULAR VOTE FOR ALL SENATE ELECTIONS HELD THAT YEAR.
COLUMN 2- # OF SENATE SEATS CONTESTED.
COLUMN 3- THE # OF SEATS WON BY THE PARTY WITH THE HIGHEST % OF THE NATIONAL VOTE, AND WHAT % THAT NUMBER REPRESENTS OF THE TOTAL # OF SEATS CONTESTED.
THE STATS BELOW ARE TAKEN FROM WIKIPEDIA, AND MAY NOT BE THE OFFICIAL NUMBERS. THEY SHOULD BE VIEWED AS A GUIDE.
1. 2018 DEM- 58.2% 33 22, 66.7%
2. 2012 DEM- 53.4% 31 23, 74.2%
3. 2016 DEM- 53.0% 34 12, 35.3%
4. 2008 DEM- 51.9% 35 20, 57.1%
5. 2014 REP- 51.5% 36 24, 66.7%
6. 2020 REP- 49.3% 35 20, 57.1%
7. 2010 REP- 48.2% 37 24, 64.9%
Thursday, July 22, 2021
HOW PROUD THE NAVY MUST BE: ANOTHER TRUMPIAN BUFFOON PUTS HIS FOOT IN HIS MOUTH.
Republican Rep. Ronny Jackson tried to criticize Democrats on their COVID-19 vaccination rates — except all of them are vaccinated.
huffpost.com/entry/ronny-ja via @HuffPostPol
Wednesday, July 21, 2021
LIZ CHENEY PROVES THAT AT LEAST ONE REPUBLICAN IS AGAINST COMMITTING TREASON AND SEDITION.
Liz Cheney told reporters that she agreed with Nancy Pelosi's veto, adding that “at every opportunity, the minority leader has attempted to prevent the American people from understanding what happened" on Jan. 6. ow.ly/DAUu50FAViU
Tuesday, July 20, 2021
Monday, July 19, 2021
THE YEAR: 2100. THE PLACE: HISTORY CLASS. THE SUBECT: EARLY TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY POLITICS. PART 1..
THE YEAR IS 2100. HIGH SCHOOL FRESHMAN.
WELCOME TO AMERICAN HISTORY. TODAY WE ARE GOING TO BEGIN OUR STUDY
OF EARLY 21ST CENTURY POLITICS. TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU ALREADY KNOW, BELOW
ARE THE RESULTS OF THE 2008,2012,2016,2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS. YOUR JOB IS
TO MATCH THE NUMBERS IN THE FIRST THREE COLUMNS.
- % OF THE NATIONAL VOTE FOR ALL 8 DEM./REP. CANDIDATES.
- WINNERS VICTORY MARGIN IN % OF VOTE.
- WINNERS VICTORY MARGIN IN # OF VOTES.
WITH THE CORRESPONDING OUTCOMES.
- # OF ELECTORAL VOTES FOR THE WINNER.
- # OF STATES CARRIED BY THE WINNER.
AFTER THEY ARE GRADED, WE WILL DISCUSS THE SIGNIFICANCE IF EACH. THERE
WILL BE A SPECIAL LOOK AT THE POSSIBILITY OF ELECTION FRAUD, AND SEE IF
ANY OF THESE RESULTS LEND CREDENCE TO SUCH ACCUSATIONS.
GOOD LUCK.
BOTH CANDIDATES. WINNER. WINNER.
% NATIONAL VOTE VICTORY MARGIN % VICTORY MARGIN #
1- OBAMA, 2008, 52.9% 1-OBAMA, 2008, +7.2% 1- OBAMA, 2008, +9,550,193
2- BIDEN, 2020, 51.3% 2- BIDEN, 2020, +4.4% 2- BIDEN, 2020, +7,058,637
3- OBAMA, 2012, 51.06% 3- OBAMA, 2012, +3.86 3- OBAMA, 2012, +4,982,291
4- CLINTON, 2016, 48.18% 4- TRUMP, 2016, -2.09% 4- TRUMP, 2016, -2,868,686
5- ROMNEY, 2012, 47.20%
6- TRUMP, 2020, 46.90%
7- TRUMP, 2016, 46.09%
8- MCCAIN, 2008, 45.70%
WINNER. WINNER.
