About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Sunday, July 19, 2020

NOT EVEN FOX CAN MAKE THE POTUS LOOK GOOD. Trump flails in interview with Wallace, citing false and nonexistent data on COVID-19.

BY CHRISTOPHER WILSON.
In an interview with Fox News’s Chris Wallace that aired Sunday, President Trump defended his handling of the coronavirus pandemic — with incorrect data that had to be corrected by Wallace — and insisted that Vice President Joe Biden wants to defund the police, which Wallace disputed. The White House was unable to provide any evidence for the claim.
Trump continued his long effort to minimize the risk from COVID-19, insisting “I’ll be right eventually” that the coronavirus will disappear on its own, an assertion he first made on Jan. 22 when he said, “We have it under control. It’s going to be just fine.”
“I'll be right eventually. I will be right eventually. You know I said, ‘It's going to disappear.’ I'll say it again,” Trump declared to Wallace.
More than 140,000 Americans have died of COVID-19, as the national death rate has ticked up to almost 1,000 a day. Many states had their deadliest seven-day stretches over the last week. Trump and his allies have pointed to increased testing for the spike in cases, but in many areas the positivity rate is much higher than it is in most other countries.
Wallace, considered the most independent-minded Fox News anchor, did his best to hold Trump accountable during the interview, which was conducted late last week on the White House grounds outside the Oval Office. But it was a largely futile effort, as Trump deflected uncomfortable questions about COVID-19 by returning to his favorite statistic, about how the U.S. has “the best testing in the world.” 
“But, sir, testing is up 37 percent,” Wallace said.
“Well, that's good,” Trump responded.
Wallace: “I understand. Cases are up 194 percent. It isn't just that testing has gone up, it's that the virus has spread. The positivity rate has increased.”
At that juncture, Trump resorted to claiming that the coronavirus isn’t actually all that bad: “Many of those cases are young people that would heal in a day. They have the sniffles and we put it down as a test. Many of them — don't forget, I guess it's like 99.7 percent, people are going to get better and in many cases they’re going to get better very quickly.” 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Robert Redfield said last week, “I do think this fall and winter of 2020, 2021, are probably going to be one of the most difficult times that we’ve experienced in American public health.” 
“I don't know and I don't think he knows. I don't think anybody knows with this. This is a very tricky deal,” Trump said. 
To support his dismissal of scientific expertise on the pandemic, he cited misleading speculation, early in the pandemic, that it might disappear in the summer. 
“Everybody thought this summer it would go away and it would come back in the fall,” said Trump. “Well, when the summer came, they used to say the heat — the heat was good for it and it really knocks it out, remember? And then it might come back in the fall. So they got that one wrong.”
The first prominent person to make that claim was Trump himself, back in February, when he said, “Looks like by April, you know, in theory, when it gets a little warmer, it miraculously goes away.”
On Saturday, the Washington Post reported that the White House was attempting to block money for states that would fund testing and contact-tracing in the upcoming stimulus bill being negotiated in Congress. The administration is also trying to block funding for the CDC, Pentagon and State Department that would go to combatting the virus.
Trump said he had a “very good relationship” with Dr. Anthony Fauci but added, “He's a little bit of an alarmist.” Trump also said Fauci had been wrong early in the fight.
The interview comes as Trump has fallen behind Biden by double-digits in a number of polls, both nationally and in some swing states
On Friday, Fox News aired a preview of the internet ad in which Trump claims Joe Biden supported eliminating police in the United States. Trump was referring to a set of policy proposals jointly suggested by allies of Biden and those of Sen. Bernie Sanders, the primary’s runner-up, which did not address defunding the police, let alone abolishing them.
Donald Trump
“It says nothing about defunding the police,” Wallace pointed out.
Trump pounced, believing he had caught Wallace in a mistake.
AdChoices
“Chris, you’ve got to start studying for these.”
He called for one of his aides to give him a copy of the “charter” that lays out a platform signed by Biden and his former rival Sen. Bernie Sanders, and began paging through it, looking for the reference to defunding the police. He couldn’t find it, Wallace reported in a subsequent voiceover, adding:  “The White House never sent us evidence the Bernie-Biden platform calls for defunding or abolishing police — because there is none.  It calls for increased funding for police departments — that meet certain standards. Biden has called for redirecting some police funding for related programs — like mental health counseling.”
Later Friday, Trump appeared to attempt damage control, tweeting, “Corrupt Joe Biden wants to defund our police. He may use different words, but when you look at his pact with Crazy Bernie, and other things, that’s what he wants to do. It would destroy America!”
Trump leaned in to one of his leading campaign themes, that “leftists” are trying to destroy the country. Wallace braced him on it:
“You said our children are taught in school to hate our country. Where do you see that?”
TRUMP: “I just look at — I look at school. I watch, I read, look at the stuff. Now they want to change — 1492, Columbus discovered America. You know, we grew up, you grew up, we all did, that’s what we learned. Now they want to make it the 1619 Project. Where did that come from? What does it represent? I don’t even know, so.”
WALLACE: “It’s slavery.”
When asked about renaming military bases named after Confederate officers, a move supported by many in the military, Trump said, “I don’t care what the military says.”
“We’re going to name it after the Reverend Al Sharpton?” Trump said, arbitrarily suggesting the name of the Black civil rights leader.” “What are you going to name it, Chris, tell me what you’re going to name it? So there’s a whole thing here. We won two World Wars, two World Wars, beautiful World Wars that were vicious and horrible, and we won them out of Fort Bragg, we won out of all of these forts that now they want to throw those names away.”
The interview touched on Trump’s claims about his own energy and mental acuity, which he often contrasts with Biden’s.
When Wallace asked Trump if he believed Biden was senile, Trump said, “I don’t want to say that” but then claimed, “Joe doesn't know he's alive, OK? He doesn't know he's alive. Do the American people want that?” When Wallace referenced a new poll that showed voters believed Biden was more competent, Trump again referenced a cognitive test he’s recently been bragging about acing.
“Well, I'll tell you what, let’s take a test,” Trump said. “Let’s take a test right now. Let’s go down, Joe and I will take a test. Let him take the same test that I took.”
“Incidentally, I took the test too when I heard that you passed it,” Wallace replied.
“Yeah, how did you do?” inquired Trump.
“It's not — well it's not the hardest test,” said Wallace. “They have a picture and it says, ‘What’s that?’ and it’s an elephant.”
“No no no,” said Trump. “You see, that’s all misrepresentation.”
“Well, that's what it was on the web,” said Wallace.
“It’s all misrepresentation,” Trump said. “Because, yes, the first few questions are easy, but I'll bet you couldn't even answer the last five questions. I’ll bet you couldn't, they get very hard, the last five questions.”
Near the conclusion of the interview, Trump declined to say he’d accept November’s election results.
“I have to see. Look ... I have to see,” Trump said. “No, I’m not going to just say yes. I’m not going to say no, and I didn’t last time either.”

