About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Thursday, March 24, 2022

First on CNN: January 6 committee has text messages between Ginni Thomas and Mark Meadows

                                    At left, Ginni Thomas, and at right, Mark Meadows.

CNN)The House Select Committee investigating the January 6 riot has in its possession more than two dozen text messages, 29 in total, between former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and Virginia "Ginni" Thomas, a conservative activist and the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, according to multiple sources familiar with the messages.

These text messages, according to sources, took place between early November 2020 and mid-January 2021. Thomas recently revealed that she attended the pro-Trump rally that preceded the US Capitol attack on January 6, 2021, but says she "played no role" in planning the events of that day.
The text messages, reviewed by CNN, show Thomas pleading with Meadows to continue the fight to overturn the election results.
    "Help This Great President stand firm, Mark!!! ... You are the leader, with him, who is standing for America's constitutional governance at the precipice. The majority knows Biden and the Left is attempting the greatest Heist of our History," Thomas wrote on November 10, 2020.
      Thomas regularly checked in with Meadows to encourage him to push claims of voter fraud and work to prevent the election from being certified. Meadows often responded. On that same day as the previous text, he wrote: "I will stand firm. We will fight until there is no fight left. Our country is too precious to give up on. Thanks for all you do."
        On November 24, 2020, Meadows promised he wasn't done battling on Trump's behalf and evoked his faith as a source of strength.
        "This is a fight of good versus evil. Evil always looks like the victor until the King of Kings triumphs. Do not grow weary in well doing. The fight continues. I have staked my career on it. Well at least my time in DC on it."
          Thomas wrote to Meadows on November 19, 2020, "Sounds like Sidney and her team are getting inundated with evidence of fraud. Make a plan. Release the Kraken and save us from the left taking America down." Attorney Sidney Powell, who worked on Trump-aligned lawsuits seeking to challenge the results of the 2020 election, was also referred to by herself as "The Kraken" in reference to the ancient mythological sea creature.
          By the end of November, Thomas was getting increasingly frustrated with the lack of progress of the attempt to find a path to overturn the results.
          On November 24, 2020 she wrote: "I can't see Americans swallowing the obvious fraud. Just going with one more thing with no frickin consequences... the whole coup and now this... we just cave to people wanting Biden to be anointed? Many of us can't continue the GOP charade."
          The committee is in possession of only one text from the month of January 2021, four days after the riot on Capitol Hill.
          Thomas wrote to Meadows that she was angry with Vice President Mike Pence for not taking the steps necessary to block the certification of the election results.
          "We are living through what feels like the end of America. Most of us are disgusted with the VP and are in a listening mode to see where to fight with our teams. Those who attacked the Capitol are not representative of our great teams of patriots for DJT!! Amazing times. The end of Liberty," Thomas wrote.
          Thomas' messages reflected a belief that the legal challenges presented by a group of conservative lawyers helping the campaign were valid. She attempted to convince Meadows to put his faith in the hands of Powell, who had spent the weeks following the election claiming to have mountains of evidence of fraud that never martialized.
          The content of the text messages may be of interest to the committee's investigation, because it asked Meadows in a subpoena to turn over "both documents and your deposition testimony regarding these and other matters that are within the scope of the committee's activity."
          The revelation of text messages between Thomas and Meadows, both key allies of former President Donald Trump, comes as progressives and some legal ethics experts see her activism as a potential conflict of interest for Justice Thomas' work on some Supreme Court cases.
          Meadows turned over thousands of text messages before he stopped cooperating with the committee. The texts have proven to hold a treasure trove of information about what was going on in the White House in the days leading up to the insurrection, and what people in Trump's orbit were thinking.
          The text messages in the committee's possession are only part of the tranche of documents that Meadows provided to the committee during the short period of time he was cooperating with their investigation. They do not necessarily represent the sum total of communication between Thomas and Meadows during that period of time.
          There is also the possibility some messages were not turned over due to privilege claims.
          Meadows and Thomas are longtime friends, both of whom have been active in conservative causes for decades.
          While Thomas has been actively involved in politics, she says she has been careful to distance her activity from her husband.
          "But we have our own separate careers, and our own ideas and opinions too. Clarence doesn't discuss his work with me, and I don't involve him in my work," she recently told the Free Beacon.
          The work of the January 6 select committee has already come before the Supreme Court. In early January. The court did not stand in the way of the release of thousands of documents from the Trump White House despite the former President suing to keep them secret under executive privilege. The vote on the matter was 8-1, with only Justice Thomas dissenting.
          CNN reached out to both Meadows' attorney and Thomas directly for comment and have yet to hear back.
            A spokesperson for the committee declined to comment.
            This story has been updated with additional developments Thursday.

            LOOKING AT THESE FOUR TERMS, AND THEIR COMMON DEFINITIONS...HOW DOES THIS NOT DESCRIBE MUCH OF TODAYS GOP?



            Come on. Did you really think that a party run by VLADIMIR PUTIN AND DONALD TRUMP wanted a WELL QUALIFIED AND ETHICALLY SOUND CANDIDATE LIKE JUDGE KETANJI BROWN JACKSON on the SUPREME COURT? 

