THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION- SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG. END GAME, PART 2.

So, what other evidence do we have that a DONALD TRUMP VICTORY WAS THE RESULT OF DUBIOUS AND UNRELIABLE ELECTION RETURNS THAT STRAIN CREDULITY?

LISTED BELOW ARE THE 6 STATES, CARRIED BY THE REPUBLICANS, WITH THE MOST
GOP VOTES IN 2012.  THE % OF THE TOTAL STATE VOTE IS ALSO INCLUDED. THIS IS FOLLOWED BY THE SAME RESULTS IN 2016

                                   2012                                                                                      2016


GEORGIA.   2,078,688/53.30%                                                                          2,089,104/50.77%

INCREASE/DECREASE-  2012-2016.
# OF VOTES:  +10,416.
% OF TOTAL:  -2.53%


INDIANA.   1,420,543/54.13%                                                                          1,557,286/56.82%      

INCREASE/DECREASE-  2012-2016.
# OF VOTES:  +136,743.
% OF TOTAL:  +2.69%.


MISSOURI.   1,482,440/53.76%                                                                        1,594,511/56.77%

INCREASE/DECREASE-  2012-2016.
# OF VOTES:  +112,071.
% OF TOTAL:  +3.01%


NORTH CAROLINA.   2,270,395/50.39%                                                       2,362,631/49.83%

INCREASE/DECREASE.  2012-2016.
# OF VOTES:  +92,236.
% OF TOTAL:  -0.56%


TENNESSEE.    1,462,330/59.48%                                                                   1,522,925/60.72%

INCREASE/DECREASE.  2012-2016.
# OF VOTES:  +60,595.
% OF TOTAL:  +1.24%    


TEXAS.    4,569,843/57.17%                                                                              4,685,047/52.23%

INCREASE/DECREASE.   2012-2016.
# OF VOTES:  +115,204.
% OF TOTAL: -4.94%


NOW, HERE ARE THE RESULTS OF THE 6 STATES THAT WENT DEMOCRAT IN 2012,
BUT REPUBLICAN IN 2016.

CHANGES IN REPUBLICAN SUPPORT:

                       2012 RESULTS.            2016 RESULTS.                    NUMBER/ %

FLORIDA.       4,163,447                       4,617,886                           +454,439/ +10.9%

IOWA.              730,617                          800,983                              +70,366/ +9.6%

MICHIGAN.    2,115,256                        2,279,543                           +164,287/ +7.8%

OHIO.             2,661,437                         2,841,005                           +179,568/ +6.7%

PENN.             2,680,434.                        2,970,733                          +290,299/+10.8%

WISCONSIN.  1,407,966                         1,405,284                          -2682/-.02%

KEEP IN MIND AS YOU LOOK AT BOTH CHARTS:

MICHIGAN, PENNSYLVANIA AND WISCONSIN HAVE VOTED
DEMOCRAT FOR DECADES.

BOTH INDIANA AND MISSOURI HAD A "NATIVE SON" INFLUENCE WITH
VICE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE MIKE SPENCE, AND SENATE MAJORITY
LEADER MITCH MCCONNELL.

So what does this comparison tell us?

THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION- SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG. END GAME, PART 1.

I guess it is about time to put an end to the MYTHOLOGY regarding the amazing DONALD TRUMP Victory in the 2016 Presidential Election. I had hoped the DEMOCRATS would have the courage to do so, but they seem determined to perpetuate the SHAM THAT THIS ELECTION WAS, BACKED UP BY A MEDIA THAT HAS ABANDONED INTEGRITY, AND A REPUBLICAN PARTY THAT IS, WELL...

Here we go:

TOTAL VOTE COUNT, AND % OF TOTAL, ALL 50 STATES.

2016 ELECTION.

UNITED STATES  NATIONWIDE VOTE COUNT.
136,669,237.


CLINTON.                                                  TRUMP.

65,853,516.                                              62,984,825.
  48.18%                                                     46.09%

CLINTON ADVANTAGE: 2,868,691.

