NBC NEWS POLITICS: Former Arizona attorney general failed to release report disproving election fraud claims.

 Mark Brnovich did not release a summary from September that made it clear accusers "did not provide any evidence to support their allegations" before he left office.

By Zoë Richards

Former Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich did not release to the public findings from his office that showed a series of 2020 election fraud claims were not backed up by evidence, according to documents released Wednesday by his successor.

Attorney General Kris Mayes, a Democrat who took office last month, released the documents linked to the investigation into the handling of the election in the state.

Agents from the office of Brnovich, a Republican, had spent over 10,000 hours looking into potential voting irregularities and allegations of illegal voting, Mayes' office said in a news release. A September summary prepared by the attorney general's Special Investigations Section showed it had not turned up evidence that backed up the claims.

"In each instance and in each matter, the aforementioned parties did not provide any evidence to support their allegations," the previously unreleased summary said. "The information that was provided was speculative in many instances and when investigated by our agents and support staff, was found to be inaccurate."

According to the summary, the agents looked over 638 complaints, which led to 430 investigations into information provided to agents that was "speculative in many instances" and that when investigated was "found to be inaccurate." Only 22 cases were ultimately submitted for prosecutorial review, and at the time of the report, two indictments were obtained stemming from ballot harvesting.

Elected officials who had made public statements alleging voter fraud "did not repeat or make such assertions when questioned by our agents," the summary said.

As he was running for what ended up being a failed bid for the GOP nomination for the Senate, Brnovich issued an interim report in April addressed to then-Senate President Karen Fann, raising concerns about some voting procedures.

Although that report did not find mass fraud or conspiracy in the 2020 election, it outlined his office’s concerns with “serious vulnerabilities” involving certain procedures during the campaign, including the signature verification process and the transportation of ballots from drop box locations.

I OFFERED THE FOLLOWING SHORT ANSWER TO A QUESTION I WAS ASKED ON QUORA.COM: WHAT IS A "SECULAR STATE."

A “SECULAR STATE” in general, is a form of Government that does not allow Religious Faith or Dogma to be the basis for its Social or Legal System.

That does not mean that there is no RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, but that FREEDOM is for personal Worship, and is not ALLOWED TO BECOME PUBLIC POLICY.

A System of ETHICS AND MORAL ABSOLUTES IS CREATED APART FROM FAITH BASED SYSTEMS. WHY? RELIGIOUS FAITH, BY ITS VERY NATURE, IS ACCEPTED WITHOUT QUESTION. There is no need to justify it to others, for the belief itself is not questioned by the individual.

Certain Concepts, such as the Idea of HUMAN OR CITIZEN RIGHTS, MANIFESTED IN LAWS THAT CREATE SUCH ETHICAL “GOODS” as Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Choice, Freedom to Assemble.,etc, cannot be guaranteed, or in some cases even allowed, IN A FAITH-BASED SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT.

QUITE SIMPLY, IN A SECULAR STATE ALL EXISTING LAWS CAN BE CREATED OR ALTERED BY THE GENERAL CIVIL POPULATION. IN A FAITH-BASED SYSTEM THAT POWER EXISTS ONLY WITH THE RELIGIOUS HIERARCHY.

ANOTHER SHORT MESSAGE ON TWITTER.

 

HERE IS THE TWEET.:

@SpeakerMcCarthy

Don't you dare back off on a promise made to the people!

You have no right to protect the criminal cartel running the federal government and you know it! Put Ray Epps and Nancy Pelosi in jail where they fully belong!You need to answer all of U.S.

MY RESPONSE:

Hey GOP Trumpians, the party could have asked for the footage at any time, and still can. You, Fascists, know very well that if this comes before a committee that the Democrats have every right to examine the same film(s). Your Treason will be exposed even further.

TRUMPIAN TRAITORS ARE DESPERATE TO COVER UP THE FACT THAT THE GOP COULD HAVE ACCESS TO ANY FOOTAGE POSSESSED BY THE GOVERNMENT ON THE JAN.6TH, INSURRECTION. HOWEVER, THAT MEANS THAT ALL PARTIES CAN EXAMINE AND TEST THE VISUAL EVIDENCE. (Like that footage provided by the JAN,6TH, COMMITTEE.)

1

25

THIS IS THE KIND OF PHOTOSHOPPED PIECE OF GARBAGE THAT TWITTER ALLOWS TO BE PUBLISHED UNCRITICALLY.

PEOPLE HAVE ASKED ME WHY I AM STILL ON TWITTER. WELL, IT IS TO CONTINUE TO EXPOSE THIS KIND OF "TWEET" THAT MIGHT CATCH A NEW SUBSCRIBER UNAWARE AS TO THE POLICY OF PUBLISHING ANYTHING YOU WANT, WITH NO EDITORIAL CONTROLS.

This obviously Doctored Fake was let through, no questions asked. 

Not to give it much room, I responded: 

Of course, you can produce the original right? Or the e-mail server it came from? What happened, did it take 2.5 years to become desperate enough to use this piece of garbage.