            Did you honestly believe a party that Supports and Defends TREASONOUS ACTS, HATE CRIMES, FOREIGN INTERFERENCE IN OUR ELECTIONS, FAULTY AND BOGUS SCIENCE FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES, RACIST AND SEXIST DOGMA, etc...CARE ANYTHING ABOUT THIS COUNTRY, AND WOULD DO ANYTHING IN ITS' BEST INTEREST?

            It is time for AMERICANS WHO CARE ABOUT THIS COUNTRY, ITS FRIENDS AND ALLIES, AND ALL THAT IS GOOD AND DECENT ABOUT MANKIND, TO UNDERSTAND THAT...

            ...THESE ARE NOT DECENT, WELL-INTENTIONED, RATIONALLY DRIVEN PUBLIC SERVANTS. THEY CAN BE DESCRIBED AS: 

            VILE- Morally Bad; Wicked.

            CONTEMPTIBLE- Deserving Contempt; Despicable.

            ANTI- INTELLECTUAL- A person who scorns intellectuals and their views and methods.

            SOCIOPATHIC- have no regard for others' rights or feelings, lack empathy and remorse for wrongdoings, and have the need to exploit and manipulate others for personal gain.

            HOW DO THESE WORDS NOT DESCRIBE:

            MITCH MCCONNELL

            TED CRUZ

            JOSH HAWLEY

            LAUREN BOEBERT

            JIM JORDAN

            KEVIN MCCARTHY

            AMONG MANY OTHERS...?

            TWO OF PUTIN/TRUMP FASCIST FLUNKIES, OZ AND WALKER, ASKED TO RESIGN.

             Biden requests Mehmet Oz and Herschel Walker resign from presidential council or be terminated

            Mehmet Oz, left, and Herschel Walker are both running for US Senate.

            (CNN)President Joe Biden has formally asked two Trump-appointed members of the President's Council on Sports, Fitness & Nutrition to resign from their posts or be terminated.

            Herschel Walker and Mehmet Oz, who are now Republican Senate candidates in Georgia and Pennsylvania, respectively, were appointed in 2018 by President Donald Trump to serve on the council. Trump reappointed them to two-year terms in December 2020, shortly before he left office.
            It's against the Biden administration's policy for federal candidates to serve on presidential boards, according to a White House official. The official said letters to Oz and Walker were sent Wednesday requesting their resignations by 6 p.m.
              Walker, the current front-runner for the GOP nomination to take on Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock in Georgia, said Thursday that he would not be resigning.
                "President Biden is so scared about us beating Raphael Warnock that he has asked me to resign from my unpaid position on the President's Council on Sports, Fitness, and Nutrition," he said on Twitter. "I'm not a quitter so you are going to have to fire me."
                Oz, who's seeking the GOP nod in a contentious primary in Pennsylvania, had taken a similar stand the previous day.
                "President Trump appointed me to two terms on the President's Council on Sports, Fitness & Nutrition. The White House just emailed me demanding my resignation by the end of the day," he said in a statement Wednesday. "Clearly, Joe Biden can't be around anyone who doesn't completely fall in line with his fear-mongering authoritarian one-size-fits-all COVID handling. I am proud of my service and will not resign."
                  Members of the President's Council on Sports, Fitness & Nutrition are considered special government employees, who, per the Hatch Act, "may not be candidates in partisan elections" while conducting official government business.
                  Both Republican candidates face May primaries.
                  Earlier Wednesday, the White House announced the appointment of chef and humanitarian José Andrés and WNBA star Elena Delle Donne as co-chairs of the fitness council.
                  Last fall, the Biden White House asked a number of Trump appointees, including former White House press secretary Sean Spicer, senior counselor Kellyanne Conway and national security adviser H.R. McMaster, to resign from their positions on military service academy advisory boards.
                  This report has been updated

                  Tuesday, March 22, 2022

                  REMEMBERING THE KAVANAUGH HEARINGS: TRUMP AND FASCISM TRIUMPH.

                  SINCE THE DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP IN THE SENATE,  AND THE "LIBERAL " NEWS MEDIA SEEM TO HAVE FORGOTTEN WHAT OCCURRED DURING THE BRETT KAVANAUGH HEARINGS FOR HIS APPOINTMENT TO THE SUPREME COURT, HERE IS A REMINDER. THIS IS WHAT YOU GET WITH A FASCIST WHITE HOUSE,  AND AN INEPT AND UNCONCERNED OPPOSITION PARTY.

                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

                  BLAST FROM THE PAST: THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU ALLOW CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION TO BECOME CORRUPTED BY SELF-SERVING POLITICIANS, INCOMPETENT JURISTS, AND AMORAL LAWMAKERS.

                   

                  REMEMBERING THE TIME WHEN THE U.S. HANDED TRUMP AND HIS BAND OF CORRUPT GOP FASCISTS THE OPPORTUNITY TO DESTROY OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.

                  FROM NPR NEWS- 6/27/2019.
                  In a 5-4 decision along traditional conservative-liberal ideological lines, the Supreme Court ruled that partisan redistricting is a political question — not reviewable by federal courts — and that those courts can't judge if extreme gerrymandering violates the Constitution.