IN PARTS 1-8 OF THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION- SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG,
I FOCUSED ON 5 STATES IN PARTICULAR, ALL OF WHOM VOTED DEMOCRAT IN 2012, BUT CHANGED IN 2016. (INCLUDES ELECTORAL VOTES.)

FLORIDA- 29, MICHIGAN- 16, OHIO- 18, PENNSYLVANIA-20
WISC- 10.   93 ELECTORAL VOTES.

THESE ARE THE RESULTS FROM THE 5 STATES IN QUESTION.

2016 ELECTION.


                                         

 TRUMP.                           CLINTON.

FLORIDA.                       
4,617,886.                        4,504,975.

MICHIGAN.                    
2,279,543.                        2,268,839.

OHIO.                                                       
2,841,005.                        2,394,164.

PENN.                            
2,970,733.                       2,926,441.

WISC.                                                                       
1,405,284.                       1,382,536.                                     


TOTAL:
14,114,451.                     13,476,955.

TOTAL #
OF VOTES.                       27,591,406.

TRUMP
ADVANTAGE.                   637,496.

IN THESE 5 STATES, 27,591,406 VOTERS CHOSE EITHER CLINTON OR TRUMP.

51.16% FOR TRUMP
48.84% FOR CLINTON.




NOW LET US TURN TO THE REST OF THE U.S:

THROUGH SUBTRACTION, THE RESULTS ARE:

CLINTON.  65,853,516-13,476,955= 52,376,561

TRUMP.      62,984,985-14,114,451= 48,870,534

CLINTON ADVANTAGE- 3,506,027, EXCLUDING THE ABOVE 5 STATES.

IN THE REST OF THE UNITED STATES, 101,247,095 CHOSE EITHER CLINTON OR TRUMP.

51.73% FOR CLINTON.
48.27% FOR TRUMP.

So, what do we have so far. IN THE OTHER 45 STATES+ (WHICH INCLUDES EVERY SINGLE STATE THAT VOTED REPUBLICAN IN 2012 AND 2016), WE HAVE A SOLID CLINTON MAJORITY.

IN THE 5 STATES I HAVE FOCUSED ON, WE SEE A COMPLETE REVERSAL, WHICH INCLUDES MICHIGAN, PENNSYLVANIA, AND WISCONSIN, WHO HAVEN'T VOTED REPUBLICAN IN DECADES... 


STAY TUNED...

THE MUELLER REPORT AND TESTIMONY, ARTICLES AND POSTS, START TO FINISH: BARR SUMMARY LETTER. PART 4.

As we examine the Summary Letter provided by ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR. IT IS JUST AS IMPORTANT TO FOCUS ON WHAT IT DOES NOT TELL US, AS MUCH AS WHAT IT DOES TELL US.

When speaking of RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE in the 2016 election, we have a problem:
There is the wording in the report, made public, which we can analyze. However, when we talk
about information that has not been released, we only have the ATTORNEY GENERALS INTERPRETATION OF WHAT SUCH INFORMATION REVEALS.

QUESTION #1. RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE- IT SEEMS THERE IS A NOTICEABLE LACK OF INFORMATION CONCERNING WHICH RUSSIAN GROUPS, ATTEMPTING TO INFLUENCE THE 2016 ELECTION, CAN BE CONSIDERED SANCTIONED AND DIRECTED BY THE PUTIN GOVERNMENT, AND THOSE WHO ACTED INDEPENDENTLY.

QUESTION #2. HOW DO WE MEASURE THE INVOLVEMENT OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN, IN TERMS OF WHO HAD THE AUTHORITY TO COORDINATE OR REPRESENT THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEES INTERESTS. IN OTHER WORDS, WHO HAD THE CAPACITY TO LEGALLY SPEAK OR ACT FOR THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN?

WHY ARE THE TWO ABOVE QUESTIONS SO IMPORTANT?

ACCORDING TO THE SUMMARY LETTER, THE FOLLOWING IS THE DEFINITION USED BY THE SPECIAL COUNSEL IN DETERMINING POSSIBLE CHARGES AGAINST MEMBERS OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN.

The Special Counsel defined "coordination" as an "agreement-tacit or express-between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference."

