NEWS UPDATE ON 1/6/2021 ATTACK ON THE U.S. CAPITOL: What Hannity's newly unveiled texts reveal about him and how Trump viewed his advice. Analysis by Oliver Darcy, CNN Business.

 (CNN Business)A version of this article first appeared in the "Reliable Sources" newsletter. You can sign up for free right here.

Okay, Sean Hannity, what are you going to do now?

He started his Tuesday night Fox News show by teasing a message to the "cowardly swamp creatures" in DC and the "media mob." Throughout the show, Hannity hyped the segment, telling his audience, "You don't want to miss it." The suggestion, of course, was that he was going to issue a response to the January 6 Committee's request for his cooperation in the insurrection investigation. But the promotion for the segment ended up being a head fake.

January 6 committee seeks cooperation from Fox News' Hannity and releases texts between host and White House

In the final moments of his show, Hannity instead delivered a rant on the lack of Covid testing availability. Which is to say that Hannity wholly ignored the 1/6 committee's request and the damning revelations contained in the letter its top members sent to him. But he won't be able to stay silent about it forever. After the show, his outside counsel Jay Sekulow issued a new statement: "We are evaluating the letter from the committee. We remain very concerned about the constitutional implications especially as it relates to the First Amendment. We will respond as appropriate."

Fox Corp. also remained silent about what Hannity and other stars knew in the run-up to the riot and in the days afterward. Lachlan Murdoch and Suzanne Scott can dismiss Hannity as an opinion host all they want, but he should still be subject to some editorial standards...

What it means

Hannity's texts to Mark Meadows, disclosed by the J6 Committee, illustrate for the umpteenth time a clear breach of traditional news media ethics by Hannity. And they show, also for the umpteenth time, how Hannity operated during the Trump years behind the scenes as a shadow chief of staff. The new part, perhaps, is how ineffective he was!

As Jamie Gangel pointed out on "Don Lemon Tonight," every line of the letter was crafted on purpose. So what about Hannity's December 31, 2020 message to Meadows that said, "I do NOT see January 6 happening the way he is being told." Did Hannity try to talk Trump away from delusional thinking? If so, he failed. And what about the January 10 text to Meadows and Jim Jordan, saying, "Guys, we have a clear path to land the plane in 9 days. He can't mention the election again. Ever." Clearly Trump doesn't respect Hannity very much, since Trump's past 12 months have been full of election lies.

Deceiving the audience

The texts also prove -- once more -- that Hannity was dishonest with his audience. He likes to claim that he says the same thing privately as he says publicly. But that clearly isn't the case. Privately, in these text messages, Hannity was expressing profound worries about Trump. But, publicly, those concerns were never conveyed to his audience. Instead, Hannity served as a loyal cheerleader of Trump until the end.

Brian Stelter went off about that on Lemon's show just now, highlighting Hannity's January 10 comment to Meadows that "I did not have a good call with him today." Stelter said: "On January 10, 11 and 12, what did Sean Hannity tell his viewers" about that call? "Did he inform them about Donald Trump's mental health? About his state of mind? No. He lied and assisted the cover-up." Stelter also pointed out that House members have many, many more texts from other Fox personalities. What else is going to be revealed?

Trump: Hannity is wrong!

Well, so much for this valuable friendship, eh? As CNN's Kaitlan Collins reported, Trump put out a statement Tuesday evening objecting to Hannity's January 10 assertion that he "can't mention the election again." Ouch. "I disagree with Sean on that statement and the facts are proving me right," Trump said, though the facts are obviously not proving him right...

What will Cheney say?

With the 1/6 anniversary on Thursday, Rep. Liz Cheney is booked on multiple networks this week, including Fox: She is slated to speak with Bret Baier on "Special Report" Thursday evening. She has not hesitated to call out Fox on the network's airwaves in the past...

Stop calling it a news network

On a related note: I'll reiterate that it's time for actual news organizations to stop calling Fox a news network. It's not. It's a right-wing talk channel that has spent the past year misleading viewers about January 6 with a flood of lies and conspiracy theories designed to sanitize the events of that day. That has happened all while the network's top hosts, as we now have evidence of, privately knew the truth about what happened. A news org's primary job is to inform viewers with the best version of the truth. What Fox has repeatedly done — on pretty much every major topic — is to misinform...

