About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Thursday, August 18, 2022

TRUMPIAN FASCISTS- PROTECTING THE RICHEST AMERICANS AT ALL COSTS. TRAITORS HAVE NO NEED TO WORRY ABOUT TELLING LIES. (THE GOP BATTLE PLAN.)

CNN

Opinion: First Republicans attacked the FBI. Look who they’re coming for now

Editor’s Note: Casey Michel is a writer and investigative journalist covering kleptocracy and dark money networks across the globe. He is the author of “American Kleptocracy: How the US Created the World’s Greatest Money Laundering Scheme in History,” and is at work on a book investigating foreign lobbying in Washington. He tweets @cjcmichel. The opinions in this article are his own. Read more opinion at CNN.com.

CNN — 

Republicans are railing against the just-signed Inflation Reduction Act, but there’s one provision in the new law that they really, really dislike: The plan to bolster the beleaguered Internal Revenue Service.

The bill signed into law on Tuesday – arguably President Joe Biden’s signature achievement since taking office – will inject $80 billion into the IRS, a lifeline that will help the emaciated agency to carry out its mandate of filling the nation’s coffers and administering its federal tax laws.

Casey michel

In just a decade, staffing at the IRS has fallen nearly 20%, The Washington Post found, “including a 30% decline in enforcement employees.” Democrats had been eager to find a way to bolster the struggling agency, after years of Republican efforts to enfeeble it.

“For decades, Republicans have starved the IRS of funding, and now American taxpayers are paying the price,” House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal (D-Mass.) said in a statement in February.

“The IRS needs greater support to carry out its most essential functions, like processing tax returns, enforcing the tax code, and closing the tax gap. Without resources from Congress to update its woefully out-of-date technology, the agency simply cannot operate at the level American taxpayers expect.”

Now, thanks to the Inflation Reduction Act, the IRS finally will be getting that support. And Republicans are not happy about it.

The GOP has been trying for years to starve the IRS of revenue and resources, in the hope – to borrow a phrase from anti-tax crusader Grover Norquist – to make it small enough to drown in a bathtub.

Republicans have been making the scurrilous claim that the Biden administration aims to deploy a ramped-up “army” of IRS agents to target middle-income workers and small businesses. Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig – who was appointed by former President Donald Trump – said earlier this month that the agency will only be increasing audits of the wealthiest Americans.

As with recent Republican attacks against the FBI, the party’s anti-IRS rhetoric has reached fever pitch. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) tried to scaremonger about an IRS “shadow army” coming to “hunt you down and take your money.”

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) even suggested on “Fox & Friends” last week that IRS workers armed with assault rifles would be deployed against taxpayers. He and other Republicans have falsely tossed around the number 87,000 as the size of this supposed army of agents.

“Are they going to have a strike force that goes in with AK-15s already loaded, ready to shoot some small-business person in Iowa?” the longtime senator asked. “With 87,000 additional employees, you can imagine what that harassment’s going to be to middle-class Americans and our small business people.

Democrats said such rhetoric is false and inflammatory.

“The incendiary conspiracy theories Republicans are pushing about armed IRS agents are increasingly dangerous and out-of-control,” said Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, calling the language being used by “high-ranking Republicans” in speaking about increased funding for the IRS “shockingly irresponsible.”

“It’s unbelievable that we even need to say this, but there are not going to be 87,000 armed IRS agents going door-to-door with assault weapons. This is funding for answering phone calls and upgrading computer systems,” he said.

The ultra inflammatory rhetoric appears to be new, but the attacks are part of a longstanding GOP agenda to keep the agency underfunded and ineffective. There were definitely signs of growing GOP opposition to the IRS under presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, but it really took off (as with so much else) when Barack Obama was president. The Government Accountability Office recently found that overall IRS audit rates have plunged in recent years, and are now at their lowest rates in generations.

By hampering the effective operation of the IRS, the GOP allows rich Americans to dodge much – or even most – of their tax burden. Audit rates also have plummeted – especially for the wealthiest Americans. The GAO reported that “audit rates decreas(ed) the most for taxpayers with incomes of $200,000 or more.” The New York Times, meanwhile, reported that audits rate for millionaires dropped by over 60% since 2010.

While individuals in the top percentile of total wealth once made up nearly one-third of all total audits, during then-president Donald Trump’s administration they represented less than 10% of the audits that actually still take place. Economists Gabriel Zucman and Emmanuel Saez wrote in an analysis of American wealth inequality,that audit rates of the largest estate tax returns have been almost completely eliminated in recent years.

Even when audits find evidence of a crime, many tax cheats avoid prosecution: Criminal referrals have plummeted by nearly half since the early 2010s. Taken together, the White House estimates that the wealthiest Americans evade some $160 billion per year – a huge sum, given that we’re only talking about one percent of the American population.