MOST ELECTORAL VOTES. CARRIED MOST STATES
365 30 + ME-02
306 26 + DC
Saturday, July 17, 2021
BLAST FROM THE PAST: THE RUSS-PUBLICAN PARTY, THE RUSSIAN GRU, AND TRUMPS DEFENSE TEAM CARE ABOUT ONE THING: DESTABILIZING THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, TREASON IS NOT AN OBSTACLE.
WHEN YOU READ ABOUT THE DISINFORMATION, ACTS OF VIOLENCE, AND THE KNOWLEDGE ACQUIRED FROM BOTH TRUMP IMPEACHMENT TRIALS, AND THE MUELLER REPORT, ONE THING BECOMES APPARENT: THE CAPITOL INSURRECTION LED BY TRUMP WAS SIMPLY AN ALTERNATE PLAN TO WEAKEN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, BOTH DOMESTICALLY AND INTERNATIONALLY.
WHEN THE "FIX" FAILED IN THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, UNLIKE 2016, PLAN B WAS TO UTILIZE TRUMPS YEARS OF COURTING AND SUPPORTING XENOPHOBIC, RACIST, WHITE SUPREMACIST HATE GROUPS etc, TO DO WHAT A LEGAL ELECTION COULD NOT DO: RETURN HIM TO POWER, OR SO WEAKEN THE U.S. SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT THAT HOSTILE FOREIGN POWERS WOULD BE ABLE TO TOPPLE THE U.S. FROM THE POSITION AS THE WORLDS LEADING ECONOMIC, MILITARY AND POLITICAL POWER.
United States Code at 18 U.S.C. § 2381
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
TWITTER: US POLITICS.
There’s no evidence of Antifa involvement in the US Capitol insurrection, according to NBC, Snopes and fact-checkers.
Hundreds of people have been arrested for their involvement in the January 6 insurrection at the US Capitol. Dozens of those arrested have proven connections to far-right movements, according to NPR. There is no evidence that anyone involved in the insurrection has any connection to the Antifa movement, according to The New York Times, Snopes and other fact-checkers.
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW.
- Former President Trump's impeachment defense team falsely claimed that Antifa was involved in the January 6 insurrection, according to NBC News and Axios
- Dozens of people arrested for their involvement in the January 6 insurrection have connections to far-right movements, according to NPR
- There is no evidence that anyone involved in the insurrection has any connection to the Antifa movement, according to Snopes and The New York Times.
NBC NEWS@NBCNEWS.COM
Fact check: Trump attorney suggests Antifa was involved in infiltrating Trump supporters during Jan. 6 protests.
There’s no evidence of widespread Antifa involvement and no criminal complaints filed so far accuse anyone of being involved with Antifa.
ALEXA AND ITS PARTNERS ARE SCAMS.
JUST A REMINDER, ANY ANALYSIS DONE BY ALEXA OR ONE OF ITS PARTNERS IS A SCAM,
AND DESIGNED TO FORCE WEBSITES TO DO BUSINESS WITH THEM.
A GOOD EXAMPLE WAS AN ANALYSIS THAT JUST APPEARED ON SOMETHING CALLED
XXXXXX*. THE NUMBERS ARE FALSE, WHICH IS WHY I PUBLISH MY GOOGLE
NUMBERS DAILY. HERE IS SOMETHING ELSE THAT COMES DIRECTLY FROM THEIR PAGE:
WEBSITE OVERVIEW: ...Expiration of searchingforreason.net will occur on September 23rd in 2017...This domain's WHOIS records was updated on September 25th in 2016.
WOW... I'm in trouble...my website expired almost 4 years ago. WAIT A SECOND...IT SAYS "WILL EXPIRE." I THOUGHT THIS WAS 2021.
"BEAM ME UP SCOTTY, NO INTELLIGENT LIFE FOUND HERE..."
*I HAVE BLACKED OUT THE NAME, NO FREE PUBLICITY. HOWEVER, I HAVE SAVED THE PAGE, JUST IN CASE.
IF YOU COME ACROSS "INFORMATION" LIKE THE ABOVE, OR "DATA" THAT CONTRADICTS THE OFFICIAL NUMBERS I GET FROM GOOGLE DIRECTLY, YOU ARE DEALING WITH A FRAUD.
