Politics · LIVE Former Meadows aide testifies before January 6 committee.

https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1BRJjnBaMQZJw

Former Meadows aide testifies before January 6 committee

Cassidy Hutchinson, an aide to former president Donald Trump’s last chief of staff, Mark Meadows, testified on Tuesday before the select committee investigating the US Capitol attack on January 6, 2021. Hutchinson, who previously gave videotaped depositions to the committee behind closed doors, appeared during a 1 pm ET live hearing. This came despite the committee chairperson Bennie Thompson saying the committee would delay the next round of hearings until after the House’s recess, which ends on July 11. Keep it here for the latest.

CNN: January 6 committee unexpectedly adds new hearing for Tuesday.

 

By Annie Grayer, CNN

(CNN)The committee investigating the Capitol Hill insurrection on January 6, 2021, has added a previously unexpected public hearing for Tuesday afternoon, the committee announced Monday.

The panel has not revealed the hearing's topic.

The announcement came as a surprise to many as the committee had said it was not going to resume its hearings until mid-July. Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, the committee's chairman, told reporters last week that the panel needed more time to go through the new documentary footage it received from documentarian Alex Holder, who possesses never-before-seen footage of Trump and his family, new information from the National Archives, and new tips coming in through the panel's tip line since the hearings started in order to move forward with its hearings

The committee did not reveal the witness list or topic but said it would "present recently obtained evidence and receive witness testimony."

Tuesday's hearing starts at 1 p.m. ET. It will be the panel's sixth hearing this month.

In its first five hearings, the committee laid out how former President Donald Trump knew he lost the 2020 presidential election but pressured former Vice President Mike Pence, state officials, and the Department of Justice to work to keep him in office anyway. Members on the committee previously laid out that its final two hearings would focus on the role domestic extremist groups played in attacking the Capitol on January 6 and would fill in the gaps of what Trump was doing as the violence at the Capitol unfolded.

Holder's "Unprecedented" three-part docuseries about the 2020 election will be released on Discovery Plus, which is owned by CNN's parent company, later this summer. The documentary includes never-before-seen footage of the Trump family on the campaign trail and their reactions to the outcome of the election.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Do not stop now. The House has taken the lead over stopping TRUMP AND HIS FASCIST FOLLOWERS FROM DESTROYING THE U.S. Don't be like the Senate, and do nothing. That is what happened in 2016, and look where we are now.

Be the Champions for our Republic that are needed now. You should be proud of your work so far, it will be remembered.

- David.

REMEMBERING THE KAVANAUGH HEARINGS: TRUMP AND FASCISM TRIUMPH.(UPDATE)

Sorry, but the ROE VS WADE DECISION, ALONG WITH THE NRA ENDORSED DECISION IN N.Y WAS ANYTHING BUT SUPRISING. WHAT DID YOU THINK WAS GOING TO HAPPEN? A CORRUPT PRESIDENT, IN OFFICE BECAUSE OF A BOGUS ELECTION, WAS NOT LIKELY TO APPOINT THE MOST CAPABLE, OR MOST IMPARTIAL MEMBERS OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION TO THE SCOTUS. YOU GOT AN INTELLECTUAL AND MORAL  BOBBLEHEAD IN THE WHITE HOUSE, SO YOU GOT AN EQUIVALENT TRIO PLACED ON THE HIGHEST COURT IN THE LAND. I'M SURE PUTIN IS PLEASED.

SINCE THE DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP IN THE SENATE,  AND THE "LIBERAL " NEWS MEDIA SEEM TO HAVE FORGOTTEN WHAT OCCURRED DURING THE BRETT KAVANAUGH HEARINGS FOR HIS APPOINTMENT TO THE SUPREME COURT, HERE IS A REMINDER. THIS IS WHAT YOU GET WITH A FASCIST WHITE HOUSE,  AND AN INEPT AND UNCONCERNED OPPOSITION PARTY.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

BLAST FROM THE PAST: THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU ALLOW CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION TO BECOME CORRUPTED BY SELF-SERVING POLITICIANS, INCOMPETENT JURISTS, AND AMORAL LAWMAKERS.

 

REMEMBERING THE TIME WHEN THE U.S. HANDED TRUMP AND HIS BAND OF CORRUPT GOP FASCISTS THE OPPORTUNITY TO DESTROY OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.

FROM NPR NEWS- 6/27/2019.

In a 5-4 decision along traditional conservative-liberal ideological lines, the Supreme Court ruled that partisan redistricting is a political question — not reviewable by federal courts — and that those courts can't judge if extreme gerrymandering violates the Constitution.

WHAT DO YOU GET WHEN YOU IGNORE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, AND ALLOW THE OPPOSITION TO CONTROL THE SELECTION PROCESS FOR A NEW SUPREME COURT JUSTICE?

OR

WHAT DO YOU GET WHEN YOU DO NOT CHALLENGE BOGUS RETURNS IN A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, HANDING THE WHITE HOUSE TO A SELF - CENTERED DEMAGOGUE?

ANSWER TO BOTH.

YOU GET DONALD TRUMPS CHOICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

THE FOLLOWING IS TAKEN FROM JUDGE BRETT KAVANAUGHS' TESTIMONY BEFORE THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, REGARDING ACCUSATIONS MADE AGAINST HIM.

"This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit, fueled with apparent pent-up anger about president trump and the 2016 election, fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record. Revenge on behalf of the Clintons and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups. This is a circus. The consequences will extend long past my nomination. The consequences will be with us for decades."

WHAT AN INTELLECT!! FITS IN WITH TRUMP AND MCCONNELL PERFECTLY.

