REMINDER #2. DID IT EVER OCCUR TO YOU THAT A RISE IN THE CRIME RATE IS NOT PROGRESSIVES LENIENT ATTITUDE, BUT THE GOPS/TRUMPS ENCOURAGING VIOLENT CRIME?

Why the following is not blanketing every single DEMOCRAT/PROGRESSIVE/LIBERAL WEBSITE IS BEYOND ME. IF THERE WAS EVER A VERBAL "SMOKING GUN" ABOUT DONALD TRUMPS INTENT TO OVERTHROW THE U.S. GOVERNMENT THIS WAS IT.

The following exchange occurred during a White House Press conference on Wednesday, Sept 24, 2020.

“Win, lose, or draw in this election, will you commit here today for a peaceful transferal of power after the election?” reporter Brian Karem asked Donald Trump, who didn’t even attempt to give the impression he cares whatsoever about preserving democracy. “Well, we’re going to have to see what happens,” Trump said. “You know that. I’ve been complaining very strongly about the ballots, and the ballots are a disaster.” Pressed again to “commit to making sure that there’s a peaceful transferal of power,” Trump responded, “Get rid of the ballots and...we’ll have a very peaceful—there won’t be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation. The ballots are out of control. You know it. You know who knows it better than anybody else? The Democrats know better than anybody else.”

''...Pressed again to “commit to making sure that there’s a peaceful transferal of power,” Trump responded, “Get rid of the ballots and...we’ll have a very peaceful—there won’t be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation."

Perhaps my understanding of the English Langauge is different from others. How is this not a threat?

- If this is done: Get rid of the ballots.

- Then this will occur- Very Peaceful Continuation.

Well, the illegal action of throwing out ballots did not occur. What happened then?

TRUMP LEADS A MOB TO THE CAPITOL, TO FORCE THE GOVERNMENT INTO CANCELLING THE 2020 ELECTION RETURNS.

Please explain how this is not DIRECT EVIDENCE OF A THREAT TO VIOLENTLY OVERTHROW THE U.S. GOVERNMENT...

...WHICH TURNED INTO ACTS OF TREASON WHEN TRUMPS THREAT WAS IGNORED? Especially when the THREAT AND THE RESULTING ACTION(S) WAS INSTITUTED BY DONALD TRUMP PERSONALLY?

In addition to Treason, How about this? 

THE CORNELL LAW SCHOOL, LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE DEFINES EXTORTION AS: forcing action or obtaining something by force or coercion. The crime of extortion is defined to exclude legitimate negotiation methods. Under the color of office, a public or private authority may abuse their authority to commit extortion.

Given what we know over the last 6 years or so, how many crimes does DONALD TRUMP GET A FREE PASS FROM?

DID IT EVER OCCUR TO YOU THAT A RISE IN THE CRIME RATE IS NOT PROGRESSIVES LENIENT ATTITUDE, BUT THE GOPS/TRUMPS ENCOURAGING VIOLENT CRIME? REMINDER #1.

 AS HAS HAPPENED SO MANY TIMES IN THE PAST, DEMOCRATS/LIBERALS/PROGRESSIVES ARE AGAIN ALLOWING THE GOP TO MAKE BASELESS AND GROUNDLESS ACCUSATIONS, AND DOING NOTHING TO CONFRONT IT.

So I have decided to Post Reminders that many Voters may have forgotten.

REMINDER #1.

THIS ANALYSIS IS AS TRUE NOW, AS IT WAS 5 YEARS AGO.

  (I FIRST PUBLISHED THIS ARTICLE ON 7/12/2016.  THE ONLY THINGS THAT HAVE CHANGED ARE: THE REPUBLICAN PARTYS LOYALTY TO THE FAR-RIGHT ELEMENT OF THE GOP HAS INCREASED, WITH THEIR OBEDIENCE TO DONALD TRUMPS IRRATIONAL AND HATE-BASED RHETORIC BEING VIRTUALLY UNOPPOSED BY THE LEADERSHIP. WHAT HASN'T CHANGED IS THE ALMOST COMPLETE DISREGARD FOR PROPER INTELLECTUAL ANALYSIS AND DISCOURSE WHEN THE GOP FORMS ANY PART OF THEIR POLITICAL AGENDA. TO THEM VOTER IGNORANCE, IRRATIONALITY, AND PERSONAL PREJUDICES ARE TO BE EXPLOITED AT ANY COST.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

HATE CHRONICLES. THE KEYS TO UNDERSTANDING THE MINDSET, MOTIVATIONS, AND GOALS OF THE FAR-RIGHT FANATIC. #1.

It is a mistake for Progressives to think that those who make up the Most Conservative Elements of the "NEW REPUBLICAN PARTY" ARE ALL CUT FROM THE SAME CLOTH. WHILE THEY MAY VOTE AS A BLOC,THE PRIMARY MOTIVATION DIFFERS FROM GROUP TO GROUP.

