TRUMP, MAGATS, FASCISM AND TERRORISM. PART 1.

 "DON'T IT ALWAYS SEEM TO GO, THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU GOT 'TIL IT'S GONE."

FROM THE SONG "BIG YELLOW TAXI."

FASCISM - FORM OF GOVERNMENT IN WHICH ALL POWER, POLITICAL ,LEGAL, SOCIAL RESTS WITH ONE PERSON AND/OR A SELECT FEW.

DICTATOR- ALL POWER RESTS WITH ONE PERSON.

JUNTA OR RULING COUNCIL- POWER RESTS WITH A FEW, HALF-DOZEN OR SO.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS CIVIL RIGHTS. LAW ENFORCEMENT AT ALL LEVELS IS CONTROLLED BY ONE SOURCE.

THE MILITARY PLEDGES ALLEGIANCE TO THE RULER(S).

RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IS ALLOWED ONLY AS FAR AS PERMITTED, DEPENDING ON HOW IT SERVES THE PURPOSE OF THE RULING GOVERNMENT.

COURTS ARE ADMINISTERED BY SELECTED JUDICIAL FLUNKIES, WHO KNOW THAT THEIR DECISIONS MUST BE AGREEABLE TO THE FASCIST LEADERSHIP, OR THEY ARE OUT.

THERE CAN BE ELECTIONS, WHERE ALL CANDIDATES ARE CAREFULLY SELECTED BY THE DESPOTS IN POWER. THERE IS NO PARTY SYSTEM ALLOWED. NO REAL OPPOSITION.

EVEN IF SOME FORM OF ELECTION(S) IS ALLOWED, THE RESULTS MUST BE AGREEABLE TO THE POWERS THAT BE, OR THEY ARE VOIDED. 

THE NEWS MEDIA IS NOTHING MORE THAN A SYSTEM OF PAID PROPAGANDISTS, NO OPPOSITION IS PERMITTED.

MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL- THE LEADERSHIP IS ACCOUNTABLE TO NO ONE. SINCE THEY ARE THE SOURCE OF ALL LAW, THEY CAN NOT AND WILL NOT BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR ANY ACTIONS THEY UNDERTAKE. 

MAGATS AND TRUMPIANS- ONE IN THE SAME. INDIVIDUALS WHO PLACE THEIR LOYALTY TO DONALD TRUMP ABOVE ALL OTHER POLITICAL, LEGAL, AND SOCIAL OBLIGATIONS.

BY DEFINITION: THEY MAY SAY THEY ARE AMERICANS, BUT THAT DEFINITION IS DEFINED BY DONALD TRUMP, NOT THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.

DONALD TRUMP IS THE FINAL JUDGE ON ALL THINGS- CRIMINAL ACTS, ELECTION LAW, THE COURT SYSTEM, ALL FORMS OF THE MEDIA. etc.

IN FACT, GIVE ANY EXAMPLE OF A BEHAVIOR THAT HE HAS ENGAGED IN, THAT YOU CONSIDER TO HAVE BEEN DISAPPROVED OF BY A MEASURABLE % OF MAGATS OR TRUMPIANS. (NOT EVEN A MAJORITY, BUT A LARGE ENOUGH GROUP THAT COULD BE IDENTIFIED AND RELIED UPON TO MAINTAIN THAT OPINION)

TERRORISM-  THE USE OF VIOLENCE, OR THREAT OF SUCH, TO ADVANCE THE DOCTRINE, IDEOLOGY, RULES, OR GOALS OF A GIVEN AND IDENTIFIABLE GROUP THAT IS NOT GENERALLY REGARDED AS A LEGITIMATE POLITICAL ENTITY, OR THE RECOGNIZED LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR A RESIDENT POPULATION OR GEOGRAPHICAL AREA.

NO, I DO NOT CONSIDER MAGATS OR TRUMPIANS A LEGITIMATE POLITICAL GROUP. THEIR ACTIONS AND GOALS PLACE THEM AS ADHERENTS TO A WANNABE ALL-POWERFUL DICTATOR- DONALD TRUMP.

REMEMBERING MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY: IT'S ALL IN THE WORDS.

 IN HONOR OF THIS DAY, I REPRINT THIS ANNUALLY.

IT'S ALSO FOR THE MEMORY OF DOCTOR RON BARNETTE.

RIP DOC.

FIRST THE END OF THE MLK SPEECH:

...And when this happens, and when we allow freedom ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, Black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual: Free at last. Free at last. Thank God almighty, we are free at last.

Abraham, Martin and John - Lyrics - Dion - YouTube 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eN4ZlST1tGc

BLAST FROM THE PAST- WHAT PROGRESSIVES MUST LEARN: STAND TOGETHER, OR FALL APART. (UPDATED)

 

There is one thing, probably more than anything else, that has held Back Progressives from Achieving Electoral Success regularly. Care to Guess what it is?  It is an Internal, Self- Inflicted Mindset that Conservatives, especially Far-Right Hate Groups and the Fascist Majority that runs the GOP, have exploited come Election Time.

IT IS THE FAILURE OF PROGRESSIVES AND LIBERALS TO STAND TOGETHER.  TO OFTEN, GROUPS THAT PROCLAIM THEMSELVES AS PROGRESSIVE, EXIST AS ONE OR TWO ISSUE GROUPS.  THE REASONING THAT LED TO CREATING AND ORGANIZING OTHER LIKE- MINDED INDIVIDUALS TO PASS LEGISLATION AND ELECT SYMPATHETIC CANDIDATES, IS NOT CARRIED OVER INTO OTHER AREAS.