Thursday, July 15, 2021
BREAKING DOWN THE MUELLER REPORT: FOR ANSWERS, LOOK IN THE RIGHT PLACES.
(Remember, this re-posting of articles on the Mueller Report is in response to what former Trump DOJ spokesperson Sarah Isgur said on ABC’s This Week on Sunday. THIS IS WHAT SHE SAID:"The SCO was charged with investigating whether the Trump campaign criminally colluded with Russians to influence the 2016 election. They did not find sufficient evidence to bring charges—that’s exonerating. My larger point was that Trump didn’t care—hence the acts of obstruction!"
BACK TO THE ANALYSIS:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(Any words that are colored RED represent portions of the Transcript that were BLACKED OUT,
AND COULD NOT BE READ.WORDS LIKE "INVESTIGATIVE TECHNIQUE" OR "HARM TO ON GOING MATTER", ARE NOT MY CREATION, BUT WERE PLACED OVER BLACKED OUT AREAS.)
As you go through the MUELLER REPORT, there is one very important detail that must be acknowledged: IT IS THE STORY OF TWO INVESTIGATIONS. Why do I say this? BECAUSE CONCLUSIONS DRAWN WERE NOT ARRIVED AT BY THE SAME PROCESS,WITH JUST ONE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OR INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE FOR EVALUATING EACH EVENT, AND THE VALUE OF THE CORRESPONDING EVIDENCE.
WHAT DO I MEAN? CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING EXCERPTS, TAKEN
DIRECTLY FROM THE TEXT. (IN ITALICS)
The Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion. Evidence of Russian government operations began to surface in mid-2016.
As set forth in detail in this report, the Special Counsel's investigation established that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election principally through two operations.
First, a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
RUSSIAN SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN.
(HERE ARE SOME EXCERPTS FROM THE BODY OF THE TEXT.)
Internet Research Agency (IRA) carried out the earliest Russian interference operations identified by the investigation. A social media campaign designed to provoke and amplify political and social discord in the United States.
- The IRA was based in St. Petersburg, Russia, and received funding from Russian oligarch Yevgeniy Prigozhin and companies he controlled. Pri ozhin is widely reported to have ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin. HARM TO ONGOING MATTER.
- The campaign evolved from a generalized program designed in 2014 and 2015 to undermine the U.S. electoral system, to a targeted operation that by early 2016 favored candidate Trump and disparaged candidate Clinton.
- The IRA later used social media accounts and interest groups to sow discord in the U.S. political system through what it termed "information warfare."
-
Second, a Russian intelligence service conducted computer-intrusion operations against entities, employees, and volunteers working on the Clinton Campaign and then released the stolen documents.
RUSSIAN HACKING OPERATIONS.
(HERE ARE SOME EXCERPTS FROM THE BODY OF THE TEXT.)
At the same time that the IRA operation began to focus ·on supporting candidate Trump in early 2016, the Russian government employed a second form of interference: cyber intrusions (hacking) and releases of hacked materials damaging to the Clinton Campaign. The Russian intelligence service known as the Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Army (GRU) carried out these operations. In March 2016, the GRU began hacking the email accounts of Clinton Campaign.
In March 2016, the GRU began hacking the email accounts of Clinton Campaign volunteers and employees....the GRU hacked into the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The GRU stole hundreds of thousands of documents from the compromised email accounts and networks. Around the time that the DNC announced in mid-June 2016 the Russian government's role in hacking its network, the GRU began disseminating stolen materials through the fictitious online personas "DCLeaks" and "Guccifer 2.0." The GRU later released additional materials through the organization WikiLeaks.
The presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump ("Trump Campaign" or "Campaign") showed interest in WikiLeaks' s releases of documents and welcomed their Potential to damage candidate Clinton. Beginning in June 2016, HARM TO ONGOING MATTER forecast to senior Campaign officials that WikiLeaks would release information damaging to candidate Clinton. WikiLeaks' s first release came in July 2016.
Now, the Investigation into the above 2 categories provided enough evidence to the committee that
made them confident in drawing definite conclusions, and in some cases, filing Criminal Charges. I will cover these in more depth at a later time, but there is one more category to cover. What you read below may seem to be a part of the RUSSIAN HACKING OPERATION...