REMEMBERING TRUMPS DISGRACE: ARTICLES AND POSTS FROM HIS IMPEACHMENT.THE MUELLER REPORT. PART 3. BY ANY OTHER NAME. (BARR SUMMARY LETTER).

The main problem with Attorney General Barrs summary of the Special Counsels report, when relating information about Russian Interference in the 2016 election, and possible collusion with members of the Donald Trump Campaign, is a failure to clarify Terms and Definitions. This is especially important when the summary letter quotes actual parts of the Special Councels Report dealing with POSSIBLE RUSSIAN INVOLVEMENT IN THE 2016 ELECTION.

This occurs twice:

 As the report states: "[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian Government in its election interference activities."

 The Special Counsel defined "coordination" as an "agreement-tacit or express-between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference."


As you can see, when the Report itself is quoted, the term "RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT" IS USED with no qualifications, it is clear and consise.  However, the Barr Summary letter uses multiple terms that creates confusion as to what is actually being discussed, and the exact nature of who and what is being accused or exonerated.


FROM THE SUMMARY LETTER WE GET:


- "...the results of the Special Counsel's investigation into Russia's interference..."


- "... persons associated with the Russian government in connection..."

- "... joined the Russian conspiracies..."


- "... Special Counsel found that Russian government actors..."


- "... Russian military officers for conspiring to hack into computers..." 


-"... Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.

What this doesn't tell us is if these were RUSSIAN NATIONALS

WORKING:

-  WITHOUT THE KNOWLEGE OF THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT.
-  WITH THE PERMISSION OF THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT.
-  ON BEHALF OF THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT.
-  INDEPENDENT OF THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT.
-  AS A MEMBER OF, OR EMPLOYED BY, THE
   RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT. 

THIS WOULD INCLUDE MEMBERS OF THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT WHO WENT "RENEGADE."


TO BE CONTINUED...

Saturday, July 18, 2020

TRUMP AND FACEBOOK: ALLIES IN HATE.

FROM NBC NEWS.
WRITTEN BY DANIELLA SILVA.

Customs and Border Protection fired four employees and suspended more 
than three dozen others without pay after a year-long investigation into their involvement in Facebook groups featuring violent, sexist and racist 
posts against migrants and Latino members of Congress.
CBP said in a statement to NBC News on Friday that after an investigation into 138 cases of “inappropriate social media activity,” four employees were removed from service, 38 were suspended without pay, 33 were disciplined with reprimands or counseling and 63 of the allegations were unsubstantiated. 

