REMEMBER THIS? WHEN FRAUD STOLE THE WHITE HOUSE. PART 8.

 

THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION- SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG. PART 8.

REPUBLICAN PARTY VOTING RESULTS FOR 2012 AND 2016.

HERE IS THE % BREAKDOWN FOR THE                                     
24 STATES THAT VOTED REPUBLICAN                                        
IN 2012 AND 2016.                                                                              

IF THE CANDIDATE LISTED IS ROMNEY,                                     
THE HIGHER FIGURE IS FROM 2012.                                             

IF IT IS TRUMP, THE HIGHER FIGURE IS                                      
FROM 2016.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                                         
ALABAMA- TRUMP: 62.08%.- 60.55%                             
ALASKA-  ROMNEY: 54.80%- 51.28%
ARIZONA- ROMNEY: 53.65%- 48.67%
ARKANSAS- TIE- 60.57%
GEORGIA- ROMNEY: 53.30%- 50.77%
IDAHO- ROMNEY: 64.53%- 59.26%
INDIANA- TRUMP: 56.82%- 54.13%
KANSAS- ROMNEY: 59.71%- 56.65%
KENTUCKY- TRUMP: 62.5%- 60.49%
LOUISIANA- TRUMP: 58.09%- 57.78%
MISSISSIPPI- TRUMP: 57.94%- 55.28%
MISSOURI- TRUMP: 56.77%- 53.76%
MONTANA- TRUMP: 56.17%- 55.35%
NEBRASKA- ROMNEY: 59.80%- 58.75%
NORTH CAROLINA- ROMNEY: 50.39%- 49.83%
NORTH DAKOTA- TRUMP: 62.96%- 58.32%
OKLAHOMA- ROMNEY: 66.77%- 65.32%
SOUTH CAROLINA- TRUMP: 54.94%- 54.56%
SOUTH DAKOTA- TRUMP: 61.53%- 57.89%
TENNESSEE- TRUMP: 60.72%- 59.48%
TEXAS- ROMNEY: 57.17%- 52.23%
UTAH- ROMNEY: 72.79%- 45.54%
WEST VIRGINIA- TRUMP: 68.63%- 62.30%
WYOMING- ROMNEY: 68.64%- 67.40%

UTAHS LARGE MARGIN BETWEEN
2012- 72.79%, 2016- 45.54% COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED
BY THE 21.54% EARNED BY EVAN MCMULLEN (IND.)
IN 2016.


THE BIGGEST INCREASE FROM 2012- 2016.
WEST VIRGINIA- +6.33%.

THE BIGGEST DECREASE- IDAHO -5.27%


NOW, HERE ARE THE 6 STATES THAT VOTED DEMOCRAT IN 2012, BUT REPUBLICAN
IN 2016.

KEEP IN MIND, THESE TOTALS REVEAL NOTHING ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTIES RESULTS FOR THE TWO ELECTIONS.

CHANGES IN REPUBLICAN SUPPORT FROM 2012-2016.

                       2012 RESULTS.            2016 RESULTS.                    NUMBER/ %

FLORIDA.       4,163,447                       4,617,886                           +454,439/ +10.9%

IOWA.              730,617                          800,983                              +70,366/ +9.6%

MICHIGAN.    2,115,256                        2,279,543                           +164,287/ +7.8%

OHIO.             2,661,437                         2,841,005                           +179,568/ +6.7%

PENN.             2,680,434.                        2,970,733                          +290,299/+10.8%

WISCONSIN.  1,407,966                         1,405,284                          -2682/-.02%


AS YOU CAN SEE, 5 OF THE STATES HAD % INCREASES LARGER THAN ANY OF THE
24 STATES WHO VOTED REPUBLICAN IN BOTH ELECTIONS. REMEMBER, THESE WERE
STATES THAT WENT DEMOCRAT 4 YEARS EARLIER.

KEEP IN MIND THAT MICHIGAN AND PENNSYLVANIA HAD VOTED DEMOCRAT SINCE 1992.

SO YOU DON"T LIKE THE TERM "GARBAGE."?

 Let's see, we have a Presidential Candidate who;

- Tried to overthrow a Lawfully Elected Government.

- Is friendly with Dictators throughout the world.

- Insults and Degrades Ethnicities across the U.S.

- Is a convicted Criminal and been held Civilly Liable

for Sexually Assaulting a Woman.

- Wants to be a Dictator from day one.

- Wants to use the Military and Federal Authorities to go

after his enemies.

- Seeks to end Universal Health Care.

