KNOW YOUR OPPONENT, THEN MAKE A STAND #2. Donald Trump is a Symptom of the REAL PROBLEM, NOT THE CAUSE.

The 2016 Presidential Election, WHILE BEING A SHAM THAT IS PERHAPS THE MOST DESTRUCTIVE EVENT IN AMERICAN ELECTORAL HISTORY, HAS AT LEAST SHOWN A LIGHT ON A VERY DISTURBING TRUTH:  SOME AMERICANS ARE WILLING TO SUPPORT AN INCOMPETENT DEMAGOGUE, EVEN TO THE POINT OF DISREGARDING
RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL. (AS LONG AS SOMEONE ELSE IS VICTIMIZED).

Remember how Indignant and Horrified members of the REPUBLICAN PARTY WERE BEFORE THE GENERAL ELECTION, RELUCTANT TO SUPPORT A CANDIDATE LIKE DONALD TRUMP? EVEN BEFORE HIS NOMINATION BY THE PARTY, MANY PROMINENT REPUBLICANS, ACTIVE OR RETIRED, ATTEMPTED TO DISAVOW TRUMP AS AN UNDESIRABLE CANDIDATE.  Yet, once TRUMP was given the PRESIDENCY THOSE OUTRAGED VOICES DISAPPEARED, AT LEAST AMONG REPUBLICAN MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

IT WAS ALMOST AS IF...

...They were playing both sides of the same coin. If the "ELECTION" DIDN'T RESULT IN TRUMP ENTERING THE WHITE HOUSE, THEY COULD CLAIM THAT HE WAS NOT "THEIR" CANDIDATE, IN THAT THEY WERE FORCED TO ACCEPT HIM.

However, when TRUMP ENTERED THE WHITE HOUSE, ALL THAT VITRIOL DISAPPEARED. SUDDENLY, TRUMP WAS THEIR CHAMPION, AND THEY JUMPED ON THE BANDWAGON. The Moral Outrage was gone.

COULD IT BE...

 ...THAT A CLINTON PRESIDENCY WOULD HAVE FORCED THEM TO COMPROMISE, WITH THE MORE DRACONIAN PARTS OF THE REPUBLICAN AGENDA REPLACED OR ELIMINATED.

IN THE END, TRUMP COULD BE CAST AS EITHER FRIEND OR FOE.

Look for the next post on this subject.

FEATURE ARTICLES. WHY DO POLITICIANS LIE? PT 1.

It is a Question that has been asked many Times, and by Members of every Society and Form of Government that Exists, or has Existed.

Elected Leaders of a Free Republic, Dictators for Life, Kings and Queens, Military Juntas etc., have been Lying to those whose Lives and Welfare Rest upon the Decisions They Make.

Yes, sometimes the Lies are Transparent and Easily Recognizable, and many times the Leader(s) could care less on Whether or not what They are saying is believed. After All, in many cases, there is little the Citizen or Resident could do about it anyway. Many Totalitarian Regimes, Past and Present, Placate the Population with Hollow Promises and Grandiose Speeches that are nothing more than Window Dressing for Foreign Critics. The Population has little opportunity to do much more then Grin and Bare it, and hope Things get better.

However, what Explanation can be Offered when those who are lying are Elected to Office, and Their Words are Recorded by a Media that has Few Restrictions on what can be Made Public and Known to the Entire World.

With That in Mind, The General Consensus among those in a Free Society, like the U.S., seems to be that Their Political Leaders Lie because They Don't want the People to Know the Truth. It is Believed that these Mistruths are Deliberate Attempts to Hide Immoral and/or Illegal Actions that Harm the Population and Undermine the Very Foundation of the Principles that are the Cornerstone of the Government They are Supposed to Protect.

But is this Always True? Could there be a more Reasonable Conclusion to explain such Behavior?

Yes, There are many examples of Politicians Lying to Cover- Up Illegal Activities that would Lead to Prosecution, or at least Censure and Possible Removal from Office. But these in no way Represent the Vast Majority of Cases where the Lie has no Connection with Criminal Activity or at least Behavior that can Result in Charges being brought.

To Examine this Topic More Clearly, we must first settle on a Few Definitions to separate the DIFFERENT LEVELS OF NON- TRUTHFUL COMMUNICATION THAT ARE USED IN LANGUAGE AND SPEECH.

