About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Sunday, July 12, 2020

REMEMBERING TRUMPS DISGRACE: ARTICLES AND POSTS FROM HIS IMPEACHMENT.THE MUELLER REPORT. PART 1. WHAT IT IS, AND WHAT IT IS NOT. (BARR SUMMARY LETTER).

SINCE I HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTIES DESIRE TO STAND UP TO THE WANNABE DICTATOR-IN-CHIEF, WHO CONTINUES TO REDUCE THE PUBLIC INTELLECT WITH HIS MINDLESS DRIVEL, I WILL BE REPUBLISHING POSTS FROM THIS DARK TIME IN AMERICAN HISTORY: WHEN A CRIMINAL AND HIS COHORTS SOUGHT TO DESTROY...AND SELL OUT THEIR OWN COUNTRY.- DAVID. 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

(THE INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN THIS 
ARTICLE IS TAKEN FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL
BARRS LETTER TO CONGRESS SUMMARIZING 
THE FINDINGS OF THE MUELLER REPORT, AND 
PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED MATERIAL THAT
APPEARS ON THIS WEBSITE.)






IF YOU VISIT THIS SITE ON A REGULAR BASIS, THE
FOLLOWING ARTICLE IS PROBABLY FAMILIAR;
THE 2016 ELECTION: "INFLUENCING " AN ELECTION,
AND "RIGGING" AN ELECTION ARE TWO DIFFERENT 
ISSUES.

THE MAIN POINT OF THE ARTICLE CAN BE SUMMED UP BY
THE FOLLOWING, (TAKEN FROM THE BODY OF THE POST.)

OBTAINING INFORMATION ILLEGALLY, AND PROVIDING
IT TO ONE SIDE IN AN ELECTION TO HARM THE OTHER 
BY ATTEMPTING TO INFLUENCE VOTERS...

AND

...PHYSICALLY ALTERING VOTING COUNTS THROUGH THE BALLOT BOX, OR COMPUTER, SO THAT ONE CANDIDATE EMERGES VICTORIOUS...


...ARE SEPERATE AND DISTINCT ACTIONS. THE TRUTH OF ONE IS NOT DEPENDENT 
ON THE OTHER. THEY MAY BOTH BE TRUE, OR BOTH FALSE. ONE MAY BE TRUE, AND THE OTHER FALSE. WE MUST NOT ALLOW EVIDENCE, OR LACK OF, IN ONE CASE TO BE USED IN JUDGING THE OTHER.


HOW DOES THIS RELATE TO THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION?

A MAIN GOAL OF THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION WAS TO ANSWER THE FIRST PART, WHICH INCLUDES 
THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT OBTAINING PRIVATE AND PRIVILEGED INFORMATION ABOUT THE OPPOSITION PARTY AND CANDIDATE, AND OFFERING IT TO TRUMPS CAMPAIGN TO HELP WIN THE ELECTION.

HOWEVER, IN THE SECOND PART, THE ALTERING OF VOTING COUNTS TO ENSURE A DONALD TRUMP VICTORY, IS NOT SOMETHING ADDRESSED BY THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION, AND HAS NO BEARING ON THE POSSIBLE FINDINGS OF "COLLUSION" OR "OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE" THAT ARE THE GOALS OF THE INVESTIGATION.  

ALONG THESE LINES, THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES INVESTIGATION OF DONALD TRUMPS FINANCES, BOTH THE SOURCES AND THE POSSIBILITY THAT FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC POLICY COULD BE INFLUENCED FOR THE RIGHT CONSIDERATIONS, IS SEPERATE FROM ANYTHING THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION ADDRESSED, AND ANY ATTEMPT TO BRING THEM TOGETHER IS DEMONSTRABLY FALSE.

IN THE END, IT COMES DOWN TO THE FOLLOWINGIT IS NO MORE VALID FOR ME TO SAY THAT DONALD TRUMP IS GUILTY OF FINANCIAL CRIMES IN THE HOUSE INVESTIGATION BECAUSE THE MUELLER REPORT SUPPORTS THE ACCUSATION OF "COLLUSION" OR "OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE,"... 

...THEN IT WOULD BE FOR ME TO SAY THAT HE IS INNOCENT OF ANY CHARGES BROUGHT BY THE HOUSE BECAUSE THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION DID NOT FIND SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO BRING CHARGES AGAINST HIM,(OR HIS CAMPAIGN.) 




