THE YEAR: 2100. THE PLACE: HISTORY CLASS. THE SUBJECT: EARLY TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY POLITICS. PART 2.

 NOW CLASS, YOU HAVE BEEN TESTED REGARDING THE PRESIDENTIAL RESULTS FROM 

2008-2020. BEFORE WE GO THROUGH THE RESULTS, I WOULD LIKE YOU TO ANALYZE 

THE ELECTION RESULTS FOR THE U.S. SENATE DURING THAT SAME PERIOD. FOR EXTRA 

CREDIT, WRITE AN ESSAY IDENTIFYING ANY RESULTS THAT MIGHT INDICATE ELECTION 

FRAUD, AND IF SO, HOW THEY MIGHT COINCIDE WITH PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION FRAUD 

FROM THE SAME ERA.

THE INFORMATION BELOW, TOGETHER WITH THE DATA FROM THE QUIZ ON  PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS FROM THE SAME TIME PERIOD, YOU WILL USE TO ARGUE AND JUSTIFY ANY CONCLUSIONS THAT YOU MAKE. 

COLUMN 1- WHICH PARTY RECEIVED THE HIGHEST % OF THE POPULAR VOTE FOR ALL SENATE ELECTIONS HELD THAT YEAR.

COLUMN 2- # OF SENATE SEATS CONTESTED.

COLUMN 3- THE # OF SEATS WON BY THE PARTY WITH THE HIGHEST % OF THE NATIONAL VOTE, AND WHAT % THAT NUMBER REPRESENTS OF THE TOTAL # OF SEATS CONTESTED.

THE STATS BELOW ARE TAKEN FROM WIKIPEDIA, AND MAY NOT BE THE OFFICIAL NUMBERS. THEY SHOULD BE VIEWED AS A GUIDE. 

1. 2018 DEM- 58.2%               33                  22, 66.7%  

2. 2012 DEM- 53.4%               31                  23, 74.2%                               

3. 2016 DEM- 53.0%               34                  12, 35.3%                        

4. 2008 DEM- 51.9%               35                   20, 57.1%                                          

5. 2014 REP-  51.5%               36                   24, 66.7%                   

6. 2020 REP- 49.3%                35                   20, 57.1%    

7. 2010 REP- 48.2%                37                   24, 64.9% 

THE YEAR: 2100. THE PLACE: HISTORY CLASS. THE SUBECT: EARLY TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY POLITICS. PART 1.

 

THE YEAR IS 2100. HIGH SCHOOL FRESHMAN.

WELCOME TO AMERICAN HISTORY. TODAY WE ARE GOING TO BEGIN OUR STUDY

OF EARLY 21ST CENTURY POLITICS. TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU ALREADY KNOW, BELOW

ARE THE RESULTS OF THE 2008,2012,2016,2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS. YOUR JOB IS

TO MATCH THE NUMBERS IN THE FIRST THREE COLUMNS.

- % OF THE NATIONAL VOTE FOR ALL 8 DEM./REP. CANDIDATES.

- WINNERS VICTORY MARGIN IN % OF VOTE.

-  WINNERS VICTORY MARGIN IN # OF VOTES.

WITH THE CORRESPONDING OUTCOMES.

- # OF ELECTORAL VOTES FOR THE WINNER.

- # OF STATES CARRIED BY THE WINNER.

AFTER THEY ARE GRADED, WE WILL DISCUSS THE SIGNIFICANCE IF EACH. THERE

WILL BE A SPECIAL LOOK AT THE POSSIBILITY OF ELECTION FRAUD, AND SEE IF 

ANY OF THESE RESULTS LEND CREDENCE TO SUCH ACCUSATIONS. 

GOOD LUCK.

  BOTH CANDIDATES.                           WINNER.                                               WINNER.

   % NATIONAL VOTE                     VICTORY MARGIN %                         VICTORY MARGIN #

1- OBAMA, 2008, 52.9%                1-OBAMA, 2008, +7.2%                    1- OBAMA, 2008, +9,550,193

2- BIDEN, 2020, 51.3%                   2- BIDEN, 2020, +4.4%                     2- BIDEN, 2020, +7,058,637

3- OBAMA, 2012, 51.06%              3- OBAMA, 2012, +3.86                    3- OBAMA, 2012, +4,982,291

4- CLINTON, 2016, 48.18%           4-  TRUMP, 2016, -2.09%                   4- TRUMP, 2016, -2,868,686  

5- ROMNEY, 2012, 47.20%

6- TRUMP, 2020, 46.90%

7- TRUMP, 2016, 46.09%

8- MCCAIN, 2008, 45.70%

          WINNER.                                                                                          WINNER.