1) LIE- THE SIMPLEST OF ALL. A LIE IS A DELIBERATE AND CONSCIOUS ACTION, WRITTEN OR SPOKEN, TO RELAY INFORMATION TO OTHERS THAT THE INDIVIDUALKNOWS IS NOT TRUE.

TO BE CONTINUED...

THE SOCIOPATH- A DANGER ALL AROUND US. "DON'T BLAME ME, YOU'RE THE PROBLEM."

Now we come to an area that is not often discussed when the definition of a "SOCIOPATH" leaves the World of Academia, and becomes a Practical Matter that Affects the Lives of those Suffering from the Malevolent Behavior of such an Individual.

Diagnosing somebody as Sociopathic isn't Easy. While the Psychiatric Profession may be Equipped to Render such a Judgment, it would not be easy unless the Potential Diagnosee agreed to Sessions that would allow Direct Contact, with Open and Unscripted Dialogue.

However, as we have seen, the Sociopath Doesn't believe they are in anyway a "HAZARD" or "DETRIMENT" to anyone else. If there is a problem, it is the Fault of others, who cannot Handle The Natural Intellectual Superiority that the SOCIOPATH feels sets them apart from "Lesser People." To put it simply, they use others because of the Weaknesses Perceived, and Tough Luck if they don't realize it. It's NOT THE SOCIOPATHS FAULT.

This is also Subject to the Willingness of the Individual under Scrutiny, to be Honest, and Forthcoming about Their Behavior, and how it affects those they come in contact with. Part of the Sociopathic Profile is the Ability to Convince others that they have Feelings, Emotions, and Reactions just like everyone else, when in fact, the SOCIOPATH has none of these.

So, in the end, it could be You, a Relative, or a Friend who is left with the Unenviable Task of Realizing someone close to you could be Sociopathic, and you must learn how to deal with it.

Unfortunately, you may end up confronting such an Individual, who has become an Important Part of your Life. Perhaps they Fulfill a certain need that has been Lacking, and that loss may seem an Unreasonable Price to pay, if you remove them from your Life altogether.

WHAT CAN YOU DO?

AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION- THE VALUE OF PUBLIC PHILOSOPHY.

(I AM A MEMBER.- DAVID.)

Dear DAVID,

I am writing today to let you know that the APA board of officers has approved the following statement, which was proposed by the committee on public philosophy and the committee on the status and future of the profession:

The American Philosophical Association values philosophers' participation in the public arena. This includes work that engages with contemporary issues as well as work that brings traditional philosophies to non-traditional settings. Public philosophy may also bring the discipline into dialogue with other humanities, the arts, natural sciences, social sciences, and interested people outside of academia. Public philosophy is done in a variety of traditional and non-traditional media. Public philosophy can be especially valuable when it reaches populations that tend not to have access to philosophy and philosophers. Further, the APA notes that public philosophy raises the profile of the discipline, the scholar, and the home institution.

The APA encourages departments, colleges, and universities to recognize public philosophy as a growing site of scholarly involvement. To that end, the APA encourages institutions to develop standards for evaluating and practices for rewarding public philosophy in decisions regarding promotion, tenure, and salary, so that faculty members who are interested in this work may, if they choose, pursue it with appropriate recognition and without professional discouragement or penalty. Although peer-reviewed scholarly publications remain central to the profession, the APA applauds philosophers' contributions to public policy, to consultation with government, medical, business, and civil society institutions, and to public opinion in general. Public philosophy presented or published outside of standard academic venues has evident value as external service to the profession and/or community. But we also urge institutions to consider broadening their standards for evidence of excellence in research and teaching and to consider whether their faculty’s work in public philosophy is more properly counted as contributing to these latter categories of faculty evaluation.

We encourage you to use this statement as a tool in your own institution to advocate for policies and practices that recognize public philosophy and all scholars who do publicly engaged work.

All the best,

Amy E. Ferrer

Executive Director

LOGIC. SEEKING THE TRUTH. HOW ABOUT REALLY LISTENING? #3.

Let us Turn to Example #2.

NEWS CONFERENCE, FOR A CANDIDATE RUNNING FOR

NATIONAL OFFICE.

Reporter- "You are Hoping to Unseat an Incumbent, who has been

in office for over a Decade. What do you Offer as Favorable Alternative,

to the Current Officeholder."

