About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Friday, November 13, 2020

2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: LET'S START WITH FLORIDA. PT 2. (UPDATE- ASK YOURSELF THIS QUESTION...)

WHY IS IT THAT FOR ALL THE FALSE AND BASELESS ACCUSATIONS  OF FRAUD MADE BY DONALD TRUMP IN THE 2020 ELECTION, THE ONLY STATE WITH RESULTS THAT ARE DEMONSTRABLY BOGUS IS FLORIDA, A STATE THAT HE "CARRIED?"  HE, OF COURSE, FAILS TO MENTION THIS.


Well, let's get the numbers out of the way. Again.

2016 ELECTION TOTALS.               2020 ELECTION TOTALS.                    CHANGE IN FLORIDA

Trump- 4,617,886                                    5,658,847                                     +1,040,961

                                                                                                                                    

Clinton- 4,504,975                        Biden- 5,284,453                                      +779,478

                                                                                                                                    

STATE TOTAL - 9,501,617                       11,043,540                                       +1,541,923


Difference- 112,911                                 374,394                                            +261,483 


So where should we go from here? How about asking the same question that led to the Conclusion of BOGUS FINAL VOTE COUNTS IN THE 2016 ELECTION. 

HOW LIKELY ARE THE RESULTS WE ARE SEEING TO BE A TRUE ACCOUNT OF THE VOTES THAT WERE CAST? ARE THEY JUST A MINOR ABERRATION, TOTALS THAT WERE NOT EXPECTED OR EVEN LIKELY, BUT ARE WITHIN THE REALM OF BEING REASONABLY POSSIBLE...

...OR IS SOMETHING ELSE GOING ON. I'm not going to repeat my work on the 2016 ELECTION, BECAUSE THERE IS MORE THAN ENOUGH INFORMATION ON THIS SITE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE REGARDING MY ANALYSIS OF THAT  PARTICULAR SUBJECT. THE 2016 FLORIDA "RESULTS" ARE USED TO COMPARE AND CONTRAST WITH THE 2020 FINAL NUMBERS. EVEN WITH THE 2016 RESULTS BEING BOGUS, THOSE WHO COMMITTED THE FRAUD HAVE TO WORK WITH THE FINAL RESULTS THEY WANTED TO BE ACCEPTED AS VALID, TO JUSTIFY THE 2020 RESULTS.


ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT- 2016-2020.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA SAW THE NUMBER OF VOTES CAST INCREASE BY 16.2% (A RECORD)


DONALD TRUMP, REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE INCREASED HIS VOTE TOTAL IN FLORIDA 22.5%

THIS MORE THAN DOUBLED THE 10.9% INCREASE BETWEEN 2012-2016. (ALSO A RECORD AT THE TIME)


THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY SAW AN INCREASE OF 17.3% BETWEEN 2016-2020. (A RECORD FOR THE PARTY)



FORGET ABOUT RECORDS, AND CONCENTRATE ON THE FOLLOWING:

THE STATE OF FLORIDA HAD AN INCREASE OF 16.2% IN TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES CAST BETWEEN 2016-2020.

IF THIS IS TRUE, HOW COULD THE REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC PARTIES RAISE THEIR TOTALS 

22.5% AND 17.3% RESPECTIVELY?


IN 2020 THE TOTALS FOR BOTH PARTIES COMBINED WAS 1,820,439.

THE STATE TOTAL WAS 1,541,923. THAT MEANS THE STATE OF FLORIDA 

OFFICIALLY RECORDED 261,483 LESS VOTES THAN BOTH PARTIES 

GIVEN TOTALS.


AS YOU TRY TO EXPLAIN THAT "ODDITY" CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING:

THE 261,483 DISCREPANCY ALSO HAPPENS TO BE THE:

2020 MARGIN OF VICTORY FOR THE REPUBLICAN PARTY:

1,040,961-779,478= 261,483.


FLORIDA I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO SAY. HAVING GONE TO COLLEGE IN 

SOUTH GEORGIA,(VALDOSTA STATE), I HAD PROFESSORS AND CLASSMATES

FROM FLORIDA WHO WERE HIGHLY INTELLIGENT, WITH A DEEP SENSE OF HONOR

AND DUTY.


I KNOW YOU'RE BETTER AND SMARTER THAN THIS FLORIDA, DON'T LET THIS

BE A LEGACY.







 

American Philosophical Association

General Discussion

Post New Message
 Nov 12, 2020

Discussions

started 2 days ago, Janet Stemwedel (6 replies)
Making room for joy   external link to thread view
1. I don't know if anyone shares this reaction, but... Michael Scriven
2. I find this discussion provocative. And as I... Kate Lindemann
3. Dear Dr. Scriven, Speaking as a young 'un... Edward Main

AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION. Call for applications: 2021–2022 Edinburgh Fellowship.

 


American
 Philosophical Association

 

Dear DAVID,

 

The APA sponsors one visiting research fellowship per year at the Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities (IASH) at the University of Edinburgh. We invite applications for the 2021–2022 Edinburgh Fellowship. The APA Fellow has a private office in the Institute, is a member of the Institute's lively research community, and has full borrowing rights at Edinburgh University Library. The fellowship is for a period of 2–6 months. Applicants must be members of the APA.

 

Applications for research on any topic within the humanities and social sciences are welcome. Priority will be given to applications linked to the themes of the new Institute Project on Decoloniality (IPD'24) taking place at IASH from 2021 to 2024. This project invites scholars from around the world to visit Edinburgh and conduct research on the theme of decoloniality, broadly understood.

 

The deadline for applications is December 15, 2020.

 

For full details of the fellowship and for application procedures, please visit the Edinburgh Fellowship page.

 

Recent Edinburgh Fellows:

 

2020–2021: Deborah Boyle (College of Charleston)

2019–2020: Carrie Figdor (University of Iowa)

2018–2019: Peter J. Graham (University of California, Riverside)

2017–2018: Marina Folescu (University of Missouri)

2015–2016: Christopher Mole (University of British Columbia)

 

We look forward to receiving your applications.

 

All the best,

 

Amy E. Ferrer

Executive Director

 

The American Philosophical Association

University of Delaware

31 Amstel Avenue, Newark, DE 19716

 


Higher Logic