A year ago, officials initially announced 70 current and former CBP employees were under investigation for participating in a secret Facebook group in which users joked about dead migrants and made sexist, derogatory comments about Latino lawmakers.The group, which at one point had roughly 9,500 members, shared comments about member of Congress, including Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Veronica Escobar, D-Texas, ProPublica reported
last year. 

The group was called “I’m 10-15," the code used by Border Patrol for migrants in custody.Escobar said on Twitter the secret Facebook page mocked the deaths of migrants, “vulnerable people dehumanized by a broken system.”She said she was one of the Latina members of Congress targeted by the “hateful attacks” in the group and never received the investigation results from the agency.“The posts shouldn't have just triggered firings but also an investigation into why other members never reported it,” she wrote in the post.“Facebook is a cesspool,” she added.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT:  FACEBOOK BLOCKS ARTICLES 
AND POSTS LIKE THOSE LISTED BELOW BECAUSE: "...includes 
content that other people on Facebook have 
reported as abusive."

Our 21-0 record against Trump. WASH. 

ATTORNEY GENERAL BOB FERGUSON. 

Your message couldn't be sent because it 

includes content that other people on 

Facebook have reported as abusive.`



Trump's racist words against my colleagues. 

U.S. REP. JENNIFER WEXTON. 

Your message couldn't be sent because it 

includes content that other people on Facebook 

have reported as abusive.



AMY KLOBUCHAR: AT LEAST ONE CAND. FOR THE WHITE HOUSE WAS PAYING ATTENTION. 

Your message couldn't be sent because it 

includes content that other people on Facebook 

have reported as abusive.


The best argument I've seen for checks and balances. PAT LEAHY. 

Your message couldn't be sent because it 

includes content that other people on Facebook 

have reported as abusive.


Kamala Harris and "Medicare for All." BERNIE SANDERS.

Your message couldn't be sent because it 

includes content that other people on Facebook 

have reported as abusive.


How my Medicare for All plan works. KAMALA HARRIS.

Your message couldn't be sent because it 

includes content that other people on Facebook

have reported as abusive.



YET, HAS NO PROBLEM WITH:
"Facebook groups featuring violent, 
sexist and racist posts against migrants 
and Latino members of Congress."
WELL, FASCISTS NEED FRIENDS TO.


Tuesday, July 14, 2020

REMEMBERING TRUMPS DISGRACE: ARTICLES AND POSTS FROM HIS IMPEACHMENT.THE MUELLER REPORT. PART 2. COLLUSION OR DELUSION. READ ON. (BARR SUMMARY LETTER).

(THE INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN THIS 
ARTICLE IS TAKEN FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL
BARRS LETTER TO CONGRESS SUMMARIZING 
THE FINDINGS OF THE MUELLER REPORT, AND 
PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED MATERIAL THAT
APPEARS ON THIS WEBSITE.)






Well, it seems that a "MYTHOLOGY" has already developed around
the contents of Attorney General Barrs Summary Letter detailing
the Special Councels findings of 2016 Election Probe about possible
COLLUSION,INTERFERENCE, CONSPIRACY etc., that provided the
TRUMP CAMPAIGN WITH PRIVILEGED OR PRIVATE INFORMATION THAT
THEY USED AGAINST HILLARY CLINTON,TO INFLUENCE THE FINAL
OUTCOME.

MYTH #1.-  DONALD TRUMP, AND HIS CAMPAIGN,WERE CLEARED FROM
ACCUSATIONS THAT THEY WERE INVOLVED IN ANY TYPE OF COLLUSION
OR INTERFERENCE WITH THE ELECTION.


NOT TRUE- Contrary to what has been said by over the airwaves, what follows is taken from the summary letter:

THE SUMMARY LETTER SAYS THE FOLLOWING- "The Special Counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election."

THIS STATEMENT WAS FOLLOWED BY THIS QUOTE, WHICH WAS TAKEN FROM THE BODY OF THE SPECIAL COUNSELS REPORT-  “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

The Difference? THE SUMMARY LETTER, (WRITTEN BY ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR), USES THE FOLLOWING WORDING: "Conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election."

THE ACTUAL QUOTE THAT IT REFERS TO SAYS: "Conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SAYING:

"...WITH RUSSIA..." INSTEAD OF ..."WITH THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT...",

THIS DIFFERENCE IS ESPECIALLY TELLING IF WE LOOK AT 
SPECIFIC CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES THAT WERE UNCOVERED 
DURING THE INVESTIGATION.

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHOULD KNOW THAT.

SEE PART 3.