Any way you look at this, the expansion of IRS funding is a win. The CBO predicts that reining in tax evasion by the wealthiest Americans will pay for itself many times over, in addition to slowing the rate of offshored finance and mitigating wealth inequality.

Not all of the new IRS money is going toward enforcement. A significant portion of the funds, as CNBC reported, will also go toward technological upgrades and basic operations. (Amazingly, some of the IRS’s computers still use programming dating to the 1960s.)

The Congressional Budget Office has already projected hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue over the next decade alone from this new IRS funding. That’s money that can be used to pay for other provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act, from funding climate initiatives to keeping the price of prescription drugs low.

GET OUR FREE WEEKLY NEWSLETTER

  • Sign up for CNN Opinion’s newsletter.
  • Join us on Twitter and Facebook
    • Indeed, there’s a kind of virtuous cycle at work in the new legislation: A beefed-up IRS allows the federal government to pay for projects which can help generate jobs – and additional tax revenue – in the future.

      But that’s all in the years to come. For now, the fact that the IRS is set to see a financial rescue is cause for celebration in and of itself. The IRS is not becoming a “shadow army,” as Cruz would have it. It is instead an agency emerging from financial duress that will finally be able to do its job in the name of the American people.

      Wednesday, August 17, 2022

      BLAST FROM THE PAST: HOW DOES A POLITICAL PARTY WIN 64.7% (22-12) OF THE SEATS UP FOR RE- ELECTION, WITH 42.4% OF THE POPULAR VOTE?

       

      BLAST FROM THE PAST: HOW DOES A POLITICAL PARTY WIN 64.7% (22-12) OF THE SEATS UP FOR RE- ELECTION, WITH 42.4% OF THE POPULAR VOTE?

       

      THE 2018 MID-TERM ELECTIONS: LEARNING NOTHING FROM THE 2016 ELECTION DEBACLE.

      Trump, False, Fake, Deception, Ruse
      If you have spent virtually any amount of time on this website,
      the topic of the 2016 Presidential Election would be something
      that would be hard to miss. I have covered and written extensively
      on the Candidates, Issues, and Results. Through all of this, I came
      to one CONCLUSION: THE RESULTS IN AT LEAST 6 STATES WERE
      BOGUS, AND DELIBERATELY ALTERED TO ENSURE DONALD TRUMPS
      ELECTION TO THE OVAL OFFICE. I AM NOT GOING TO REVIEW ALL
      THIS INFORMATION HERE, SINCE IT IS AVAILABLE IN OTHER AREAS
      ON THIS WEBSITE. 

      HOWEVER, WHAT ABOUT POSSIBLE IRREGULARITIES IN OTHER
      RACES?  WELL, I WAITED UNTIL THE 2018 MID-TERM ELECTIONS
      WERE 0VER, AND ANALYZED THE NUMBERS FROM THE 2016 AND 2018
      U.S. SENATE ELECTIONS. 

      HERE IS THE RESULT. 



      With the Mississippi Senatorial contest over, we can now examine
      the 2018 Mid-Term elections, and see what they tell us about the 
      New Make Up of the U.S. Senate.

      2018 SENATE ELECTION RESULTS.

      DEMOCRATS- 22 VICTORIES.  

      REPUBLICANS- 11 VICTORIES.

      INDEPENDENTS- 2 VICTORIES.

      DEMOCRATS DEFENDED 24 SEATS.
      20 WINS.        4 LOSSES.

      REPUBLICANS DEFENDED 9 SEATS.

      7 WINS           2 LOSSES.

      INDEPENDENTS DEFENDED AND WON 2 SEATS.


      THE NEW SENATE WILL BE MADE UP OF:

      53 REPUBLICANS
      45 DEMOCRATS.
      2 INDEPENDENTS.

      VOTE TOTALS.
      DEMOCRATS- 52,260,651    58.4%
      REPUBLICANS- 34,723,013  38.8%
      INDEPENDENTS- 892,988     1.0%


      NOW, LET US EXAMINE

      THE 2016 SENATE ELECTION RESULTS.



      2016 SENATE ELECTION RESULTS.


      REPUBLICANS-  22 VICTORIES.


      DEMOCRATS-  12 VICTORIES.


      REPUBLICANS DEFENDED 24 SEATS.

      22 WINS.     2 LOSSES.

      DEMOCRATS DEFENDED 10 SEATS.

      10 WINS.     0 LOSSES.

      THE 2016 ELECTION

      CREATES A SENATE 
      THAT CONSISTS OF:
      51 REPUBLICANS. 
      47 DEMOCRATS.
      2 INDEPENDENTS.

      2016 VOTE TOTALS.

      DEMOCRATS-  51,496,682    53.8%
      REPUBLICANS- 40,402,790  42.4%


      What do the results of these elections

      tell us, if they are compared to one another?