Candidate- "Im glad you asked. I represent the future of Politics, Elected

Officials who will listen to the Will of the Voters. We Need a Change of

Direction, going back to the TRADITIONS THAT MADE THIS COUNTRY

GREAT."

After Listening to this, what do we now know about the Candidate, that

could help the Voter make an Informed Decision on Election Day?

Finally, Example #3.

You are Watching T.V., and while Turning the Channel, you come Across

the Following:

Spokesperson- "Yes, I know its Hard to Believe, but Taking Just Two Pills,

Twice a Day, will result in an Almost Immediate Improvement in your Condition.

It is a Treatment Doctors and Big Pharma dont want you to Try, because They

dont make any Money off of it. The are Trying to Discredit Its Effectiveness, so

you will continue to take Their Prescriptions."

How much of what you have just Heard Sounds Truthful, and Why?

To be continued...

LOGIC. ONE WAY TO ENCOURAGE PROPER ANALYSIS: DO NOT COMBINE TWO DISTINCT ISSUES.

As the controversy about a possible RUSSIAN INVOLVEMENT IN THE 2016 U.S ELECTION HEATS UP, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE ONE THING PERFECTLY CLEAR;  MY SERIES OF POSTS TITLED, "THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION- SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG...", DOES NOT ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING:  

INFORMATION ACQUIRED, AND DISSEMINATED, THROUGH "HACKING" OR UNAUTHORIZED VISITATION TO ANY FILES, EITHER INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP.

THE MULTI-PART ARTICLE,"THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION- SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG...", DEALS WITH CALCULATED AND DELIBERATE ACT(S) OF ALTERING THE VOTING RESULTS IN AT LEAST 5 STATES, WITH THE GOAL OF ENSURING DONALD TRUMPS VICTORY IN THE 2016 ELECTION.  IN THIS POST, I WILL NOT GET INTO THE EVIDENCE, OR MY REASONING, FOR COMING TO THIS CONCLUSION. FOR THAT I REFER 
YOU TO THE SERIES OF POSTS ADDRESSING THE SUBJECT.

WHAT MUST BE MADE CLEAR IS THE FOLLOWING: THE TOPIC OF RUSSIA, OR ANY OTHER COUNTRY, INDIVIDUAL, OR GROUP BEING GUILTY OF TAMPERING WITH THE ELECTION BY PROVIDING ILLEGALLY OBTAINED INFORMATION TO ONE SIDE IN BENEFITTING THEIR CANDIDATE OF CHOICE, IS AN ENTIRELY SEPERATE ISSUE FROM THE SUBJECT MATTER CONTAINED IN MY ARTICLE. 

THE CONCLUSIONS:

X OBTAINED INFORMATION ILLEGALLY, AND PROVIDED IT TO ONE SIDE IN THE DESIRE TO BENEFIT CANDIDATE A...

AND

THE VOTING COUNTS IN ...WERE ALTERED DELIBERATELY, GIVING ELECTORAL VICTORY TO CANDIDATE B...

...ARE SEPERATE AND DISTINCT.  THE TRUTH OF ONE IS NOT DEPENDENT ON THE OTHER. THEY MAY BOTH BE TRUE, OR BOTH FALSE. ONE MAY BE TRUE, AND THE OTHER FALSE. WE MUST NOT ALLOW EVIDENCE, OR LACK OF, IN ONE CASE TO BE USED IN JUDGING THE OTHER.

FEATURE ARTICLES. THE MOST DANGEROUS ONE OF ALL. PT 5.

Let us Start the list with what may be the Most Offensive Category of Hypocrite to be found anywhere.

The RELIGIOUS HYPOCRITE- Question: How many Times can the RELIGIOUS HYPOCRITE get away with the Lying and Deceit That is the Trademark of Their Behavior?

Answers- 1) As Long as the Gullible continue to Swallow the "APOLOGIES," and FORGIVE THE LAPSES IN JUDGMENT.

2) As long as Their Double Standards and Self -Centered Lifestyle continues to Further the Interests of Others, who also Live by the same CODE OF CONDUCT.