While They are usually Packaged Together, ULTRA CONSERVATIVE POLITICIANS HAVE REALIZED THAT FINDING THE ONE KEY ISSUE THAT DRIVES CERTAIN GROUPS OF VOTERS TO THE POLLS, OFTEN WILL TURN THEM INTO LOYAL ALLIES, who will support an agenda full of Issues They may care little about.

It could be GUN CONTROL, SAME- SEX MARRIAGE, GOVERNMENT SPENDING, SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, IMMIGRATION LAWS, REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE etc. THE STRATEGY IS TO PUT FORTH AN UNCOMPROMISING, RIGID, AND VITRIOLIC POINT OF VIEW ON A PARTICULAR ISSUE, APPEALING TO THE BASER ELEMENTS OF HUMAN NATURE.

THE REASON: TO LEARN OF THE ONE ISSUE THAT EACH SECTION OF INDIVIDUAL VOTERS MOST IDENTIFIES WITH, AND MANIPULATE IT TO THEIR ADVANTAGE.

IT'S A TACTIC THAT REQUIRES NO INTELLECTUAL EFFORT ON THE PART OF THE LISTENER.THERE IS NO NEED TO UNDERSTAND, OR EVEN CARE ABOUT THE OPPOSITIONS POINT OF VIEW. IT PLAYS ON RAW EMOTION, WITHOUT THE NEED FOR CONTEMPLATION OR REFLECTION.

THE INDIVIDUAL IS ENCOURAGED NOT TO THINK ABOUT AN INTELLECTUAL JUSTIFICATION FOR THE OPINION THEY ARE SUPPORTING, BUT TO REACT TO THE WORDS OF THE AUTHOR AND\OR SPEAKER, AND ACCEPTING THE MESSAGE AS TRUE, AND WORTHY OF SUPPORT.  THIS, IN TURN, ENCOURAGES AGREEMENT WITH OTHER OPINIONS THAT ARE EXPRESSED THE SAME WAY.

 

A SHORT POST ON DONALD TRUMP: HOW SHOULD WE EVALUATE HIS OPINION ABOUT THE INTELLECTUAL ABILITIES OF OTHERS?

On another website, (Quora), this Question was posed: Is Donald Trump correct that President Barack Obama was not academically qualified for admission to an Ivy League school without affirmative action?

After realizing this wasn't a gag, I offered the following:

Having endured 4 years of listening to Donald Trump impart his opinions on Science, Politics, History, Law, etc, do you really think that he is even minimally capable of assessing anyone's Intellectual Capacity? Why would you take seriously anything DER FUEHRER TRUMP has to say on any subject? In fact, if you can, point out any area of Education, Academia, or Professional Competence that you would say: “Donald’s knowledge and expertise in this area is sufficient enough for accepting his opinion as probably being Logically Valid and Factually Accurate”

In addition, on several occasions, I have reprinted Speeches and Oral Presentations President Barack Obama gave during his presidency. Intellectually, as a President, he was about as good as we've ever had in the Oval Office.

PAUL PELOSI'S ATTACKER: IS HE A MAGAT? I WONDER... AND A THOUGHT FROM VIRGINIA GOVERNOR GLENN YOUNGKIN

 Nancy Pelosi's husband is viciously attacked at home, what was the motivation?

FROM ABC NEWS:

The suspect, 42-year-old David Depape, attacked Paul Pelosi with a hammer when officers responded to a priority well-being check at 2:27 a.m. local time, San Francisco police said. Officers tackled the suspect and disarmed him, police said.

The motive is under investigation, Hammill said.

But according to the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, a think tank dedicated to researching extremism and disinformation, Depape "likely was motivated by a wide range of conspiratorial beliefs."

"In the last two months, DePape has posted dozens of articles and videos to his blogs spreading conspiracies and hateful rhetoric related to COVID-19, women, Hillary Clinton, the Jewish community, federal law enforcement (e.g., FBI), government censorship, Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the climate crisis, QAnon, the 2020 election, the transgender community, and 'grooming' in schools," the ISD said, though no posts were found specifically mentioning Nancy Pelosi.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

I WONDER WHAT PARTY HE SUPPORTS IN THE MID-TERM ELECTIONS?

David DePape in Berkeley, Calif., Dec. 13, 2013.

                                            Michael Short/San Francisco Chronicle/Polaris

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

TAKEN FROM THE HUFFPOST ARTICLE:

Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin Jokes About Assault On Nancy Pelosi's Husband

“Speaker Pelosi’s husband, they had a break-in last night in their house, he was assaulted. There’s no room for violence anywhere, but we’re going to send her back to be with him in California,” Youngkin said while campaigning on behalf of Virginia House GOP candidate Yesli Vega. “That’s what we’re going to go do.”

I DON'T WANT TO SAY YOUNGKIN IS SCUM, I HAVE MORE RESPECT FOR SCUM THAN THAT. VIRGINIA-  GOOD JOB LETTING HIM GET INTO OFFICE BECAUSE OF BOGUS ELECTION TOTALS. YOU, FLORIDA, TEXAS, AND OHIO ARE THE BEST WHEN IT COMES TO GETTING WORTHLESS POLITICIANS INTO OFFICE THROUGH ELECTION FRAUD.- DAVID.