About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Monday, November 4, 2019

NPR BREAKING NEWS. Congress Releases First Transcripts From Closed-Door Trump Impeachment Depositions.

Former Ambassador To Ukraine Says She Was Told To 'Watch Her Back'

Former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch testified Oct. 11 as part of the House impeachment inquiry into President Trump. The full transcript of her testimony was released Monday.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Updated 1:38 p.m. EST
Congressional investigators released the first transcripts of closed-door testimonies from individuals at the center of the Ukraine affair, which has landed President Trump in an impeachment inquiry.
The transcripts are of the hours-long depositions of former Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch and Michael McKinley, a former senior adviser to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Yovanovitch, who has decades of diplomatic experience, was recalled as ambassador, and Trump referred to her as "the woman" and "bad news" in his phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy.
Yovanovitch said, per the transcript of her deposition, the first she heard that Rudy Giuliani, Trump's personal lawyer, was targeting her was from Ukrainian officials. She also noted that Ukrainian officials told her she should "watch her back," because now-arrested Giuliani associates Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman wanted a different ambassador in the post.
"I guess for — because they wanted to have business dealings in Ukraine or additional business dealings," Yovanovitch told House Intelligence Committee members, which include Republicans. "I didn't understand that, because nobody at the embassy had ever met those two individuals. And, you know, one of the biggest jobs of an American ambassador of the U.S. Embassy is to promote U.S. business. So, of course, if legitimate business comes to us, you know, that's what we do — we promote U.S. business."
The release of the transcripts is one of the first steps in the new public phase of the impeachment inquiry. A record of Trump's call with Zelenskiy shows him asking for "a favor" of investigations into conspiracy theories about the 2016 election and into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden. That came right after Zelenskiy inquired about purchasing more American weapons.
Trump also said Zelenskiy should work with his Giuliani and Attorney General William Barr on the investigations.
Opening statements had previously been released, but these transcripts, which are hundreds of pages long, include full questions and answers with some sensitive items redacted.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff of California promised to release more transcripts Tuesday — from former special envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker and Ambassador to the EU Gordon Sondland. Sondland was a major Trump donor, and witnesses have contradicted parts of Sondland's testimony.
Yovanovitch detailed a campaign to oust her from her post, and when she spoke to Sondland about the campaign against her, he told her that she should tweet her praise for Trump.
"You need to, you know, tweet out there that you support the president and that all these are lies and everything else," Yovanovitch said, paraphrasing what Sondland told her. "And, you know, so, you know, I mean, obviously, that was advice. It was advice that I did not see how I could implement in my role as an ambassador and as a foreign service officer."
McKinley, a career foreign service officer, said that the way Yovanovitch was treated "raised alarm bells" and that it "had a very serious effect on morale."
"I'm just going to state it clearly," McKinley told Congress. "As a foreign service officer, to see the impugning of somebody I know to be a serious, committed colleague in the manner that it was done raised alarm bells for me."
He also noted concerns about "bullying tactics" at the State Department after complaints were lodged about getting information to Congress in a timely manner. And he noted that he was "absolutely appalled" that the State Department was not going to provide legal financial support for people who had to go and testify before Congress.
Four administration officials defied congressional subpoenas and chose not to testify in closed-door depositions Monday despite being scheduled to do so. Schiff said those four will help build a case for an article of impeachment that includes obstruction of Congress' constitutionally mandated duties.
Schiff called all four "firsthand witnesses" to serious allegations of misconduct.
"We may infer that their testimony would be further incriminating for the president," Schiff argued, adding that the administration's strategy of not cooperating amounts to "delay, deny, obstruct."
Schiff also noted that transcripts from Yovanovitch and McKinley detailed the "back channel" efforts by Giuliani, which he said included "a vicious smear campaign" to remove Yovanovitch.
He declined to comment on whom the committee planned to ask to appear in public hearings.
NPR's Deirdre Walsh contributed to this report.

NPR BREAKING NEWS: APPEALS COURT RULES TRUMPS ACCOUNTANTS MUST TURN OVER TAX RECORDS.

