About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Saturday, April 18, 2020

LOGIC- IT'S NOT JUST FOR VULCANS, AND VIEWERS OF "THE BIG BANG THEORY." #1.



(ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED ON 3/26/2014)

Graffiti, Spock, Leonard Nimoy


The subject matter will focus on current issues, and how many of those who give opinions and commentary in Public Forums often violate the basic rules of Logic and Critical Thinking.  Often this is done so casually, that it implies a disdain for proper intellectual discourse.

All examples are not meant to be considered true to life, they are being used for illustrative purposes only.

Some of the definitions I will use are my own, others can be found in Textbooks, Websites and Essays that are used to teach Logic and Deductive Reasoning.  If a definition is of my own creation, I will indicate it.

Let's get started.

TOPIC-  Gun control laws.

Reporter- "Senator, results from National Crime Reports indicate that your State, has one of the highest rates of violent crime and murder convictions in the nation. Do you think that your States Gun Laws are responsible for this, and what changes would you support to bring these rates more in line with the national average."

Senator- "My Constituents believe that the Second Amendment is essential to guarantee the Freedom of all Americans.  If we start taking away Guns from law-abiding Americans, then only the Criminals will have them."  

This is what I label as a case of:

MISDIRECTION.

Magician, Magic, Cards, Attention

1)  A QUESTION IS ASKED ABOUT A CERTAIN TOPIC. 
                            
2)  THE ANSWER, WHILE STILL ON TOPIC, DOES NOT  
ADDRESS THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE 
QUESTION.
                            
3)  INSTEAD, THE RESPONSE ATTEMPTS TO TURN THE 
CONVERSATION INTO AN AREA OF THE TOPIC NOT 
COVERED BY THE INITIAL QUESTION.

This is a Tactic of many politicians, who want to avoid controversy by not taking a stand that may upset a certain portion of the electorate.

Why do I call it MISDIRECTION?-  Those of you familiar with Stage Magicians know that the success of many illusions relies on getting the audience to pay attention to what one hand is doing, while ignoring the other.  It is this hand that is actually performing the necessary work to make the Trick believable.

MISDIRECTION in the above example, (Gun Control Laws), is an attempt to draw attention away from what is actually asked, and focus it on information that has nothing to do with the question. Since it remains on Topic, the answer is the deception to draw attention away from the initial question, and focus it on unrelated information.

EXPOSING TELEVISION "EXPERTS."

(I CAN'T STRESS THIS ENOUGH: PUTTING SOMEONE IN FRONT OF A CAMERA DOES NOT MEAN THAT THEY ARE PROFESSIONALLY COMPETENT, OR EVEN KNOW WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT. THIS 
IS WHY LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS ARE SO VITAL. THE PSEUDOSCIENCE AND SCIENTIFIC ILLITERACY PUSHED BY TV CELEBRITIES IS BAD ENOUGH, BUT "CREDENTIALED" INDIVIDUALS CAN BE AS INCOMPETENT AS ANY MEDIA DARLING.- DAVID.)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Dr. Oz, other TV docs face criticism for coronavirus cracks

