I ANSWERED THE QUESTION: WHAT IS THE DEFINITION OF "SECULARISM" ON QUORA.COM.

 

In simple terms, “Secularism” usually refers to Government, Public, or Social Agencies, Institutions, Departments etc., that were created for the Benefit and Proper Administration of Programs that were Lawfully Created and Budgeted for, NOT BEING ALLOWED TO USE PRIVATE OR PERSONAL RELIGIOUS BELIEFS TO BE PART OF THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS ON WHETHER OR NOT SOMEONE IS ELIGIBLE FOR INCLUSION IN, OR ABLE TO RECEIVE BENEFITS FROM THESE TAX PAYER FUNDED ENTITIES.

Further, that CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LAW MUST BE SEPARATE FROM, AND NOT ALLOWED TO BE SUBJECT TO ANY FORM OF ECCLESIASTICAL AUTHORITY. Moral or Ethical Guidelines, as set forth in the U.S. CONSTITUTION, AND JUDICIAL PRECEDENT, were created to be set apart from those that were found in FAITH BASED DOCTRINE.

IN OTHER WORDS, Government has no BUSINESS IN INSTITUTING OR ESTABLISHING RELIGIOUS FAITH AS PART OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM. IN THE END, THAT IS WHAT “SECULAR” REALLY STANDS FOR.

A REMINDER: 2022 GEORGIA U.S. SENATE RUN - OFF ELECTION.

 Reverend Raphael Warnock

US Senate candidate, GA

Call the Voter Protection Hotline at 1-888-730-5816 if you or anyone you know is having issues at the polls. Let's win this again.

NBC NEWS. In a major setback for Trump, appeals court ends special master's review of seized Mar-a-Lago records.

The panel said Judge Aileen Cannon* was incorrect to appoint an arbiter and prevent the government from using a trove of classified documents retrieved from Trump’s resort in its criminal probe.

By Zoë Richards and Daniel Barnes

 A federal appeals court ruled Thursday that a judge’s order appointing a special master to review documents seized from former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort should be dismissed.

The ruling by a three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit lifts earlier restrictions on the Justice Department’s examination of classified documents and other records and allow investigators to proceed with the probe more quickly.

The panel said U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon’s order in September to appoint an arbiter and prevent the government from using a trove of documents it retrieved with a search warrant from Trump’s resort in Florida on Aug. 8 was incorrect.

"The law is clear. We cannot write a rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the warrant," the panel wrote. "Accordingly, we agree with the government that the district court improperly exercised equitable jurisdiction, and that dismissal of the entire proceeding is required."

Two of the three judges on the panel — Britt Grant and Andrew Brasher — were appointed by Trump. The third, Chief Judge Brill Pryor, was appointed by President George W. Bush.

In a separate order, the panel said its ruling will take effect in seven days, barring any intervention by the Supreme Court. Trump could appeal Thursday's ruling and request that the order be put on hold.

The appeals court ruling rolls back Cannon's appointment of Raymond J. Dearie, a senior U.S. district judge for the Eastern District of New York, to review all of the materials retrieved from Mar-a-Lago after Trump’s team argued that it couldn’t rely on a so-called filter team at the Justice Department to set aside any privileged documents. The filter team is separate from the investigators conducting the criminal probe.

Legal experts at the time blasted Cannon's ruling to grant Trump's request for an independent review, many of them questioning the implementation process and warning that the government's eventual appeal was likely to drag the investigation out further.

Cannon had set a deadline of Nov. 30 to complete the special master's review, but he later pushed it back to Dec. 16.

Outside court, Trump has put forth various arguments for why he believes the seized documents belong to him while simultaneously accusing the FBI of planting evidence. His attorneys have not backed up those remarks in court.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

* IN OTHER WORDS:  JUDICIAL JOKE AILEEN CANNON CAN NOT CREATE LAW TO BENEFIT HER BOSS, DONALD TRUMP.- DAVID.

I ANSWERED THE QUESTION: Why does Trump appeal to uneducated Americans? ON QUORA.COM

Because Hate, Irrational Fears, Xenophobia, Homophobia. etc, does not require Intellectual Reflection or Rational Justification. All that is required is blind acceptance, and every problem in your life, or the nations, is someone elses fault. Guess what? All you have to do is believe what you are being told, (Just Accept, don’t ask questions), and the Fascist of your choice will happily legislate all the Irrational and Vile Judgments you make into law. 

Of course, don’t bother questioning the Fiduciary Decisions that the Fascist wants to institute for all citizens. The Opposition says they only benefit the Wealthy, at the expense of the vast majority, but hey... 

...they want to let same-sex couples have equality of marriage rights. So who are you gonna believe, those Sinners who are going to Hell, or honest God-Fearing citizens like Donald Trump, Lauren Boebart, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Ron DeSantis, Kevin McCarthy etc.