...BUT THERE IS ONE MAJOR DIFFERENCE.
EXCERPTS FROM THE BODY OF THE TEXT.
In addition to targeting individuals involved in the Clinton Campaign, GRU officers also targeted individuals and entities involved in the administration of the elections. Victims included U.S. state and local entities, such as state boards of elections (SBOEs), secretaries of state, and county governments, as well as individuals who worked for those entities. 186 The GRU also targeted private technology firms responsible for manufacturing and administering election-related software and hardware, such as voter registration software and electronic polling stations.187 The GRU continued to target these victims through the elections in November 2016. While the investigation identified evidence that the GRU targeted these individuals and entities, the Office did not investigate further. The Office did not, for instance, obtain or examine servers or other relevant items belonging to these victims. The Office understands that the FBI, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and the states have separately investigated that activity.
By at least the summer of 2016, GRU officers sought access to state and local computer networks by exploiting known software vulnerabilities on websites of state and local governmental entities. GRU officers, for example, targeted state and local databases of registered voters using a technique known as "SQL injection," by which malicious code was sent to the state or local website in order to run commands (such as exfiltrating the database contents). 188 In one instance in approximately June 2016, the GRU compromised the computer network of the Illinois State Board of Elections by exploiting a vulnerability in the SBOE's website. The GRU then gained access to a database containing information on millions of registered Illinois voters, 189 and extracted data related to thousands of U.S. voters before the malicious activity was identified.
GRU officers INVESTIGATIVE TECHNIQUE scanned state and local websites for vunerabilities. For example, over a two day period in july 2016, GRU OFFICERS INVESTIGATVE TECHNIQUE
for vulnerabilities on websites of two dozen states. INVESTIGATIVE TECHNIQUE.
Unit 74455 also sent spearphishing emails to public officials involved in election
administration and personnel at companies involved in voting technology. In August 2016, GRU officers targeted employees of **** ,a voting technology company that developed software used by numerous U.S. counties to manage voter rolls, and installed malware on the company network. Similarly, in November 2016, the GRU sent spearphishing emails to over 120 email accounts used by Florida county officials responsible for administering the 2016 U.S. election. 191 The spearphishing emails contained an attached Word document coded with malicious software (commonly referred to as a Trojan) that permitted the GRU to access the infected computer.192 The FBI was separately responsible for this investigation. We understand the FBI believes that this operation enabled the GRU to gain access to the network of at least one Florida county government. The Office did not independently verify that belief and, as explained above, did not undertake the investigative steps that would have been necessary to do so.
The Hacking operations that included the following:
- Individuals and entities involved in the administration of the elections.
- U.S. state and local entities, such as state boards of elections (SBOEs), secretaries of state, and county governments, as well as individuals who worked for those entities.
- Private technology firms responsible for manufacturing and administering election-related software and hardware, such as voter registration software and electronic polling stations.
- Employees of **** ,a voting technology company that developed software used by numerous U.S. counties to manage voter rolls, and installed malware on the company network.
- Florida county officials responsible for administering the 2016 U.S. election...
WERE NOT EVALUATED, IN TERMS OF THE QUALITY OF THE EVIDENCE, BY THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL.
FROM THE TEXT:
"While the investigation identified evidence that the GRU targeted these individuals and entities, the Office did not investigate further. The Office did not, for instance, obtain or examine servers or other relevant items belonging to these victims. The Office understands that the FBI, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and the states have separately investigated that activity."
"The Office did not independently verify that belief and, as explained above, did not undertake the investigative steps that would have been necessary to do so."
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? WHILE THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL IDENTIFIED EVIDENCE THAT THE GRU"TARGETED THESE INDIVIDUALS AND ENTITIES", NO FURTHER INVESTIGATION WAS DONE.
WHY?
"The Office understands that the FBI, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and the states have separately investigated that activity."
"The Office did not independently verify that belief and, as explained above, did not undertake the investigative steps that would have been necessary to do so."
Well this answers the question: "Who is exonerated by the Mueller Report?"
ANSWER: NO ONE. The Evaluation of the
most important information regarding fraud in
the 2016 election was not part of their
responsibility. They couldn't exonerate anyone
even if they wanted to.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)