AS THE TRIAL OF DONALD TRUMP GOES ON,
LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT THE CHARGE OF:
ABUSE OF POWER.
COMMITTING, OR AIDING AND ABETTING , A
CRIMINAL ACT THROUGH AN OFFICIAL CAPACITY,
USING THE POWER AND/OR INFLUENCE THAT IS
ACQUIRED WHILE IN OFFICE.
THIS INCLUDES ACTS THAT ENRICH THE OFFICE
HOLDER, OR OTHER SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS AND/OR
GROUPS, THAT CANNOT BE JUSTIFIED AS REASONABLE
AND RESPONSIBLE IN AN OFFICIAL CAPACITY.
To see how this played out with POTUS DONALD TRUMP,
CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING:
BRIBERY
IF THE EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT DONALD TRUMP
ATTEMPTED TO USE HIS POWER OF OFFICE TO BLOCK
FUNDS TO UKRAINE, UNLESS THEY AGREED TO
INVESTIGATE THE BIDENS, HE IS GUILTY OF BRIBERY.
Bribery is defined by Black's Law Dictionary as the offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of any item of value to influence the actions of an official, or other person, in charge of a public or legal duty.
THE OFFER: RELEASING THE FUNDS THAT HAD ALREADY BEEN ALLOCATED,
WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AN ITEM OF VALUE. SINCE THIS WAS DIRECTED AT UKRAINIAN OFFICIALS, YOU HAVE INFLUENCE THE ACTIONS.
THE DEFENSE OF: "...THE FUNDS WERE RELEASED BEFORE THE DEADLINE." IS NONSENSE. HE IS GUILTY OF "...OFFERING... GIVING...OR SOLICITING," WHICH SHOWS INTENT. THE FACT THAT HE WAS EXPOSED BEFORE UKRAINIAN OFFICIALS COULD COMPLETE THE CONDITIONS TRUMP REQUIRED BEFORE THE FUNDS WERE RELEASED IS IRRELEVANT.
No comments:
Post a Comment