BLAST FROM THE PAST: HOW DOES A POLITICAL PARTY WIN 64.7% (22-12) OF THE SEATS UP FOR RE- ELECTION, WITH 42.4% OF THE POPULAR VOTE?

 

BLAST FROM THE PAST: HOW DOES A POLITICAL PARTY WIN 64.7% (22-12) OF THE SEATS UP FOR RE- ELECTION, WITH 42.4% OF THE POPULAR VOTE?

 

THE 2018 MID-TERM ELECTIONS: LEARNING NOTHING FROM THE 2016 ELECTION DEBACLE.

If you have spent virtually any amount of time on this website,
the topic of the 2016 Presidential Election would be something
that would be hard to miss. I have covered and written extensively
on the Candidates, Issues, and Results. Through all of this, I came
to one CONCLUSION: THE RESULTS IN AT LEAST 6 STATES WERE
BOGUS, AND DELIBERATELY ALTERED TO ENSURE DONALD TRUMPS
ELECTION TO THE OVAL OFFICE. I AM NOT GOING TO REVIEW ALL
THIS INFORMATION HERE, SINCE IT IS AVAILABLE IN OTHER AREAS
ON THIS WEBSITE. 

HOWEVER, WHAT ABOUT POSSIBLE IRREGULARITIES IN OTHER
RACES?  WELL, I WAITED UNTIL THE 2018 MID-TERM ELECTIONS
WERE 0VER, AND ANALYZED THE NUMBERS FROM THE 2016 AND 2018
U.S. SENATE ELECTIONS. 

HERE IS THE RESULT. 



With the Mississippi Senatorial contest over, we can now examine

the 2018 Mid-Term elections, and see what they tell us about the 
New Make Up of the U.S. Senate.

2018 SENATE ELECTION RESULTS.

DEMOCRATS- 22 VICTORIES.  

REPUBLICANS- 11 VICTORIES.

INDEPENDENTS- 2 VICTORIES.

DEMOCRATS DEFENDED 24 SEATS.
20 WINS.        4 LOSSES.

REPUBLICANS DEFENDED 9 SEATS.
7 WINS           2 LOSSES.

INDEPENDENTS DEFENDED AND WON 2 SEATS.

THE NEW SENATE WILL BE MADE UP OF:
53 REPUBLICANS
45 DEMOCRATS.
2 INDEPENDENTS.

VOTE TOTALS.

