About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Thursday, June 4, 2020

ETHICS AND MORALITY. RIGHTS- WHAT THEY ARE, AND WHAT THEY ARE NOT. PT 1.



Statue Of Liberty, Landmark, Close

There is perhaps no more important word, when we discuss such issues as Freedom of Choice,
Protection from Governmental Interference into our lives, and yes, "Life, Liberty and the pursuit
of Happiness." Yet, the definition of RIGHTS seems to be something many don't understand. 

Even more alarmingly, there are those who define the term in different ways at different times, depending on the agenda they are supporting in the latest election cycle.

The goal of this article is to define what is meant when the word RIGHTS is used properly, and to shed light on the improper usage of the term.

In general terms, a RIGHT can be referenced and defined in several ways:

-  A Protection against Persecution for certain behaviors, that an individual or group may engage in.

-  The ability to make decisions about ones' own life, free of improper
influence or malicious retribution.

-  Protecting groups that are recognized legally, from hostile actions by those
who desire to inflict harm upon the members, without just cause.

-  Punishment administered to any individual, Either by Government, Social Organization, or Employer must be justified through defined procedures that allow the individual an opportunity to provide a proper defense to any and all charges. Further, that judgment will be based on facts and evidence that were gathered in a prescribed manner.  Of course, the degree to which these are implemented differs from the Public to the Private sector.

When speaking of Rights that are found in the Private Sector, we usually find them to be creations of contractual agreements between Employer and Employee, or in By-Laws that are part of a fraternal organizations code of conduct for members. By their very nature, these Rights affect a very select group.

This is not true in the Public Sector.
End of PT 1.  

Tuesday, June 2, 2020

"TO PROTECT, AND TO SERVE." THEY GET IT.

THIS IS WHAT A REAL "STATESMAN" SOUNDS LIKE.




Photo via @CNNPolitics



Go to Moment

THE TRUE "FACE" OF FACEBOOK.


AOL NEWS.

Civil rights leaders slam Zuckerberg 

after meeting on Trump posts.





A group of civil rights leaders who spoke with Mark Zuckerberg Monday night
 blasted the Facebook CEO afterward for his refusal to take action on posts by 
President Donald Trump they say incite violence.
In a joint statement, Vanita Gupta of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, 
Sherrilyn Ifill of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, and Rashad Robinson of 
Color of Change said they were “disappointed and stunned by Mark’s incomprehensible
 explanations for allowing the Trump posts to remain up.”
“He did not demonstrate understanding of historic or modern-day voter suppression and 
he refuses to acknowledge how Facebook is facilitating Trump’s call for violence against 
protesters,” the statement continued. “Mark is setting a very dangerous precedent for 
other voices who would say similar harmful things on Facebook.”
Trump’s posts came as protests flared around the country following the death of 
George Floyd, a Black man, after a white Minneapolis police officer knelt on 
his neck. In one message, Trump called protesters “THUGS” and said 
“when the looting starts, the shooting starts,” parroting a racist Miami
 police chief’s quote against 1960s civil rights protests. 
Twitter placed Trump’s posts on that platform behind a warning label that 
said they violated rules against “glorifying violence.”
 The company didn’t take the tweets down, however, saying
 it was “in the public’s interest” for the president’s posts to remain accessible.
Facebook did nothing.
Facebook told HuffPost the company appreciated the “candid” dialogue.
“We’re grateful that leaders in the civil rights community took the time to share candid, honest feedback with Mark and Sheryl,” a spokesperson said in an emailed statement. “It is an important moment to listen, and we look forward to continuing these conversations.”
Facebook employees on Monday began to speak out publicly against the company and staged a “virtual walkout” to protest Zuckerberg’s inaction.
Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg, policy executives Nick Clegg and Joel Kaplan, and external affairs director Lindsay Elin were also on the call with the civil rights leaders. Kaplan’s inclusion is notable ― he’s a close friend of Supreme Court Justice Bret Kavanaugh and supported Kavanaugh’s controversial nomination at the expense of Facebook’s reputation.
  • This article originally appeared on HuffPost.