About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

QUICK HITTERS- WHAT MOTIVATES MOST PEOPLE? IS IT NOTORIETY AT ANY COST? PT 3.



WHAT MOTIVATES MOST PEOPLE?
IS IT NOTORIETY AT ANY COST?  PT 3.

You really have to wonder what goes on inside the mind
of someone who deliberately sets up Themselves, Family, and
Friends to be the Object of Scorn and Ridicule.  Is Fame so 
Important, that Attaining it in any Manner is a Worthwhile Life
Choice?

Well, in some cases, it seems so.  Why?  Because the Foolish,
Vain, Egotistical, Ill- Informed, Selfish, Irrational and Prejudiced are
Often Celebrated and Rewarded in our Society, with Financial Benefits
that encourage others to follow the same path.  In Fact, some of Them run
for Political Office, and Win.  

This is the State of much of the Programming we see in the Visual Medium, 
often Cloaked under the Guide as being News Worthy.

Time and Time again we Hear these "Media Darlings" Spew outright
Garbage into a Microphone, giving Their Opinions on Medicine, Politics,
Social Programs, Science and so on...

Guess What? This may be difficult for some to understand, but Media 
Exposure and Availability does NOT MAKE WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY 
ANY MORE REASONABLE OR INTELLIGENT JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE
GIVES THEM AIR TIME.

However, the Biggest Tragedy is that the Message or Opinion is Allowed to 
Stand by the Hosts or Producers, without any Dissension from someone 
who Actually knows what Their Talking About.

(NO I AM NOT GOING TO LIST THE NAMES OF "CELEBRITIES,"
THEIR FAMILIES, PEOPLE FAMOUS FOR DUBIOUS OR NONSENSICAL
ACHIEVEMENTS, TALK SHOW DARLINGS etc. If you want to find Them,
I'm not going to help. Research Forces Me to View Samples of this Mindless
Drivel, which is Almost Painful to Watch.)







QUICK HITTERS. WHAT MOTIVATES MOST PEOPLE? IS IT NOTORIETY AT ANY COST? PT 2.


WHAT MOTIVATES MOST PEOPLE?
IS IT NOTORIETY AT ANY COST?  PT 2.

Of Course, We can't Blame the Traditional News Media, and the Lack of Professionalism and Objectivity that seems to Pervade the Medium, for every Example of a Dubious and Frivolous Story that hits the Airways.

News Programming, in All it's Forms, is not Uniform in Nature.  The Level of Safeguards and Precautions set in place to Avoid Incorrect, Invalid, or Irrational News Items can Differ greatly. 

These EDITORIAL STANDARDS can Vary Greatly, From Channel to Channel, or Network to Network.  Unfortunately, it seems that Most Viewers do not Understand the Degree to Which some News Outlets place on Entertainment Value, at the Price of Veracity, Importance, and Quality.  What is Really Tragic, it seems like the Entertainment Emphasized News Shows represent the Majority of the Options currently Available to Those Tuning In.  The Result, as I Mentioned in PT 1, are Offerings that seem Interchangeable and Identical in Format and Content.

So what does This Tell Us about Individuals and Groups that seek News and Media Coverage to Promote Themselves, or a Particular Agenda? 


Thursday, November 24, 2016

DONALD TRUMP AND FOX NEWS- WHAT YOU SEE, IS WHAT YOU GET. (Updated)

HERE IS SOME UPDATED INFORMATION, WHICH I AM ADDING ON 11/22/2016.


HERE ARE TWO "ADVERTORIALS," BOTH FEATURING DONALD TRUMP.
AS YOU WILL SEE, THEY ARE BASICALLY THE SAME SALES PITCH.  JUST THE NAMES ARE ALTERED, AND THEY BOTH INCLUDE THE SAME "ENDORSEMENT" FROM DONALD TRUMP.  HOWEVER, HE WOULDN'T DO ANYTHING THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED "FRAUDULENT," WOULD HE?


HERE IS A LOOK AT THE NEW DONALD TRUMP ADVERTORIAL. THE ORIGINAL ADVERTORIAL IS BELOW IT.

FOX 
BUSINESS.


(Fox News) --Speaking before a packed auditorium Donald Trump revealed his secret economic Stimulus Plan behind his "Make America Great Again" initiative. "It's no secret that the Average American is earning less today than they were before the 2008 recession." Stated Mr. Trump. "The reason is simple. There are people who know how to make money very easily, and they've rigged the system for themselves without sharing their secrets with people who really need it."

THE "CLIENT" IS NOW Financial Independence Academy.

IN THIS "REPORT" WE SEE THE FOLLOWING LINE:

"Trump has not hidden his affection for Mr. Anderson. He has recently been praising him on 

social media for his efforts to teach regular people how to create amazing wealth in their 

spare time."

IN THE PREVIOUS "REPORT" WE FIND THIS:
(THE CLIENT WAS "HOME CASH CODE")

"Trump has not hidden his affection for Ms. Taylor. He has recently been praising her

on social media for her efforts to teach regular people how to create amazing wealth In Their spare time.

WE ALSO FIND THIS IN THE NEW POST:

"We investigated the claims made by Mr. Trump and Mr. Anderson, and what we found is nothing short of amazing."

IN THE PREVIOUS POST.

"We investigated the claims made by Mr. Trump and Ms. Taylor, and what we found is nothing short of amazing."