                  WHAT DO YOU GET WHEN YOU IGNORE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, AND ALLOW THE OPPOSITION TO CONTROL THE SELECTION PROCESS FOR A NEW SUPREME COURT JUSTICE?

                  Image result for mitch mcconnell images- public domain photos

                  OR

                  WHAT DO YOU GET WHEN YOU DO NOT CHALLENGE BOGUS RETURNS IN A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, HANDING THE WHITE HOUSE TO A SELF - CENTERED DEMAGOGUE?

                  Image result for donald trump images- public domain photos



                  ANSWER TO BOTH.

                  YOU GET DONALD TRUMPS CHOICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT.


                  Image result for judge kavanaugh images- public domain photos



                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

                  THE FOLLOWING IS TAKEN FROM JUDGE BRETT KAVANAUGHS' TESTIMONY BEFORE THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, REGARDING ACCUSATIONS MADE AGAINST HIM.

                  "This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit, fueled with apparent pent-up anger about president trump and the 2016 election, fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record. Revenge on behalf of the Clintons and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups. This is a circus. The consequences will extend long past my nomination. The consequences will be with us for decades."

                  WHAT AN INTELLECT!! FITS IN WITH TRUMP AND MCCONNELL PERFECTLY.
                  WHAT ELSE CAN WE TAKE FROM THIS?

                  #1. Anger-  Does this reference the Unconstitutional denial of President Barack Obamas choice for the Supreme Court, Merrick Garland, a chance to testify before the Senate, to be followed by a public vote? 

                  BUT YOU'RE BEING TREATED UNFAIRLY. REALLY?

                  #2. President Trump and the 2016 Election- You mean an election with Bogus Returns in at least 6 States that handed Donald Trump the White House, paving the way for him placing 2 Judges on the Supreme Court.

                  Do you mean "FEAR" of having the future course of Judicial Precedents decided by DONALD TRUMP, whose behavior while in the WHITE HOUSE is often considered to be IRRATIONAL AND VINDICTIVE? 

                  #3. Revenge on behalf of the Clintons- I assume you have the facts to back this up, since this is a direct accusation. Also, Do you mean that the Clintons planned and executed these plans directly, or are unwitting pawns that had no knowledge about the attempt to create this "Circus"?

                  IS THIS HOW A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SHOULD CONDUCT HIMSELF IN THE FACE OF ADVERSITY?




                  Washington Dc, Boulevard, Avenue, Street

                  So, What do I mean when I say: TODAYS DONALD TRUMP IS WHAT 
                  HE WAS ALLOWED TO BECOME...

                  Ask yourself the following question: OF THE THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT;  EXECUTIVE, LEGISLATIVE, AND JUDICIAL, WHAT IS THE HIGHEST OFFICE/MOST POWERFUL POSITION THAT CAN BE OCCUPIED IN EACH BRANCH?

                  ANSWER.

                  EXECUTIVE-    PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.

                  LEGISLATIVE-  U.S. SENATE MAJORITY LEADER.
                                       SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REP.

                  JUDICIAL-        ONE OF THE NINE MEMBERS OF THE
                                         U.S. SUPREME COURT.

                  Now, in most recent history, what events have most influenced the
                  current state of each office. 

                  For that, let's go back a few years.

                  THE SUPREME COURT.

                  On FEB,13, 2016 SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA passed away.
                  THEN PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, following procedures Set forth in the U.S.
                  CONSTITUTION, nominated JUDGE MERRICK GARLAND TO FILL THE VACANCY.       

                  The following passage is taken from the U.S. CONSTITUTION.


                  "...and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for..."

                  However, for the first time in U.S. HISTORY, THE U.S. SENATE DID NOT MEET TO QUESTION
                  THE NOMINEE, SO THAT THEY COULD "ADVISE" THE PRESIDENT, AND VOTE TO APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE OF THE JUDGE GARLAND NOMINATION. SENATE MAJORITY LEADER MITCH MCCONNELL DECIDED THAT CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IS NOT A DUTY OR OBLIGATION THAT THE U.S. SENATE HAS, BUT CAN BE FOLLOWED WHENEVER THEY FEEL LIKE IT. SO, HE REFUSED TO SEAT THE SENATE TO ACT ON THE NOMINATION.

                  GIVEN SENATOR MCCONNELLS LEGISLATIVE HISTORY, I DON'T EXPECT MUCH IN THE WAY OF FAIR AND INTELLECTUALLY JUSTIFIABLE REASONS FOR THE POLITICAL AGENDA HE PUSHES. HOWEVER, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTIES REFUSAL TO FILE SUIT, AND BRING THIS MATTER INTO COURT TO FORCE MCCONNELL AND OTHER REPUBLICANS TO OBEY THE OATH THEY TOOK TO "SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION," SHOWED AN INEXPLICABLE LACK OF MORAL AND INTELLECTUAL COURAGE. WHAT MESSAGE DO YOU THINK THIS SENT TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? TO BAD, IT WAS ONLY THE BEGINNING.