• 
  

  • 
    
  • 
    

WHAT WERE REPUBLICANS SAYING ON JANUARY, 6 AND 7, 2021, ABOUT THE ATTACK ON THE CAPITOL? LET'S FIND OUT.

Fox News talking about BLM protesters but make the footage January 6th

https://twitter.com/i/status/1478729246034038786

The Republican Accountability Project

https://twitter.com/i/status/1478548703673827331

Compare this to what they say now, and 

Tell me again about REPUBLICAN PATRIOTISM AND HONOR.

ANOTHER JOKE DECISION, ANOTHER JOKE JUDGE.

We may have gotten rid of DONALD TRUMP, but his intellectual equals still seek to dumb down, and ultimately destroy our CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.

NEW CASE IN POINT.

Washington (CNN) A federal judge in Texas on Monday ruled against the Biden administration's vaccine requirement for members of the military in a decision that took aim at how the Navy's policies handled those who sought religious exemptions from receiving the Covid-19 vaccine.

US District Judge Reed O'Connor issued a preliminary order blocking the Navy from taking adverse action against 35 Navy Seals who sued in court because they are seeking exemption from the vaccine requirement for religious reasons. The order blocked the Navy from implementing policies that would allow those religious objectors to be deemed non-deployable or disqualified from Special Operations. 

"The Navy service members in this case seek to vindicate the very freedoms they have sacrificed so much to protect," O'Connor wrote in his order. "The COVID-19 pandemic provides the government no license to abrogate those freedoms. There is no COVID-19 exception to the First Amendment. There is no military exclusion from our Constitution."

The Navy declined to comment on the litigation.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

APPARENTLY, ACCORDING TO THIS "LEGAL SCHOLAR," ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS CLAIM "RELIGIOUS FREEDOM," AND YOU ARE EXEMPTED FROM ANY LIMITATIONS THAT MIGHT BE INSTITUTED BY GOVERNMENT FOR THE "PUBLIC GOOD." In fact, according to this "JUDGE," government cannot require any American to be vaccinated, for any reason, if it violates their RELIGIOUS FAITH, MILITARY OR NOT. 

From U.S History we learn that the following:

- NOT PAYING TAXES. 

- HARASSING OR INTIMIDATING OTHERS.

- BEATING YOUR SPOUSE AND KIDS.

- DISCRIMINATION AND INTIMIDATION AGAINST

OTHER FAITHS.

- SEXISM AND APPLYING DIFFERENT STANDARDS

FOR EACH GENDER.

Were, at one time, argued to be  "PROTECTED BEHAVIORS" UNDER THE CONSTITUTIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF "FREEDOM OF RELIGION." Yet, those "EXEMPTIONS" do not apply in todays courts.

WHY? Since I have actually taken the time to examine past cases relevant to the CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF "FREEDOM OF RELIGION," I found the following:

The liberty secured by the Constitution of the United States does not import an absolute right in each person to be at all times, and in all circumstances, wholly freed from restraint, nor is it an element in such liberty that one person, or a minority of persons residing in any community and enjoying the benefits of its local government, should have power to dominate the majority when supported in their action by the authority of the State.

As I stated in other articles, there is no ABSOLUTE RIGHT of FREEDOM OF SPEECH OR FREEDOM OF RELIGION. (ABSOLUTE MEANING NO LEGAL RESTRICTIONS, CIVIL OR CRIMINAL.) The above SUPREME COURT Ruling makes that clear.

This judicial decision flies in the face of JUDICIAL PRECEDENT, MORAL ACCOUNTABILITY, AND COMMON SENSE. Further, members of the U.S.  MilItary are held to the same legal standards as every other American, regardless of Branch or MOS. Being a member of the Military, or a first responder, does not exempt you from personal responsibility. WE CALL THAT EQUALITY IN THE EYES OF THE LAW, A MORAL ABSOLUTE WORTH PROTECTING, AND IT APPLIES TO EVERYONE.

CONSPIRACY THEORIES PAINT FRAUDULENT REALITY OF JAN.6 RIOT. ASSOCIATED PRESS. by David Klepper.

abcnews.go.com
Millions of Americans watched the events in Washington last Jan. 6 unfold on live television. Police officers testified to the violence and mayhem. Criminal proceedings in open court detailed what happened.

