"...PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE..."

If there is one thing that the Covid Crisis/Vaccination Controversy has taught me, it is the extent some people will go to;

- Avoid personal responsibility.

- Stick to a Conclusion they can't reasonably defend.

- Refuse to admit they were wrong

- Drag others down to their own level. (Intellectual and Emotional)

Worst of all...

DESTROY "GOOD" AND DEFEND "EVIL" BECAUSE THEY CANNOT

ACCEPT THE FACT THAT, INITIALLY, THEY DID NOT RECOGNIZE THE 

POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES AND OUTCOMES OF THE ETHICAL/MORAL

DECISIONS THEY WERE MAKING. THIS OFTEN INCLUDES ALTERING OR 

DISREGARDING THEIR INITIAL ARGUMENT(S)THAT THEY REALIZE CANNOT

STAND UP TO CRITICAL ANALYSIS OR PROPER SCRUTINY, AND SELECTING

NEW ARGUMENTS THAT ARE NOT ANY MORE REASONABLE OR ACCEPTABLE

THAN THE FIRST, BUT ALLOWS THEM TO DELAY THE ADMISSION OF FAILURE.

A TACTIC THAT CAN BE ESPECIALLY USEFUL JUST BEFORE AN ELECTION.

CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING: THE PREAMBLE TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.

"We the people, In order to form a more perfect union, Establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, Provide for the common defense, Promote the general welfare and Secure the blessings of liberty To ourselves and our posterity Do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

Read this very carefully. It is the beginning of the Document that would help form a Nation based on principles that would seek to CREATE THE MOST DESIRABLE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT POSSIBLE. 

It is not a collection of Sentences and Statements telling its citizens what Government will do

to make every American happy. IT'S A SET OF MORAL JUDGMENTS THAT MUST BE 

OBEYED TO ESTABLISH A GOVERNMENT THAT WILL MOST BENEFIT THE AMERICAN

 PEOPLE, A COLLECTION OF INDIVIDUALS.

SO YOU THINK I'M TOUGH ON DONALD TRUMP? HOW ABOUT THIS QUOTE FROM JIM ACOSTA.

Acosta: "They aren’t going to be doing the fighting themselves. We’ve already seen what happens when the going gets tough for Ted Cruz…These instigators will send others into battle.. and for what? the orange-headed love child of Rupert Murdoch and David Duke?"

BLAST FROM THE PAST: THIS IS WHAT YOU GET WHEN YOU HAVE "MORAL" AND "INTELLECTUAL" COWARDS IN THE U.S. SENATE.

DO YOU REALLY WONDER WHY TRUMP AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY PURSUE

AN AGENDA OF HATE AND CORRUPTION, AIDING AND SUPPORTING THE POLICIES

OF GOVERNMENTS LIKE PUTINS RUSSIA, AND PROMOTING THE FASCIST IDEOLOGY

OF FAR-RIGHT ORGANIZATIONS IN THE U.S?

HERE IS A REMINDER:

DEJA VU. FROM TODAYS HEADLINES.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election. 

"I think it's highly unlikely — in fact, no, I don't think either party, if it were different from the president, would confirm a Supreme Court nominee in the middle of an election," McConnell told radio host Hugh Hewitt.

TREASON AND VIOLATING CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES IS NOW PART OF THE GOPS GAMEPLAN IN TURNING THE U.S. INTO A FASCIST UTOPIA, WHERE;

- XENOPHOBES

- HOMOPHOBES

- RELIGIOUS FANATICS

- ANTI-INTELLECTUALISTS

- SCIENCE DENIERS

- RACISTS

etc... CONTROL AND SHAPE EVERY ASPECT OF AMERICAN LIFE.

NOW THE TRUMPS AND MCCONNELLS OF THIS WORLD ARE VILE AND CONTEMPTIBLE "HUMAN" BEINGS WHO WOULD SELL OUT ANYONE, AT ANY TIME, IF IT WOULD BENEFIT THEIR CONTROLLERS.

THESE WOULD INCLUDE:

- AMERICAN FASCIST ORG. AND GROUPS.

- VLADMIR PUTIN AND THE RUSSIAN GRU.

- INDIVIDUALS AND GROUPS PREACHING AND

 PROMOTING "BOGUS" AND "FALSE" CAPITALIST DOGMA.

HOWEVER, WOULDN'T A CAPABLE AND DETERMINED OPPOSITION PARTY BE ABLE TO STOP THEM? IDEALLY, YES...

...BUT THEY WOULD ACTUALLY HAVE TO CARE ENOUGH TO DO SOME  WORK.

HERE ARE SOME ARTICLES, POSTED OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS, THAT SHOULD REMIND YOU OF THAT "DEDICATION" DISPLAYED BY SENATE DEMOCRATS, WHEN IT COMES TO PROTECTING THE PRESIDENTS ABILITY TO PICK AND CHOOSE A NOMINEE FOR THE SUPREME COURT, AND THE SENATES RESPONSIBILITY IN EVALUATING THAT CHOICE.

www.searchingforreason.net : FEATURE ARTICLES. LOOKING AT THE U.S. SUPREME COU... https://searchingforreasondotnet.blogspot.com/2017/02/feature-articles-looking-at-us-supreme.html?spref=tw

w.searchingforreason.net : BLAST FROM THE PAST- Friday, November 6, 2020: HOW... https://searchingforreasondotnet.blogspot.com/2021/04/blast-from-past-friday-november-6-2020.html?spref=twww

www.searchingforreason.net : THE TRUMPIANS AND THE TRUMPOCRATS PERFORMED THEIR ... https://searchingforreasondotnet.blogspot.com/2020/11/the-trumpians-and-trumpocrats-performed.html?spref=tw

THE HORRIFIC IMPLICATIONS OF REFUSING TO MEET AND EVALUATE THE PRESIDENTS NOMINEE FOR THE U.S. SUPREME COURT.