3) Until Those who Oppose the Reasoning behind the Goals of the RELIGIOUS HYPOCRITE, Make a Stand and Show Them for what They really are; AMORAL OPPORTUNISTS WHO SEE SUCH MORAL IMPERATIVES AS FREEDOM OF RELIGION, AND THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE AS CONDITIONAL, WHERE THE DEFINITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF SUCH MAXIMS IS DEPENDENT UPON THE SITUATION. They are APPLIED WHEN AND WHERE THE RELIGIOUS HYPOCRITE BELIEVES THEY SHOULD BE.

4) When Those who Cheer the Unequal Treatment the RELIGIOUS HYPOCRITE GIVES TO CERTAIN LEGAL ISSUES, IS AS MUCH A DANGER TO THEM AS ANYONE ELSE. ITS TOUGH TO ARGUE PREJUDICE AND INEQUALITY IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM, WHEN YOUVE BEEN PUSHING THE SAME TYPE OF INVALID REASONING FOR OTHER ISSUES. Do you really Think Those WHO have been Harmed and Oppressed will Turn a Blind Eye WHEN IT IS YOUR RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS THAT ARE BEING INFRINGED UPON?

THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION- SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG. END GAME, PART 1.

I guess it is about time to put an end to the MYTHOLOGY regarding the amazing DONALD TRUMP Victory in the 2016 Presidential Election. I had hoped the DEMOCRATS would have the courage to do so, but they seem determined to perpetuate the SHAM THAT THIS ELECTION WAS, BACKED UP BY A MEDIA THAT HAS ABANDONED INTEGRITY, AND A REPUBLICAN PARTY THAT IS, WELL...

Here we go:

TOTAL VOTE COUNT, AND % OF TOTAL, ALL 50 STATES.

2016 ELECTION.

UNITED STATES  NATIONWIDE VOTE COUNT.
136,669,237.


CLINTON.                                                  TRUMP.

65,853,516.                                              62,984,825.
  48.18%                                                     46.09%

CLINTON ADVANTAGE: 2,868,691.

IN PARTS 1-8 OF THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION- SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG,
I FOCUSED ON 5 STATES IN PARTICULAR, ALL OF WHOM VOTED DEMOCRAT IN 2012, BUT CHANGED IN 2016. (INCLUDES ELECTORAL VOTES.)

FLORIDA- 29, MICHIGAN- 16, OHIO- 18, PENNSYLVANIA-20
WISC- 10.   93 ELECTORAL VOTES.

THESE ARE THE RESULTS FROM THE 5 STATES IN QUESTION.

2016 ELECTION.


                                         

 TRUMP.                           CLINTON.

FLORIDA.                       
4,617,886.                        4,504,975.

MICHIGAN.                    
2,279,543.                        2,268,839.

OHIO.                                                       
2,841,005.                        2,394,164.

PENN.                            
2,970,733.                       2,926,441.

WISC.                                                                       
1,405,284.                       1,382,536.                                     


TOTAL:
14,114,451.                     13,476,955.

TOTAL #
OF VOTES.                       27,591,406.

TRUMP
ADVANTAGE.                   637,496.

IN THESE 5 STATES, 27,591,406 VOTERS CHOSE EITHER CLINTON OR TRUMP.

51.16% FOR TRUMP
48.84% FOR CLINTON.




NOW LET US TURN TO THE REST OF THE U.S:

THROUGH SUBTRACTION, THE RESULTS ARE:

CLINTON.  65,853,516-13,476,955= 52,376,561

TRUMP.      62,984,985-14,114,451= 48,870,534

CLINTON ADVANTAGE- 3,506,027, EXCLUDING THE ABOVE 5 STATES.

IN THE REST OF THE UNITED STATES, 101,247,095 CHOSE EITHER CLINTON OR TRUMP.

51.73% FOR CLINTON.
48.27% FOR TRUMP.

So, what do we have so far. IN THE OTHER 45 STATES+ (WHICH INCLUDES EVERY SINGLE STATE THAT VOTED REPUBLICAN IN 2012 AND 2016), WE HAVE A SOLID CLINTON MAJORITY.

IN THE 5 STATES I HAVE FOCUSED ON, WE SEE A COMPLETE REVERSAL, WHICH INCLUDES MICHIGAN, PENNSYLVANIA, AND WISCONSIN, WHO HAVEN'T VOTED REPUBLICAN IN DECADES... 