MOST ELECTORAL VOTES.                                                                CARRIED MOST STATES

365                                                                                                   30 + ME-02       

332                                                                                                            28 + DC + NE-02   

306                                                                                                            26 + DC    

304                                                                                                            25 + DC + NE-02

MORE NEWS FROM FASCIST DESPOT, AND GOP/FOXNEWS IDOL VLADIMIR PUTINS ADMINISTRATION.

Israel condemns Russian foreign minister's "unforgivable" Hitler remarks.

 Israel on Monday condemned Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov's false claim that Adolf Hitler had "Jewish blood," which he used to justify calling Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky a "Nazi."

Why it matters: It's the first time Israel has publicly condemned the Russian claim that Zelensky is a "Nazi."

The big picture: The condemnation is the latest example of how Israeli policy toward the Russian invasion of Ukraine has slowly shifted, with the Israeli government voicing more criticism of Russian action and showing more willingness to give aid to Ukraine.

• While Israel condemned the Russian invasion and recently accused Russia of committing war crimes, it has for many weeks taken a careful approach to the Ukraine crisis to ensure military cooperation with Russia in Syria continues.

Driving the news: On Sunday evening, Lavrov was asked in an interview with an Italian TV channel how Russia can be "de-Nazifying" Ukraine — a stated goal of its invasion — if the leader of the country is Jewish.

• Lavrov falsely claimed that Adolf Hitler had "Jewish blood" and added that some of the most enthusiastic anti-semites were Jews.
• Lavrov's remarks quickly went viral on social media and were widely reported in the Israeli press.
• On Monday morning, the Israeli Foreign Ministry summoned the Russian ambassador to demand that Russia clarify Lavrov's remarks.

What they're saying: "Foreign Minister Lavrov’s remarks are both an unforgivable and outrageous statement as well as a terrible historical error. Jews did not murder themselves in the Holocaust. The lowest level of racism against Jews is to accuse Jews themselves of antisemitism," Israeli foreign minister Yair Lapid said in a statement.

• Dani Dayan, the chairman of Yad Vashem, the national Holocaust memorial in Israel, said Lavrov's remarks were "absurd and dangerous."
• He also condemned the claim that Zelensky is a Nazi. "This is a complete distortion of the history and a serious affront to the victims of Nazism," Dayan said.

Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett said he views Lavrov's comments "with utmost severity."

• "His words are untrue and their intentions are wrong. The goal of such lies is to accuse the Jews themselves of the most awful crimes in history, which were perpetrated against them, and thereby absolve Israel's enemies of responsibility," Bennett said in a statement.
• "As I have already said, no war in our time is like the Holocaust or is comparable to the Holocaust. The use of the Holocaust of the Jewish people as a political tool must cease immediately."

Editor's note: This story has been updated with Bennett's statement.

This morning

Russian state media threatens UK with ‘nuclear tsunami’

In his Sunday evening primetime show, the Channel One anchor Dmitry Kiselyov said a strike by Russia’s Poseidon nuclear underwater drone could turn Britain into a wasteland by drowning the country in a 500-metre tidal wave of radioactive seawater

Photo via @thetimes

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

THE REAL SAD PART OF THESE TWO STORIES IS THAT MANY GOP SUPPORTERS WILL PRAISE THE PUTIN ADMINISTRATION, DREAMING OF A U.S. THAT WOULD PROMOTE AND SUPPORT THIS KIND OF INTELLECTUALLY CHALLENGED AND MORALLY DEPRAVED MINDSET.

 

- DAVID.

These candidates say Trump won in 2020 — now they're running to oversee future elections. NBC NEWS.

 

At least 23 people who deny the results of the 2020 presidential election are running for secretary of state in 19 states, according to a group that tracks the races.t least 23 people who deny the results of the 2020 presidential election are running for secretary of state in 19 states, according to a group that tracks the races.

HERE IS THE LINK TO THIS ARTICLE:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2022-election/candidates-say-trump-won-2020now-running-oversee-future-elections-rcna26241

SO, NOW SUPPORTING SEDITION AND FRAUD IS A VIABLE CAMPAIGN PLATFORM.

TELL ME AGAIN ABOUT THE GOP NOT BEING A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION.