About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Sunday, October 11, 2020

WELL SENATE DEMOCRATS, YOU TALK A GOOD GAME, AS USUAL. HOW ABOUT BACKING IT UP WITH A LAWSUIT. (I'M SURE YOU HAVE READ THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, RIGHT?)

Democrats condemn GOP rush to seat Amy Coney Barrett as 'court packing': aol.it/3nNFhzN via @AOL

WELL SENATE DEMOCRATS, YOU TALK A GOOD GAME, AS USUAL. HOW ABOUT BACKING IT UP WITH A LAWSUIT. (I'M SURE YOU HAVE READ THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, RIGHT?)- DAVID.

HOW HAVE WE COME TO THIS? THE INCOMPETENCE, IRRATIONALITY, CRIMINALITY, AND BETRAYAL THAT HAS LEAD THE U.S. TO EDGE OF THE ABYSS. PART 1.

 



Since the Democrats are continuing their efforts to make things as easy as possible for TRUMP to add another Mediocre Legal Mind to the Supreme Court, furthering the FASCIST AGENDA THAT IS THE REAL GOAL OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, it is time to lay out the INCOMPETENCE, IRRATIONALITY, CRIMINALITY, AND BETRAYAL THAT HAS LEAD THE U.S. TO EDGE OF THE ABYSS.

#1- WHY DID THE REPUBLICAN PARTY BLOCK PRESIDENT OBAMAS CHOICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT MERRICK GARLAND?

The simple answer is to block a Well-Respected, Deserving, and Highly Regarded Legal Mind who would not blindly obey their Fascist Ideology. However, it was more than just that;

A TEST:
IT WAS TO SEE HOW MUCH, AND WHAT TYPE OF OPPOSITION REPUBLICANS WOULD FACE IF THEY DECIDED THAT REGAINING POWER AND KEEPING IT, COULD BE ACHIEVED THROUGH UNCONSTITUTIONAL METHODS. WITH A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION COMING UP, JUST HOW FAR COULD THEY PUSH THE DEMOCRATS (ESPECIALLY THOSE IN THE SENATE), INTO GIVING UP POLITICAL GROUND WITHOUT A FIGHT.

Again, here is the Text from SECTION 2 OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION:
"He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments."

That's it. There are no Qualifications, What-Ifs, Different Scenarios etc; TO DO CONSTITUTIONALLY WHAT MCCONNELL DID WOULD REQUIRE AMENDING THE DOCUMENT. THERE ARE NO PRECEDENTS THAT WOULD ALLOW THE SENATE MAJORITY LEADER TO DO WHAT HE DID. NONE. THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A CASE WHERE A PRESIDENTIAL SUPREME COURT NOMINEE WAS DENIED A HEARING AND VOTE BEFORE THE U.S. SENATE.

I can understand why REPUBLICANS didn't object, (HONOR AND DUTY IS NOT PART OF BEING A REPUBLICAN THESE DAYS), BUT FOR SENATE DEMOCRATS TO ACCEPT THIS IS INEXCUSABLE. EVEN IF THEY ACCEPTED MCCONNELL'S EXPLANATION THAT THE NEXT PRESIDENT SHOULD MAKE THE CHOICE, A LAWSUIT TAKEN INTO COURT WOULD HAVE SET LIMITS AND GUIDELINES. LIKE THE FOLLOWING:

"THAT IN FUTURE ELECTIONS, SHOULD A VACANCY OPEN UP, THE COURT REQUIRES THAT THE SAME STANDARDS AND PRECEDENTS THAT HAVE BEEN SET IN THIS CASE MUST BE FOLLOWED." 

THIS TYPE OF RULING WOULD PREVENT CONTINUOUS PERSONAL PREJUDICES, PARTY POLITICS, AND CRIMINAL INTENT FROM TURNING THE PROCESS INTO A 3 RING CIRCUS.
LIKE MCCONNELL AND TRUMP ARE DOING NOW.

HOW LUDICROUS IS THIS? IF WE, AGAIN, ACCEPT MCCONNELLS EXPLANATION THAT THE NEXT PRESIDENT SHOULD MAKE THE CHOICE, THEN GIVING JUDGE GARLAND THE CONSTITUTIONALLY MANDATED HEARING BEFORE THE SENATE WOULD NOT HAVE CHANGED THE ULTIMATE OUTCOME. WITH A REPUBLICAN MAJORITY VOTING NOT TO APPROVE PRESIDENT OBAMAS CHOICE, (WHICH THEY CAN DO CONSTITUTIONALLY), THEY COULD HAVE FORCED A DELAY UNTIL AFTER THE ELECTION. 

THIS WAS THE REAL TEST, AND SENATE DEMOCRATS FAILED MISERABLY. 

TO BE CONTINUED...

NOW WE WILL SEE IF DEMOCRATIC LEADERS CARE ABOUT ALL AMERICANS, OR IF THEY ARE TRUMP SUPPORTERS IN DISGUISE, COWERING BEFORE THEIR LEADER....

 WITH TRUMPS NOMINATION OF AMY CONEY BARRET FOR THE SUPREME COURT, LET US SEE IF DEMOCRATS FILE SUIT TO PREVENT A SENATE CONFIRMATION HEARING, WHICH WAS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY DENIED TO MERRICK GARLAND...

TO BE CONTINUED...

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

REMEMBER THIS BLAST FROM THE PAST: REMEMBER STRIKE 3?

WHAT PROGRESSIVES MUST LEARN: EDUCATE YOURSELF, PAY ATTENTION. AND SCRUTINIZE ALL ELECTION RESULTS.

So what should Progressives, Liberals , and other Groups that believe Government has a Moral Responsibility to Aid those in need, (which doesn't include returning FUNDS LOST THROUGH BAD INVESTMENTS TO THE WEALTHY, WHICH MEANS ALL TAXPAYERS ARE FOOTING THE BILL), to change the minds of those who are buying into the LIES AND FALSEHOODS BEING FED TO THEM BY SELF-CENTERED AND CORRUPT POLITICIANS.

Trump President America American United St

#1-  Acknowledge that the Selfish, Self-Centered, and Dishonest also Vote, so Quit trying to Win over everyone through Fear of Confrontation.

#2-  Stop Allowing Republicans and Ultra Right Wing Candidates to Hijack the Moral High Ground, when its Media Campaign is Transparent, and Easily Refuted.   

#3-  By the Almost Incredible Inability to Stand Up to the Outright Lies and Misrepresentations that
are thrown around come Election Time, regarding Programs that Help the Poor and Disadvantaged.

#4-  When Statistics are Trotted Out about possible Fraudulent Activities in Social Programs, Research and Demand the Sources for such Claims, and Contrast Them with them with  Public Funds Lost Through; 

-  Corporate Bailouts. 

-  Tax Breaks that do not, or are not required
to Benefit the Taxpayer.

-  Funds Acquired Through Government Contracts,
that are Shifted to Foreign Markets with no Positive
Affects on the U.S. Economy.

-  Refusing to Raise Wages to a Minimal Level, which
Encourages Self- Sufficiency, and Decreases the 
Need for Government Aid.

... Other Policies that Push an Agenda that
Benefits a Narrow Set of American Citizens.  

#5-  Point Out to Voters, who have Benefited from 
Programs Instituted by the Progressive Agenda, that
what has been Won by Voting, can be Lost or Unfunded
by Not Voting.

MOST IMPORTANT:

MAKE SURE THAT ELECTIONS, AT ANY LEVEL, ARE SCRUTINIZED CAREFULLY FOR FRAUD. DO NOT TAKE THE RESULTS AT FACE VALUE, BECAUSE EVEN THE LOSERS AT THE POLLS MAY NOT HAVE THE FORTITUDE OR INCLINATION TO CHALLENGE  OUTCOMES THAT ARE FIXED. THAT IS WHAT THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION HAS TAUGHT US.

STRIKE 1.

- THE REPUBLICANS TOOK CONTROL OF THE SUPREME COURT WITHOUT A FIGHT 
BECAUSE THE MORAL AND INTELLECTUAL COWARDICE OF SENATE DEMOCRATS ALLOWED MAJORITY LEADER MCCONNELL TO EFFECTIVELY ELIMINATE THE ROLE OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH IN FILLING A VACANCY ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT.

STRIKE 2.

- DONALD TRUMP WAS HANDED THE WHITE 
HOUSE AFTER A FRAUDULENT ELECTION, WHICH WAS NOT CONTESTED BY ANY MEMBER OF THE U.S. SENATE, OR THE U.S. HOUSE OF REP.

WHAT IS STRIKE 3 GOING TO BE?
- ?