SENATE "TRUMPIANS" AND THEIR ALLIES SENATE "TRUMPOCRATS" BETRAYAL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IS ALMOST COMPLETE.

I WONDER WHAT YOU GET FOR SELLING OUT YOUR CONSTITUENTS, YOUR PRESIDENT, AND YOUR PARTY.

(THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE DEM. HOUSE MEMBERS, WHO I BELIEVE HAVE MADE A GENUINE EFFORT TO STOP TRUMP AND HIS HATE FILLED AGENDA.)

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Senate Republicans vote 'overwhelmingly' to advance Amy Coney Barrett's final Supreme Court confirmation In a 51-48 vote, members of the Senate GOP voted "overwhelmingly" to end a Democratic filibuster on Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation. The final confirmation will be held on Monday night.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

THE FOLLOWING DOES NOT INCLUDE SENATE DEMOCRATS REFUSING TO QUESTION THE BOGUS 2016 PRESIDENTIAL RESULTS THAT GAVE TRUMP THE WHITE HOUSE.

The Senate hearing concerning TRUMPS choice for the vacant SCOTUS SEAT is about as pure an example of HYPOCRISY that you will ever find. Listening to SENATORS FROM THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY CONDEMNING TRUMPS "PACKING THE COURT" IS SO OUTRAGEOUS THAT I HAVE NO PROBLEM CALLING THEM "TRUMPOCRATS."

I HAVE BEEN PUBLISHING MATERIAL ABOUT THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTIONS OF 

MITCH MCCONNELL EVER SINCE HE BLOCKED PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMAS CHOICE

MERRICK GARLAND. OVER THE PAST 4 YEARS NONE OF THESE "OUTRAGED" 

SENATORS SOUGHT A LEGAL OR POLITICAL REMEDY TO ADDRESS THIS FLAGRANT 

ABUSE OF POWER.  AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE START OF THE HEARING THEY COULD

HAVE SPOKEN OUT FOR THE NECESSITY OF A LAWSUIT, PROTECTING THE 

EXECUTIVE BRANCHES ROLE IN THE SELECTION OF A NEW JUSTICE. THEY DID 

NOTHING, DIDN'T EVEN TRY. THEY ABANDONED A PRESIDENT FROM THEIR OWN 

PARTY.

NOW THAT THE HEARING HAS STARTED, AND THE REPUBLICANS HAVE THE NUMBERS TO OVERCOME ANY OPPOSITION, THESE "COURAGEOUS" SENATORS ARE SUDDENLY OUTRAGED AND INDIGNANT, KNOWING FULL WELL THAT IT'S JUST NOISE, AND NOTHING THEY SAY WILL CHANGE THE OUTCOME. SO THE TRUMPIANS ARE QUITE CONTENT. 

LET THEM TALK, AND WE'LL PLAY ALONG.

THEY SERVED OUR PURPOSE.

HOW TO EXTRACT ADRENOCHROME FROM CHILDREN. SKEPTOID.

 

How to Extract Adrenochrome from Children

Conspiracy theorists believe that Hollywood elitists torture children and extract drugs from their bodies.  

by Brian Dunning

Filed under Conspiracy Theories

Skeptoid Podcast #750
October 20, 2020
Podcast transcript | Subscribe

Listen:

  

THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: LETTING THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN, AND THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT, OFF THE HOOK.

The Special Counsel defined "coordination" as an "agreement-tacit or express-between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference."

IF THIS IS THE ONLY DEFINITION USED, THE SPECIAL COUNSELS REPORT CLEARS UP NOTHING AND OPENS
UP SOME DISTURBING POSSIBILITIES.

HOW SO?

IF WE ACCEPT THAT THE ABOVE DEFINITION IS THE 
SOLE MEASUREMENT FOR PROSECUTION, IT LEAVES US WITH  THE FOLLOWING POSSIBLE SCENARIOS:

SCENARIO #1- A RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT OPERATIVE ENLISTS A TRUMP CAMPAIGN WORKER WITH A PLAN TO AID DONALD TRUMP, BY GATHERING AND DISTRIBUTING INFORMATION THAT IS ANECDOTAL IN NATURE, AND FULL OF INNUENDO AND UNSUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION.

SCENARIO #2- A TRUMP ELECTION OFFICIAL APPROACHES A RUSSIAN NATIONAL,WHO CONDUCTS BUSINESS IN THE U.S. THE REASON? HE ASKS THE BUSINESSMAN IF HE COULD OBTAIN "SPECIAL INFORMATION" THAT WOULD AID DONALD TRUMP IN WINNING THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.

THESE ARE EXAMPLES, NOT ACCUSATIONS. THE POINT IS THIS: IF SCENARIOS LIKE THIS, OR OTHER SIMILAR ONES DID OCCUR, NO LEGAL ACTION WOULD BE TAKEN BY THE SPECIAL COUNSEL. WHY? BECAUSE IN NEITHER CASE WAS THE DEFINITION OF PROSECUTORIAL CONDUCT MET.

REMEMBER, IN THE ABOVE DEFINITION, THE "TRUMP CAMPAIGN," AND THE "RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT" HAD TO
BOTH BE INVOLVED, NOT JUST ONE. THE EXAMPLES OF A TRUMP CAMPAIGN WORKER, OR A RUSSIAN BUSINESSMAN,
SHOW US THAT "COLLUSION," OR "ELECTION INTERFERENCE" COULD OCCUR. HOWEVER, THE CONCLUSION OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN BEING INNOCENT OF SUCH ACCUSATIONS, AS THE SUMMARY LETTER IMPLIES, WOULD BE VALID, EVEN IF CRIMINAL ACTS WERE PRESENT IN BOTH SCENARIOS.

THE CONCLUSION IS SIMPLY THIS: THE DEFINITION USED BY THE MUELLER COMMITTEE IS SO NARROW, WHEN REFERRING TO "COORDINATION" TO VIOLATE ELECTION LAW(S), THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN, THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT, AND JUST ABOUT ANYONE ELSE COULD HAVE COMMITTED ACTS OF "CONSPIRACY" OR "ELECTION INTERFERENCE", BUT WOULD NOT BE CHARGED UNLESS THERE WAS A FORMAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TWO. 

THIS DOES NOT EXCLUDE AGENTS OF ONE, OR BOTH, ACTING INDEPENDENTLY WITHOUT THE "OFFICIAL " APPROVAL OF THE LEADESHIP. IN FACT, AGENTS OF ONE OR BOTH COULD HAVE BEEN "ENCOURAGED" TO ACT IN A CERTAIN MANNER TO BENEFIT THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN, BUT WITHOUT AN ACKNOWLEDGED AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE "OFFICIAL LEADERSHIP," NO ONE COULD BE CHARGED CRIMINALLY. THIS EXTREMELY NARROW DEFINITION ESSENTIALLY MADE "CONSPIRACY", "COORDINATION", OR "ELECTION INTERFERENCE" PERFECTLY LEGAL.

Southern Poverty Law Center. SOUNDS LIKE HATE.

Listen to secret audio recordings obtained from a neo-Nazi group called the Base, and follow the FBI’s effort to infiltrate their inner circles. 

“Sounds Like Hate” Chapter 3: Baseless is now available to stream -- listen now on your favorite podcast app.