IF THIS IS THE ONLY DEFINITION USED, THE SPECIAL COUNSELS REPORT CLEARS UP NOTHING, AND OPENS
UP SOME DISTURBING POSSIBILITIES.

HOW SO?

IF WE ACCEPT THAT THE ABOVE DEFINITION IS THE 
SOLE MEASUREMENT FOR PROSECUTION, IT LEAVES US WITH  THE FOLLOWING POSSIBLE SCENARIOS:

SCENARIO #1- A RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT OPERATIVE ENLISTS A TRUMP CAMPAIGN WORKER WITH A PLAN TO AID DONALD TRUMP, BY GATHERING AND DISTRIBUTING INFORMATION THAT IS ANECDOTAL IN NATURE, AND FULL OF INNUENDO AND UNSUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION.

SCENARIO #2- A TRUMP ELECTION OFFICIAL APPROACHES A RUSSIAN NATIONAL,WHO CONDUCTS BUSINESS IN THE U.S. THE REASON? HE ASKS THE BUSINESSMAN IF HE COULD OBTAIN "SPECIAL INFORMATION" THAT WOULD AID DONALD TRUMP IN WINNING THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.

THESE ARE EXAMPLES, NOT ACCUSATIONS. THE POINT IS THIS: IF SCENARIOS LIKE THIS, OR OTHER SIMILAR ONES DID OCCUR, NO LEGAL ACTION WOULD BE TAKEN BY THE SPECIAL COUNSEL. WHY? BECAUSE IN NEITHER CASE WAS THE DEFINITION OF PROSECUTORIAL CONDUCT MET.

REMEMBER, IN THE ABOVE DEFINITION, THE "TRUMP CAMPAIGN," AND THE "RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT" HAD TO
BOTH BE INVOLVED, NOT JUST ONE. THE EXAMPLES OF A TRUMP CAMPAIGN WORKER, OR A RUSSIAN BUSINESSMAN,
SHOW US THAT "COLLUSION," OR "ELECTION INTERFERENCE" COULD OCCUR. HOWEVER, THE CONCLUSION OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN BEING INNOCENT OF SUCH ACCUSATIONS, AS THE SUMMARY LETTER IMPLIES, WOULD BE VALID, EVEN IF CRIMINAL ACTS WERE PRESENT IN BOTH SCENARIOS.

THE MUELLER REPORT. PART 3. BY ANY OTHER NAME. BARR SUMMARY LETTER. PART 3.

The main problem with Attorney General Barrs summary of the Special Counsels report, when relating information about Russian Interference in the 2016 election, and possible collusion with members of the Donald Trump Campaign, is a failure to clarify Terms and Definitions. This is especially important when the summary letter quotes actual parts of the Special Councels Report dealing with POSSIBLE RUSSIAN INVOLVEMENT IN THE 2016 ELECTION.

This occurs twice:

 As the report states: "[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian Government in its election interference activities."

 The Special Counsel defined "coordination" as an "agreement-tacit or express-between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference."

As you can see, when the Report itself is quoted, the term "RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT" IS USED with no qualifications, it is clear and consise.  However, the Barr Summary letter uses multiple terms that creates confusion as to what is actually being discussed, and the exact nature of who and what is being accused or exonerated.

FROM THE SUMMARY LETTER WE GET:

- "...the results of the Special Counsel's investigation into Russia's interference..."

- "... persons associated with the Russian government in connection..."

- "... joined the Russian conspiracies..."

- "... Special Counsel found that Russian government actors..."

- "... Russian military officers for conspiring to hack into computers..." 

-"... Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.

What this doesn't tell us is if these were RUSSIAN NATIONALS
WORKING:

-  WITHOUT THE KNOWLEGE OF THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT.
-  WITH THE PERMISSION OF THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT.
-  ON BEHALF OF THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT.
-  INDEPENDENT OF THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT.
-  AS A MEMBER OF, OR EMPLOYED BY, THE
   RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT. 

THIS WOULD INCLUDE MEMBERS OF THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT WHO WENT "RENEGADE."

TO BE CONTINUED...