About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Sunday, March 27, 2022

FROM THIS WEEKEND: A FEW HIGHPOINTS.

THE "LARGE" CROWD AT TRUMPS GEORGIA RALLY THIS PAST SATURDAY.           



BUSINESS INSIDER.

TRUMPS RALLY REMARKS INCLUDED:
  • Former President Donald Trump praised Xi Jinping, Kim Jong-Un, and Vladimir Putin in a campaign event.
  • Trump called Putin's decision to put troops on the border of Ukraine "a great negotiation."
  • Trump has a pattern of praising authoritarian leaders from around the world.


  • NEW: Dr. Oz and Herschel Walker say “when” they become US senators, they will investigate President Biden for ordering them to resign from the White House fitness council that Trump appointed them to. They were violating the Hatch Act before Biden fired them.

    NPR POLITICS

    Week in politics: Reactions to Court nominee; Trump retracts an endorsement in Ala.

    DEBBIE ELLIOTT, HOST:

    The Supreme Court is under scrutiny this week on several fronts. President Biden's nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, faced two days of aggressive questioning from Republican senators on her path to confirmation. The health of Justice Clarence Thomas is in question, as is the political activism of his wife, Ginni Thomas. NPR's congressional correspondent Susan Davis joins us now.

    Good morning, Susan.

    SUSAN DAVIS, BYLINE: Hey, Debbie.

    ELLIOTT: Democratic Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia came out yesterday announcing he'll be voting for Jackson's confirmation. Why is that important?

    DAVIS: Well, he's a swing vote in the Senate. And it's not really a surprise that he's going to support her. But making it official makes it pretty certain she's going to be confirmed in a few weeks from now. You know, it's still possible that some combination of Republican senators vote for her. We're watching people like Alaska's Lisa Murkowski and Maine's Susan Collins. But even without any Republican support, Democrats have Vice President Harris to break a theoretical tie. And, you know, Senate Majority Leader Schumer still wants her confirmed before the Easter break starts on April 11.

    ELLIOTT: Let's turn now to Justice Clarence Thomas. First, we should note that he's been ill but has been released from the hospital now.

    DAVIS: That's right. He spent a week in the hospital due to an infection of some kind. He was released and sent home Friday. But that's really all the public knows about his condition. The court has declined to offer any more details.

    ELLIOTT: So this week, it was revealed his wife, Ginni Thomas, a longtime conservative activist, was in communication with then-President Trump's chief of staff, Mark Meadows, after the 2020 election. In those messages, she is explicitly advocating to overturn the results of the election. What has been the response to this?

    DAVIS: So this was first reported by CBS and The Washington Post, but NPR has independently confirmed this, as well. The House committee investigating the January 6 attack on the Capitol is in possession of 29 text messages between Ginni Thomas and Meadows. And in these messages, she subscribes to conspiracy theories that the election was stolen from Trump, and she's encouraging the White House and Trump's circle to do everything possible to overturn the election. Now, she also attended the January 6 Stop the Steal rally. But she has said she went home before the attack on the Capitol.

    Now, in general, the political activities of a spouse are not used against any sort of sitting elected official or government official. But certainly in this case, it is raising questions about whether Justice Thomas should recuse himself from any cases before the court that are related to January 6 and President Trump's efforts. So far, he has chosen not to. Just last month, the court ruled against Trump's efforts to deny the January 6 committee certain documents. There was one dissenting vote in the case. And that was Clarence Thomas.

    ELLIOTT: Is there any recourse in terms of when a judge has to recuse?

    DAVIS: You know, yes and no. There is a federal law that applies to all judges that says they should recuse if their impartiality in a case could be reasonably questioned. But historically, there's a lot of deference given to judges on the high court on when they should recuse. There could also be pressure from inside the court. You know, Chief Justice John Roberts does have an interest in maintaining public trust in the court, which is currently pretty low, according to public opinion polls. But if there is any of that internal pressure, the public wouldn't necessarily know it.

    ELLIOTT: Former President Trump remains engaged in election politics.

    DAVIS: Oh, yeah.

    ELLIOTT: He's still trying to undermine the 2020 election. And now he's playing kingmaker in Republican primaries this year. This week, he retracted an endorsement in the Alabama Senate primary. Tell us what's going on there.

    DAVIS: So Trump had backed Congressman Mo Brooks, who had been a staunch ally of Trump in Congress. He even spoke at that January 6 rally prior to the attack on the Capitol. But Trump said he couldn't support Brooks anymore because Brooks had advised him to move on from his 2020 election claims. Brooks also wasn't winning in his primary. He was dropping in the polls. And Trump has been very sensitive to picking winners in these races. But what's notable here is Brooks responded with a statement of his own, saying the former president has repeatedly asked him to illegally rescind the election. And this all leads back to that January 6 committee investigating this - Trump's role in the attack. They have not commented on Brooks' statement, but they want to hear from lawmakers who could shed some light on Trump's actions around this time. And Brooks sounds like he's open to an invitation to testify now.

    ELLIOTT: NPR's Susan Davis, thanks so much.

    DAVIS: Ah, you're welcome.

Friday, March 25, 2022

VLAD AND DONALD, IT WAS A GOOD PLAN...BUT HUMANITY IS MORE THAN JUST SYCOPHANTIC SELF-CENTERED YES MEN...PART 7.



However, before you go public, the Gameplan must be in place. VLADIMIR. to you, that means getting the support you need to Bypass or Neutralize NATO. Why? Because, going up against NATO could put your REGIME IN A DIFFICULT POSITION, BOTH MILITARILY AND ECONOMICALLY. Your attitude about how the average RUSSIAN CITIZEN might be affected in case of a UKRANIAN INVASION IS COMPLETE INDIFFERENCE. They get what you give them. Which, of course, MAKES DONALD TRUMP THE PERFECT ALLY. HE CARES NOTHING FOR THE WELFARE OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC, SO YOU TWO HAVE COMMON GROUND.