DEMOCRATS- 52,260,651    58.4%

REPUBLICANS- 34,723,013  38.8%

INDEPENDENTS- 892,988     1.0%

NOW, LET US EXAMINE THE 2016 SENATE ELECTION RESULTS. 2016 SENATE ELECTION RESULTS. REPUBLICANS-  22 VICTORIES. DEMOCRATS-  12 VICTORIES. REPUBLICANS DEFENDED 24 SEATS. 22 WINS.     2 LOSSES. DEMOCRATS DEFENDED 10 SEATS. 10 WINS.     0 LOSSES. THE 2016 ELECTION CREATES A SENATE  THAT CONSISTS OF: 51 REPUBLICANS.  47 DEMOCRATS. 2 INDEPENDENTS. 2016 VOTE TOTALS. DEMOCRATS-  51,496,682    53.8% REPUBLICANS- 40,402,790  42.4% What do the results of these elections tell us, if they are compared to one another? THE MOST APPARENT CHARACTERISTIC IS HOW SIMILAR THE RESULTS ARE, IN THAT  THE RESULTS OF ONE ELECTION BASICALLY  CANCELS OUT THE RESULTS OF THE OTHER. # OF SEATS CONTESTED. 2016- 34. 2018- 35. # OF TOTAL WINS. 2016- REPUBLICANS: 22 WINS,            DEMOCRATS: 12 WINS.  2018- DEMOCRATS: 22 WINS.           REPUBLICANS: 11 WINS. RECORD RETAINING SEATS. 2016- REP. DEFENDED 24 SEATS. 22 WINS- 2 LOSSES. DEM. DEFENDED 10 SEATS. 10 WINS 0 LOSSES. 2018- DEM. DEFENDED 24 SEATS. 20 WINS - 4 LOSSES. REP. DEFENDED 9 SEATS. 7 WINS- 2 LOSSES. # OF SEATS THAT CHANGED HANDS. 2016- TOTAL: 2, BOTH REPUBLICAN. 2018- TOTAL: 6, 4 DEMOCRATS, 2 REPUBLICAN. BOTH PARTIES LOST A TOTAL OF 4 SEATS EACH, WHEN BOTH ELECTIONS ARE COMBINED. As you can see, the results seem to almost mirror one another. That, in itself, does not provide adequate evidence to conclude that the results are fraudulent . However, that changes if we look at the  one variable that seems to contradict the  "MIRROR IMAGE" COMPARISON. IN 2018, THE DEMOCRATS WERE VICTORIOUS IN 22 RACES, THE REPUBLICANS 11. THAT IS A RATIO OF 2 TO 1. WHEN WE EXAMINE THE POPULAR VOTE, THE NUMBERS ARE: VOTE TOTALS. DEMOCRATS- 52,260,651    58.4% REPUBLICANS- 34,723,013  38.8% INDEPENDENTS- 892,988     1.0% THESE NUMBERS ARE WHAT WE SHOULD EXPECT, GIVEN THE # OF VICTORIES FOR THE DEMOCRATS,  AS COMPARED TO THE # OF REPUBLICAN WINS. WHAT ABOUT 2016? IN 2016,THE REPUBLICANS WERE VICTORIOUS  IN 22 RACES, THE # OF DEMOCRATS WINS WAS 12. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE 2016 AND 2018 ELECTIONS SAW 22 VICTORIES FOR EACH PARTY, WITH ONLY 1 SEAT SEPERATING THE TOTAL # OF LOSSES. HERE IS THE POPULAR VOTE: 2016 VOTE TOTALS. DEMOCRATS-  51,496,682    53.8% REPUBLICANS- 40,402,790  42.4% DO YOU SEE IT? IN 2018, THE DEMOCRATS HAD A SUBSTANTIAL LEAD IN THE POPULAR VOTE, 58.4% TO 38.8%, AND WERE ABLE TO POST AN ELECTION RECORD OF 22 WINS AND 11 LOSSES. (I AM NOT COUNTING THE IND. VICTORIES) IN 2016, THE REPUBLICANS RECEIVED 42.4% OF THE POPULAR VOTE, WHICH WAS 11.4% LESS THAN THAT OF THE DEMOCRATS 53.8% EVEN THOUGH THE RESULTS ARE VIRTUALLY IDENTICAL, THE REPUBLICANS ACHIEVED THEIR ELECTION RECORD IN 2016 WITH 42.4% OF THE POPULAR VOTE. THE 2018 DEMOCRATS NEEDED 58% OF THE POPULAR VOTE TO ACHIEVE THE SAME RESULT. HOW DOES A POLITICAL PARTY WIN 64.7% (22-12) OF THE SEATS UP FOR RE- ELECTION, WITH 42.4% OF THE POPULAR VOTE? REMEMBER, THE BOGUS PRESIDENTIAL RETURNS IN 2016 HAD DONALD TRUMP WINNING 60% OF THE STATES WITH ABOUT 47% OF THE POPULAR VOTE. TO BE CONTINUED...

FROM THE DESK OF PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN.

 

VIDEO-https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1mnGedgzVkrKX

From the American Rescue Plan to a once-in-a-generation infrastructure law. From the most meaningful gun safety and veterans' health care laws in decades to the groundbreaking CHIPS and Science Law and historic Inflation Reduction Act. We're getting the job done.

BLAST FROM THE PAST: BARACK ON HILLARY. 10/28/2016.

 As you continue to listen to the Irrational and Juvenile Rants by Trump and his Fascist Following trying to find any excuse to ignore his Criminal Acts, (TREASON JUST TOPS THE LIST), remember what we could of had if the 2016 Election results had been properly Audited, negating a Bogus Result that what have kept "DER FUEHRER TRUMP" out of the White House.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

FROM: BARACK OBAMA. HILLARY CLINTONS NOMINATION AS THE DEMOCRATIC PARTIES CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT.

David --

On Wednesday night I gave my final speech to a Democratic convention as president. I’m grateful I got to spend it talking about why Hillary is the right person to succeed me in the White House. She is going to be an exceptional leader because she is an exceptional person.

David, Hillary has my trust because I know her, and I know her heart. 

My respect for Hillary has been reaffirmed time and time again by those who have known her for decades.

In 2012, we traveled to Burma together and met people she remembered from the time she was First Lady nearly twenty years before -- and they hadn’t forgotten her, either. A year later, when we flew to South Africa in 2013 to pay our respects at Nelson Mandela’s funeral, I could see in the eyes of his family how much she had meant to him.