PART 1- http://searchingforreason.net : THE HORRIFIC IMPLICATIONS OF REFUSING TO MEET AND ... https://searchingforreasondotnet.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-horrific-implications-of-refusing.html?spref=tw

PART 2- http://searchingforreason.net : THE HORRIFIC IMPLICATIONS OF REFUSING TO MEET AND ... https://searchingforreasondotnet.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-horrific-implications-of-refusing_27.html?spref=tw

PART 3- http://searchingforreason.net : THE HORRIFIC IMPLICATIONS OF REFUSING TO MEET AND ... https://searchingforreasondotnet.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-horrific-implications-of-refusing_71.html?spref=tw

PART 4- http://searchingforreason.net : THE HORRIFIC IMPLICATIONS OF REFUSING TO MEET AND ... https://searchingforreasondotnet.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-ho

REDDIT IS STILL "RED."

 A number of years ago,  I would occasionally post on the REDDIT SITE, or try to. I noticed the trend to either ban Progressive/Liberal views, or force the author to avoid criticizing conservative talking points. So, I stayed on sites that actually encouraged intellectual dialogue beyond that of a sixth grader, and ignored REDDIT entirely.

Well, yesterday, for the first in years, I tried posting the following article, as it appears on my website,

TWITTER, MIX, TUMBLER etc.

THAT IS THE POINT. THE RITTENHOUSE VERDICT.

 After about 24 hrs, I went on twitter to see what the comments were about. Naturally, ALMOST ALL OF THEM MISSED THE POINT, BUT ONE ASKED A SIMPLE QUESTION, AND IN THE END THE ANSWER TELLS YOU ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE VERDICT.

Was it ever considered that these men's sole reason for

attacking Kyle was to take possession of the gun?

ME: THAT IS THE POINT. IF THEY WERE NOT AN IMMEDIATE DANGER TO HIM, OR ANYONE ELSE, HE DID NOT ACT IN SELF-DEFENSE. YOU CANNOT RAISE A FIREARM, POINT IT AT SOMEONE, AND THEN CLAIM SELF-DEFENSE AFTER THEY TRY TO DISARM YOU. ACCORDING TO TESTIMONY, THE ALTERCATION DID NOT OCCUR UNTIL HE POINTED A DEADLY WEAPON AT AN INDIVIDUAL WHO WAS NOT A PHYSICAL DANGER TO HIM, OR ANYONE ELSE. RITTENHOUSE CLAIMED HE WAS IN FEAR FOR HIS LIFE THAT THEY WOULD TAKE THE GUN AWAY AND USE IT ON HIM.

WELL, YOU SKIPPED ONE STEP. WHEN YOU POINT A FIREARM AT ANOTHER, THAT INDIVIDUAL HAS THE RIGHT TO ASSUME THAT THEIR LIFE IS IN IMMEDIATE DANGER, AND CAN USE ANY REASONABLE AMOUNT OF FORCE TO END THAT THREAT. IN ADDITION, AN INDIVIDUAL CAN INTERCEDE IF THEY PERCEIVE A DEADLY THREAT TO ANOTHER, AND ATTEMPT TO SAVE THE LIFE OF THE INDIVIDUAL BY PHYSICALLY DISARMING THE ARMED SUSPECT.

IT IS BEYOND THE REALM OF REASON THAT AN INDIVIDUAL CAN THREATEN AN UNARMED INDIVIDUAL WITH AN ASSAULT RIFLE, AN INDIVIDUAL WHO AT THE TIME HAS NOT PHYSICALLY THREATENED ANYONE, SHOOT HIM, OR ANYONE ELSE, IN A STRUGGLE FOR CONTROL OF THE GUN, AND THEN CLAIM THE UNARMED INDIVIDUAL IS RESPONSIBLE.

IN NO WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM WAS THIS SELF-DEFENSE. HIS CLAIM OF BEING AFRAID FOR HIS LIFE ONLY FLIES IF YOU ARE WILLING TO SAY THAT THE VICTIMS SHOULD NOT HAVE TRIED TO TAKE THE GUN AWAY, BUT JUST STAND THERE AND HOPE FOR THE BEST. I GUESS THAT MAKES ANYONE WHO TRIED TO DISARM SHOOTERS AT THE WORK PLACE, OR SCHOOLS, RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEATHS. WHY DON'T YOU RUN THAT LINE OF THOUGHT TO THE FAMILIES OF THE VICTIMS?

A JOKE JUDGE, A JOKE JURY, A JOKE VERDICT. I ASSUME THIS IS THE TYPE OF DECOR. THE JUDGE AND JURY ARE HOPING BECOMES PART OF THE KENOSHA COURTHOUSE EXTERIOR.

OR MAYBE THIS:

HERE IS WHAT I RECEIVED IN RETURN:

Sorry, this post has been removed by the moderators of r/politics.

Moderators remove posts from feeds for a variety of reasons, including keeping communities safe, civil, and true to their purpose. 

I'm sorry that LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING, PLUS KNOWLEDGE OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM VIOLATES THEIR POLICIES. ( WHICH ONES? THEY WERE NOT SPECIFIC.)

Knowing that complaining would do no good, I sent the following:

SEIG HEIL!!! LONG LIVE DER FUEHRER TRUMP!! I THOUGHT THAT PERHAPS REDDIT WAS NO LONGER CONTROLLED BY TRUMPIANS AND MOSCOW. MY MISTAKE.

I've been banned. BE STILL MY HEART, WHATEVER WILL I DO?

Dasvidaniya tovarisch.