Appeals Court Rules Trump's Accountants Must Turn Over Tax Records

An appeals court has ruled President Trump's accounting firm must turn over his tax returns to the Manhattan district attorney.
Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP
President Trump has lost another legal fight in his efforts to keep his tax returns private. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday that Trump's accounting firm must turn over his tax returns to Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.
The president will appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court, said Jay Sekulow, one of Trump's outside attorneys.
"The decision of the Second Circuit will be taken to the Supreme Court. The issue raised in this case goes to the heart of our Republic. The constitutional issues are significant," said Sekulow in a statement.
Vance has sought the records as part of an investigation into whether two women who said they had affairs with Trump were paid for their silence before the 2016 election.
The appellate court's order upholds a U.S. District Court order from last month requiring Trump's accounting firm, Mazars USA, to turn over Trump's personal and business tax returns starting from 2011.
As a candidate and as president, Trump has broken from long-standing practice to make his returns public. Unlike other past presidents, Trump has also not divested from his business interests.
Trump's attorneys claim that as president, he is immune from criminal investigation. A lower court found that argument "repugnant to the nation's fundamental structure and constitutional values."
The appeals court did not rule on the merits of that claim but said that because Vance's office was seeking the records from Trump's accounting firm, and not the president, the question of immunity was not a factor.
"The subpoena at issue is directed not to the President, but to his accountants; compliance does not require the President to do anything at all," wrote Judge Robert Katzman on behalf of the three-judge panel.
Vance's office is looking into whether any New York state laws were broken when Trump's then-attorney, Michael Cohen, arranged payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal in the closing weeks of the 2016 election. Trump has denied having sexual relationships with the two women.
The president is also fighting efforts by the House of Representatives to obtain his tax records.

Saturday, November 2, 2019

IMPEACHING DONALD TRUMP: LET ME COUNT THE WAYS. PART 5.


Donald Trump

Before I get back to the reasoning behind the necessity to Impeach DONALD TRUMP, AND WHY HE DESERVES TO BE REMOVED FROM THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT, IT'S NECESSARY TO CLEAR UP SOME MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT THE PROCESS. IN THIS WAY WE CAN IDENTIFY FALSE AND MISLEADING INFORMATION THAT WILL COME FROM THOSE WHO SEEK TO PROTECT DONALD TRUMP,  SO THAT THEY CAN PRESERVE AND EXPAND FASCIST IDEOLOGY ACROSS ALL BRANCHES OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. IN OTHER WORDS, A LEGACY OF HATE.

IMPEACHMENT, on any level, be it President, Congressman, Judge etc, is not part of our JUSTICE SYSTEM. Our System of Laws, be it CRIMINAL OR CIVIL, does not address the Concept Of  IMPEACHMENT. THE FINDERS OF FACT are not Judges or Juries, but the MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. IT IS THEY WHO EVALUATE THE ACTIONS AND BEHAVIORS OF THE INDIVIDUAL FACING POSSIBLE IMPEACHMENT, AND IF THE FACTS SUPPORT IT, A VERDICT THAT LEADS TO REMOVAL FROM OFFICE.

The BILL OF RIGHTS has nothing to do with IMPEACHMENT. CONCEPTS such as DUE PROCESS, MIRANDA RIGHTS, TRIAL BY JURY, BURDEN OF PROOF, DOUBLE JEOPARDY etc, that are part of our SYSTEM OF LAWS, ARE NOT PART OF THE PROCESS OF IMPEACHMENT. ANYONE WHO CLAIMS THAT THEY ARE IS EITHER IGNORANT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER, INCOMPETENT, OR LYING.

TO BE CONTINUED...

Friday, November 1, 2019

NPR BREAKING NEWS: ELIZABETH WARREN AND MEDICARE FOR ALL.

READ: Elizabeth Warren's Plan To Pay For 'Medicare For All'

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., has released her plan to fund single-payer health care, keeping with a pledge not to raise taxes on the middle class.
Zach Gibson/Getty Images
Updated at 11:10 a.m. ET
Sen. Elizabeth Warren says she can fund "Medicare for All" without raising taxes on the middle class. Instead, among other things, she would boost the wealth tax on the ultra-rich that she has promoted on the campaign trail.
Warren had promised at a recent debate that she would not sign a bill that raises health care costs for the middle class. Under a plan released Friday morning, the Massachusetts senator and 2020 Democratic presidential candidate goes further: Middle class Americans would no longer pay health premiums or copays and would also not pay any new taxes to replace those costs. However, they would pay taxes on whatever extra take-home pay they would receive in this new system.
However, she will boost what had been a 3% wealth tax on people with more than a billion dollars to 6%. Her plan would also have employers pay higher taxes to the government, which she says would replace what they currently pay toward private health insurance.
Warren is proposing $20.5 trillion in new federal spending under the proposal.
Altogether, Warren's plan says that total national health costs would not go up under the single-payer health proposal. Rather, all of the estimated $52 trillion in health spending over a decade would be paid via the federal government.
ClarificationNov. 1, 2019
While middle class Americans would no longer pay health premiums or copays under Elizabeth Warren's proposal and would also not pay any new taxes to replace those costs, they would pay taxes on whatever extra take-home pay might result.