NBC NEWS. CORKY SIEMASZKO
Three of America's best known TV doctors are taking their medicine after making inflammatory statements about the coronavirus.
Dr. Drew Pinsky, Dr. Mehmet Oz, and Dr. Phil McGraw have all been criticized in recent days for making statements on television and podcasts that appear to downplay the dangers of COVID-19, for buttressing their arguments with bogus statistics, and for making remarks that have been branded as insensitive.
None are experts on pandemics and McGraw isn’t even a medical doctor (he has a doctorate in psychology but is currently not a licensed psychologist). Yet all three weighed in on a pandemic that has paralyzed the country. And Oz was a recent guest on NBC’s "Today" show, talking about the coronavirus.
“What's remarkable in this case is that all three of these folks have gotten into trouble speaking, sometimes in aggressively offensive ways, against the consensus of medical intelligence,” Bob Thompson, a Syracuse University professor and expert on pop culture, said in an email to NBC News. “Part of that may have to do with the fact that they were pandering (in true show business style) to their audience.”
McGraw and Oz were discovered by Oprah Winfrey, added Thompson.“They were discovered, groomed, and chosen by the standards of show business, not the standards of the American Medical Association,” he said. “The most important skills these guys were chosen for were not their medical abilities (of which they had some), but their bedside manner.”
Dr. Henry I. Miller, a former federal Food and Drug Administration researcher and a senior fellow at the Pacific Research Institute in San Francisco, said they are ubiquitous on television because the medium is looking for "pseudo-experts" who reflect the biases of the network or interviewer.
“Among the most egregious examples," he said in an email, "are physicians who endorse products like hydroxychloroquine in the absence of evidence of safety and efficacy from reliable, randomized, controlled clinical trials.”
Oz, in particular, has, like President Donald Trump, touted hydroxychloroquine as a possible coronavirus cure. So too have several Fox News hosts.
“Oz has demonstrated no credibility on any medical subject that I am aware of,” said Miller, who has publicly called Oz a “quack,” an accusation Oz has vehemently denied.
Will they be able to dig out from under this blizzard of criticism? Thompson said they probably would.
“I suspect many of the people who are still watching Oz, Phil, and Drew are watching them because they like them, their format, the way they interact with their guests,” he said. “They will probably forgive them and continue to watch. My guess is that many of the people who are rightfully outraged by the recent comments have been outraged by them before and no longer among their regular viewers.”
Oz this week had to walk back remarks he made Tuesday during an interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News in which he appeared to suggest that up to three percent of children dying would be an acceptable trade-off for reopening the schools.
“Let’s start with things that are really critical to the nation where we think we might be able to open without getting into a lot of trouble,” he said. “I tell you, schools are a very appetizing opportunity.”
Oz took to Twitter after he was besieged by criticism.
“I’ve realized my comments on risks around opening school I have confused and upset people, which was never my intention,” Oz said. “I misspoke.”
Dr. Oz, through a representative, released a statement to NBC News Friday: “As a heart surgeon, I’ve spent my career fighting to save lives in the operating room by minimizing risks. At the same time, I’m being asked constantly – how will we be able to get people back to their normal lives? To do that… one of the important steps will be figuring out how do we get our children safely back to school. We know for many kids, school is a place of security, nutrition, and learning that is missing right now. These are issues we are all wrestling with and I will continue looking for solutions to beat this virus.”
McGraw, who holds a doctorate in psychology, caught flak for downplaying the coronavirus crisis and for getting some of his numbers wrong during an interview with Fox News’ Laura Ingraham on Thursday.
“The economy is crashing around us and they’re doing that because people are dying because of coronavirus,” he said. “I get that, but look, the fact of the matter is we have people dying –- 45,000 people a year die from automobile accidents, 480,000 from cigarettes, 360,000 from swimming pools. But we don’t shut the country down.”
“But yet, we’re doing it for this and the fallout is going to last for years because people’s lives are being destroyed,” he said.
In the US, there was an average of 3,536 deadly drownings from 2005 through 2014, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
McGraw released a YouTube video on Friday in which he admitted he botched the interview, used some “probably bad examples,” and misspoke about the number of drowning deaths. He said he supports the CDC recommendations to self-isolate and shutting down the country’s economy to protect all Americans.
Pinsky began getting hit with criticism earlier this month after a social media user compiled the former “Celebrity Rehab” star's comments from February through mid-March in which he called the coronavirus crisis a “press-induced panic” and said the “flu virus in this country is vastly more consequential.”
The ex-“Loveline” host also compared the likelihood of dying from the virus to “being hit by an asteroid.”
Pinsky posted an apology online on April 4.
“My early comments about equating coronavirus with influenza were wrong,” he said. “They were incorrect. I was part of a chorus that was saying that and we were wrong. And I want to apologize for that. I wish I got it right, but I got it wrong.”


Friday, April 17, 2020

DONALD TRUMP AND EXTREMIST POLITICS: WHAT IS RULE #2? THERE ARE NO RESTRAINTS WHEN IT COMES TO ACHIEVING OUR GOALS. (UPDATED).

