Philosophical Foundations for digital ethics and AI ethics: a Dignitarian Approach.

 Dear Kantian Philosopher,

You might be interested in this just-published article--

"Philosophical Foundations for Digital Ethics and AI Ethics: A Dignitarian Approach"

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-021-00040-9

Best wishes,

Robert Hanna

Director, The Contemporary Kantian Philosophy Project: HERE

Editor, Contemporary Studies in Kantian Philosophy: HERE

Independent philosopher: https://roberthanna.academia.edu/

BLAST FROM THE PAST, 12/10/2015 : FEATURE ARTICLES. A TRUMP VISION OF THE U.S.?

WHAT ARE THE TRUE GOALS OF A DONALD TRUMP ADMINISTRATION, AND WHAT WILL SUCH POLICIES MEAN TO ALL AMERICANS, NOW, AND IN THE FUTURE?

HERE IS A SHORT LIST TO CONSIDER:

PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATS                                      REPUBLICANS.

            SUPPORT.

                                                                                        

                                                                                         

-  UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE.                                         OPPOSE ALL

-  RAISING THE MINIMUM WAGE.                                           OF

-  LEGALIZING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE.                              THESE.

-  RESTRICTIONS AND DISCLOSURE LAWS,                       

   ON CONTROLLING  CAMPAIGN SPENDING.

-  PROVIDING SANCTUARY FOR WAR REFUGEES 

   FROM SYRIA.

... AND STRICT GUN CONTROL LAWS.

WHAT CAN WE TAKE FROM THIS?

It is a List that gives us a snapshot OF WHAT IS CONSIDERED IMPORTANT TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY ON A NATIONAL LEVEL. ( OR ISN'T IMPORTANT, TAKE YOUR PICK.)

It can also give us INSIGHT INTO WHY THEY ARE ANXIOUS TO DEMONIZE ENTIRE GROUPS OF HUMAN BEINGS, WHICH INCLUDES FELLOW AMERICANS, WHO ARE GUILTY OF NOTHING.

HOW SO?

REPUBLICANS DO NOT SUPPORT

ANYTHING ON THE LIST, EVEN THOUGH IT...

-  Gives different groups of AMERICAN CITIZENS 

RELIEF FROM SPECIFIC CAUSES OF ECONOMIC 

DISTRESS. ( UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE, RAISING

THE MINIMUM WAGE.)

-  Offers an OPPORTUNITY FOR COUPLES OF THE 

SAME GENDER, TO ENTER INTO A LEGAL AND MORAL

MARRIAGE CONTRACT. 

-  Expands or Creates Laws that Limit Campaign Spending, and

Discloses Lists of Prominent Donors.

-  Expands Gun Control Laws To:  REQUIRE BACKGROUND CHECKS,

LIMIT PRIVATE GUN SALES, RESTRICT THE SALE OF

AUTOMATIC WEAPONS. 

-  OFFERS REFUGE TO WAR VICTIMS, WHO ALREADY

HAVE TO PASS A COMPREHENSIVE BACKGROUND CHECK, AND

HAVE NEVER BEEN ACCUSED OF HARMING ANYONE.

WITH THE ABOVE IN MIND, LET US ASK THE FOLLOWING:

QUESTION #1.

WHICH PART OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC IS

HARMED BY ANY OF THESE?

IF SO, HOW, AND IS THE HARM ENOUGH TO NEGATIVELY IMPACT

THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR ANY CITIZEN?

QUESTION #2.

DO ANY OF THESE ALLEVIATE HARDSHIP, OR CAUSE IT?

QUESTION #3.

WHO BENEFITS FROM THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS LIST,

AND WHO SUFFERS?

QUESTION #4.

DOES THIS LIST VIOLATE ANY PORTION OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION,

IF SO, HOW?

QUESTION #5-  DO ANY OF THESE REMEDY PAST INJUSTICES,

OR ELIMINATE ANY INEQUALITIES FOUND IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, OR IN CIVIL LAW.

??????

BLAST FROM THE PAST: December 16, 2017 THE NEW TAX PLAN: PREDICTING THE FUTURE? LEARN FROM THE PAST.

 

Let us consider the following;

If a MEMBER OF EITHER THE HOUSE OR SENATE represents a STATE THAT;

-  HAS A HIGHER THAN AVERAGE POVERTY RATE.

-  SETS A MINIMUM WAGE THAT RARELY INCREASES, FAILING TO KEEP UP

WITH THE COST OF LIVING. THIS FORCES SOME WORKING FAMILIES TO SEEK

FEDERAL AID TO PROVIDE A MINIMAL LIVING STANDARD.

-  IS RELUCTANT TO SUPPORT A UNIVERSAL HEALTH PLAN THAT
WOULD BENEFIT ALL OF ITS RESIDENTS.