      THE MOST APPARENT CHARACTERISTIC IS

      HOW SIMILAR THE RESULTS ARE, IN THAT 
      THE RESULTS OF ONE ELECTION BASICALLY 
      CANCELS OUT THE RESULTS OF THE OTHER.


      # OF SEATS CONTESTED.


      2016- 34.


      2018- 35.




      # OF TOTAL WINS.

      2016- REPUBLICANS: 22 WINS, 

                DEMOCRATS: 12 WINS. 
      2018- DEMOCRATS: 22 WINS.
                REPUBLICANS: 11 WINS.


      RECORD RETAINING SEATS.


      2016- REP. DEFENDED 24 SEATS.

      22 WINS- 2 LOSSES.

      DEM. DEFENDED 10 SEATS.

      10 WINS 0 LOSSES.

      2018- DEM. DEFENDED 24 SEATS.

      20 WINS - 4 LOSSES.

      REP. DEFENDED 9 SEATS.

      7 WINS- 2 LOSSES.


      # OF SEATS THAT CHANGED HANDS.


      2016- TOTAL: 2, BOTH REPUBLICAN.


      2018- TOTAL: 6, 4 DEMOCRATS, 2 REPUBLICAN.


      BOTH PARTIES LOST A TOTAL OF 4 SEATS EACH, WHEN BOTH ELECTIONS ARE COMBINED.




      As you can see, the results seem to almost mirror one another. That, in itself, does not provide adequate evidence to conclude that the results are fraudulent .

      However, that changes if we look at the 

      one variable that seems to contradict the 
      "MIRROR IMAGE" COMPARISON.


      IN 2018, THE DEMOCRATS WERE VICTORIOUS
      IN 22 RACES, THE REPUBLICANS 11. THAT IS A
      RATIO OF 2 TO 1.

      WHEN WE EXAMINE THE POPULAR VOTE, THE
      NUMBERS ARE:



      VOTE TOTALS.
      DEMOCRATS- 52,260,651    58.4%
      REPUBLICANS- 34,723,013  38.8%
      INDEPENDENTS- 892,988     1.0%


      THESE NUMBERS ARE WHAT WE SHOULD EXPECT,
      GIVEN THE # OF VICTORIES FOR THE DEMOCRATS, 
      AS COMPARED TO THE # OF REPUBLICAN WINS.



      WHAT ABOUT 2016?

      IN 2016,THE REPUBLICANS WERE VICTORIOUS 
      IN 22 RACES, THE # OF DEMOCRATS WINS WAS 12.

      AS YOU CAN SEE, THE 2016 AND 2018 ELECTIONS SAW 22 VICTORIES FOR EACH PARTY, WITH ONLY 1 SEAT SEPERATING THE TOTAL # OF LOSSES.

      HERE IS THE POPULAR VOTE:
      2016 VOTE TOTALS.
      DEMOCRATS-  51,496,682    53.8%
      REPUBLICANS- 40,402,790  42.4%

      DO YOU SEE IT?

      IN 2018, THE DEMOCRATS HAD A SUBSTANTIAL LEAD IN THE POPULAR VOTE, 58.4% TO 38.8%, AND WERE ABLE TO POST AN ELECTION RECORD OF 22 WINS AND 11 LOSSES.
      (I AM NOT COUNTING THE IND. VICTORIES)

      IN 2016, THE REPUBLICANS RECEIVED 42.4% 
      OF THE POPULAR VOTE, WHICH WAS 11.4% LESS THAN THAT OF THE DEMOCRATS 53.8%

      EVEN THOUGH THE RESULTS ARE VIRTUALLY IDENTICAL, THE REPUBLICANS ACHIEVED THEIR ELECTION RECORD IN 2016 WITH 42.4% OF THE POPULAR VOTE. THE 2018 DEMOCRATS NEEDED 58% OF THE POPULAR VOTE TO ACHIEVE THE SAME RESULT.


      HOW DOES A POLITICAL PARTY WIN 64.7% (22-12) 
      OF THE SEATS UP FOR RE- ELECTION, WITH 42.4% OF THE POPULAR VOTE?



      REMEMBER, THE BOGUS PRESIDENTIAL RETURNS IN 2016 HAD DONALD TRUMP
      WINNING 60% OF THE STATES WITH ABOUT 47% OF THE POPULAR VOTE.

      TO BE CONTINUED...

      Tuesday, August 16, 2022

      FROM THE DESK OF PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN.

       


      VIDEO-https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1mnGedgzVkrKX


      From the American Rescue Plan to a once-in-a-generation infrastructure law. From the most meaningful gun safety and veterans' health care laws in decades to the groundbreaking CHIPS and Science Law and historic Inflation Reduction Act. We're getting the job done.