STAY TUNED...

FEATURE ARTICLES. WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GOOD EVIDENCE, BAD EVIDENCE, AND EVERYTHING IN BETWEEN? PT 1.

It is a Strange World, when you Realize that Three Common Topics Covered and Discussed on TELEVISION AND RADIO;

- POLITICS.

- PSEUDOSCIENCE.

- MEDICAL AND HEALTH ISSUES.

Subjects, Which on the Surface should have very little in common, ARE SATURATED WITH BOGUS AND UNTRUTHFUL CLAIMS AND CONCLUSIONS, WHICH ARE DERIVED USING THE SAME TYPES OF IRRATIONAL, ANTI- INTELLECTUAL, AND FAULTY REASONING THOUGHT PROCESSES.

Unfortunately, THIS SEEMS TO BE WHAT THE MEDIA IS LOOKING FOR, IN THE HOPES OF INCREASED RATINGS. 

The result is that MANY OF THOSE WHO TUNE IN ARE LEFT WITH THE IMPRESSION THAT ANY ASSERTIONS MADE DURING THE PROGRAM ARE PROBABLY TRUE, BECAUSE THERE WAS NO ONE TO OFFER REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS THAT CONTRADICT THESE "TRUTHS."

I Believe that the Level of Success or Popularity these "SHOWS" Enjoy, can be Understood because of the following CHARACTERISTICS FOUND AMONG SOME OF THE VIEWING AUDIENCE:

- PREJUDICIAL ATTITUDES WHICH LOOK FOR JUSTIFICATION, NO MATTER

WHAT THE SOURCE.

- A SIMPLISTIC AND UNDISCIPLINED VIEW OF SCIENCE, AND THE

NATURAL WORLD.

- A FAITH OR BELIEF SYSTEM THAT IS SO TENUOUS, THAT IT

MUST NOT BE QUESTIONED.

- REFUSING TO CONFRONT ANY CONCLUSIONS THAT HAVE BEEN

MADE ON A PERSONAL BASIS, FOR FEAR OF WHAT IT MAY REVEAL.

...AND THE MOST TELLING OF ALL...

THAT ANY OPPOSITION, NO MATTER WHAT THE SITUATION, ISSUE

OR DISAGREEMENT IS, REPRESENTS AN EVIL CONSPIRACY,

REGARDLESS OF THE LACK OF EVIDENCE.

SEE PART 2.

FEATURE ARTICLES. THE SOCIOPATH- A DANGER ALL AROUND US. PT 16.

There is one thing that all Sociopaths have in common that sets them apart from the rest of HUMANITY, and I can't stress it enough;

THAT THEY ARE UNABLE TO FEEL ANY EMPATHY TOWARDS ANOTHER PERSON. IT COULD BE A PARENT, CHILD, RELATIVE, CLOSE FRIEND, OR A COMPLETE STRANGER. THEY DONT UNDERSTAND FEELINGS SUCH AS LOVE, SADNESS, GUILT, WORRY ETC., EVEN WHEN THEY ARE PRESENT IN OTHERS. WHY? BECAUSE THESE ARE EMOTIONS THAT ARE FOREIGN TO THEM, SO THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND THE REASONING TO ADAPT THEIR BEHAVIOR TO WHAT OTHERS ARE FEELING OR NEEDING AT A TIME OF CRISIS.

As we have seen, the Hierarchy of Sociopaths, is often measured by the Ability to Adapt their Behavior to what is expected. It is the Primary way of getting what they want, and the ability to remain unrecognized as Sociopathic, is how well they are able pull off this Deception.

However, keep one thing in mind. No matter how Genuine or Realistic their Behavior seems at times, especially when exhibited during times of Great Stress that others are going through, it is an Act. They are playing a Part, doing things that they believe are expected of them. The Turmoil and Emotional Mind Sets that are present among those involved in a given Conflict or Situation, are alien to the Sociopath. In Fact, the Sociopath considers such emotions as Flaws and Weaknesses, that make others Fair Game to Use and Exploit.

This leads to another Characteristic found among Sociopaths; A BELIEF THAT THEY ARE SUPERIOR BEINGS, NOT WEIGHTED DOWN BY CONSCIENCE, OR FEELINGS OF GUILT AND REMORSE. EVERYONE ELSE WHO FEELS SUCH THINGS, IS MENTALLY HANDICAPPED, AND DESERVES TO BE USED AND EXPLOITED.