So it is important is to make sure your new ally is on board with the idea of RENDERING NATO AS IMPOTENT AS POSSIBLE. This is to either Prevent any Interference during the Invasion, or Limit any possible Sanctions to Basic Political Posturing by Members. This would be limited to being Lectured about the Evil you are committing, but nothing of Real Consequence. 

THE GOAL FOR YOU VLADIMIR IS:

- Stop Ukraine from entering NATO.

if not feasible...

- Delay Ukraines entry into NATO.

if not feasible...

- Make NATO as weak and powerless as possible.

However, before I get into more detail, I would like to

remind everyone about what NATO is, and why it was created.

For that, let us step into the WAYBACK MACHINE, AND RETURN TO...




Thursday, March 24, 2022

First on CNN: January 6 committee has text messages between Ginni Thomas and Mark Meadows

                                    At left, Ginni Thomas, and at right, Mark Meadows.

CNN)The House Select Committee investigating the January 6 riot has in its possession more than two dozen text messages, 29 in total, between former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and Virginia "Ginni" Thomas, a conservative activist and the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, according to multiple sources familiar with the messages.

These text messages, according to sources, took place between early November 2020 and mid-January 2021. Thomas recently revealed that she attended the pro-Trump rally that preceded the US Capitol attack on January 6, 2021, but says she "played no role" in planning the events of that day.
The text messages, reviewed by CNN, show Thomas pleading with Meadows to continue the fight to overturn the election results.
    "Help This Great President stand firm, Mark!!! ... You are the leader, with him, who is standing for America's constitutional governance at the precipice. The majority knows Biden and the Left is attempting the greatest Heist of our History," Thomas wrote on November 10, 2020.
      Thomas regularly checked in with Meadows to encourage him to push claims of voter fraud and work to prevent the election from being certified. Meadows often responded. On that same day as the previous text, he wrote: "I will stand firm. We will fight until there is no fight left. Our country is too precious to give up on. Thanks for all you do."
        On November 24, 2020, Meadows promised he wasn't done battling on Trump's behalf and evoked his faith as a source of strength.
        "This is a fight of good versus evil. Evil always looks like the victor until the King of Kings triumphs. Do not grow weary in well doing. The fight continues. I have staked my career on it. Well at least my time in DC on it."
          Thomas wrote to Meadows on November 19, 2020, "Sounds like Sidney and her team are getting inundated with evidence of fraud. Make a plan. Release the Kraken and save us from the left taking America down." Attorney Sidney Powell, who worked on Trump-aligned lawsuits seeking to challenge the results of the 2020 election, was also referred to by herself as "The Kraken" in reference to the ancient mythological sea creature.
          By the end of November, Thomas was getting increasingly frustrated with the lack of progress of the attempt to find a path to overturn the results.
          On November 24, 2020 she wrote: "I can't see Americans swallowing the obvious fraud. Just going with one more thing with no frickin consequences... the whole coup and now this... we just cave to people wanting Biden to be anointed? Many of us can't continue the GOP charade."
          The committee is in possession of only one text from the month of January 2021, four days after the riot on Capitol Hill.
          Thomas wrote to Meadows that she was angry with Vice President Mike Pence for not taking the steps necessary to block the certification of the election results.
          "We are living through what feels like the end of America. Most of us are disgusted with the VP and are in a listening mode to see where to fight with our teams. Those who attacked the Capitol are not representative of our great teams of patriots for DJT!! Amazing times. The end of Liberty," Thomas wrote.
          Thomas' messages reflected a belief that the legal challenges presented by a group of conservative lawyers helping the campaign were valid. She attempted to convince Meadows to put his faith in the hands of Powell, who had spent the weeks following the election claiming to have mountains of evidence of fraud that never martialized.
          The content of the text messages may be of interest to the committee's investigation, because it asked Meadows in a subpoena to turn over "both documents and your deposition testimony regarding these and other matters that are within the scope of the committee's activity."
          The revelation of text messages between Thomas and Meadows, both key allies of former President Donald Trump, comes as progressives and some legal ethics experts see her activism as a potential conflict of interest for Justice Thomas' work on some Supreme Court cases.
          Meadows turned over thousands of text messages before he stopped cooperating with the committee. The texts have proven to hold a treasure trove of information about what was going on in the White House in the days leading up to the insurrection, and what people in Trump's orbit were thinking.
          The text messages in the committee's possession are only part of the tranche of documents that Meadows provided to the committee during the short period of time he was cooperating with their investigation. They do not necessarily represent the sum total of communication between Thomas and Meadows during that period of time.
          There is also the possibility some messages were not turned over due to privilege claims.
          Meadows and Thomas are longtime friends, both of whom have been active in conservative causes for decades.
          While Thomas has been actively involved in politics, she says she has been careful to distance her activity from her husband.
          "But we have our own separate careers, and our own ideas and opinions too. Clarence doesn't discuss his work with me, and I don't involve him in my work," she recently told the Free Beacon.
          The work of the January 6 select committee has already come before the Supreme Court. In early January. The court did not stand in the way of the release of thousands of documents from the Trump White House despite the former President suing to keep them secret under executive privilege. The vote on the matter was 8-1, with only Justice Thomas dissenting.
          CNN reached out to both Meadows' attorney and Thomas directly for comment and have yet to hear back.
            A spokesperson for the committee declined to comment.
            This story has been updated with additional developments Thursday.