Yet the hoaxes, conspiracy theories and attempts to rewrite history persist, muddying the public's understanding of what actually occurred during the most sustained attack on the seat of American democracy since the War of 1812.

By excusing former President Donald Trump of responsibility, minimizing the mob’s violence and casting the rioters as martyrs, falsehoods about the insurrection aim to deflect blame for Jan. 6 while sustaining Trump's unfounded claims about the free and fair election in 2020 that he lost.

Spread by politicians, broadcast by cable news pundits and amplified by social media, the falsehoods are a stark reminder of how many Americans may no longer trust their own institutions or their own eyes. 

Several different conspiracy theories have emerged in the year since the insurrection, according to an analysis of online content by media intelligence firm Zignal Labs on behalf of The Associated Press. Unfounded claims that the rioters were members of antifa went viral first, only to be overtaken by a baseless claim blaming FBI operatives. Other theories say the rioters were peaceful and were framed for crimes that never happened.

Conspiracy theories have long lurked in the background of American history, said Dustin Carnahan, a Michigan State University professor who studies political misinformation. But they can become dangerous when they lead people to distrust democracy or to excuse or embrace violence. 

“If we’re no longer operating from the same foundation of facts, then it’s going to be a lot harder to have conversations as a country,” Carnahan said. “It will fuel more divisions in our country, and I think that ultimately is the legacy of the misinformation we're seeing right now."

An examination of some of the top falsehoods about the Capitol riot and the people who have spread them:

CLAIM: THE RIOTERS WEREN'T TRUMP SUPPORTERS

In fact, many of those who came to the Capitol on Jan. 6 have said — proudly, publicly, repeatedly — that they did so to help the then-president.

Different versions of the claim suggest they were FBI operatives or members of the anti-fascist movement antifa. 

“Earlier today, the Capitol was under siege by people who can only be described as antithetical to the MAGA movement,” Laura Ingraham said on her Fox News show the night of Jan. 6, referring to Trump's “Make America Great Again” slogan. “They were likely not all Trump supporters, and there are some reports that antifa sympathizers may have been sprinkled throughout the crowd.”

The next day, Ingraham acknowledged the inaccuracy when she tweeted a link to a story debunking the claim. 

Another Fox host, Tucker Carlson, has spread the idea that the FBI orchestrated the riot. He cites as evidence the indictments of some Jan. 6 suspects that mention unindicted co-conspirators, a common legal term that merely refers to suspects who haven’t been charged, and not evidence of undercover agents or informants.

Yet Carlson claimed on his show that “in potentially every single case, they were FBI operatives.”

Carlson is a “main driver” of the idea that Jan. 6 was perpetrated by agents of the government, according to Zignal’s report. It found the claim spiked in October when Carlson released a documentary series about the insurrection.

Members of Congress, including Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., have helped spread the theories.

“Some of the people who breached the Capitol today were not Trump supporters, they were masquerading as Trump supporters and, in fact, were members of the violent terrorist group antifa,” Gaetz said.

Spokespeople for Carlson and Gaetz say they stand by their claims.

In truth, the rioters are just who they said they were. 

One was a recently elected state lawmaker from West Virginia, a Republican Trump supporter named Derrick Evans who resigned following his arrest. Evans streamed video of himself illegally entering the Capitol.

“They’re making an announcement now saying if Pence betrays us you better get your mind right because we’re storming the building,” Evans said on the video. “The door is cracked! … We’re in, we’re in! Derrick Evans is in the Capitol!” Vice President Mike Pence was in the building to preside over the Senate's certification of Democrat Joe Biden's election victory. Pence went ahead despite Trump's pleas to get Pence to block the transfer of power.

During testimony before Congress, FBI Director Christopher Wray was asked whether there was any reason to believe the insurrection was organized by “fake Trump protesters.”

“We have not seen evidence of that,” said Wray, who was appointed by Trump.

___

CLAIM: THE RIOTERS WEREN'T VIOLENT

Dozens of police officers were severely injured. One Capitol Police officer who was attacked and assaulted with bear spray suffered a stroke and died a day later of natural causes.