Remember, that Sociopathy is not a MENTAL ILLNESS. There are no Biological or Chemical factors that have caused this World View. It is not the result of Genetics gone wild, or problems during Pregnancy. UNLIKE, THE PSYCHOPATH AND SCHIZOPHRENIC, WHO CAN BE DIAGNOSED AND TREATED, THE SOCIOPATH CANNOT BE "CURED" IN THE TRADITIONAL SENSE.

WORTHWHILE OR WORTHLESS- A CONSUMER GUIDE TO AVOIDING SCAMS AND SCOUNDRELS. THE ADVERTORIAL- SELLING THE "NEWS?" #2.

I have been using DONALD TRUMP, AND HIS FREQUENT APPEARANCES ON THE INTERNET,  AS EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT WAYS CERTAIN MARKETERS TRY TO SELL PRODUCTS AND/OR SERVICES TO THE CONSUMER BY DISGUISING THE SALES PITCH AS A "NEWS" REPORT, ITEM, OR INVESTIGATION. IT IS A PRACTICE THAT RELIES ON THE GULLIBILITY, AND TRUST, OF SOME CONSUMERS WHO BELIEVE IN THE "INHERENT" TRUSTWORTHINESS OF THE NEWS MEDIA.

HOWEVER, THE DONALD TRUMP ADVERTORIALS ARE BY NO MEANS EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE, AND NEITHER HE, NOR THE BUSINESSES THAT USE HIS NAME, LIKENESS, AND "WORDS", ARE UNIQUE IN UTILIZING THIS DECEPTIVE SALES PITCH.

ADVERTORIALS are a common SALES AND MARKETING TECHNIQUE that inhabits every form of TRADITIONAL MEDIA that we come in contact with, often on a Daily Basis.

TV, RADIO, NEWSPAPERS, MAGAZINES etc., have been using them for years to Generate Income. (This includes the Internet of course.) However, It is important to Understand that the INFORMATION RELAYED BY SUCH PROGRAMS, STORIES, OR ARTICLES ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE EDITORIAL SCRUTINY OR OVERSIGHT THAT ARE FOUND IN GENUINE NEWS ITEMS.

KEEP IN MIND THAT THIS IS AD SPACE, OR ON AIR TIME, THAT IS BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY COMPANIES TRYING TO SELL YOU A PRODUCT OR SERVICE.

THESE INCLUDE:

HOUSEHOLD ITEMS.

- COOKWARE.

- REPAIR AND FIX-IT.

- JEWELRY.

- ALARMS, PROTECTION DEVICES.

ETC...

OR

HEALTH AND BEAUTY.

- DIET FOODS TO IMPROVE

YOUR GENERAL HEALTH.

- MAKE UP OR CLOTHES ACCESSORIES

FOR IMMEDIATE ALTERING OF YOUR

GENERAL APPEARANCE.

- EXERCISE EQUIPMENT, AND/OR

VIDEOS.

ETC...

OR

ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES.

- GENERAL INVESTMENT ADVICE.

- BUY/SELL PARTICULAR GOODS

OR COMMODITIES.

- CREATING YOUR OWN BUSINESS.

So what are the Guarantees that what you are SEEING, HEARING, OR READING REPRESENTS
TRUTHFUL OR CORRECT INFORMATION, INSTEAD OF SOMETHING CREATED BY AN AD
AGENCY, WITH THE SOLE GOAL OF SEPARATING YOU FROM YOUR MONEY.

PRACTICALLY NONE. WHY DO I SAY THIS?

HERE ARE A FEW REASONS:

- THE DISCLAIMER.

- GREAT MEDICAL BREAKTHROUGHS

ARE MADE IN THE LAB, AND VERIFIED

BY VALID PEER REVIEWS.

- INDIVIDUAL ENDORSEMENTS ARE

VIRTUALLY WORTHLESS.

- MANY OF THE "BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES",

ARE LITTLE MORE THAN MLM SCHEMES.

- BEING FAMOUS, OR RENOWNED IN ONE FIELD,

DOES NOT MEAN COMPETENCE, OR RELIABILITY,

IN OTHERS.

We Will Examine each of these in the Future.