It is Astonishing to Listen to a "PROGRESSIVE VOTER", Who sees an Injustice and Wants to Affect a Change in the Law to Remedy this Iniquity, Refusing to use the Same Thought Process if it Deals with an Issue That Doesn't Appeal to Them Directly.

Unfortunately, this Lack of a Consistent Line of Moral Guidelines that are NOT UNIVERSAL IN NATURE, SETS PROGRESSIVES AGAINST ONE ANOTHER, AND BREEDS RESENTMENT THAT LEADS TO ELECTORAL FAILURE.

I have heard the Argument that concludes with the-  "...their not all the same. Social , Economic, and Other Domestic Agenda Issues Deal with Different Problems, and Need Different Solutions."

That may be, but it Doesn't Explain or Solve the UNDERLYING PROBLEM THEY ALL HAVE IN COMMON; INEQUALITY UNDER THE LAW, WHETHER IT IS...

-  UNFAIR LABOR OR WAGE PRACTICES.

- TAX LAWS THAT BENEFIT THE WEALTHY

AT THE EXPENSE OF THE MIDDLE CLASS.

-  ELIGIBILITY AND AVAILABILITY FOR 

GOVERNMENT FUNDS TO ADDRESS HARDSHIP,

IN ALL ITS FORMS.

-  FAILURE TO GIVE ALL COMPETENT

ADULTS THE OPPORTUNITY TO ENTER

INTO A LEGAL MARRIAGE CONTRACT.

-  ENSURING EQUAL TREATMENT IN A COURT OF 

LAW, WHERE THE SIZE OF YOUR WALLET DOESN'T 

= THE AMOUNT OF JUSTICE YOU'LL RECEIVE.

- IGNORING THE ATTEMPTS BY A CORRUPT/INCOMPETENT

JUDICIARY ATTEMPTING TO INSTALL FAITH-BASED MORALITY

INTO PUBLIC POLICY, DESTROYING THE CONSTITUTIONAL 

FOUNDATION THAT CREATED THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM.

WHO IS THE WINNER WHEN THIS HAPPENS?  

Why don't we ask the Citizens of RUSSIA, IRAN, CHINA

AND OTHER REPRESSIVE REGIMES.

LOGIC. FAULTY LOGIC, AND GETTING ELECTED: THE FALLACY OF ASSUMING THE CONSEQUENCE INCLUDES GUN CONTROL. (UPDATE)

 

This post could just as easily have been published on A PAGE DEALING WITH ELECTION ISSUES. However, it does deal with Invalid and Faulty Arguments that violate the rules of Logic and Critical Thinking. So I have placed it here.

How many of us have run into the line of reasoning, that the following are examples of;

-  "IF WE PASS GUN CONTROL LAWS, THEN ONLY THE CROOKS WILL HAVE GUNS."

-  " ALLOWING IMMIGRANTS INTO THE U.S. WILL RESULT IN DISEASES LIKE EBOLA SPREADING ACROSS THE COUNTRY."

"GAY MARRIAGE BEING MADE LEGAL WILL RESULT IN AN INCREASE OF CHILD MOLESTATION AND BESTIALITY BECAUSE NO SEXUAL ACTS ARE AGAINST THE LAW ANYMORE."

These are all examples of:

THE FALLACY OF ASSUMING THE CONSEQUENCE-  WHEN YOU ASSERT THAT A GIVEN ACTION WILL AUTOMATICALLY RESULT IN A SPECIFIC CONSEQUENCE.  THIS IS DONE WITHOUT ANY REASONABLE EXPECTATION THAT ONE NECESSARILY FOLLOWS THE OTHER.

Problem #1-  It Assumes Facts, not in Evidence-  There is no foundation for one to conclude that creating guidelines for Gun Ownership, Entry into the U.S. for Foreign Nationals, or Legalizing Same Sex Marriage, would result in the predictions claimed in the above examples coming true.

-  Gun Control does NOT MEAN GUN ELIMINATION.  Legal ownership is not prevented by law.

-  Medical Evaluations are part of gaining Legal Refugee Status. Further,  There is no evidence that foreign nationals are any more or less likely to be infected with any contagious diseases that are found inside the U.S.

-  The Legalization of Gender Identical Marriage does not create blanket amnesty for anyone engaging in sexual acts already prohibited by law. 

Problem #2-  Claiming a Causal Relationship, where one doesn't exist.

-  Many Laws on the Books inside the U.S. allow all Americans to earn or receive licenses required to legally own and/or operate certain Mechanical Devices such as Vehicles, Construction Equipment , Medical Diagnostic Tools etc. Requiring someone to have the Knowledge, Ability and Mental Capacity to operate such things are not considered intrusions into Individual Rights and Freedoms.  There is no precedent that Firearms would be treated any differently.

THIS ALSO IGNORES CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS THAT INCLUDE PERSONAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, WHICH IS WHERE LAWS ON INDIVIDUALS OWNING FIREARMS PROPERLY BELONGS.

-  The Idea that Citizens of other Countries are not properly Immunized compared to American Citizens is not always true, especially if we are speaking about those who are from Nations in North, South or Central America.  It is an amazing comparison, considering the number of irrational exemptions inside the U.S., that allow a parent not to have a child immunized.

-  That the idea of Same- Sex Married couples being so different from Hetero-Sexual ones, that legalization of such unions will cause a complete breakdown of Sexual Mores within the U.S. is without any rational foundation. There is not one shred of credible evidence that such a result is even possible. 

I guess it leaves us with Two basic types of Candidates for elected office:

The Candidate who wants you to fear the opposition before you vote, or

The Candidate who wants you to understand the opposition before you vote.