HERE IS THE DISCLAIMER FROM THE NEW "ADVERTORIAL."
These statements have not been evaluated or endorsed by Dianne Fischer, Donald Trump, or their companies. The use of Fox Business and Fox Business.com and any and all trademarks belonging to or relating to Fox are used for entertainment purposes only. This information was not written, reviewed or approved by Dianne Fischer, Donald Trump, any employee or representative of Fox Business or any of its affiliates. Fox News does not endorse or approve any of the comments made in this advertorial. Financial Independence Academy is not affiliated with Dianne Fischer, Donald Trump, or any of Dianne Fischer or Donald Trump companies. Any and all quotations attributed to Dianne Fischer or Donald Trump in the above advertorial do not represent the opinions of Dianne Fischer or Donald Trump in any way. These products and services are not affiliated with Dianne Fischer, Donald Trump or any of Dianne Fischer, Donald Trump companies. This piece is purely for entertainment purposes only. 



HERE IS THE DISCLAIMER FROM THE FIRST "ADVERTORIAL."
These statements have not been evaluated or endorsed by Donald Trump or the Trump companies.The use of Fox News, Fox News.com and any and all trademarks belonging to or relating to Fox News are used for entertainment purposes only. This information was not written, reviewed or approved by any employee or representative of Fox News or any of its affiliates. Fox News does not endorse or approve any of the comments made in this advertorial.
Home Cash Code is not affiliated with Donald Trump, or any of the Trump companies. Any and all quotations attributed to Mr. Trump in the above advertorial do not represent the opinions of Mr Trump in any way. These products and services not affiliated with Donald Trump or any of the Trump companies. This piece is purely for entertainment purposes only.






HERE IS THE FIRST "ADVERTORIAL."

FOX NEWS

Home  Video  Politics U.S. Opinion Money.

Donald Trump reveals simple plan to help every American earn more money.
By Michael Pearson, Faith Karimi, and Joe Sutton, Fox News.









Mr, Trump says the best opportunity available is a new program called Home Cash Code which teaches regular people to take advantage of this massive internet opportunity quickly and easily, and even places them with real online companies that pay them for their time completing simple tasks.
"Sara Taylor is absolutely changing the world with her Home Cash Code program" he said. "Normally, rich people keep the secrets to their wealth to themselves. But Sara, she has found an amazing opportunity, and she is sharing it with everyone. That's incredible."
Trump has not hidden his affection for Ms. Taylor. He has recently been praising her on social media for her efforts to teach regular people how to create amazing wealth in their spare time.
We investigated the claims made by Mr. Trump and Ms. Taylor, and what we found is nothing short of amazing.





These statements have not been evaluated or endorsed by Donald Trump or the Trump companies.The use of Fox News, Fox News.com and any and all trademarks belonging to or relating to Fox News are used for entertainment purposes only. This information was not written, reviewed or approved by any employee or representative of Fox News or any of its affiliates. Fox News does not endorse or approve any of the comments made in this advertorial.

Home Cash Code is not affiliated with Donald Trump, or any of the Trump companies. Any and all quotations attributed to Mr. Trump in the above advertorial do not represent the opinions of Mr Trump in any way. These products and services not affiliated with Donald Trump or any of the Trump companies. This piece is purely for entertainment purposes only.






Thursday, November 17, 2016

ETHICS AND MORALITY. RIGHTS- WHAT THEY ARE, AND WHAT THEY ARE NOT. PT 6.


 Supreme Court Building, Supreme Court

Let us now examine another quote, taken from  
a speech given by the late Justice Anton Scalia.

“We do him [God] honor in our pledge of allegiance, in all our public ceremonies,” Justice Scalia said. “There’s nothing wrong with that. It is in the best of American traditions, and don’t let anybody tell you otherwise. I think we have to fight that tendency of the secularists to impose it on all of us through the Constitution."

Before I get into the question of the history of the PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, I would like to address something else said at the same time.

"WE DO HIM (GOD) HONOR... IN ALL OUR PUBLIC CEREMONIES."  This is perhaps the most clear expression of the lack of coherent knowledge about the content of the CONSTITUTION by Justice Scalia or, more likely, that he has abandoned any pretense of being Fair and Unbiased.

How is this possible?  Here it is, and I quote:  The Senators and Representatives...and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers... shall be bound by Oath and Affirmation, to support this Constitution;
but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public trust under the United States. (Italics are mine.)

This is taken from Article Six of the U.S. Constitution.  We, as Americans, can never require an elected or appointed public official, to relate or explain their private religious beliefs, as a requirement to hold office.  This includes PUBLIC CEREMONIES THAT INCLUDE SWEARING THEM INTO OFFICE.  IF AN AMERICAN MUST FIRST ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY ACCEPT THE EXISTENCE OF A RELIGIOUS ENTITY, AS PART OF AN OATH OF OFFICE, AND BY REFUSING TO EXCLUDES THEM FROM HOLDING OFFICE, YOU HAVE CREATED A TEST OF RELIGIOUS OBEDIENCE. 

This is Unconstitutional.  It is a first step into creating a THEOCRACY. The only oath required to be taken before one enters office, is the following, also spelled out in Article Six:  ...SHALL BE BOUND BY OATH OF AFFIRMATION TO SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTION.

This is clear, and leaves no room for interpretation.

End of PT 6.
(First published on 10/25/2014)