WHAT IS RULE #2? THERE ARE NO RESTRAINTS WHEN IT COMES TO ACHIEVING OUR GOALS.
Trump, Globe, Choice, Usa, America

THEREFORE; LIES, THREATS, DECEPTIONS, HATE SPEECH, ETC. ARE NOT TO BE
AVOIDED, BUT USED WHEN IT FURTHERS OUR AGENDA.

WORDS AND TERMS LIKE:

GOD AND RELIGION.

LOYALTY AND PATRIOTISM.

ETHICS AND MORALITY.

LAW.

FAMILY.

POLICE AND MILITARY.

...ARE MEANINGLESS, SO THEY CAN BE USED AND DEFINED ANY WAY THAT FITS OUR NEEDS. THIS ALLOWS US THE OPPORTUNITY TO DUPE THOSE WHO SEEK TO LIVE BY CERTAIN PRINCIPLES THAT THESE WORDS AND TERMS MEAN TO THEM ON A PERSONAL LEVEL.

THE ONLY RESPONSIBILITY WE HAVE IS TO OURSELVES, ANY PAIN AND SUFFERING INFLICTED ON OTHERS IS THEIR TOUGH LUCK. PROMISES WE MAKE ARE ILLUSIONS, TO BE KEPT OR DISCARDED AS WE SEE FIT.

INSTILLING "TRUST" IS A TOOL THAT LEAVES OPEN OPPORTUNITIES TO ACT WITHOUT
ANY OPPOSITION. HOW? "TRUST" IS ALSO AN ILLUSION FOR IT CAN BE ALTERED, WITH 
THE MEANING CHANGED TO SUIT OUR PURPOSES. IT ALSO MEANS NEVER ALLOWING THE
OPPOSITION TO TIE US DOWN TO A SINGLE COHERENT DEFINITION THAT CAN BE USED
TO HINDER OUR FUTURE PLANS.


Tuesday, April 14, 2020

SOMETIMES CORRUPTING A STATE SUPREME COURT, ALONG WITH THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, DOESN'T GUARANTEE VICTORY.

CORRUPTING THE STATE SUPREME COURT, 
ALONG WITH THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, WASN'T ENOUGH 
FOR THE FACE OF "FASCISM", DONALD TRUMP AND HIS
RUSSIAN...uh..."REPUBLICAN" ALLIES TO ACHIEVE 
VICTORY IN WISCONSIN.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(FROM YAHOO NEWS, CHRISTOPHER WILSON.)
Last week, Republican officials and conservative judges pushed 
for Wisconsin to have in-person voting even though the state was 
in the middle of a public health emergency with the coronavirus 
pandemic. It led to some absurd visuals, such as Wisconsin state 
Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, a leading GOP figure, telling voters 
it was safe to go to the polls even as he was protected by a mask, 
goggles and a gown.
The reason for their focus on the race was protecting a state Supreme 
Court seat held by conservative Justice Daniel Kelly. With a competitive 
Democratic primary also on the April ballot, the push to have an election 
despite warnings to avoid large gatherings was seen as an attempt to 
suppress the vote, particularly in the Democratic stronghold of Milwaukee. 
In the state’s largest city, just five of the usual 180 polling places were open, 
leading to hours-long waits for voters. An attempt by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers 
to delay in-person voting by executive order was overturned by the state 
Supreme Court, with the four conservative justices outvoting 
the two liberal justices and Kelly abstaining.
The United States Supreme Court also ruled against the Democrats, with 
the five Republican-appointed justices voting on the eve of the Wisconsin 
election to strike down a six-day extension for returning absentee ballots. 
The four Democratic appointees dissented.
Despite the court rulings and vocal support from President Trump, when the
 results were announced Monday Kelly failed to retain his seat, losing by 11 
points to progressive challenger Jill Karofsky. Every state Supreme Court 
justice voted absentee, including the four who had ruled against delaying 
in-person voting. 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PACKERLAND SHOULD BE PROUD. JUST REMEMBER WHAT HAPPENED IN 
THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. DON'T BE VICTIMIZED TWICE BY BOGUS
ELECTION RETURNS.