Former Metropolitan Police Officer Michael Fanone, who rushed to the scene, said he was “grabbed, beaten, tased, all while being called a traitor to my country.” The assault stopped only when he said he had children. He later learned he had suffered a heart attack. Fanone resigned from the department in December 2021.

Rioters broke into the Senate chamber minutes after senators had fled under armed protection. They rifled through desks and looked for lawmakers, yelling, “Where are they?” In House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office, staffers hid under desks while rioters called out the name of the California Democrat.

That's not how some Republican politicians have described the insurrection.

Appearing on Ingraham's show in May, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said he condemned the Capitol breach as well as the violence, but said it was wrong to term it an insurrection.“By and large it was a peaceful protest, except for there were a number of people, basically agitators, that whipped the cand breached the Capitol," Johnson said.

Johnson has since said that he doesn't want the violent actions of a few to be used to impugn all.

Rep. Andrew Clyde, after watching video footage of rioters walking through the Capitol, said it resembled a “normal tourist visit.” Other video evidence from Jan. 6 showed Clyde, R-Ga., helping barricade the House doors in an attempt to keep the rioters out.

Trump called the insurrection a display of “ spirit and faith and love.”

Rioters also broke windows and doors, stole items from offices and caused an estimated $1.5 million in damage. Outside the Capitol someone set up a gallows with a noose.

“The notion that this was somehow a tourist event is disgraceful and despicable,” Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., said in May. “And, you know, I won’t be part of whitewashing what happened on Jan. 6. Nobody should be part of it. And people ought to be held accountable.”

___

CLAIM: TRUMP DID NOT ENCOURAGE THE RIOTERS

Trump may now want to minimize his involvement, but he spent months sounding a steady drumbeat of conspiracy theory and grievance, urging his followers to fight to somehow return him to power.

“Big protest in D.C. on January 6th,” Trump tweeted on Dec. 19, 2020. “Be there, will be wild!”

Immediately before the mob stormed the Capitol, Trump spoke for more than an hour, telling his supporters they had been “cheated” and “defrauded” in the “rigged” election by a “criminal enterprise” that included lawmakers who were now meeting in the Capitol.

At one point, Trump did urge his supporters to “peacefully and patriotically make your voice heard.” The rest of his speech was filled with hostile rhetoric.

“We fight. We fight like hell,” he told those who would later break into the Capitol. “And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”

Now, Trump says he had nothing to do with the riot.

“I wasn’t involved in that, and if you look at my words and what I said in the speech, they were extremely calming actually,” Trump said on Fox News in December.

Nearly two-thirds of Americans believe Trump bears some responsibility for the Capitol breach, according to a survey last year by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.

___

CLAIM: ASHLI BABBITT WAS KILLED BY AN OFFICER WORKING FOR DEMOCRATS

Babbitt died after being shot in the shoulder by a lieutenant in the Capitol Police force as she and others pressed to enter the Speaker's Lobby outside the House chamber. 

Babbitt, a 35-year-old Air Force veteran, was unarmed. An investigation cleared the officer of wrongdoing. 

The Capitol Police Department protects all members of Congress, as well as employees, the public and Capitol facilities. The officer wasn't assigned to any particular lawmaker.

Trump falsely claimed the officer was the head of security “for a certain high official, a Democrat," and was being shielded from accountability. He also misstated where Babbitt was shot.

“Who is the person that shot ... an innocent, wonderful, incredible woman, a military woman, right in the head?” Trump asked on Fox News.

___

CLAIM: THE JAN. 6 SUSPECTS ARE POLITICAL PRISONERS AND ARE BEING MISTREATED

No, they are not, despite some assertions from members of Congress.

“J6 defendants are political prisoners of war,” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., tweeted in November. She said she had visited some suspects in jail who complained about the food, medical care and “re-education” they were receiving in custody.

Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., said the Justice Department was “harassing peaceful patriots” by investigating their involvement in the insurrection.

While it’s true some of the suspects have complained about their time in jail, it’s wrong to argue they’re being held as political prisoners. Authorities have said the suspects in custody are being given the same access to food and medical care as any other inmate.

One of the most notorious rioters, Jacob Chansley, known as the QAnon Shaman, was given organic food in his jail cell after he complained about the food options.