Thursday, July 9, 2020

TWITTER NEWS. Supreme Court rules Trump must turn over tax records to New York prosecutors.

Header media
On Thursday, the Supreme Court upheld a subpoena issued by New York prosecutors to access President Trump's tax records. In doing so, the decision rejects Trump's assertion that sitting presidents should be exempt from criminal investigations while in office. Both of Trump's SCOTUS appointees, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch, ruled against him.
Photo via @nycjim

I hope this puts an end to the FASCIST FANTASY THAT THE POTHUS IS ABOVE THE LAW, SINCE NOWHERE IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION IS ANYONE GIVEN A FREE PASS FROM CRIMINAL PROSECUTION.- DAVID

Wednesday, July 8, 2020

WELL DEMOCRATS: NOW IS THE TIME TO STAND UP FOR LT. COLONEL VINDMAN, AND OTHERS, WHO HELPED TO EXPOSE TRUMP.

TWITTER NEWS

YOU REMEMBER THEM: THOSE WHO RISKED JUST ABOUT EVERYTHING TO TESTIFY AT THE TRUMP IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS, AMONG OTHER THINGS.

DEMOCRATS, NOW IS THE TIME TO REALLY SET YOURSELF APART FROM A REPUBLICAN PARTY WHO SOLD OUT THEIR COUNTRY, BY PROTECTING A CRIMINAL WHO PUT RUSSIAS AGENDA AHEAD OF THE COUNTRY HE SWORE TO PROTECT.


Header media

Impeachment witness Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman announces his retirement as his lawyer cites Trump's 'bullying, intimidation and retaliation'
Lt. Col. Vindman, who served as a key witness during President Trump's impeachment hearings, announced his retirement from the US Army after more than 21 years of service on Wednesday. Vindman was reportedly due for a promotion that was being stalled by the White House, following a "campaign of bullying, intimidation and retaliation" led by the president, Vindman's lawyer said.
Photo via @nbcchicago

BLAST FROM THE PAST: THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: IT WAS A RIGGED, NEITHER HILLARY CLINTON OR BERNIE SANDERS WOULD HAVE WON. PT 1.

Trump, Politics, President


...That even with the results of the 2016 Presidential Election staring them in the face, neither the REPUBLICANS OR DEMOCRATS are going to contest the BOGUS ELECTION RESULTS THAT HANDED DONALD TRUMP THE OVAL OFFICE. So, if valid and fair Elections are a priority for you, I SUGGEST WORKING VERY HARD AT THE LOCAL AND STATE LEVELS, TO ENSURE THAT RESULTS ARE AUDITED, COMPUTER RESULTS ARE CHECKED AND RECHECKED, AND THAT THOSE WHO ARE IN PLACE TO ENSURE HONESTY AND ACCURACY ARE INVESTIGATED FOR ANY POSSIBLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Apparently, at the Federal Level it is not a priority. DO NOT TAKE THE WORD OF YOUR OWN PARTY, BECAUSE HONEST AND OPEN ELECTIONS MIGHT NOT BE IMPORTANT. 

Just a reminder, these results were ACHIEVED BY THE ALTERING OF THE FINAL VOTE COUNTS.  Feeding or Providing one side with information detrimental to the other, COULD HAVE INFLUENCED VOTERS BEFORE THEY ENTERED THE POLLS, BUT WOULD NOT GUARANTEE VICTORY. THERE IS NO WAY TO QUANTIFY THE AMOUNT OF INFLUENCE SUCH INFORMATION WOULD HAVE. The Final Vote counts were determined by ILLEGALLY ENTERING THE SYSTEM , AND ENSURING THAT THE TOTALS GAVE DONALD TRUMP VICTORY.

Along the same lines; It is hilarious that Democrats are still turning on one another, ATTEMPTING TO EXPLAIN THE DONALD TRUMP VICTORY AT THE POLLS.

GUESS WHAT?: IT WAS A RIGGED ELECTION, NEITHER HILLARY CLINTON OR BERNIE SANDERS WOULD HAVE WON. TRY LOOKING FOR ACTUAL SOLUTIONS, INSTEAD OF GIVING DONALD TRUMP AN OPPORTUNITY TO TALK ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY DISUNITY, SO HE CAN AVOID TALKING ABOUT THE UNMITIGATED DISASTER HIS ADMINISTRATION HAS BECOME.