Hillary commands any room she enters because her wisdom, her patience, and her generosity of spirit are impossible to deny. I counted on her advice on everything from foreign policy to how to raise my daughters in the White House. She treats everyone she encounters with decency and dignity, whether the cameras are on or off.

I am proud to see Hillary become our party’s nominee, and I can’t wait to see her win this election and become our 45th President.

Thanks, 

           

BARACK.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

THE DAY AN UNDERSERVING DONALD TRUMP WAS INAUGURATED AS PRESIDENT IS AS DARK A MOMENT THAN JUST ABOUT ANY OTHER IN U.S. HISTORY. THAT EVENT CAUSED MORE HARM THAN ANYTHING HITLER, MAO, OR STALIN COULD HAVE EVER DONE. WHY?

WE ONLY CONCENTRATED ON THE "ENEMY FROM WITHOUT," AND IGNORED THE "ENEMY FROM WITHIN."

TRUMP LIES AGAIN. THIS TIME IT IS AN EX-PRESIDENT THAT PEOPLE ACTUALLY ADMIRE AND RESPECT.

THE INTELLECTUALLY AND ETHICALLY CHALLENGED DICTATOR WANNABE 

CONTINUES TO SINK LOWER INTO THE CESSPOOL OF TREASON THAT HE HAS CREATED.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

AP NEWS.

Obama didn’t keep millions of classified White House documents.

CLAIM: Former President Barack Obama took 30 million documents, many of them classified, to Chicago upon leaving the White House.

AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Obama administration records are exclusively held and maintained by the National Archives and Records Administration, the federal agency confirmed on Friday. Millions of unclassified documents were transferred after Obama left office to a NARA facility in Chicago, but neither Obama’s personal foundation nor the facility set to house his presidential memorabilia have control over those papers.

THE FACTS: Amid mounting revelations surrounding the FBI’s search of former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, a counternarrative pushed online — including by Trump himself — posits that Obama similarly kept possession of White House documents after his term of office.

“President Barack Hussein Obama kept 33 million pages of documents, much of them classified. How many of them pertained to nuclear? Word is, lots!” Trump posted on Truth Social, the social network he founded, on Friday.

“OBAMA TOOK 30 Million Documents when he left the WHITEHOUSE and No FBI RAID,” read one tweet posted Tuesday, the day after the FBI’s search, that had garnered almost 20,000 likes by Friday.

But these records were given to NARA in 2017, upon the end of Obama’s term, and they remain in NARA’s sole custody, in accordance with federal law. Some 30 million documents were moved to a NARA-operated facility in the Chicago area, as the agency explained in a statement Friday, but none were classified. The administration’s classified documents are stored in a separate NARA facility in the Washington, D.C., area.

Presidential libraries are managed by NARA, and the documents therein belong to the agency, which also manages related public records requests. But the Obama Presidential Library has no physical location; it’s the first to be wholly virtual. Some 95 percent of Obama administration documents were “born digital,” meaning they have no “hard-copy” version and don’t need to be digitized, per NARA.

Separately, construction began in 2021 on the Obama Presidential Center, a complex in Chicago managed by the privately-run Obama Foundation. But because the center will not be affiliated with NARA, the Obama Foundation will need to request to borrow any artifacts or records intended for display there from the government. The foundation did provide funding to NARA for digitizing the Obama administration’s paper documents, but NARA itself is responsible for actually handling them, according to the agency.

A spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Benjamin Hufbauer, a professor at the University of Louisville and a researcher of presidential libraries, reiterated that no White House records remain in Obama’s personal possession. They are “owned by the nation,” he told The Associated Press in an email.

The FBI retrieved “top secret” records from Mar-a-Lago, including some with particularly sensitive information, according to court papers released Friday, the AP reported Friday. The warrant authorizing the search says agents were investigating possible violations of three federal laws, including rules surrounding the gathering and transmission of defense information under the Espionage Act.

The fact that such secret papers were reportedly seized directly from Trump’s estate is the key distinction between Trump’s records and Obama’s, Hufbauer said. “Even if there are duplicate copies of these documents in the National Archives (which there almost certainly are), sensitive documents about, say, nuclear secrets, are to be housed in a secure facility, and access to them is very tightly controlled,” he said.

___

This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.