-  HAS A LOW REGARD FOR EDUCATION, ESPECIALLY THE SCIENCES.

-  DOES NOT EMPHASIZE PROTECTIONS FOR THE EMPLOYEE, BUT LEAVES
THAT TO THE WHIMS OF THE EMPLOYER.

- TRIES TO ADMINISTER JUSTICE ACCORDING TO THE FAITH AND 
RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OF THOSE IN POWER.

WHAT WOULD YOU SAY ABOUT SUCH A POLITICIAN? 

NOW, SUPPOSE THAT MEMBER OF CONGRESS HAS SERVED FOR YEARS,
AND THROUGH "SENIORITY" HAS GAINED POWER OVER OTHER MEMBERS
OF CONGRESS, INFLUENCING OR PREVENTING LEGISLATION THAT OTHERS
THINK NECESSARY.

WHAT WOULD YOU SAY ABOUT THAT POLITICIAN?

NOW, AS WE LOOK BACK OVER THIS POLITICIANS CAREER, WE SEE THAT
THE PEOPLE REPRESENTED BY THIS MEMBER OF CONGRESS ARE NOT
MUCH BETTER OFF, (STANDARD OF LIVING, HEALTH, EDUCATION.), THAN 
THEY WERE BEFORE THIS "PUBLIC SERVANT" CAME TO WASHINGTON, D.C.
FURTHER, WHEN WE LOOK AT THE PUBLIC RECORD, IT SEEMS THAT LITTLE
WAS DONE, PROPOSED, OR SUPPORTED BY THIS ELECTED OFFICIAL THAT 
WOULD ALLEVIATE THE PROBLEMS OF THE CONSTITUENCY.

WHAT WOULD YOU SAY ABOUT THAT POLITICIAN?

NOW WHAT WOULD YOU SAY IF THAT POLITICIAN WAS GIVEN THE 
POWER TO INFLUENCE THE COURSE OF THE ENTIRE COUNTRY, FREE
TO USE THEIR EXPERTISE FOR THE "GOOD" OF ALL.

WELL...

...WHY DON'T WE TAKE A LOOK AT THOSE WHO AUTHORED THE NEW 
REPUBLICAN "TAX PLAN", AND SEE WHO IS IN CHARGE OF DETERMINING 
THE ECONOMIC FUTURE OF THE U.S...

Two of our endorsed incumbents were impeachment managers. SERVE AMERICA.

 

David, Despite the failure of Senate Republicans to convict Donald Trump in both of his impeachment trials, there’s no question that the House impeachment managers made us proud as they prosecuted the case against Trump for his obvious crimes. Today, we want to take a minute to tell you more about Representatives Joe Neguse and Jason Crow, two of our endorsed incumbent House Democrats, who served as impeachment managers during the first and second impeachment trials. Congressman Joe Neguse, representing Colorado’s 2nd district, was a House impeachment manager during the second impeachment trial. The son of refugees from Eritrea, Joe’s family’s story, and deeply held belief that people from all walks of life need to speak up and engage in our democracy, motivated him to run for Congress in 2018. He is the first and only African-American elected to serve in Congress in Colorado’s history. He serves as a Vice-Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, a Vice-Chair of the Medicare-for-All Caucus, and was elected by his peers to be the Freshman Co-Representative to Leadership. Prior to being elected to Congress, Joe served as an attorney, civic leader, and public official who spent his career fighting to expand opportunities for families across Colorado. He was the co-founder of Colorado’s largest youth voter registration non-profit, the former leader of Colorado’s consumer protection agency, and a former member of the board of regents at the University of Colorado. Congressman Jason Crow representing Colorado’s 6th district was a House impeachment manager during the first impeachment trial. Jason Crow is a former U.S. Army Ranger who represents Colorado’s 6th District. Jason served three tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan with the storied 82nd Airborne Division and later with the elite 75th Ranger Regiment where he achieved the rank of captain. He was awarded the Bronze Star for his actions leading a combat platoon in Iraq. During rocket attacks in Afghanistan, Jason would use his time in the bunker to study for the LSAT and after his service attended the University of Denver Law School. Since leaving the Army in 2006, Jason has been an outspoken advocate for his fellow veterans in Colorado and across the country. As a member of Congress, Jason is proud to serve on the House Armed Services Committee as well as the Committee on Small Business. Since his election in 2018, Jason has worked to address energy efficiency and climate change at the Department of Defense, improve cybersecurity, and ensure just and equitable treatment for all service members. Both of these incredible leaders represent the best of America and we’re proud to endorse them at Serve America. Will you take a minute today to sign our card thanking them for their efforts during both of Trump’s impeachment trials? SIGN CARD We look forward to supporting them in their upcoming re-election campaigns. Thanks for taking a minute to show them your support today. Serve America   DONATE