- Misquotes and wants to abuse the 2nd Amendment.

- Has no idea that the following terms:

Refugee.

Resident Alien.

Illegal Immigrant.

Are not defined the same way.

- Wants to make sure the Wealthiest get the biggest and

longest tax breaks.

- Believes Religious Fanatics should run our Schools and

Courts.

and on and on...

You don't like the term "Garbage" to describe Trumps supporters? 

WHAT TERM WOULD YOU USE TO DESCRIBE A GROUP

VOTING FOR A CANDIDATE TRYING TO DESTROY OUR

CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC? WHO HEARS THE THINGS 
 
HE AND HIS CRONIES HAVE TO SAY, AND STILL CHEER HIM ON.

SO YOU DONT LIKE THE TERM "GARBAGE."?

REALLY?

REMEMBER THIS? WHEN FRAUD STOLE THE WHITE HOUSE. PART 7.

 

THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION- SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG. PART 7.

IT IS THIS BAD...

Before I continue with an Analysis of the 2016 Presidential Election, I would like to point out a couple of things:

-  All the Statistics and Numbers I use in this SERIES OF POSTS ARE AVAILABLE AND EASY TO FIND ON THE INTERNET. NUMEROUS SITES CARRY THE "OFFICIAL" ELECTION RETURNS FOR EACH STATE, AND THE U.S AS A WHOLE. IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THE FIGURES, AT LEAST HAVE THE INTELLECTUAL HONESTY TO BACK IT WITH FACTUAL DATA. IT CAN BE AS EASY AS GOING ON WIKIPEDIA, AND ENTERING "2016" OR "2012" ELECTION. However, if you don't want to use WIKIPEDIA, I'm sure your News Outlet of Choice will contain all the information you need.

-  The RUSSIAN CONNECTION TO THIS ELECTION, WHILE DISTURBING, IS NOT THE REAL STORY.  AS I SAID IN THE LAST POST, YOU CANNOT "QUANTIFY" THE AMOUNT OR NUMBER OF VOTES THAT WERE GAINED OR LOST BY THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT LEAKING INFORMATION DETRIMENTAL TO HILLARY CLINTON.

EVEN IF THIS INTERFERENCE WENT AS FAR AS HACKING INTO SYSTEMS TO ALTER

VOTER RETURNS, IT LEAVES ONE MORE IMPORTANT FACTOR TO CONSIDER:

IT WAS NOT RUSSIAN POLITICIANS WHO CERTIFIED, AND SIGNED OFF ON THE "OFFICIAL NUMBERS." IT WAS AMERICAN ELECTION OFFICIALS WHO DID THAT. AS IMPROBABLE AS THESE TOTALS SEEM TO BE IN SOME CASES, NO ONE CONTESTED THEM.  

THAT IS THE REAL STORY.

I'll leave you with another example:

PENNSYLVANIA- 2012 ELECTION. TOTAL # OF DEMOCRAT\REPUBLICAN VOTES: 5,670,708.

TOTAL DEMOCRATIC VOTES- 2,990,274.

TOTAL REPUBLICAN VOTES- 2,680,434.

MARGIN OF DEMOCRATIC VICTORY- 309,840 VOTES.

PENNSYLVANIA- 2016 ELECTION.  TOTAL # OF DEMOCRATIC/REPUBLICAN VOTES: 5,897,174.  UP +226,466 VOTES FROM 2012 ELECTION.

TOTAL DEMOCRATIC VOTES- 2,926,441 VOTES, LOSS OF 63,833 VOTES FROM 2012 ELECTION.

TOTAL REPUBLICAN VOTES- 2,970,733 VOTES, GAIN OF +290,299 VOTES.

HERE IS A BREAKDOWN:

The TOTAL # OF DEMOCRAT/REPUBLICAN VOTES INCREASED +226,466 votes from

2012-2016.

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY LOST 63,833 VOTES BETWEEN 2012 AND 2016, OR ABOUT -2.1%. In itself, that's 

not a drastic decline. It would be considered a result that is well within normal expectations.

HOWEVER, THE REPUBLICAN PARTY NUMBERS ARE ANOTHER MATTER. AN INCREASE OF +290,299 VOTES REPRESENTS ABOUT AN + 10.8% INCREASE. 

This number, (+290,299), is more than 4 times the number 

of votes that the Democrats lost.

TO ACHIEVE THE TOTAL OF 2,970,733 VOTES IN 2016, THE REPUBLICAN PARTY NEEDED A SCENARIO LIKE THE FOLLOWING TO HAPPEN:

EVERY SINGLE VOTER WHO CAST A BALLOT FOR THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN 2012, HAD TO DO SO AGAIN IN 2016: 2,680,434 VOTES.