WHAT ELSE CAN WE TAKE FROM THIS?

#1. Anger-  Does this reference the Unconstitutional denial of President Barack Obamas choice for the Supreme Court, Merrick Garland, a chance to testify before the Senate, to be followed by a public vote? 

BUT YOU'RE BEING TREATED UNFAIRLY. REALLY?

#2. President Trump and the 2016 Election- You mean an election with Bogus Returns in at least 6 States that handed Donald Trump the White House, paving the way for him placing 2 Judges on the Supreme Court.

Do you mean "FEAR" of having the future course of Judicial Precedents decided by DONALD TRUMP, whose behavior while in the WHITE HOUSE is often considered to be IRRATIONAL AND VINDICTIVE? 

#3. Revenge on behalf of the Clintons- I assume you have the facts to back this up, since this is a direct accusation. Also, Do you mean that the Clintons planned and executed these plans directly, or are unwitting pawns that had no knowledge about the attempt to create this "Circus"?

IS THIS HOW A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SHOULD CONDUCT HIMSELF IN THE FACE OF ADVERSITY?

So, What do I mean when I say: TODAYS DONALD TRUMP IS WHAT 
HE WAS ALLOWED TO BECOME...

Ask yourself the following question: OF THE THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT;  EXECUTIVE, LEGISLATIVE, AND JUDICIAL, WHAT IS THE HIGHEST OFFICE/MOST POWERFUL POSITION THAT CAN BE OCCUPIED IN EACH BRANCH?

ANSWER.

EXECUTIVE-    PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.

LEGISLATIVE-  U.S. SENATE MAJORITY LEADER.
                     SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REP.

JUDICIAL-        ONE OF THE NINE MEMBERS OF THE
                       U.S. SUPREME COURT.

Now, in most recent history, what events have most influenced the
current state of each office. 

For that, let's go back a few years.

THE SUPREME COURT.

On FEB,13, 2016 SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA passed away.
THEN PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, following procedures Set forth in the U.S.
CONSTITUTION, nominated JUDGE MERRICK GARLAND TO FILL THE VACANCY.       

The following passage is taken from the U.S. CONSTITUTION.

"...and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for..."

However, for the first time in U.S. HISTORY, THE U.S. SENATE DID NOT MEET TO QUESTION
THE NOMINEE, SO THAT THEY COULD "ADVISE" THE PRESIDENT, AND VOTE TO APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE OF THE JUDGE GARLAND NOMINATION. SENATE MAJORITY LEADER MITCH MCCONNELL DECIDED THAT CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IS NOT A DUTY OR OBLIGATION THAT THE U.S. SENATE HAS, BUT CAN BE FOLLOWED WHENEVER THEY FEEL LIKE IT. SO, HE REFUSED TO SEAT THE SENATE TO ACT ON THE NOMINATION.

GIVEN SENATOR MCCONNELLS LEGISLATIVE HISTORY, I DON'T EXPECT MUCH IN THE WAY OF FAIR AND INTELLECTUALLY JUSTIFIABLE REASONS FOR THE POLITICAL AGENDA HE PUSHES. HOWEVER, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTIES REFUSAL TO FILE SUIT, AND BRING THIS MATTER INTO COURT TO FORCE MCCONNELL AND OTHER REPUBLICANS TO OBEY THE OATH THEY TOOK TO "SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION," SHOWED AN INEXPLICABLE LACK OF MORAL AND INTELLECTUAL COURAGE. WHAT MESSAGE DO YOU THINK THIS SENT TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? TO BAD, IT WAS ONLY THE BEGINNING.

This U.S. Supreme Court isn't about Intellectually and Reasonably applying Constitutional Law to todays Social and Political Issues. It's about finding any excuse to install Fascism in the U.S. PART 1. (UPDATE)

THE RULING STRIKING DOWN NEW YORKS LAW ABOUT THE PUBLIC CARRYING OF FIREARMS BY INDIVIDUAL CITIZENS, WAS "JUSTIFIED" BY THE OPINION OFFERED BY JUSTICE THOMAS, WHO WROTE THE FOLLOWING FOR THE MAJORITY:

"We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need."

Number one is the fact that he is interpreting the history of CONSTITUTIONAL LAW INCORRECTLY.

All Constitutional Rights, are considered to be ABSOLUTE, in the form they are presented in the Document. Government,(COURTS), PLACE AND IMPLEMENT GUIDELINES AND LIMITATIONS ON SUCH BEHAVIORS. NO ONE WAS REQUIRED TO ASK PERMISSION IN EVERY SINGLE CASE THAT CAME UP INVOLVING THE BILL OF RIGHTS. THE COURTS STEPPED IN WHEN INDIVIDUALS AND GROUPS WERE MISUSING OR ABUSING A PARTICULAR RIGHT. Citizens did not have to prove that they had the "RIGHT" TO ANYTHING, COURTS HAD TO STEP IN AND SAY "NO YOU DO NOT," OR "YES, YOU DO."

THAT IS HOW WE GET "CONTINGENT" RIGHTS.

You need to stop thinking of ROBERTS, THOMAS, ALITO, KAVANAUGH, GORSUCH, AND BARRET AS LEGAL SCHOLARS OR PROFESSIONALS. THEY ARE NOT. THEY ARE BOUGHT AND PAID FASCIST STOOGES WORKING FOR THE GOP. THEIR GOAL? TO UNDERMIND OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC FOR A FINAL TAKEOVER LED BY THE "NEW" REPUBLICAN PARTY, WHO SEE STALINIST RUSSIA/HITLERS GERMANY AS THE MODEL FOR THE NEW U.S.