EVERY NEW VOTER WHO CAST A BALLOT FOR EITHER THE DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE, HAD TO CHOOSE REPUBLICAN: +226,466 VOTES.

THAT TOTAL= 2,906,900 IS STILL SHORT OF THE "OFFICIAL" TOTAL OF 2,970,733 VOTES.

HOW COULD THIS BE? THE REPUBLICANS WERE STILL 63,833 VOTES SHORT OF THE FINAL NUMBER. WELL, GO BACK A FEW PARAGRAPHS AND CHECK OUT THE NUMBER OF VOTES THE DEMOCRATS LOST FROM 2012-2016= -63,833.

TO ACHIEVE A TOTAL OF 2,970,733 VOTES IN 2016, HERE IS RUNDOWN OF WHAT THE REPUBLICANS NEEDED TO HAPPEN:

EVERY REPUBLICAN VOTER FROM 2012, RETURNS AND VOTES REPUBLICAN AGAIN IN 2016: 2,680,434.

EVERY NEW VOTER WHO SELECTS EITHER DEM.\REP. IN 2016, CHOOSES REP.: 226,466.

EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE 63,833 VOTERS THE DEM. PARTY LOST BETWEEN 2012- 2016, RETURNS TO THE POLLS AND VOTES REPUBLICAN.

2,680,434 + 226,466 + 63,833 = 2,970,733.

THIS IS LUDICROUS. NO REASONABLE INDIVIDUAL WHO
LOOKS AT THESE NUMBERS COULD TAKE THEM SERIOUSLY. 

TO ALL DEMOCRATS, PROGRESSIVES, AND FRIENDS AND ALLIES OF THE U.S. ACROSS THE GLOBE: THIS ELECTION WAS A SHAM. 

DON'T BELIEVE ME? PLEASE CHECK THE RESULTS YOURSELF. DON'T TAKE MY WORD, GO OVER THEM CAREFULLY. 

ANY DEMOCRATIC LEADER WHO SAW THESE RESULTS, AND DIDN'T QUESTION THEM, IS AS GUILTY AS ANY REPUBLICAN WHO MAY HAVE SET THIS SCAM INTO MOTION. 

ANY DEMOCRATIC LEADER...

I HAVE BROKEN DOWN ONLY 2 STATES, WISCONSIN, AND PENNSYLVANIA. STAY TUNED....

DONALD TRUMP AND EXTREMIST POLITICS: WHAT IS RULE #2? THERE ARE NO RESTRAINTS WHEN IT COMES TO ACHIEVING OUR GOALS. (UPDATED).

 WHAT IS RULE #2? THERE ARE NO RESTRAINTS WHEN IT COMES TO ACHIEVING OUR GOALS.

THEREFORE; LIES, THREATS, DECEPTIONS, HATE SPEECH, ETC. ARE NOT TO BE
AVOIDED, BUT USED WHEN IT FURTHERS OUR AGENDA.

WORDS AND TERMS LIKE:

GOD AND RELIGION.

LOYALTY AND PATRIOTISM.

ETHICS AND MORALITY.

LAW.

FAMILY.

RIGHTS AND DUTIES.

...ARE MEANINGLESS, SO THEY CAN BE USED AND DEFINED ANY WAY THAT FITS OUR NEEDS. THIS ALLOWS US THE OPPORTUNITY TO DUPE THOSE WHO SEEK TO LIVE BY CERTAIN PRINCIPLES THAT THESE WORDS AND TERMS MEAN TO THEM ON A PERSONAL LEVEL.

THE ONLY RESPONSIBILITY WE HAVE IS TO OURSELVES, ANY PAIN AND SUFFERING INFLICTED ON OTHERS IS THEIR TOUGH LUCK. PROMISES WE MAKE ARE ILLUSIONS, TO BE KEPT OR DISCARDED AS WE SEE FIT.

INSTILLING "TRUST" IS A TOOL THAT LEAVES OPEN OPPORTUNITIES TO ACT WITHOUT
ANY OPPOSITION. HOW? "TRUST" IS ALSO AN ILLUSION FOR IT CAN BE ALTERED, WITH 

THE MEANING CHANGED TO SUIT OUR PURPOSES. IT ALSO MEANS NEVER ALLOWING THE

OPPOSITION TO TIE US DOWN TO A SINGLE COHERENT DEFINITION THAT CAN BE USED

TO HINDER OUR FUTURE PLANS.